Minutes Exhibit B
" r. Commission Special Meeting
March 12, 2019

ER    The Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP)
10 SAMPLE QUESTIONS AND RELATED SCOPING REQUESTS
=> NAM- 5 ORErni Zaha

Welcome to the SAMP scoping meeting! We're providing a list of sample questions  questions we
certainly have for the Port of Seattle. Ask the Port personnel these, or any questions you want. We
also want to make sure YOURvoice is heard. If you want the subject matter of any of these questions
included in the scope of the environmental review, for each question we've added
a related sample
"scoping request." Justinitial any request you want, sign at the bottom, and find QSPS volunteers will
collect and provide them as a matter of public record to the Port.

QUESTION        COMMENT          SCOPE REQUEST          INITIAL

Why No Study of        Four-year increase  Please include a complete assessment
What's Already          raised annual       of the human health and environmental
Happened? How does    overflight total from  impacts, including from noise and
Port intend to study the     316,000 to            emissions, resulting from the additional
human health and         413,000.            97,000 aircraft overflight operations
environmental impacts of                       growth from the last four years.
the 97,000 new flights
already added in last four
years?
Why No Study of Your   SAMP Executive    Please include a complete assessment
Own Long-Term Plan?   Summary; Port's    of the human health and environmental
Why not study of the       own consultant       impacts resulting from additional
human health and         says long term      aircraft overflight operations for the
environmental impacts of   study is "key." But    Port's post-SAMP Long Term Vision
the Long-Term Vision      Port's will not be     projects and Century Agenda growth
anticipated to begin when  studying total        plans.
capacity is reached in      growth plans for
20277?                     potential harms.
Adequate Geography?   The Port has not    Please include a complete study ofall
Will Port study unique      committed to study   of the human health and environmental
human health and         all of Des Moines,    impacts for all of Des Moines, Federal
environmental impacts     Federal Way,        Way, Burien, Tukwila, Normandy Park,
from aircraft noise and      Burien, Tukwila,      and SeaTac, resulting from aircraft
emissions,in all of the six  Normandy Park,      overflights, from 2013-present; for the
south-end airport           and SeaTac.         Near-Term Projects; and for Long
neighborcities?                                 Term Projects.
Use Current Science?    Studies around the   Please include all studies (worldwide)
Will Port review all          world now exist on    from at leastthe last ten years, to the
studies from around        harms and           extent such studies explore,find,
world relating to human    potential harms      suggest, or hypothesize any
health and environment    from aircraft noise    association, correlation, causation, or
impacts from aircraft       and emissions.       other potential linkage between aircraft
noise and poliution?                             overflights and impacts on human
health or the environment.

Wait For Pending New                    ~
Regional studies     Please include a review and
Science? Why is Port     underway, include   assessment of the results of critical
proceeding without         ultra-fine particle     Sea-Tac Airport studies now underway
waiting for the results of    study from UW and   before proceeding with the
the pending studies in      the airport            environmental review for the SAMP.
the State of Washington    mitigation study
directly relating to Sea-     from Department of
Tac Airport?               Commerce.
Sensitive populations?   Studies have found  Please include a complete assessment
Are you studying the       risk of harm to       of the unique human health impacts
unique impacts of aircraft   elderly citizens and   from noise on elderly citizens and
noise on elderly citizens    children from         children.
and children?              aircraft noise.
What About Overnight   Studies have       Please include a complete scientific
Flights? Will Port collect   concluded            study review and assessment of the
and assess global         increased risk of     unique human health impacts from
scientific studies relating    human harm from    noise from overnight flights.
to impacts from overnight  overnight flight
flights noise?                noise.
Unique - Full Time 3     Despite historical    Please include a complete study of the
Runway Use. How will    statements, 3d      unique human health and
Port separately assess     Runway now full-    environmental impacts from the
the impacts of the full-      time.                  exponential increase in overflights over
time usage of the 3                            neighborhoods beneath and near the
Runway?                               3 Runway.
What if Your             SAMP Executive.    To determine the risks of error in Port
Projections Are          Summary           projections, please include a study of
Wrong? How are you     inaccurate; est.     the health and environmental impacts
accounting for the impact   398,910 flights by    from increased aircraft operations that
if your estimates of         2019; we are at       exceed estimated Near Term
growth are too low?        413,000 now.        Operations.
Regional Airport Now?   The Port has        Please include a study of the benefits
Are you studying the       refused to join calls  to human health and the environment
benefits of a regional       for siting a regional   in the six airport neighborcities if
airport?                      airport now.           growth is more fairly distributed
throughout the entire region.
Please include the requests | have initialed above in the scope of the SAMP
environmental review. Deadline for commenting Septe

