6i. State Government Relations Advocacy Memo

COMMISSION 
AGENDA MEMORANDUM                        Item No.          6i 
ACTION ITEM                            Date of Meeting       June 11, 2019 
DATE:     June 3, 2019 
TO:        Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director 
FROM:    Eric ffitch, Manager, State Government Relations 
Nate Caminos, Government Relations Director 
SUBJECT:  State Government Advocacy contract 
Amount of this request:                  $450,000 
ACTION REQUESTED 
Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to execute a contract for state
government relations advocacy services for monitoring of state legislation, regulations, and
policy developments, acting on behalf of the Port of Seattle at the direction of Port of Seattle
staff.  The proposed contract term is a two-year contract with three, one-year options for an
estimated total cost of $450,000. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
The Port of Seattle currently retains a state government relations advocacy firm in Olympia,
WA, to assist the Port's full-time state government relations  manager in addressing the
significant number of state actions that have a direct impact on the Port's organization and
business operations. This firm acts as the Port's advocate and policy consultant, providing
regular and consistent personal contact with key legislators, executive branch, state agency
staff and organizations, and helping analyze and understand the impact of state actions. This
memorandum requests authority to execute a contract with a state government relations
advocacy consultant to monitor legislative and regulatory activity in Olympia, WA and to
provide strategic guidance on state policy and regulatory issues. The current contract for such
services was competitively bid in 2015 and expires December 31, 2019. There will be a robust
competitive process for future state advocacy services under the term of this contract, and we
intend to include WMBE utilization goals in the upcoming contract solicitation as well. 
JUSTIFICATION 
Advocacy in the state legislature, and in the executive agencies of the state, is key to advancing
many of the priorities set by our commission. From implementing sustainable aviation fuels at
Sea-Tac Airport to leading the region in training the next generation of workers, leadership in
the state capitol will be required. Working directly with a consultant that is located in Olympia,
WA and has a consistent presence in the State Capitol will enhance the Port's effectiveness and

Template revised January 10, 2019.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. __6i__                               Page 2 of 5 
June 11, 2019 
reduce the prospect of major policies that effect our operations being adopted without our
input. 
The Port's state government relations manager follows the day-to-dayoperations of the state
legislature and executive branch closely and is often in the state capitol meeting with
lawmakers and other stakeholders. However, engaging a consultant who is there every day and
who can share the workload with the government relations manager promotes the success of
the Port's priorities. 
DETAILS 
Scope of Work 
The proposed scope of work is to assist Port staff to support the Port of Seattle in state
government relations activities in Olympia, WA, through the monitoring of state legislation,
regulations, and policy developments, acting on behalf of the Port of Seattle at the direction of
Port of Seattle staff.  This work will promote and protect the Port's interest in state matters.
More specific duties will be: 
(1) Develop and maintain a deep understanding of Port of Seattle operations and policy
initiatives, even those not directly related to ongoing advocacy efforts; 
(2) To the extent necessary, assist Port staff and elected leadership in developing and
maintaining a deep understanding of the workings of the legislature and the
executive branch; 
(3) Represent the Port at state legislative and executive branch agency meetings in
Olympia WA or around the state; 
(4) Develop and deliver testimony, as requested by staff, at legislative hearings on
matters of port interest; 
(5) Serve as the Port's liaison with key legislators, executive branch, state agency staff
and organizations and relevant industry associations; 
(6) Provide strategic guidance related to state executive and legislative policy and
regulatory issues; 
(7) Direct  advocacy  efforts  during  the  interim  period,  including  assisting  in  the
scheduling of commissioner and executive outreach meetings in the months leading
up to the state legislative session; 
(8) Represent the Port on various state level work groups, as requested by Port staff,
over the course of the legislative interim; 
(9) Provide regular reports on its activities in Olympia WA, on behalf of the Port, both
orally and in writing. Written reports will be required on a weekly basis during the
legislative session. 
(10)    Prepare a final written report, as requested by the state government relations
manager, detailing activities on behalf of the Port of Seattle, within two weeks of the
end of the state legislative session. 

