COMMISSION 
AGENDA MEMORANDUM                        Item No.          8e 
ACTION ITEM                            Date of Meeting     February 26, 2019 
DATE:     February 19, 2019 
TO:        Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director 
FROM:    Dave McFadden, Managing Director Economic Development 
Tim Leonard, Capital Project Manager 
SUBJECT:  Terminal 91 (T-91) Uplands Development Phase I (CIP #C800158) 
Amount of this request:               $4,000,000 
Total estimated project cost:         $39,000,000 
ACTION REQUESTED 
Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to execute contracts for overall
master planning, environmental review, permitting, and Phase I Design services in an amount
not to exceed $4,000,000, in support of the Port's development of the T-91 Uplands area
located north of the Magnolia Bridge. This brings the total authorization to date to $4,300,000, 
including $300,000 previously authorized,  of an estimated total Phase I project cost of
$39,000,000. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
The Port's Real EstateDevelopment Department is proposing to construct two 50,000 square
foot light industrial buildings to support maritime manufacturers and fishing industry suppliers
in the Ballard Interbay Manufacturing Industrial Center ("BINMIC").
These  facilities were proposed within the Port's 2016 Real Estate Strategic Plan. It
recommended constructing approximately 700,000 square feet of new maritime light/flex
industrial building space on the T-91 Uplands area north of the Magnolia Bridge. 
Based on a follow-up T-91 infrastructure study completed in January 2018, new light industrial
facility  development  would  unfold  over  the  next  10-15  years  in  two  phases  (refer  to
accompanying PowerPoint).   Phase I  of the T-91 Uplands Development, located in the
northeast corner of the T-91 property, will enable development of approximately 100,000
square feet to be built with minimal infrastructure investment by the Port.
The buildings proposed in Phase I will initially target current T-91 tenants and other maritime
customers who have expressed interest in expanding their current operations on the property.
The requested Phase I design funds will enable the completion of the following work:

Template revised April 12, 2018.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8e                                   Page 2 of 9 
Meeting Date: February 26, 2019 
Development and approval of Major Phased Development Plan covering both proposed T-
91 Uplands Development phases 
Environmental review and community outreach for the Major Phased Development Plan 
Detailed site survey of entire T-91 Uplands area 
Preliminary T-91 Uplands area infrastructure design connected to the Major Phased
Development Plan 
Full construction design of Phase I buildings and associated site improvements including
necessary T-91 Uplands area stormwater management upgrades to  become  fully 
compliant with Port and City of Seattle code requirements 
The T-91 Uplands Development project is funded in the 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan. 
JUSTIFICATION 
The T-91 Uplands Development supports and aligns with the Port's Century Agenda goal to
double the economic value of the fishing and maritime cluster: 
The development project also supports the following Economic Development Division and
Maritime Division goals developed in conjunction with a Port conducted stakeholder outreach
program: 
1.  Improve overall financial returns that fulfill Port of Seattle commitments to the industry
and taxpayers. 
2.  Continue to grow the economic value of the fishing and maritime cluster including the
number of local jobs and business revenue. 
3.  Prioritize uses that support the commercial fishing industry, with a focus on anchoring
the North Pacific fishing fleet. 
4.  Prioritize development that maximizes utilization of facility assets. 
Additionally, the homeporting of the fishing fleets at Port of Seattle facilities including T-91
relies  on  an  extensive  network  of  suppliers  and  trades  in  the  area  that  are  having  an
increasingly difficult time finding and retaining acceptable light industrial space near their
customers. The T-91 Uplands Development project will support the following planning concepts
developed from Port fishing industry stakeholders' input as well as an associated economic
cluster study performed by the Port: 
1.  Develop new light industrial space 
2.  Expand on the Port's role in workforce development 
3.  Protect precious land for industrial uses 
Studies previously completed by the Port and others within the fishing and maritime clusters 
have determined that there is currently a limited supply of industrial property in Seattle in
general, and Ballard Interbay in particular, resulting in rising rents and building sale prices. The

