5. Bell Harbour International Conference Center/World Trade Center

INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT 
THIRD-PARTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 
BELL HARBOR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CENTER
(BHICC) / WORLD TRADE CENTER (WTC) 


JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 
ISSUE DATE: JUNE 27, 2017 
REPORT NO. 2017-07

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

AUDIT OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE 
The purpose of the audit was: 
1.  To determine whether Port management internal controls were effective to ensure: 
a.  Reported revenues and operating expenses were complete and accurate. 
b.  Expenses were appropriate and in accordance with the Agreement terms and conditions. 
c.  Related party events were held in accordance with the Agreement terms and conditions. 
2.  To ensure Columbia Hospitality, Inc. complied with significant terms of the Agreement. 
We reviewed and analyzed records for the Audit period. For purposes of rendering our opinion, we
focused on the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2016. 
Details of our audit's scope and methodology are on page six. 
BACKGROUND 

On June 1, 2012, the Port of Seattle (Port) entered into a Third Party Management Agreement with
Columbia Hospitality, Inc. (CHI) to manage operations for Bell Harbor International Conference Center
(BHICC) and the World Trade Center (WTC). The initial term of the agreement is 10 years, expiring on
May 31, 2022. 
CHI receives a base management fee equal to 3.5% of gross revenues. If net operating profit is greater
than or equal to 15% of the gross revenue, CHI receives an incentive management fee equal to 15% of
the net operating profit. 
AUDIT RESULT
SUMMARY
CHI generally complied with key terms of the Agreement. 
However, we identified opportunites for management to strengthen its monitoring controls as
to ensure complaince with the agreement terms and conditions. For instance, internal
controls could be improved to ensure proper allocation of CHI's labor costs for employees in
accordance with the percentage agreed between the two parties. 
We also noted an opportunity for the Agreement to be clarified relating to affiliated party 
events and CHI's use of Port facilities and the allowability of discounted rates. 
Please refer to the Schedule of Findings and Recommendations for further detail. 


2

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 2 
TRANSMITTAL LETTER ..................................................................................................................................... 4 
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS .................................................................................................................................. 5 
AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODLOGY ................................................................................................................... 6 
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................... 8 
SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... 11 













3

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 

TRANSMITTAL LETTER 
Audit Committee 
Port of Seattle 
Seattle, Washington 

We have completed an audit of the Third Party Management Agreement for the Bell Harbor
International Conference Center and World Trade Center. We reviewed information for the period
January 1, 2015  December 31, 2016. 
We conducted this performance audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing
Standards and the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to
provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe
that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our
audit objectives. 
We extend our appreciation to the management and staff of Columbia Hospitality Inc., Central Harbor
Management, Seaport Finance and Budget and Accounting and Financial Reporting for their assistance
and cooperation during the audit. 


Joyce Kirangi, CPA, CGMA 
Internal Audit, Director 

AUDIT TEAM                                 RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT TEAM 
Ritika Marwaha, Auditor                      Dave McFadden, Managing Director - Economic Development 
Spencer Bright, CIA, CFE, CGAP Senior Auditor   Melinda Miller, Director  Real Estate Management 
Dan Chase, CPA, Audit Manager - Acting       Susie Archuleta, Real Estate Manager 





