Item 5b Memo

PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 

COMMISSION AGENDA             Item No.          5b 
Date of Meeting        June 2, 2009 
DATE:    May 7, 2009 
TO:      Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:    Michael Ehl, Director Airport Operations 
Robert F. Riley, Director, Aviation Capital Improvement Program 
Richard Ottele, General Manager, Aviation Facilities and Infrastructure 
SUBJECT: Trash Handling & Recycling System at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. 
ACTION REQUESTED 
Request Port Commission authorization for the Chief Executive Officer to advertise for
construction bids for the sixth site of the Trash Handling & Recycling System project at Seattle-
Tacoma International Airport (Airport), for an additional amount of $136,000 and a total project
cost of $1,612,000. 
SYNOPSIS 
The Commission previously authorized full design and construction funding and to advertise for
bids on a construction contract to install sets of trash and recycling compactors at five sites on
the airfield ramp area. The location of the sixth site is now confirmed and will be located at C1
airfield ramp area. The sixth site will be included in the construction contract along with the
other five sites. This request will authorize the full project budget of $1,612,000. 

BACKGROUND 
Several air carriers at the Airport have started recycling off-aircraft waste which reduces landfill
waste disposal requirements. They see this as one way of demonstrating their environmental
commitment. Recent studies of off-aircraft waste indicate as much as forty percent of the waste
stream can be recycled.  Industry-wide, airlines and airports are working to divert these
recyclables from landfill disposal in an effort to reduce negative impacts on the environment and 
reduce waste disposal costs. Examination of the Airport's ramp facilities and operations has
identified opportunities to support airline recycling efforts as well as to reduce threats to airfield
operations from Foreign Object Damage (FOD) and bird-strike hazards that result from open top
dumpsters.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
May 7, 2009 
Page 2 of 6 
The project will also reduce vehicular congestion resulting from numerous trash and recycle haul
trucks. Each airline currently manages its own waste stream, using various containers, which are
maintained and serviced through separate contracts. Unlike the passenger terminal, the airfield
ramp areas are not utilizing a centralized waste management and recycling system. This project
will extend the Airport's award-winning trash and recycling program to the airfield ramp areas,
and support the Port's commitment to becoming the cleanest, greenest port in the United States. 
The Commission authorized $752,000 on April 22, 2008 (Item 8b) to complete purchase of
twelve trash handling compactors and the design for six sites. At this time, five locations are
designed and ready for construction bidding. The design for the sixth site is nearing completion
and will be included in the final construction bid package. Four of the twelve compactors are
completed and ready to be delivered to the Port. The remaining compactors will be completed
mid July 2009. 
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF WORK 
Project Statement: 
The purpose of this project is to centralize trash handling and recycling on the airfield, encourage
and extend recycling opportunities to airlines, and reduce the negative effects of the existing
trash handling methods. The Airport will install, operate, and maintain large-capacity trash and
recycling compactors at six convenient locations throughout the airfield ramp areas. Compactor
sites selected to achieve optimal use by the airlines and their ramp service personnel are at
Concourses A, B, C, D, North Satellite, and South Satellite. 
Each site will be equipped with the following: 
A pair of self-contained 30 yard compactors, including one trash compactor and one
recycling compactor. 
Electrical service to power compactor hydraulic system and local control system for each
compactor. 
Automatic monitoring systems that will sense the pressure within each compactor and alert
the hauler when the compactor is near capacity, optimizing hauling frequency and thereby
minimizing truck traffic in the aircraft areas. 
Electronic key systems, which will record usage by each tenant, airline, or concessionaire. 
The operation and maintenance costs of these compactors will be recovered by charging usebased
fees. Each user will be charged a per-toss fee for use of the trash compactor, while a toss
in the recycling compactor will be free. This system of charging costs to users was established
within the terminal to create an incentive to recycle while recovering costs, and has been a
cornerstone of our successful recycling program. Airlines that are currently paying for
independent recycling services will be able to eliminate those costs, and recognize a net overall
savings.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
May 7, 2009 
Page 3 of 6 
Project Objectives: 
Improve the recycling program at the Airport. 
Reduce the airlines' trash handling costs. 
Reduce vehicle traffic on the airfield. 
Ensure no project impacts to flight operations on the airfield ramp area during the
development and construction of each site. 
Scope of Work: 
Develop infrastructure to accommodate the installation and operation for six compactor sites on
the airfield ramp area. See the attached site plan. Infrastructure development will, at a
minimum, include: 
1)  Site preparation for installation of bollards, steel plates and anchoring system. 
2)  Installation of electrical power and control systems. 
3)  Installation of communication system. 
4)  Re-striping driveways and parking areas. 
5)  Installation of signage. 
6)  Commissioning of each set of compactors. 
7)  Training to Airport and airline staff. 
8)  Closeout of completed project. 
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 
The Trash Handling and Recycling Program supports several of the Port's Strategies and
Objectives, notably: 
Ensure Airport and Seaport Vitality 