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8e                                   Page 3 of 9 
Meeting Date: February 26, 2019 
Port is in a position to relieve some of this pressure while supporting the fleet and the maritime
industrial sector by developing additional industrial space at Terminal 91. 
The Ballard Interbay industrial sub-market, which includes Terminal 91, has an extraordinarily
low vacancy rate of 0.6 percent at the end of 3Q 2015, well below the Puget Sound industrial
real estate market vacancy rate of 4.9 percent, and far below the national average of 6.7 
percent. As late as 3Q 2018, the Ballard Interbay industrial submarket vacancy rate is 1.9 
percent and the Puget Sound vacancy rate now at 3.5 percent. The lack of acceptable space for
businesses operating in this sub-market (Ballard Interbay) is under constant threat of
gentrification. By taking advantage of our existing Terminal 91 asset and developing new light
industrial space, the proposed Phase I buildings will be able to provide modern, well-designed
and constructed spaces to many of the small companies currently doing business in this area. 
The tenant profile for the proposed Phase I buildings is made up of suppliers and vendors that
prefer light industrial facilities with a warehouse/shop area, office space, and either grade-level
or dock-high loading capabilities. Of the suppliers polled, the median facility requirement was
5,000 square feet, and the largest was over 110,000 square feet. On a very regular basis, Port
staff is contacted by similar type companies inquiring about space at both Fishermen's Terminal 
and T-91. 
Unlike other asset classes, industrial development does not lend itself to pre-leasing, except in
very specific situations that usually result in a Build-to-Suit arrangement. The types of tenants
that will occupy the proposed T-91 Uplands area buildings will be small and medium sized
multi-national operations where the local branch is looking for space to upgrade or enlarge
their  existing  maritime  business  from  their  current  locations.  Nearly  all  light  industrial
developments initiate construction on a spec basis with no tenant agreements in place. This is
for a few reasons and relevant to this development  
- Smaller tenants can't/don't want to commit to a lease with a long lead schedule 
- The buildings are simple and without tenants the design and construction is quicker 
- Pre-leasing results in lower rents overall and greater tenant concessions 
We would estimate that we have contact with potential tenants with space needs that would
fill the proposed T91 Uplands buildings several times over. Within the Seattle industrial areas,
particularly in the Ballard Interbay sub-market, there has been almost no new development
since the early 1970's. Due to this fact, as well as incremental gentrification, vacancy for
industrial properties continues to drop and rents are at an all-time high. 
Seattle manufacturing and light industries want to grow, but low vacancy and even higher rents
limit opportunities. Small businesses that focus on the fishing and maritime opportunities have
struggled to find or keep acceptable space in order to operate and serve this vital industry. In
order to meet this demand, our strategy is to take advantage of our own existing property and
develop new light industrial facilities on the working waterfront including Terminal 91. 

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8e                                   Page 4 of 9 
Meeting Date: February 26, 2019 
Diversity in Contracting 
In association with this effort, the project manager will work with the Diversity in Contracting 
Department to determine potential women and minority business participation opportunities 
and will set WMBE aspirational goals. The applicability of a project labor agreement will be
determined as well in coordination with Labor Relations. 
The Port is considering issuing two contracts. The first contract is for consulting services related
to master planning for T-91 uplands (all phases) and design services related to Phase 1 work.
The second contract is for environmental review and permitting. Future design work associated
with Phase 2 will be procured separately.
DETAILS 
The T-91 Uplands Phase I development will create up to 100,000 square feet of new flex
industrial building space at the northeast corner of the T-91 Uplands area by taking advantage 
of connecting to an existing off-site Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) sewer system that is located
approximately 50-feet north of T-91's north property boundary.  The maximum available
capacity in this sewer is the equivalent of the discharge produced by approximately 100,000
square feet of typical industrial building usage. 
Based on the Port's 2018 T-91 Infrastructure Study, all other required on-site utility services for
the proposed Phase 1 buildings, including water, storm drainage, electrical power, gas, and
communications,  are planned to  be extended from the applicable existing on-site utility
systems. A stormwater treatment system to serve the Phase I area, currently non-existent at T-
91, will be installed as required to meet the Port's and City of Seattle's stormwater code. 
Scope of Work 
T-91 Development Phase I site improvements are anticipated to include, but are not necessarily
limited to, the following: 
1.  Removal and replacement of associated on-site utility systems 
2.  Installation of stormwater treatment system 
3.  Removal and replacement of on-site roadway and parking lot pavement 
4.  Construction of new buildings totaling approximately 100,000 SF 
5.  Upgrading of facility signage, lighting, and landscaping as required 
6.  Improvements to off-site public streets as required by the City of Seattle 
7.  Implementation of applicable environmental best management practices 
MAJOR PHASED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 
The Port is requesting funds for design, review and permitting for a Major Phased Development 
Plan (MPDP) through the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspection (SDCI).  A MPDP is
a unique permitting vehicle under the Seattle land use code, which allows for one land use