4

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 
BACKGROUND 
On June 1, 2012, the Port of Seattle (Port) entered into a Third Party Management Agreement with
Columbia Hospitality, Inc. (CHI) to manage operations for Bell Harbor International Conference Center
(BHICC) and the World Trade Center (WTC). The initial term of the agreement is 10 years, expiring on
May 31, 2022. 
CHI receives a base management fee equal to 3.5% of gross revenues. If net operating profit is greater
than or equal to 15% of the gross revenue, CHI receives an incentive management fee equal to 15% of
the net operating profit. The Port pays all costs of the facility including, repair and maintenance,
utilities and labor and compensation of CHI employees. 
The WTC is located on Seattle's downtown waterfront and includes conference rooms and executive
and private dining rooms. The BHICC features 18 meeting rooms totaling 100,000 square feet. CHI
oversees the day-to-day operations and provides a full range of services including meeting room rentals
and food and beverage catering. 
CHI's mission is to maintain the highest quality international conference center and world trade center 
and provide superior customer service that consistently exceeds its customers' expectations. 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSFINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
BELL HARBOR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CENTER 
REVENUE AND EXPENSE DESCRIPTION                               2015           2016 
REVENUES                                                             $8,844,226         $6,669,867 
EXPENSES (EXCLUDING BASE AND INCENTIVE MANAGEMENT FEES)                  (6,568,645)                 (5,535,645) 
BASE MANAGEMENT FEE                                                    (309,576)               (233,417) 
INCENTIVE MANAGEMENT FEE                                                    221,268                  31,538 
NET OPERATING PROFIT                                                        $1,966,005*         $900,805* 
Data Source: PeopleSoft Financials (*Includes Smith Cove Conference Center Data) 

WORLD TRADE CENTER 
REVENUE AND EXPENSE DESCRIPTION                                2015           2016 
REVENUES                                                               $1,245,568         $1,297,661 
EXPENSES (EXCLUDING BASE AND INCENTIVE MANAGEMENT FEES)                      (873,483)          (976,478) 
BASE MANAGEMENT FEE                                                (43,595)               (45,418) 
INCENTIVE MANAGEMENT FEE                                                      (43,204)                  (34,915) 
NET OPERATING PROFIT                                                  $328,490         $275,765 
Data Source: PeopleSoft Financials 
* Does not include depreciation expense of the buildings or maintenance costs. 

5

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 

HIGHLIGHTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS 

We observed the following highlights and best practices: 
CHI staff members were professional and provided all documentation as requested. 
Through its hospitality business, CHI is helping create jobs and assisting in economic
development in the region. This is in line with the Port's mission of creating jobs by stimulating
economic development. 

AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODLOGY AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 

We utilized a risk-based audit approach from planning through testing for the period January 1, 2015
through December 31, 2016. We obtained a complete understanding of the financial requirements of
the Agreement through document requests, interviews, observation and data analysis. 
We applied additional detailed audit procedures to areas with the highest likelihood of significant
negative impact as follows: 
1.  To determine whether Port Management internal controls were effective, we 
i.     Evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls that were designed
and/or operated by the Property Manager and Financial Analyst: 
By reviewing evidence to ensure the Annual Plan was being timely approved by Port
Management 
Reviewing samples of the Monthly Operations Reports provided to the Port by CHI 
Reviewing the Cash Disbursement worksheets, submitted to the Port by CHI 
Reviewing the Incentive Management Fee worksheet and a selection of Base Management
Fee invoices 
ii.     Selected a total of thirty four checks from the Check Registers for 2015 and 2016
utilizing a risk based approach, for both BHICC (total of ten samples) and WTC (total of
twenty four samples), and reviewed the supporting documentation to determine whether
the expenses incurred by BHICC/WTC and reimbursed by the Port were accurate,
reasonable, valid and were being properly allocated to BHICC and WTC. 
iii.     Reviewed the GL Expense Summary by Location Reports and Reimbursement Request
Summary Invoices for the eight samples (four months from each year) selected for
testing the Payroll expenses. The total of the filtered Payroll Expense codes were then
compared to the reimbursement request invoices. 
iv.     Performed testing around the payroll expense allocation, by reviewing the Personnel
Action Form for the one Shared Employee for both years; 2015 and 2016. Utilizing the GL
Detail Reports from the selected pay periods, we determined the amount charged to
BHICC. This amount was compared to the amount that was recalculated by IA. 

6

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 

v.     Analyzed  the  Banquet  Event  Order  Forms/Event  Checks  for  completeness  and
appropriateness.  We  tested  a  risk-based  selection  of  twenty  four  Booking  ID
confirmations for events (six from each year for both BHICC and WTC), which included a
total of eighty one BEOs for BHICC and sixteen BEO's for WTC related to Columbia
Hospitality and its affiliates. Banquet Event Order/Event Check is a document that
itemizes the room rental, equipment, food & beverage, and labor. 

