8i. Presentation
Packaged Amendments Commission Code of Ethics and Governance Committee
Agenda Item No.: 8i_supp Meeting Date: January 28, 2025 2025 Revised Commission Code of Ethics Policy Directive January 28, 2025 Requested Action -Adopt Resolution No. 3833 with or without Amendment to Update the Commission's Code of Ethics and Governance Committee Charter 2 2025 Proposed Revised Commission Code of Ethics Project Team Aaron Pritchard, Commission Chief of Staff Pete Ramels, General Counsel Jessica Nadelman, Senior Counsel Michelle M. Hart, Commission Clerk Elizabeth Black, Deputy General Counsel 3 2025 Proposed Revised Commission Code of Ethics • Last Code Revision - May 2013 • Project Work Started in 2021 and Continued Through 2022 • July 2022 Presentation to Governance Committee -Discussed Components of 2013 Ethics Code • Structure of the Document • Content of the Document 4 2025 Proposed Revised Commission Code of Ethics • Work was Paused in 2023 and Resumed in 2024 • Project Team Reviewed the Entire Code with a Fresh Perspective Based on Code Construction and Needs 5 2025 Proposed Revised Commission Code of Ethics Work Done To-Date • Reviewed the Code for Technical Updates; Duplicity; Consistency with Statute; Process Trigger Points; Transparency; Confidentiality-Balance; Neutrality/Equity; and Clarity in Construction of the Document and its Policies and Procedures • Feedback on New Draft - Commission's Counsel; General Counsel; Board of Ethics; Governance Committee 6 2025 Proposed Revised Commission Code of Ethics- New Draft • General Alignment with Statute - Aligns Conflicts of Interests and Interest in Contracts Provisions with State Law - Aligns Acceptance of Gifts Provisions with State Statute • Structures Commission Requirements and Behavioral Standards - Consistent with Bylaws Revisions 7 2025 Proposed Revised Commission Code of Ethics- New Draft • Former Port Commissioners - General Section Clean-up and Added Language Around Maintaining Confidentiality • Added a New Section 7 Regarding Non-Profit Boards - Addressing Service on these Boards, with Service Creating a Remote Interest in Contracts • Revamped the Board of Ethics Section 8 8 2025 Proposed Revised Commission Code of Ethics- New Draft • Added Section 9 Related to Written Complaints of Alleged Violations of Commission Behavioral Standards When Such Complaints are Unaccompanied by an Ethics Complaint Filing - to the Governance Committee. • Removed Definitions Where Duplicative with State Statute and Added Definitions for Admonishment; Censure; and Reprimand. 9 2025 Proposed Revised Commission Code of Ethics Next Steps • Introduction of Resolution to Adopt a New Code of Ethics - Jan. 14, 2025 • Adoption of Resolution to Adopt a New Code of Ethics - Jan 28, 2025 • Corresponding Bylaws and Governance Committee Charter Amendments 10 Questions and Discussion 11 Appendix SECTIONAL ANALYSIS 12 Revised Code of Ethics • Sectional Analysis - Preamble • New -Has been made succinct, clear, and includes references to statutes governing the Code and modelled after applicable sections of RCW 42.52, Ethics in Public Service. 13 Revised Code of Ethics • Sectional Analysis - Sections 1 and 2 - General Requirements (Consolidated): • Added reference to applicable Port employee policies • Aligned language with RCW 42.52, Ethics in Public Service • Removed duplicative sections • Added training requirement 14 Revised Code of Ethics • Sectional Analysis - Section 2 - Conflicts of Interest: • Aligned language with RCW 42.52, Ethics in Public Service • Commission legal counsel opines on questions of outside employment • Removed references to appearance of impropriety violations except as to contracts • Changed title of "Financial Interest Prohibited" to "Activities Incompatible with Public Duties" to align with state law and incorporate wider potential application i.e. service on non-profit boards 15 Revised Code of Ethics • Sectional Analysis - Section 3 - Interest in Contracts: • Contracting violations can be from direct or indirect interests • Updated exceptions to include consistent references to immediate family • Updated exceptions consistent with RCW 42.23 • Added termination of leadership position (Commission officers) as a possible corrective action 16 Code of Ethics Rewrite Project • Sectional Analysis - Section 4 - Statement of Financial Affairs: • Simplified to align with PDC requirements • Removed timeline requirement because already set out in state law. - Section 5 - Acceptance of Gifts: • Aligned with RCW 42.52 • Added exception for food and beverages consistent with state law • Added tokens of appreciation 17 Code of Ethics Rewrite Project • Sectional Analysis - Section 6 - Former Port Commissioners: • Added language re maintaining confidentiality • Aligned with prohibitions applicable to sitting Commissioners. - Section 7 - Participation on Non-Profit Boards (New Section): • Provides guidance and provisions related to participation on non-profit boards. • States that service on non-profit boards creates a remote interest in contracts • Duty of Loyalty Provision - States that no violation exists if engaging in certain activities on behalf of the port related to the non-profit board upon which a Commissioner also serves. 18 Code of Ethics Rewrite Project • Sectional Analysis - Section 8 - Board of Ethics • 2025 rewrite increases clarity in many areas regarding the complaint process - including, intake, notices during the process, screening process, investigation, complaint timelines, confidentiality, provisions in case of public hearings, board recommendation to the Commission, and final review and decision of the Commission. • The rewrite includes authority to the board to issue advisory opinions. • Definitions have also been removed if otherwise already defined in statute and definitions added for final actions of the Commission. 19 Code of Ethics Rewrite Project • Sectional Analysis - Section 8 - Board of Ethics • Added language to define the Board as an investigative agency to allow potential use of Public Records Act exemption 42.56.240(2) for complainants • Public records act exemption above - names will not be released. • Provided clarity around submission of complaints to the Board or to Port Workplace Responsibility (WR) - Complaint Intake Points • Clarified intake process by the Board for non-employees or by the Office of Workplace Responsibility for employees • Notice provided at intake - to respondent Commissioner, Commission COS, Commission's legal counsel, and Port General Counsel 20 Code of Ethics Rewrite Project • Sectional Analysis - Section 8 - Board of Ethics • Clarified screening process to be completed by the Board with assistance of outside investigator when necessary • Thirty days to complete screening • Five days to inform key stakeholders • One day to inform Commission when screened in • Port pays Commissioner legal fees • Investigation by outside investigator - goal to complete in 60 days • Board deliberates in executive session 21 Code of Ethics Rewrite Project • Sectional Analysis - Section 8 - Board of Ethics • Commissioner can exercise right for public meeting or hearing • Board provides findings, conclusions and corrective action recommendation in goal of 45 days • Board's decisions are final if there is a quorum of subject Commissioners • Commission decides on corrective action 22 Code of Ethics Rewrite Project • Sectional Analysis - Section 8 - Board of Ethics • Board has power to issue advisory opinions. Protection for reliance on advisory opinion provided. • Board members removed without hearing - Section 9 -Complaints of Alleged Violations of Commissioner Behavioral Standards Not Accompanied by an Ethics Complaint Filing • Governance committee handles complaints addressing the Port's Statement of Values and Commission's respect standards • Board of Ethics will have jurisdiction when accompanied by Code violations (Section 8) 23 Code of Ethics Rewrite Project • Sectional Analysis - Section 10 - Definitions • Definitions removed where duplicative of state law • Added definitions of admonishment, censure and reprimand based on judicial code 24
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.