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8e                                   Page 5 of 9 
Meeting Date: February 26, 2019 
permit to cover multiple development projects on one large site phased over time. A major
phased development authorizes construction up to 15 years after the permit is issued. 
The MPDP provides flexibility for the Port in planning, design, and construction. The Port will
work in partnership with the City of Seattle and neighboring community members on
completing a comprehensive environmental review for this project. Similar recent MPDP
developments include the Expedia campus in Interbay, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
headquarters, and proposed development at University Village. 
The MPDP will include all of Phase I and Phase 2 development. Phase I will contain up to
100,000 SF of light industrial buildings and Phase II can accommodate up to 300,000 SF of light
industrial space. The Infrastructure Study also concluded that there is the potential for a Phase
III that would fully develop the remaining open space on the uplands including up to 600,000 SF
of light industrial space. At this initial step, we are only proposing to include Phase I & II in the
MPDP and evaluate the need for any more development once this 400,000 SF is constructed
and occupied. 
The cost of the infrastructure for Phases 1 and 2 comes in at less than $6M in total. The final
Phase III requires more than a $28 million infrastructure investment in order to achieve the
final additional 600,000 SF of space. The initial two phases should take 10-15 years of Port
development in order to match the velocity of the market take-up in this sub-market for this
type of space. Should the market turn and lease rates rise significantly, the Port should revisit
Phase III, but only after seeing significant real demand. In the meantime, the western portion
of Terminal 91 Uplands can continue to support critical lay-down areas and parking needed by
maritime operations.
Procurement of an Architectural/Engineering design team for the project will begin with the
creation and advertisement of a Request for Qualifications immediately after Commission
approval of the requested additional design funding. The selected consultant team will perform
the necessary design services and complete full construction bid documents under a project
specific contract with the Port. 
Community Outreach and Communications 
In addition to environmental review, a robust communications and outreach plan will keep
stakeholders informed about the schedule, design scope and impacts of the proposed
development. Outreach will provide opportunities for a wide range of stakeholders to offer
input including residents in neighboring communities, current T-91 tenants, business and
maritime industry organizations, and the Port's Neighbor'sAdvisory Committee. In addition,
liaison work will continue with transportation planning teams from the City of Seattle, METRO 
Transit and Sound Transit to ensure awareness and coordination between projects. 
The outreach effort will utilize a number of communications tools including a project kick-off
event to inform stakeholders and to understand community and industry issues early in the

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8e                                   Page 6 of 9 
Meeting Date: February 26, 2019 
project. The project team will establish an online open house and project email address to
ensure continued dialogue throughout the project. Updates also will be provided via media
outreach and open houses, along with project updates at industry, business and community
meetings. 
Estimated Schedule 
Activity 
Commission design authorization (initial design)                   2019 Qtr 1 
Development of Major Phased Development Plan Complete       2019 Qtr 4 
Environmental Review of MPDP Complete                      2020 Qtr 2 
Approval MPDP by SDCI                                       2020 Qtr 4 
Commission construction authorization Phase 1                  2021 Qtr 2 
Construction start                                                  2021 Qtr 4 
In-use date                                                        2023 Qtr 3 
ok                                                                This Request       Total CIP 
Design/Permitting                                               $4,000,000     $4,300,000 
Construction                                                               $0    $34,700,000 
Total                                                                   $4,000,000    $39,000,000 
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED 
Alternative 1  Do Nothing  Pass on T-91 Uplands Development Program 
Cost Implications: Loss of potential generated revenue 
Pros 
(1)   Retains Port capital for other priority projects and financial initiatives 
(2)   Avoids temporary construction impacts to existing T-91 upland tenant business
operations 
(3)   Retains current availability of T-91 uplands for on-site open storage 
Cons 
(1)   Missed opportunity to achieve Port objectives of supporting fishing and maritime
clusters 
(2)   Missed opportunity for improving long-term financial viability of T-91 
(3)   Missed opportunity to add major maritime business tenants at T-91 
(4)   Missed opportunity to add needed light industrial space in the Ballard Interbay area at
T-91 
(5)   Missed opportunity to replace existing aging storm sewer system with effective
stormwater management system, including water quality treatment, at T-91 in full
compliance with Port and City of Seattle standards 

