7c

PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 
COMMISSION AGENDA               Item No.      7c. 
STAFF BRIEFING 
Date of Meeting    September 27, 2016 
DATE:    August 31, 2016 
TO:     Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:    Ralph Graves, Senior Director, Capital Development 
David Brush, IAF Program Leader 
SUBJECT:  International Arrivals Facility (IAF) - Phasing Revision & Progress
Update Briefing (CIP #C800583) 
SYNOPSIS 
This staff briefing provides a two-part update on the IAF Program, which is being
delivered as a Progressive Design Build (PDB) project:
1.  On July 12, 2016, Commission approved accelerating the execution of an
extension to the Concourse A sterile corridor, a portion of the Phase 2 work
planned for the IAF. During that meeting, Commission asked staff to evaluate the
benefits of revising the project's phasing to include in Phase 1 parts (or all) of the
balance of the Phase 2 work. That review has been completed and the IAF team
plans to return to Commission in October to request authorization to execute the
entirety of the Phase 2 scope of the IAF under the current Phase 1 contract with
Clark/SOM, the IAF Design/Build team.
The scope of work currently programmed as IAF Phase 2 includes: 
Two baggage claim devices (Carousels 6 and 7) and the associated
controls and baggage feed belts. 
All work associated with peripheral systems and equipment required to
support the two claim devices, e.g., the Baggage Information Display
System (BIDS), signage, striping, protection, security and access control. 
Forty additional automated passport control (APC) kiosks and eleven
additional CBP verification podiums to support the increase from 1,900 to
2,600 passengers per peak hour processing. 
All associated indirect and soft costs, e.g., design, general conditions,
overhead and profit, Washington State sales tax, and Port staff costs. 

Approval of this request will provide the balance of the building infrastructure
required for the facility to accommodate a peak hour passenger processing
capacity of 2,600.

Template revised May 30, 2013.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer 
August 31, 2016 
Page 2 of 4 
Approving this change prior to the commencement of the negotiation of the
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) in November, will allow the IAF team to
incorporate the work within the GMP. The cost to add this scope of work prior to
negotiating GMP is estimated to be $11,000,000. 
2.  To update the Commission on the current IAF design, an animated virtual
walkthrough will be previewed to Commission as part of this briefing. 
BACKGROUND 
In July 2013, the Commission approved preliminary funds to program a replacement of
the existing under-sized and aging Federal Inspection Service (FIS) facility in the South
Satellite (SSAT) with a new IAF that will serve the Airport well into the future and
facilitate the Port's Century Agenda objective to make the Airport the West Coast
"Gateway of Choice" for international travel. The Commission also authorized use of an
alternative project delivery method called Progressive Design Build for the IAF program.
This method is newly available for use by public agencies in Washington State and
allows the Port to select a design-build team based mainly on their qualifications with
competitive pricing on certain commercial terms (e.g., fee, insurance, bond) as an
additional selection factor.
The Port contracted with Clark/SOM as the Design-Builder to deliver this project. The
contract with Clark/SOM is a phased contract covering three distinct periods: the
Validation Period, the GMP Development Period (including some preliminary base
building construction e.g., site utilities and footings and the purchase of long lead items
e.g., steel), and the GMP Execution Period (full build). 
On November 17, 2015, Clark/SOM delivered the Target Budget and Target Schedule,
the two critical Validation Period deliverables, along with the many other reports and
plans required under the terms of the contract. On December 8, 2015, the Commission
approved $275.5M to amend the Design-Builder's contract, via a Post-Validation
Amendment and to initiate the second phase - the GMP Development Period. That
Amendment was executed in January, 2016 launching the GMP Development Period and
start of design. During this period, the Design-Builder will continue to work to improve
on the Target Budget and Target Schedule in order to establish the GMP. 
Owing to the continued and dramatic growth in airline operations at the Airport, the
Commission has authorized a significant change to the IAF program; $41M to extend the
sterile corridor in order to add two additional international wide body gates (previously
programmed as IAF Phase 2 scope to be executed as a separate, future project) and two
changes to the IAF design/build contract, adding two separate capital projects for
execution by the IAF design/build team; $5.5M to optimize the layout of narrow body
aircraft at the SSAT and $18.5M to seize the opportunity to provide additional space for
outbound baggage not associated with the IAF in the IAF footprint.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer 
August 31, 2016 
Page 3 of 4 

ATTACHMENTS TO THIS BRIEFING 
Computer slide presentation. 
Computer graphics animation. 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
September 13, 2016  IAF FAA Reimbursement Agreement Authorization 
July 12, 2016 - Two Additional International Aircraft Gates at (IAF) to Meet
Continuing Rapid Growth Authorization. 
June 28, 2016 - Two Additional International Aircraft Gates at International
Arrivals Facility (IAF) to Meet Continuing Rapid Growth briefing. 
May 17, 2016  Plan of Finance Update briefing. 
April 26, 2016  IAF 1Q2016 Briefing. 
February 9, 2016 - IAF 4Q2015 Briefing 
December 8, 2015 - IAF Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Development Period
Authorization (presented in combination with NSAT authorization request). 
November 10, 2015  IAF Update. 
August 11, 2015  Special Meeting, Roundtable with Airline Representatives. 
July 28, 2015  IAF Forum. 
July 14, 2015 - IAF Forum. 
June 23, 2015  Authorization to Execute a Design-Build Contract. 
May 26, 2015  IAF Preliminary Funding Plan Motion.
April 28, 2015 - Service Agreement for Commissioning Services. 
April 28, 2015  Request Authorization to Execute Lease Agreement with
SEATAC VENTURES 2010 LLC for International Arrivals Facility (IAF)
Program Management Office Space near Sea-Tac International Airport. 
February 24, 2015  Service Agreement for IAF Consultant Program Leader. 
January 27, 2015  IAF Funding Plan. 
January 27, 2015  IAF RFP Advertisement. 
January 13, 2015  IAF Update. 
December 2, 2014  IAF Scope and Budget Update. 
October 28, 2014  IAF Q3 Quarterly Briefing. 
August 19, 2014  IAF Q2 Quarterly Briefing. 
August 5, 2014  IAF RFQ Advertisement. 
July 22, 2014  IAF Progress Briefing. 
June 10, 2014  IAF Update and Quarterly Briefing. 
May 6, 2014  IAF Project Delivery Briefing. 
April 22, 2014  Capital Program Briefing. 
March 11, 2014  IAF Master Planning Authorization. 
February 25, 2014  IAF Program Briefing.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer 
August 31, 2016 
Page 4 of 4 
November 19, 2013  International Arrivals Facility Construction Management,
testing and inspection; surveying and locating and safety service agreements. 
July 23, 2013  International Arrivals Facility Project & Program Support; and
Price Factor Design-build Methodology authorization. 
July 9, 2013  Sea-Tac Airport International Arrivals Facility Briefing. 
July 9, 2013  Alternative Public Works Contracting Briefing. 
April 9, 2013  Sea-Tac Airport International Arrivals Facility Briefing. 
June 26, 2012  Briefing on Airport Terminal Development Challenges at Seattle-
Tacoma International Airport. 
June 14, 2011  International Air Service Growth and Future Facility briefing. 
February 2, 2010  Briefing on South Satellite Passenger Growth and Facility
Considerations, Delta's Proposed Airline Lounge and Other Possible Future
Aviation Projects.

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.