This project will provide a lower cost and a more efficient trash and recycling system for Airport
tenants. In contrast to current manually operated open-top dumpsters, the closed compactors
with automatic doors will prevent birds from extracting FOD items and scattering them across
the ramp, reducing the risk of ingestion into aircraft engines. Available ramp space will be
increased, by replacing numerous small capacity waste collection units with fewer, strategically
located large capacity units.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
May 7, 2009 
Page 4 of 6 
Exhibit Environmental Stewardship through Our Actions 
This project is in alignment with the Port's goal of becoming the cleanest, greenest and most
energy-efficient port in the United States. By increasing the amount of recyclable material
diverted from the waste stream, the Port will be helping to reduce the amount of material
delivered to regional landfills. Air emissions and fuel consumption will also be reduced as a
result of decreased ramp and public arterial traffic. This project supports and encourages airline
environmental initiatives. 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
Budget/Authorization Summary 
Original Budget                         $1,526,000 
Budget Increase                           $86,000 
Revised Budget                        $1,612,000 
Previous Authorizations                    $1,476,000 
Current request for authorization                $136,000 
Total Authorizations, including this request        $1,612,000 
Remaining budget to be authorized                  $0 
Project Cost Breakdown               This Request   Total Project 
Construction costs                         $83,000     $640,000 
Port furnished equipment                         $0     $405,000 
Sales tax                                      $0       $93,000 
Outside professional services                       $0     $229,000 
Aviation PMG and other soft costs               $53,000     $245,000 
Total                                    $136,000    $1,612,000 
Source of Funds 
This project is included in the 2009-2013 capital budget and plan of finance as CIP #C800020.
The funding source will be the Airport Development Fund.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
May 7, 2009 
Page 5 of 6 
Financial Analysis 
CIP Category 
New/Enhancement 
Project Type             Infrastructure Renewal/Replacement 
Risk adjusted Discount rate     7.5% 
Key risk factors            Realization of savings due to recycling. 
Project cost for analysis        $1,612,000 
Business Unit (BU)          Utilities 
Effect on business          NOI after depreciation will increase due to cost
performance             recovery of capital and operating costs in the utility
tariff. 
IRR/NPV             8.3% / $187,329 
IRR/NPV is based on 6 compactor locations, all
associated costs and full participation from Airline
partners. 
CPE Impact             Project will not affect CPE 
ECONOMIC IMPACTS 
From a financial analysis perspective, the positive net present value for this project is based on
viewing the Airport and airlines together. The airlines are currently paying nearly $600,000 per
year for their trash and recycling activities. The Port will incur increased Operation and
Maintenance (O & M) costs of about $350,000 per year. These O & M costs are the expenses
related to trash disposal and represent a savings of nearly $250,000 per year over what the
airlines are currently paying. From a financial statement perspective, the Airport will charge the
airlines usage fees sufficient to recover the operating and capital costs, resulting in an increased
net operating income. 
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY/COMMUNITY BENEFITS 
There are significant recycling benefits to installing a centralized waste handling and recycling
system on the airfield. Airlines participating in an incentive based recycling program will reduce
the amount of waste sent to regional landfills, while helping to reduce traffic via more efficient
compactor hauls. Reductions in traffic will also result in lower fuel consumption, air emissions
and vehicular congestion in neighboring communities. 
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE SUMMARY 
This project is expected to help reduce the overall operating costs of the airlines and promote
recycling efforts. Reduced ramp vehicular traffic servicing existing waste collection units will
result in increased ramp safety, decreased air emissions, and decreased fuel consumption. This
will also help reduce vehicular traffic on neighboring public streets and highways.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
May 7, 2009 
Page 6 of 6 
Environmental benefits include reduced waste sent to landfills, cleaner air, and improved airfield
safety by reducing bird attractants and reducing FOD. 
PROJECT SCHEDULE 
Commission Authorization to Start Design           April 2008 
Start Design                            May 2008 
Pre-purchase Compactors                    July 2008 
Commission Authorization to Bid and Increase Budget    March 2009 
Commission Authorization to Bid and Increase Budget    June 2009 
Bid Advertisement                       June 2009 
Commission Authorization to Award (if necessary)     July 2009 
Construction Start                         September 2009 
Construction Complete at Six Sites                December 2009 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION 
Initial Commission review of the project occurred on January 15, 2008.  The project was
deferred until the project approval moratorium was provisionally lifted in March 2008. 
The Commission authorized $752,000 on April 22, 2008 (Item 8b) to complete purchase of
twelve trash handling compactors and the design for six sites. 
On March 31, 2009 (Item 6a) the Commission authorized for construction bids for five sites and
to increase the project authorization by $724,000 for a total project authorization of $1,476,000
for the installation of five sites. At that time, the total estimated project cost was $1,612,000.

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.