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8e                                   Page 7 of 9 
Meeting Date: February 26, 2019 
(6)   Missed opportunity to improve existing water, sanitary, lighting, electrical,
communications, and traffic related infrastructure at T-91 
This is not the recommended alternative 
Alternative 2  Develop T-91 Uplands on a more limited building-by-building basis 
Cost Implications: Reduced "economy of scale" cost benefit due to more segmented phasing 
Pros: 
(1)   Creation of multiple building projects will provide additional opportunities for
consulting firms to compete for work 
(2)   Construction impact to existing T-91 upland tenant business operations may be more
limited at any given time 
(3)   The property would support the creation of hundreds of new jobs in the
maritime/manufacturing sector 
Cons: 
(1)   Requires major Port investment of funds 
(2)   Requires an increase in costs due to increased number of consultant procurements
and multiple construction mobilizations 
(3)   Requires additional staff time and cost to manage multiple individual design and
construction efforts 
(4)   Creates a longer-term, constant, and disruptive construction impact to existing upland
tenant business operations due to multiple construction starts and extended overall
duration 
(5)   Requires consultant firms to spend form time and money responding to individual
project based contracts and procurements 
This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 3  Development of T-91 Uplands in two phases 
Cost Implications: Results in greatest cost efficiency due to combination of reduced Phase I
infrastructure investment and "economy of scale" of multiple buildings being constructed 
Pros: 
(1)   Achieves Port objectives of supporting fishing and maritime clusters 
(2)   Improves long-term financial viability of T-91 
(3)   Adds major maritime business tenants at T-91 
(4)   Adds needed light industrial space in the Ballard Interbay area at T-91 
(5)   Provides a flexible city-approved development plan for phased construction over 15
years to meet market demand 
(6)   Provides long-term cost savings due to economy of scale derived from larger (more
consolidated) design and construction efforts 


Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8e                                   Page 8 of 9 
Meeting Date: February 26, 2019 
(7)   Replaces existing aging storm sewer system with effective stormwater management
system, including water quality treatment, at T-91 in full compliance with Port and City
of Seattle standards 
(8)   Improves existing   water, sanitary, lighting, electrical, communications, and traffic
related infrastructure at T-91 
(9)   The  property  would  support  the  creation  of  hundreds  of  new  jobs  in  the
maritime/manufacturing sector 
Cons: 
(1)   Requires major Port investment of funds over shorter term 
(2)   Requires reduction of existing area available for on-site open storage 
(3)   Creates  temporary  construction  impacts  to  existing  T-91  upland  tenant  business
operations 
This is the recommended alternative. 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary               Capital        Expense           Total 
COST ESTIMATE 
Original estimate                                $39,000,000               $0     $39,000,000 
AUTHORIZATION 
Previous authorizations                            $300,000                0        $300,000 
Current request for authorization                $4,000,000                0      $4,000,000 
Total authorizations, including this request       $4,300,000                0      $4,300,000 
Remaining amount to be authorized           $34,700,000             $0    $34,700,000 
Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds 
This project was included in the 2019 Plan of Finance under CIP800158  T-91 Uplands
Development with a total project cost of approximately $39,000,000. 
This project will be funded by the Tax Levy. 
Pre-Design Financial Analysis and Summary 
Project cost for analysis              $39,000,000 
Business Unit (BU)                  Real Estate Development 
Effect on business performance     The new buildings, when complete, will provide
(NOI after depreciation)             incremental leasing revenue at T-91. Estimated stabilized
net operating income for the project is expected to be
approximately $1.5M per year (including depreciation).
IRR/NPV (if relevant)                NPV: ($8.7M) 
IRR: 5.5-6% 
CPE Impact                        N/A 

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8e                                   Page 9 of 9 
Meeting Date: February 26, 2019 
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST 
(1)   T-91 Uplands Development Design Funding PowerPoint slide presentation 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
November 27, 2018  Commission approved 2019 Capital Budget and Plan of Finance
including T-91 Uplands Development. 
October 25, 2016  Commission received a briefing about the Real Estate Strategic Plan
including the T-91 Uplands Development project. 















Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.