Name:                      |
a       Signature:      { T28th 2018.7
Address:

E-mail:

Submit form on your own/add comments at: SAMP@portseailtle.org

comment submitted was reviewed, summarized, and identified with a Comment
Topic from one of the categories above.
For example, Comment S3-1 was "Concerned about increased flights and air
emissions as a result of the proposed action." This issue was commented on by
numerous individuals in both written and oral testimony. This comment is directly
related to the scope of the environmental review process for SAMP so it is denoted
with an 'S'. Additionally, it focuses on the broader topic of Air Quality, which is
denoted by the '3'. In every written or oral comment, this specific comment is
identified as S3-1 and is addressed in the response to Topic 3  Air Quality/Climate.

Agencies and organizations that submitted comments were given a unique alpha
identifier before the comment number. For example, Comment PS-1 was submitted
by Puget Sound Regional Council, and Comment AA-1 was submitted by Alaska
Airlines. There were 12 agencies and organizations that submitted written
comments, and their unique alpha identifiers are as follows:

Comment                 Agency/Organization
Identification
AA          Alaska Airlines
CST          City of SeaTac
DM         City of Des Moines
DoE          State of Washington, Department of Ecology
ECR          El Centre de la Raza
EPA           US Environmental Protection Agency
FW         City of Federal Way
JC            Joint City Comments (Des Moines, Burien, Normandy
Park, and Sea-Tac)
PS            Puget Sound Regional Council
ST           Sound Transit
TU           City of Tukwila
WSD        Washington State Department of Transportation

Written and oral comments appear in the following order:

Agency and organization comments
Public comments
e   Handed in at public scoping meeting, provided through oral testimony,
emailed, or mailed
e   Online comments
sFightithe:Elightsf     fet
Vashon Island Fair Skies form letter

This summary includes agency, organization and individual comments that were
received during the Scoping period. The Scoping period extended from July 30,
2018 to September 28, 2018 and included four public meetings, one
agency/organization meeting, and an online open house. In total, 344 people

attended the public meetings. The Port and FAA received approximately 760
comments from the public, agencies and organizations regarding the SAMP Near
Term Projects environmental review. One hundred thirty-three comment sheets
were handed in and 43 people provided oral testimony at the public meetings. An
additional 141 comments were submitted online through the Online Open House.
WwFight'the'Flightvand Vashon Island Fair Skies also created form letters for
individuals to submit, with 360 and 16 respectively emailing or mailing those to the
Port. In addition to the public comment, 12 agencies/organizations submitted
written comments to the Port and the FAA.

Below is an index of commenters with their comment codes. Following that is a
matrix of topical comments, along with responses to the most common comments.

M Gmail                   Quiet Skies 
SAMP Public Comment Scoping
1 message

Quiet Skies          'co 20                    Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:13 PM
To: samp@portseattle.org, ramblinon2017@gmail.com

Dear Mr. Steve Rybolt,

Please accept the public comments attached by Ms. Carla Anderson of Burien, Wa, regarding the NEPA
EA/SEPA EIS SAMP 2018 Scoping Comment Review. Per the Port of Seattle's website, email of public
comment to this address is one of the 4 acceptable ways offiling.

We believe the 10 comments below pertains to "Are There Other Impacts We Should Be Looking At"? As
stated on the Port of Seattle's own online comment form.

Should us forwarding comments on behalf of Ms. Anderson be deemed unacceptable, please reply to all in
this email chain immediately as to your reasons why.

Kind Regards,

Quiet SkiesPuget Sound
Team Member

ry Scoping_Comment_Carla_Anderson.pdf
1784K