6d. Surface Water Monitoring IDIQ memo
COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM Item No. 6d ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting September 10, 2019 DATE: September 3, 2019 TO: Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director FROM: Elizabeth Leavitt, Senior Director, Environment and Sustainability Arlyn Purcell, Director, Aviation Environment and Sustainability SUBJECT: Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to perform Surface Water Monitoring and Permit Support Amount of this request: $0 Total estimated contract $3,500,000 cost: ACTION REQUESTED Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to execute one indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract to perform surface water monitoring and permit support with a total value of $3,500,000 and a contract ordering period of five years at the Seattle- Tacoma International Airport. No funding is associated with this authorization. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Aviation Environmental Department proposes to advertise and select one qualified firm to provide surface water monitoring and toxicity testing services. This IDIQ would be used to meet requirements of the Airport's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, King County Industrial Waste Discharge Permit, and other environmental permits. The IDIQ contract would also provide required surface water monitoring and testing support to the Airport's Capital Improvement Program (CIP), planning and development initiatives,and other strategic interests. Funding for service directives under this contract will be either from projects that have already been authorized or from authorized division operating budgets. Consequently, there is no funding request associated with this request. JUSTIFICATION The Aviation Division, led by the Aviation Environmental Program, is responsible for ensuring compliance with the Airport's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and other environmental permits. The Airport operates under an individual NPDES permit that includes comprehensive monitoring and testing of stormwater runoff associated with Airport Template revised January 10, 2019. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _6d___ Page 2 of 5 Meeting Date: September 10, 2019 operations and construction activities. Runoff associated with these activities drains to 11 outfalls discharging to local streams that provide habitat to recovering salmon populations and other aquatic resources. The permit also regulates runoff associated with Airport fueling and deicing operations that discharge to Puget Sound. In addition to receiving water discharges, the permit requires monitoring and testing of industrial wastewater discharges to local sanitary sewer systems. To effectively comply with these requirements, a variety of specialized environmental services are required including those related to environmental sample collection and testing, aquatic toxicology, stream hydrology, limnology, illicit discharge investigations, facility process analyses, mapping, and pollution fate and transport. Remaining in compliance and being proactive about the performance of our stormwater Best Management Practices align with the Port's Century Agenda of being the cleanest and greenest Port, and specifically Objective 14 Meet or exceed agency requirements for stormwater leaving Port-owned or operated facilities. Failure to comply with the conditions of the NPDES permit will result in permit violations and potential fines. Additionally, repeat violations can lead to increased sampling requirements that will increase the cost of the stormwater monitoring program and generate negative perception of the Port's environmental efforts. This procurement would support the Port's strategy to manage our finances responsibly by providing a cost-efficient means to secure professional services for tasks which present variable workload, are often time-sensitive, and require specialized expertise that cannot be effectively provided by Port staff. Diversity in Contracting The Diversity in Contracting Department has been contacted regarding this procurement and an aspirational goal of seven percent has been established for women- and minority-owned business enterprise. DETAILS This contract will enable the Port to meet the surface water-related monitoring and testing requirements of the Airport's NPDES and other environmental permits. Failure to meet these requirements would be a direct violation of the permits and would subject the Port to enforcement actions. Individual service directives consisting of a scope, fee agreement, and schedule will be negotiated and processed before any work is performed. Service directives will span over the life of the contract, which is expected to be five years. Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting). COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _6d___ Page 3 of 5 Meeting Date: September 10, 2019 Scope of Work The surface water management contract is a crucial component of the NPDES permit compliance efforts at the Airport. Work authorized under this contract is needed to meet field sampling and other monitoring and reporting requirements that are conducted at various times throughout the year on a 24/7 basis. The Surface Water Monitoring Support Services Scope of Work consists of five principal tasks. (1) Non-construction surface water monitoring, testing and reporting (2) Construction surface water monitoring, testing and reporting (3) Municipal sewer system monitoring, testing and reporting (4) Toxicity monitoring, testing and reporting (5) Other surface water monitoring and studies Schedule Commission authorization 2019 Quarter 3 Contract execution 2019 Quarter 4 Service directives issued 2020 Quarter 1 through 2024 Cost Breakdown This Request Total Project From yearly expense budgets $0 $3,200,000 From capital project budgets 0 $300,000 Total $0 $3,500,000 ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED Permit conditions must be met, so all alternatives considered consist of staffing methods that would allow the Port to be in compliance. Alternative 1 Monitoring and Inspections Completed by Port Staff All the monitoring and inspection work would be completed by Port staff. Existing staff would be able to perform a small portion of the necessary work. There would be four additional Port positions necessary to provide the full staffing required for monitoring storm events and available 24-hours per day and weekends based on rain events. Cost Implications: $600,000 - $800,000 per year plus Toxicity Contract Pros: (1) Contract administration needs would decline. (2) Port would have a team of employees with flexibility to perform miscellaneous tasks. (3) Port Environmental team would increase their technical capacity. Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting). COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _6d___ Page 4 of 5 Meeting Date: September 10, 2019 Cons: (1) A contract for toxicity testing would still be needed at a significant cost. (2) New Port staff would not have full-time work in stormwater program due to variable effort and timing necessary for monitoring and inspections. (3) Extensive training would be required for telemetry/sampling equipment operations and maintenance. (4) Increased chance of permit violations during the training/ramp-up period. (5) Third party sample collection provides non-biased approach. (6) Technical expertise for sampling methodology and regulatory support lessened. This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 2 All Monitoring and Inspections Completed Through IDIQ Contract Cost Implications: $800,000 per year Pros: (1) Does not require the hiring of any additional Port staff. (2) Provides a flexible, contracted workforce. (3) Ability to hire sub-consultants that provide highly specific technical skills. (4) Third party sample collection provides non-biased approach Cons: (1) Cost is greater than preferred alternative. (2) Does not utilize Port staff. (3) Reduced technical development opportunities for Port staff. (4) Consultant based team is focused on completing task and not focused on Port's holistic goals and strategic long-term planning such as Port's Century Agenda goals. This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 3 Monitoring and Inspections Completed Through IDIQ Contract and Port Staff Existing Port staff would be used to supplement work primarily completed by outside contractor. Set tasks would be assigned to Port staff, while variable work would be completed by the contractor. Cost Implications: $700,000 per year Pros: (1) Lowest cost alternative. (2) Provides a highly skilled workforce for varied stormwater requirements. Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting). COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _6d___ Page 5 of 5 Meeting Date: September 10, 2019 (3) Allows Port staff to develop technical skills and stay fully utilized. Cons: (1) Requires coordination between contractor and Port staff to ensure Port utilization. This is the recommended alternative. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary Capital Expense Total COST ESTIMATE Original estimate $300,000 $3,200,000 $3,500,000 AUTHORIZATION Previous authorizations 0 0 0 Current request for authorization 0 0 0 Total authorizations, including this request 0 0 0 Remaining amount to be authorized $0 $0 $0 Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds Funding for service directives under this contract will be either from projects that have already been authorized or from authorized division operating budgets. Consequently, there is no funding request associated with this request. ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND The Aviation Stormwater Program has used IDIQ contracts to assist with compliance of their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit since 2004. If approved, this contract will be the fifth such contract. All previous contracts have used the collaborative approach proposed for this current action. This contract will replace an expiring $3 million IDIQ contract. ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST None PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS None Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.