10d. Presentation - North Main Terminal Redevelopment
Item No. 10d_supp Meeting Date: November 9, 2021 North Main Terminal Redevelopment (NMTR) Program James Jennings Alan Olson Director, Aviation Business and Properties Capital Project Manager IV Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Aviation Project Management Group Program Background Alaska and the Port have been working together on the planning of the North Main Terminal Redevelopment Program (NMTR) scope for a couple of years Alaska will design and construct the NMTR Project through a multi-phased Tenant Reimbursement Agreement (TRA) The Port anticipates designing and constructing similar improvements in the remaining areas of the Ticketing Level in the coming years Area of Work Overview 3 NMTR Program Drivers Needed renewal and replacement (1980s era) o Infrastructure systems o Architectural finishes Capacity enhancements o Security checkpoint expansion and reconfiguration o Promenade buildout for relocated ticketing and office space Safety enhancements o Code upgrades o Safety enhancements (smoke control) Customer service enhancements o Open and airy o Technology enhancements 4 High-Level Scope Summary Build out currently undeveloped space on the Bridge/Promenade Level Create new ticketing and bag drop for Alaska and new space for tenants Reconfigure Alaska's existing Ticketing Level space in the Main Terminal Remove part of the Mezzanine above Alaska Ticketing and relocate displaced tenants Increase passenger processing and bag drop capacity Provide technology and other updates to improve the passenger experience Enlarge Security Screening Checkpoint #5 from five to seven lanes Increase passenger security screening capacity Upgrade/provide new building systems to meet code requirements Develop building system and architectural solutions for use in the rest of the Main Terminal 5 Ticketing & Security Screening Checkpoint #5 Plan View 6 Proposed Alaska Ticketing 7 Proposed Security Screening Checkpoint #5 8 Proposed Promenade Ticketing and Bag Drop 9 Tenant Reimbursement Agreement (TRA) Plan TRA # Scope Value Execution #1 Project Definition Document & 30% Design $10 million 10/15/21 #2 Post 30% full program design $21.5 million Q4 2021 Q4 2021 #3 Phase 1 construction $TBD Q1 2022 #4 Phase 2 construction $TBD Q3 2022 10 Cost Breakdown Cost Breakdown Previous Requests This Request Total to Date Complete PDD and 30% Design $9,000,000 $0 $9,000,000 Design Phases 1 and 2 $0 $16,900,000 $16,900,000 Port Soft Cost $1,000,000 $1,300,000 $2,300,000 Alaska Soft Cost $0 $3,300,000 $3,300,000 Total $10,000,000 $21,500,000 $31,500,000 11 High Level Schedule 12 Program Phasing Phase 1 Construct previously undeveloped Promenade Level space including: o New space on the Promenade Level for Alaska passenger check-in, bag drop and operations as well as spaces to accommodate tenants displaced during Phase 2 work o Reconfiguration of existing Main Terminal space to accommodate other tenant displacements o Modifications/upgrades to existing building systems to support the newly built Promenade spaces Phase 2 o Abatement and demolition of a section of the Mezzanine Level above Alaska ticketing o Abatement, demolition, and reconfiguration of the north Main Terminal Ticketing o Reconfiguration of the northern-most section of the Mezzanine o Expand Security Screening Checkpoint # 5 from 5 to 7 screening lanes o Installation of new building systems, upgrades/modifications to existing building systems, and building code updates to support the reconfigured spaces on the Mezzanine, Ticketing and Baggage Claim levels (i.e. smoke control, fire sprinklers) Questions 14 Alternatives Considered Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 * Authorize Phase 1 design for Alaska's Program Delay design for Alaska's Program and align with Proceed with full design of Phases 1 and 2 of only the Port's Main Terminal Upgrade Alaska's Program Cost: ~$13 million (Phase 1 design only) Cost: ~$1.2 - $1.5 billion (combined Alaska/Port Cost: $21.5 million (full design cost, Alaska Program) constructed) Pros: Pros: Pros: Delays Port commitment to full design until Delays capital investment for another 12-14 Allows Alaska to manage their own operational 30% design is reviewed and independent cost months, allowing for a single project for the impacts estimate is developed, providing more cost entire Main Terminal More closely aligns with Alaska's target certainty Potentially allows for improved cost certainty completion date and avoids the cost escalation Allows for a better defined offramp between Reduces technical challenges of system penalty with Alternatives #1 & #2 Phase 1 and Phase 2 integration and schedule coordination Provides congestion relief sooner between adjacent projects Retains advantages of PDB project delivery Cons: Cons: Cons: Delays congestion relief Does not allow Alaska to manage their own Commits to full design prior to Port's Significantly reduces the advantages of PDB operational impacts commitment to complete Phase 2 of Alaska's Does not meet Alaska's target completion date Delays congestion relief Program Costs will continue to escalate Does not meet Alaska's target completion date Does not provide optimal cost certainty for and costs will continue to escalate Phase 1 work Coordinating Alaska TRA and Port Capital work would be challenging Significantly reduces the advantages of PDB * Recommended Alternative 15 Phasing & Authorization Plan Commission Description Value Authorization Project Definition Document & 30% Design $10 M 04/27/21 Post 30% Full Program Design $21.5 M 11/09/21 Phase 1 Construction (Off Ramp) ~$150 M 01/11/22 Phase 2 Construction (FGMP) ~$225 M Q3 2022 16
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.