6d Memo Perimeter Intrusion Detection
COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM Item No. 6d ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting January 22, 2019 DATE: January 10, 2019 TO: Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director FROM: Wendy Reiter, Director Aviation Security SUBJECT: Perimeter Intrusion Detection System (CIP #C800844) Amount of this request: $3,520,000 Total estimated project cost: $10,000,000 ACTION REQUESTED Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to authorize to (1) proceed with the first phase in the Perimeter Intrusion Detection capital project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport; (2) procure required hardware, software, vendor services, and license and maintenance; and (3) use Port staff for implementation, for a total phase one cost not to exceed $3,500,000 and estimated training of $20,000. A 10 -year contract for license and maintenance fees is estimated at $420,000. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this authorization request is to create an additional security layer for portions of the Airport perimeter using technology for continuous monitoring, threat assessment, and alerts. This improved capability is an important part of the Aviation Security Plan. Perimeter detection systems include a range of technologies that provide reliable detection of an intruder, and integrated with a video surveillance system, allow for visual verification and assessment for appropriate security or operational response. Enhanced perimeter intrusion detection (PIDS) at Sea-Tac airport is most economically provided using a variety of technologies appropriate for the selected coverage areas. Radar or similar technology can cover a large amount of the visible perimeter with centrally located detection devices. In areas with visibility obstructions, integrated fencing systems will better meet security requirements. This layered approach for perimeter security improvements will advance the Port's capabilitiesto detect and analyze intrusion events and enable rapid, coordinated responses. The full PIDS capital budget includes scope to implement multiple technology solutions for selected coverage areas. To maximize our investment, the solution will be delivered in two phases. The scope of this initial phase includes the procurement and full implementation of only the radar, or similar technology, intrusion detection system. Once the coverage area for Template revised April 12, 2018. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 6d Page 2 of 5 Meeting Date: January 22, 2019 the first phase is finalized, a second phase for fencing intrusion detection will be brought forward for authorization. The authorization request for this initial phase includes no funding for the planned second phase. Aviation Security, Information & Communication Technology (ICT), Aviation Maintenance (AVM), and Port Construction Services (PCS) will collaborate to complete this project. Total cost for this initial phase is estimated to be $3,520,000. Ten-year license and maintenance fees are estimated at $420,000. Recurring license and maintenance costs will be budgeted within the Aviation Maintenance department operating budget. The cost of both phases was included in the 2019-2023 capital budget and plan of finance in the amount of $10,000,000. JUSTIFICATION Enhancements to our perimeter security have been identified as critical in ensuring public safety and improving operational efficiencies through automation. The new system will be part of a layered protection strategy that incorporates people, processes, and technology to decrease security risk and increase situational awareness. When integrated with existing security systems, it will provide a comprehensive picture to security and safety personnel and facilitate coordinated responses. The authorization for the first phase will provide for selected areas of the airport perimeter: (1) Continuous monitoring for selected coverage areas. (2) Algorithm-based threat assessment with the ability to proactively distinguish between normal operations and a potential threat. (3) Robust alerting capabilities. (4) Directional tracking of potential intrusions enabling rapid responses to mitigate issues. DETAILS Scope of Work for First Phase (1) Procure and implement a radar or similar technology solution to enhance perimeter security for selected coverage areas. (2) Integrate with existing security systems to provide a comprehensive picture and operational efficiencies. Schedule for First Phase Commission Authorization 2019 Quarter 1 Product Selection 2019 Quarter 3 Implementation 2021 Quarter 3 Cost Breakdown This Request Total Project PIDS Hardware, Software, and Vendor Services $1,975,000 $4,000,000 Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 6d Page 3 of 5 Meeting Date: January 22, 2019 Port of Seattle Labor $1,200,000 $2,500,000 Hardware Installation $325,000 $3,500,000 Training $20,000 $20,000 Total $3,520,000 $10,040,000 ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED FOR FIRST PHASE Alternative 1 Implement the Initial Phase of the Perimeter Intrusion Detection System Project Cost Implications: Phase One Cost: $3,520,000 + Operating Expense: $42,000 per year Pros: (1) Provides continuous monitoring, real-time intrusion alarms, threat assessment, location and information for appropriate and coordinated security and operational responses for selected coverage areas. (2) Remote location, tracking, identification and assessment capability for multiple business units that aids quicker response and resource coordination. (3) Ability to respond rapidly and in a coordinated manner based on assessment of intrusion. (4) Additional data and robust reporting capabilities for post-incident assessment and analysis of intrusion types. Cons: (1) Capital funds are not available for other efforts. (2) Requires an additional FTE to manage and maintain the system. (3) There is a risk that the product selected will require more construction than estimated although research supports the requested budget. This is the recommended alternative. Alternative 2 Security Staff Augmentation Cost Implications: $400,000 per year Pros: (1) Utilizes current processes with 4.5 added FTE staff for additional patrols to increase awareness and identification. (2) Aviation Security has more personnel available to respond and assist during an event. Cons: (1) No ability to provide continuous monitoring, real-time alerting, identification and coordinated response to intrusion(s). (2) Higher operating cost for 4.5 additional FTE and increased vehicle maintenance. (3) No automated reporting capabilities. (4) Increases ramp congestion and potential safety hazards due to extra vehicles in the area. Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 6d Page 4 of 5 Meeting Date: January 22, 2019 (5) Reduces, but does not eliminate, lag time between ground intrusion and detection. This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 3 Implement no new technology for perimeter intrusion detection Cost Implications: $0 Pros: (1) No additional capital or operating costs required Cons: (1) No ability to provide continuous monitoring, real-time alerting, identification and coordinated response to intrusion(s) (2) Doesn't increase patrols nor add resources for event responses (3) No automated reporting capabilities This is not the recommended alternative. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary Capital Expense Total COST ESTIMATE Original estimate $10,000,000 $20,000 $10,020,000 AUTHORIZATION Previous authorizations 0 0 0 Current request for authorization $3,500,000 $20,000 $3,520,000 Total authorizations, including this request $3,500,000 $20,000 $3,520,000 Remaining amount to be authorized $6,500,000 $20,000 $6,520,000 Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds This project CIP #C800844 was included in the 2019-2023 capital budget and plan of finance in the amount of $10,000,000. The project will be delivered in two phases. This capital request for the initial phase is estimated at $3,500,000. The full capital project will be submitted to the airlines for Majority-in-Interest approval. The funding source is the Airport Development Fund. Financial Analysis and Summary Project cost for analysis $10,000,000 Business Unit (BU) Airfield Movement Area Effect on business performance (NOI NOI after depreciation will increase after depreciation) IRR/NPV (if relevant) N/A CPE Impact $0.03 in 2022 Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 6d Page 5 of 5 Meeting Date: January 22, 2019 Future Revenues and Expenses (Total cost of ownership) Estimated 10-year hardware and software maintenance costs of $420,000 will be budgeted in the Aviation Maintenance operating budget beginning in 2021. One additional Aviation Maintenance staff will be required to support the new system. ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST None PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS None Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.