Aviation Business Development

INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT 

AVIATION BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 
COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL AUDIT 

JANUARY 1, 2013  JUNE 30, 2014 

ISSUE DATE: JULY 29, 2014 
REPORT NO. 2014-10

AVIATION BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT                                   INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2013  JUNE 30, 2014 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 


TRANSMITTAL LETTER .......................................................................................... 3 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 4 
BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 5 
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS....................................................................................... 5 
HIGHLIGHTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS ................................................................ 6 
AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODLOGY ......................................................................... 6 
CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 7 









2

AVIATION BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT                                   INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2013  JUNE 30, 2014 

TRANSMITTAL LETTER 
Audit Committee 
Port of Seattle 
Seattle, Washington 
We have completed an audit of the Aviation Business Development Department. We reviewed
information for the period January 1, 2013  June 30, 2014.
We conducted the audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards and
the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable
basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence
obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. 
We extend our appreciation to the management and staff of the Aviation Business Development
Department for their assistance and cooperation during the audit. 


Joyce Kirangi, CPA, CGMA 
Internal Audit, Director 

AUDIT TEAM                                RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT TEAM 
Tyler Winchell, Performance Auditor           Jim Schone, Director  Aviation Business Development 
Brian Nancekivell, Senior Auditor              Deanna Zachrisson, Travel Dining and Retail Group Manager 
Jack Hutchinson, Audit Manager              James Jennings, Aviation Properties Manager 
Jeff Wolf, Business Development Manager 
Jennifer Kipp, Parking Revenue Manager 






3

AVIATION BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT                                   INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2013  JUNE 30, 2014 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

AUDIT OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE 
The purpose of the audit was to determine whether Aviation Business Development management has
adequate and sufficient controls to develop and manage its agreements. 
We reviewed information for the period January 1, 2013  June 30, 2014. Details of our audit's scope
and methodology are on pages 6-7. 
BACKGROUND 
The Aviation Business Development Department (AVBD) is responsible for generating non-aeronautical
revenues from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) operations, which include retail concessions,
rental cars, and local property development. It develops, manages, and terminates lease agreements
for  diverse  customers  including  airlines,  rental  cars,  concessionaires,  and  other  airport-related
businesses. The business agreements developed and managed by AVBD generate over $48 million in
non-aeronautical revenues annually for the Port. 
AUDIT RESULT
Management controls are adequate and sufficient for developing and managing agreements. 









4

AVIATION BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT                                   INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2013  JUNE 30, 2014 

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 
This is the second audit of the Port's Aviation Business Development Department (AVBD). The primary
mission for AVBD is to increase STIA's non-aeronautical income from multiple business groups including
travel dining and retail, rental cars, and property development. It also develops and manages hundreds
of lease agreements with airlines, concessionaires, rental car companies, and other airport businesses.
The Department has four groups specializing in business development: 
Travel Dining & Retail Group (TDRG): This group develops and manages all of STIA's dining and
retail concessionaires. It identifies or solicits vendor interest to develop quality food, beverage,
and retail concepts in the airport terminal, as well as the new Consolidated Rental Car Facility.
It manages existing tenants, and oversees the tenant-marketing program to drive increases in
sales across all categories. 
Aviation Properties Group (APG): Oversees all of the remaining airport properties, tenants, and
agreements not overseen by TDRG. Its oversight includes rental car companies, airlines leasing
terminal space, and other airport business ventures. APG is also responsible for managing all
Aviation Division agreements through the Port's PROPWorks system, to ensure billings, insurance
renewals, and tenant annual requirements are met. 
Parking Revenue Group (PRD): Develops, analyzes, and recommends programs to increase the
Port's share of airport parking and ground transportation services revenues. 
Business Development & Analysis (BDA): This group aides the three groups above, and also
evaluates the financial suitability of potential tenants, vendors, programs, and projects before
they are recommended to the Aviation Investment Committee or to the Port Commission. BDA
reviews multiple criteria including credit, financing, market conditions, and financial risks, and
develops business cases and plans to support the efforts of other groups. 
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSFINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 
The Aviation Business Development Department(AVBD) is one of the largest sources of non-aeronautical 
revenues in the Aviation Division. In FY 2013, agreements developed and managed directly by AVBD
generated $48 million from airlines, concessionaires, rental car companies, and other customers for use
of STIA's aeronautical facilities and properties. The table below shows the top five sources of
departmental revenues by value and overall share, representing over 50% of total departmental
revenues. 
TOP 5 SOURCES OF AVIATION BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT REVENUE AND PERCENT-SHARE 
RANK    REVENUE SOURCE               2011         2012         2013   2013 SHARE1
1           Retail2                           $ 8,726,299     $ 9,219,223     $ 9,716,575               20% 
2           In-Flight Meals                     3,732,987        4,486,312        4,813,815               10% 
3           Food & Beverage                  3,928,609        4,239,946        4,617,400               10% 
4           General Space Rentals            3,390,479        3,353,147        3,150,403                 6% 
5           Advertising Display                4,409,560        3,246,209        2,696,593                 6% 
Data Source: PeopleSoft Financials 
Data Notes: 1 The percent-share is based on the FY 2013 departmental revenues of $48,533,161.34. 
2 Retail includes multiple PeopleSoft Financial accounts described as 'retail'. 


