Federal inspection Services

Internal Audit Report

Federal Inspection Services Revenue
Limited Scope Operational Audit

January 1, 2011  December 31, 2012




Issue Date: October 1, 2013
Report No. 2013-17

Internal Audit Report
Federal Inspection Services (FIS) Revenue
January 1, 2011  December 31, 2012

Table of Contents

Transmittal Letter ........................................................................................................................ 3 
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 4 
Background ................................................................................................................................ 5 
Audit Scope and Methodology .................................................................................................... 5 
Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 6 











2 of 6

Internal Audit Report
Federal Inspection Services (FIS) Revenue
January 1, 2011  December 31, 2012

Transmittal Letter

Audit Committee
Port of Seattle
Seattle, Washington

We have completed an audit of Federal Inspection Services Revenue.
We reviewed information relating to a two-year period from January 1, 2011  December 31, 2012.
We conducted the audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards and
the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable
basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence
obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives.
We extend our appreciation to the management and staff of Aviation Operations and Customer Service
department for their assistance and cooperation during the audit.


Joyce Kirangi, CPA, CGMA
Director, Internal Audit

Audit Team:                             Responsible Management Team:
Brian Nancekivell, Sr. Internal Auditor       Jim Schone, Director, Aviation Bus. Dev. & Management
Jack Hutchinson, Audit Manager           Michael Ehl, Director, Airport Operations




3 of 6

Internal Audit Report
Federal Inspection Services (FIS) Revenue
January 1, 2011  December 31, 2012

Executive Summary

Audit Scope and Objectives The purpose of the audit was to determine whether:
1.  Management controls are adequate to provide reasonable assurance that Federal Inspection
Services (FIS) revenue is accurate and complete.
The scope of our audit covered the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012.
Background  Deplaned international passengers are required to clear US Customs and Immigration
by Federal Inspection Services, a division of Homeland Security of the Federal government. Per the
Signatory Lease Operating Agreement (SLOA), international airlines self-report monthly the number
of deplaned international passengers to the Port. The airlines are billed monthly a 1/12th of a flat
annual fee and a per deplaned passenger fee, both of which are adjusted annually. The Business
Development  and  Management  department  records  the  number  of  deplaned  international
passengers in a recently implemented custom-developed Port system and transmits that information
to Finance & Accounting. In turn, that department processes that information in Prop Works and
PeopleSoft and invoices the airlines.
There are currently some 14 international airlines servicing Sea-Tac and over a million deplaned
passengers clearing FIS. Revenue was $5.1 million and $4.4 million for 2011 and 2012 respectively.
Audit Result Summary Management controls are adequate to provide reasonable assurance that
Federal Inspection Services revenue is accurate and complete.








4 of 6

Internal Audit Report
Federal Inspection Services (FIS) Revenue
January 1, 2011  December 31, 2012

Background
Enplaned and deplaned international passengers account for almost 10 percent of passenger traffic at
Sea-Tac International Airport. International passenger traffic is growing more rapidly than domestic
traffic and is a strategic initiative, part of the Century Agenda. There are currently some 14 international
airlines servicing Sea-Tac.
Per the Signatory Lease Operating Agreement (SLOA), international airlines self-report monthly the
number of deplaned passengers that are required to clear Federal Inspection Services, a division of
Homeland Security of the Federal government. Airline crews are not subject to FIS fees and
international passengers en route to Sea-Tac clearing FIS at Canadian airports are not subject to local
FIS fees. Airlines are billed monthly for a 1/12th of an annual fee and a per deplaned passenger fee. 
The Business Development and Management department records the number of deplaned international
passengers in a recently implemented custom-developed Port system and transmits that information to
Accounting and Financial Reporting (AFR). In turn, AFR processes that information in PeopleSoft and
invoices the airlines monthly.
The table below summarizes FIS revenues and deplaned passenger counts by airline for the audit
period.
2011                    2012
FIS       Passenger      FIS       Passenger
(in thousands)                    Revenue*       Count       Revenue*       Count
Delta                                $1,308          308        $1,139          350 
Horizon                               583          132           432          126
British Airways                            425            94            360           104 
United Airlines                             311             66            269             75
Lufthansa                             335           72           259           72 
Others                              2,184          440         1,909          500 
Total                                  $5,146         1,112        $4,368         1,227 
Source: PROPWorks
*includes both the annual and per-passenger fees

Audit Scope and Methodology
We reviewed information for the period from January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2012. We utilized a riskbased
audit approach from planning to testing. We gathered information through document reviews,
interviews, observations, and analytical procedures, in order to obtain a complete understanding of
operations related to FIS revenue. We assessed significant risks and identified controls to mitigate
those risks. We evaluated whether the controls were functioning as intended.


5 of 6

Internal Audit Report
Federal Inspection Services (FIS) Revenue
January 1, 2011  December 31, 2012
We applied additional detailed audit procedures to areas with the highest likelihood of significant
negative impact as follows:
1.  Completeness and Accuracy of Reported Revenue
Toured and observed operations at international arrivals and FIS clearing areas during flight
arrivals
With the assistance of Aviation Planning, we analyzed and compared data reported by
international airlines:
o  To Homeland Security records on each flight, which is summarized daily by Aviation
Operations and recorded in a database.
o  To US Department of Transportation data for all FIS reporting airlines, which is collated
by a third party, and reconciled all of 2011 and 2012 records to their monthly selfreported
FIS numbers to the Port.
Observed the processing of the reported data by Aviation Business Development &
Management and Accounting & Financial Reporting (AFR)

Conclusion
Management controls are adequate to provide reasonable assurance that Federal Inspection Services
revenue is accurate and complete.










6 of 6

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.