2.  To determine whether CHI complied with the significant terms of the Agreement, we: 
i.     Analyzed the financial statements by line-item for significant outliers. 

ii.     Recalculated  the  Incentive  Management  Fees  and  the  Base  Management  Fees,  to
determine whether these fees were being accurately calculated. 

iii.     Picked a  selection of  three Affiliated Party Events from each year under Audit, and
reviewed the Banquet Event Checks, to determine if any discounts were applied on these
transactions, and whether they were allowed by the Agreement. 

iv.     Reviewed the listing of all the Affiliated Party Events reported to the Port for the period
under Audit. This helped us gain an understanding of the type of related party events
held and the location of the respective events, to determine, whether the events were
allowed a reduced rate according to the Third Party Management Agreement. 

CONCLUSION 
CONCLUSION 
We identified opportunities for management to strengthen some of its monitoring controls as
well as some areas where new monitoring controls could be designed and implemented to
ensure compliance with the Agreement terms and conditions. For example: 
We identified opportunities for management to strengthen its monitoring controls to
ensure proper allocation of CHI's labor costs for employees in accordance with the
percentage agreed between the two parties. 
We also identified opportunities for the Agreement to be clarified relating to
affiliated party events and CHI's use of Port facilities and the eligibility of discounted
rates, if any. 
Please refer to the Schedule of Findings and Recommendations for further detail. 
With regards to compliance with the Agreement, we determined CHI complied with the
significant terms of the Agreement. 



7

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 

SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 
1.   INTERNAL CONTROLS COULD BE IMPROVED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT 
We observed that internal controls could be designed more effectively to validate gross revenues
and ensure only allowable operating expenses are paid. For example: 
a.  Revenues 
In 2016, CHI reported combined BHICC and WTC revenues of $7.5 million. Our testing of the base
and incentive management fees paid to CHI did not identify any exceptions. However, the Port's
reliance on reports submitted by CHI without an adequate review of supporting documentation
increased the risk of inaccurate payments to CHI. 
b.  Operating Expenses 
During 2016, the Port paid operating expenses totaling $6.8 million. Port management relied on
reports submitted by CHI and performed random reviews of supporting documentation. In general,
the Port paid allowable expenses. However, we identified a discrepancy between the agreed upon
percentage of the allocated salary between CHI and BHICC. 
Section 7.2 of the amended Management Agreement states in part: 
"The Port and Manager may agree that the expense associated with shared employees may
be allocated between the Port (as an operating expense) and Manager on other more easily
administered metrics The particular, agreed methodology shall be documented between
the parties in writing from time to time and shall not include any markup or other
multiplier beyond the employee costs allocated between the parties." 
The Port did not perform any review to ensure the salary allocation was accurate which resulted in
the following overpayments in 2015 and 2016: 
Shared Employee            2015         2016       Total overpayment 
Salary:                                  $170,000        $176,800 
Agreed Percent Allocation:                 80%             70% 
Expected Salary Allocation:              $136,000        $123,760 
Actual Allocated to BHICC:             $161,974.81     $124,172.57 
Difference: over/(under):              $25,974.81       $412.57            $26,387.38 
Data source: Columbia Hospitality personnel action forms & detail account analysis reports 
We reviewed the salary allocation with CHI management for 2017 and determined the allocation 
was correct. 



8

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 
Recommendation 
We recommend: 
Port management establish adequate internal controls to ensure reported revenues and
expenses are accurate and allowable. 
Port management seek recovery of the overpayment of salary costs. 