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. __6i__                               Page 3 of 5 
June 11, 2019 
(11)    Conduct other work as assigned, including but not limited to:  introductory
meetings for Port officials and staff; creating strategies to advance Port issues before
the Legislature and Executive Branch; attending legislative hearings and briefings on
matters of interest to the Port; drafting correspondence to state entities and; writing
draft testimony and legislation; reviewing draft comments for the state regulatory
process; providing state-oriented  briefing materials as requested; and interacting
regularly with the state legislative body, committee staffs and state regulatory staff. 
While this contract may be asked to perform state advocacy work on behalf of the NWSA, the
scope of work for this contract is primarily focused on the Port of Seattle's state agenda. The
NWSA will retain a separate advocacy contract. The firm selected to represent the port will be
able to compete for both contracts. 
Diversity in Contracting 
This contract will be procured competitively and according to Port procedures. Public Affairs 
has coordinated with Diversity in Contracting and established a 10 percent aspirational goal.
Many qualified firms based in Olympia and the broader Northwest provide these types of
services, and we are likely to receive a competitive response. 
Schedule 
Staff in External Affairs is working with the Port's Central Procurement Office and Diversity in
Contracting Department to a request for proposal advertisement with an expected start of
contract service date of January 1, 2019.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED 
Alternative 1  Do not hire an advocate, instead vesting the state government relations
manager position with the entirety of the responsibility for tracking state policy and regulation. 
Cost Implications: Estimated cost reduction of approximately $84,000 per year. 
Pros: 
(1)   Reduction in the amount of budget dedicated to state government advocacy services. 
Cons: 
(1)   Diminished visibility with state lawmakers and representatives of executive branch
agencies. 
(2)   Reduced effectiveness in advancing Port of Seattle priority issues. 
(3)   Increased chance for advancement of issues which the Port may not support, or which
will not reflect our input when adopted. 
This is not the recommended alternative. 


Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. __6i__                               Page 4 of 5 
June 11, 2019 
Alternative 2  Do not hire an advocate, and instead dedicate the budget to hiring a new inhouse
government relations staffer to support the state government relations manager
position. 
Cost Implications: No cost implications, budget is repurposed to new position. 
Pros: 
(1)   Policy analysis and administrative support for the state government relations manager
position. 
Cons: 
(1)   Diminished visibility with state lawmakers and representatives of executive branch
agencies. 
(2)   Reduced effectiveness in advancing Port of Seattle priorities issues. 
(3)   Increased chance for advancement of issues which the Port may not support, or which
will not reflect our input when adopted. 
This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 3  Through a broadly advertised, competitive process, hire a consultant to perform
specialized and highly skilled advocacy services. 
Cost Implications: The costs of maintaining a state government advocacy firm would be the
same as current budget levels. 
Pros: 
(1)   Ensure maximum effectiveness for Port's in-house  government  affairs  staff  by
engaging the support of a specialist with unique knowledge of the State Capitol and
the functioning of the legislature and executive branch agencies. 
(2)   Support enactment of policies that the Port of Seattle Commission has deemed
priorities by inclusion in the Port's adopted state legislative agenda, and that support
our mission to create jobs, stimulate economic development, promote industrial
growth, and advance trade and commerce in King County, the Puget Sound region,
and Washington state. 
Cons: 
(1)   Requires spending up to $450,000 of funds over a five-year period. 
This is the recommended alternative. 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
The estimated cost of the agreement is $450,000 for five years.  Services are estimated at
$90,000 per year. Charges to this contract will be from the Public Affairs department and will
be included in annual budgets. 


Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. __6i__                               Page 5 of 5 
June 11, 2019 
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST 
None 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
September 22, 2015  The Commission authorized the state consultant contract for period
2015 to 2019 















Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.