5

AVIATION BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT                                   INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2013  JUNE 30, 2014 

Business Goals and Priorities 
The Port's Aviation Director has charged AVBD with increasing non-aeronautical revenue at an annual
rate of 4.5% through fiscal year 2018. Non-aeronautical revenue includes any income not derived from
per-use fees charged to airlines under the Signatory Lease and Operating Agreement (SLOA). Generally,
non-aeronautical revenue derives from the concession operators servicing the airport terminal, rental
car facility, and other airport properties. Each fiscal year, AVBD issues a strategic Business Plan that
aligns its activities with its budget with attainment of the Aviation Director's goal. The chart, below,
illustrates total departmental revenues for the last 5 fiscal years, and the 5-year trend average. 
AVIATION BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 
ANNUAL REVENUES 
FISCAL YEARS 2009 - 2013, DOLLARS IN MILLIONS 
$60
5-YEAR TREND AVERAGE 
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$0
2009        2010        2011        2012        2013
Data Sources: PeopleSoft Financials, AVBD Reports 

HIGHLIGHTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS HIGHLIGHTS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS 
Recently, AVBD has overseen a number of significant Department accomplishments: 
Developed  Master  Concession  Plan:  A  new  business  plan  for  guiding  the  development  and
organization of STIA's concession program was developed with input from the Port's customers,
including passengers, airlines, concessionaires, and community members. 
Des  Moines  Creek  Business  Park:  In  partnership  with  the  Real  Estate  Division,  community
partners, and Panattoni Development Company, will redevelop the Tyee Golf Course into a
transit-oriented business and light-industrial park. 
Small Business Kiosk Program: A new program to provide opportunities to new and/or small
business owners within under-utilized spaces in the airport terminal. 
FedEx Lease: Successfully negotiated a 15-year lease renewal with FedEx, the largest air cargo
operator at STIA, under the Century Agenda priority of increasing cargo operations. 

AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODLOGY AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 
We reviewed information for the period January 1, 2013 - June 1, 2014. We utilized a risk-based audit
approach  from  planning  to  testing.   We  gathered  information  through  research,  interviews,

6

AVIATION BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT                                   INTERNAL AUDIT 
JANUARY 1, 2013  JUNE 30, 2014 
observations, and data analysis, in order to obtain a complete understanding of the operations of the
Aviation Business Development Department. We assessed significant risks and identified controls to
mitigate those risks. We evaluated whether the controls were functioning as intended. We applied
additional detailed audit procedures to areas with the highest likelihood of significant negative impact
as follows: 
1)  To determine whether management has adequate and sufficient controls for developing
agreements: 
Determine whether agreements developed within the audit period were in compliance with Port
policies and procedures (using a risk-based sample of up to 10 agreements executed during FY
2013): 
i)   Financial analysis was conducted (RE-2 Procedure, 1.G, 2.A) 
ii)  Port Counsel reviewed the final agreements (RE-1 Procedure, II.A.b) 
iii) Tenant Risk Analysis was conducted (RE-2 Procedure, 1.G, 2.A); 
iv) Insurance and Surety were obtained/verified prior to tenant's occupancy; 
2)  To determine whether management has adequate and sufficient controls to manage agreements: 
a)  Determine if key management processes are adequately documented: 
i)   Management processes for Aviation Properties. 
ii)  Management processes for Travel Dining & Retail. 
b)  Determine the sufficiency of risk management processes, including, evaluation of: 
i)   Extent of prior, repeat audit findings and mitigation strategies. 
ii)  Extent of vendor risk management processes. 
iii) Quality assurance audit processes. 
iv) Financial monitoring processes. 
v)  Processes for mitigating conflicts of interest. 
c)  Determine whether industry Best Practices (recognized by the Airport Cooperative Research
Program/Airports Council International, N.A) are utilized as part of key management
processes for: 
i)   Developing agreements. 
ii)  Managing agreements. 
iii) Managing vendor marketing. 
iv) Managing ACDBE tenant/subtenants. 

CONCLUSION CONCLUSION 

Management controls are adequate and sufficient for developing and managing agreements. 

AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 

7

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.