Management Response 
Port management thanks our Internal Audit colleagues for the professional manner in which they
conducted this audit. They took the time to understand the Conference and Event business and to
review and acknowledge the multiple internal controls that exist today, including monthly reviews
of: 
Owner's reports 
Documentation supporting operating expense reimbursement requests 
Management fee expenses 
Documentation supporting randomly selected checks in the check registers 
Banquet Event Orders (invoices) for randomly selected Affiliated Party events 
Now IA recommends expanding these Internal Controls, and we are supportive of this concept. 
1.   We have begun conversations with CHI to understand what revenue testing processes we might
add to our monthly reviews.
2.  We have also begun conversations with CHI to review shared employee salary allocation
documentation on a regular basis.
3.  Lastly, we have requested reimbursement from CHI for the $26,387.38 which is the total salary
allocation overpayment. CHI has acknowledged the error and has already delivered a check to
us for the amount recommended.
2.   RELATED AND AFFILIATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 
Section 15.2 of the Agreement between the Port and CHI., states that the "Manager shall not
grant discounts for use of the Facility on the basis of any contractual or business affiliation that
Manager (or any Affiliate or Qualified Person) may have with the user". 
The agreement however, is silent regarding the use of Port owned facilities by CHI. We identified
more than 100 events, including team member orientations, employee parties, and trainings, in
which CHI held these events at a discount (68% discount). Some of these events were held at
affiliate locations. This resulted in a discount of approximately $250,000 over the period June 1,
2012 through December 31, 2016. 
Of the $250,000 discount, approximately $110,000 appeared ineligible and therefore, a discount
shouldn't have been granted to CHI. 
Without clear guidance in the Agreement, there is an increased risk that CHI may use Port owned
facilities at a discounted rate and the Port may not receive all revenues it is entitled. Further,

9

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 
there is an increased risk of the appearance of a gift of public funds by a private company using
Port owned facilities at a discounted rate. 
Recommendation 
In order to decrease the risk of an appearance of gifting of public funds and to ensure the Port
receives all revenue it is entitled, we recommend: 
Amending the agreement to define the type of events and discounted rate for related
party and affiliate events held at Port facilities. 
Port management approves all CHI related and affiliate party events prior to being held. 
Port Management review the list of events identified by Internal Audit and determine
whether the event should have been held at a discount (i.e. at cost). If it is determined
that the event should not have been held at a discount then Management should seek the
respective compensation from CHI. 
Management Response 
Port management agrees that the current Affiliated Party language could be expanded to
provide helpful clarifications for all.
1.  We will amend the Agreement to provide the additional clarifying language to ensure
compliance.
2.  We currently require that CHI provide a list of Affiliated Party events in the monthly
Owners Report. Going forward, we will also require advance approval of these events.
3.  While our initial review of the list of affiliated events provided by IA appears to us to be
in compliance, we agree to review this list in detail to confirm that they qualify as
compliant Affiliated Events and whether reimbursement should be sought. This review
will also help us develop the clarification language needed to avoid confusion in the
future. 
Thank you for providing opportunities for us to continue improving our oversight and
management of the Conference and Event Center Management Agreement. 






1 0

BHICC / WTC                                                                        INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2015  DECEMBER 31, 2016 
SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS 
Port of Seattle 
Bell Harbor International Conference Center/ World Trade Center 
January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2016 
This schedule presents the status of findings reported in prior audit periods. Internal Audit has
reviewed the status as presented. 
Audit Period:                                    Report Ref. No:     Finding Ref. No: 
01/01/2010  12/31/2011                       2013-03            1 
Finding Caption: 
Port management monitoring could be strengthened 
Background: 
We identified the following deficiencies in internal controls: 
Management monitoring over areas of high risk (e.g., payroll cost allocation and
expense payments) were not effectively focused to ensure compliance. 
Status of Corrective Action: (check one) 
Fully                        Partially         Not Corrected     Finding is considered
Corrected                    Corrected                             no longer valid 
Corrective Action Taken: 
Dedicated Employees: 
CHI dedicated employees to the Port Facilities. There was one remaining employee whose
salary was allocated between BHICC and CHI. This employee's allocated salary percentage was
approved by the Port. The percentage charged to BHICC was not in accordance with the
Agreement in 2015 or 2016 which resulted in the Port paying more than agreed. We noted in
2017, the salary allocation between BHICC and CHI was accurate. 
Related And Affiliated Party Activities: 
CHI met with Port management to obtain a compliant approach on related party events. The
current audit identified opportunity to ensure compliance with the Agreement and decrease
the risk of an appearance of gifting of public funds. 






1 1

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.