05 Payless Car Rental

INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT 

LEASE AND CONCESSION AGREEMENT AUDIT 

SEATAC RENTALS INC dba PAYLESS CAR RENTAL 

MAY 17, 2012  MAY 31, 2014 

ISSUE DATE:  AUGUST 08, 2016 
REPORT NO. 2016-10

SEATAC RENTALS INC dba PAYLESS CAR RENTAL                          INTERNAL AUDIT 
MAY 17, 2012  MAY 31, 2014 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
AUDIT OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE 

The purpose of the audit was to determine whether Port management monitoring controls are
adequate and effective to ensure: 
1.  SeaTac Rentals Inc. reported concession fees were complete, properly calculated, and remitted
timely to the Port. 
2.  SeaTac Rentals Inc. complied with significant financial provisions of the agreement. 
3.  Customer Facility Charges (CFC) were properly collected and remitted. 
We reviewed and analyzed records for the agreement period. For purposes of rendering our opinion, we
focused on the period May 17, 2012  May 31, 2014. 
Details of our audit's scope and methodology are on pagesix. 

BACKGROUND 

SeaTac Rentals Inc. dba Payless Car Rental is a subsidiary of Avis Budget Group. 
The lease and concession agreement with SeaTac became effective May 17, 2012. The terms of the
agreement provide for a Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) of 85% of the total amount paid to the Port
in the previous agreement year. Additionally, the agreement requires a percentagefee equal to ten
percent (10%) of gross revenues, provided the fee is higher than the monthly MAG. 

AUDIT RESULT

Management controls are effective to ensure that reported concession fees were materially complete,
properly calculated, and remitted timely to the Port. The Lessee materially complied with the terms
of the Lease and Concession Agreement, as amended. 
However, we determined that the Customer Facility Charge (CFC) was underreported. We recommend
Port management seek recovery of $19,682 in CFC charges, and audit cost. We also recommend Port
management consider assessing a one-time late fee and accrued interest, and seek recovery from the
tenant as appropriate. See Finding 1 on the Schedule of Findings. 



2

SEATAC RENTALS INC dba PAYLESS CAR RENTAL                          INTERNAL AUDIT 
MAY 17, 2012  MAY 31, 2014 



TABLE OF CONTENTS 


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 2 
TRANSMITTAL LETTER.................................................................................................................................................. 4 
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................... 7 
1.   CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGE (CFC) WAS UNDERREPORTED .................................................................... 7 











3

SEATAC RENTALS INC dba PAYLESS CAR RENTAL                          INTERNAL AUDIT 
MAY 17, 2012  MAY 31, 2014 

TRANSMITTAL LETTER 
Audit Committee 
Port of Seattle 
Seattle, Washington 

We have completed an audit of SeaTac Rentals Inc. dba Payless Car Rental. We reviewed information
for the period May 17, 2012  May 31, 2014. 
We conducted the audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Audit Standards and the
International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide reasonable basis
for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained
provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based our audit objectives. 
We extend our appreciation to the management and staff of Aviation Business Development
Department, Accounting and Financial Reporting for their assistance and cooperation during the audit. 



On behalf of 
Joyce Kirangi, CPA, CGMA 
Internal Audit, Director 

AUDIT TEAM                      RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT TEAM 
Margaret Songtantaruk, Senior Auditor      Jim Schone, Director AV Business Development 
Jessica Martin-Carscadden, IA Manager     Rudy Caluza, Director Accounting and Financial Reporting 





4

SEATAC RENTALS INC dba PAYLESS CAR RENTAL                          INTERNAL AUDIT 
MAY 17, 2012  MAY 31, 2014 

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 

SeaTac Rentals Inc. dba Payless Car Rental is a subsidiary of Avis Budget Group. 
The lease and concession agreement with SeaTac became effective May 17, 2012. The terms of the
agreements provide for a Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) of 85% of the total amount paid to the Port
in the previous agreement year. Additionally, the agreement requires a percentage fee equal to ten
percent (10%) of gross revenues, provided the fee is higher than the monthly MAG. 
The MAG is payable in advance, on or before the first of each month, without notice from the Port. The
percentage fee, if applicable, is due on or before the 20th of the following month. For late payments,
the agreement provides for a one-time late payment charge of 5% of the overdue amount. 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 

KEY FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR SEATAC RENTALS, INC AGREEMENT 
AGREEMENT YEAR        REPORTED GROSS REVENUES        CONCESSION PAID 
20121-2013                          $ 4,545,900                 $454,590 
2013-2014                          5,784,331                578,433 
TOTAL                          $ 10,330,231             $ 1,033,023 
Data Source: PeopleSoft Financials and Propworks 
Data Note: 1 Started 05/17/2012 

AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 

We reviewed information for the period May 17, 2012  May 31, 2014. We utilized a risk-based audit
approach from planning to examination. We gathered information through document requests,
interviews, observation, and data analysis. Internal Audit obtained a complete understanding of the
significant provisions of the agreement between the Port of Seattle and SeaTac Rentals, Inc. and the
respective operations. 
We applied additional detailed audit procedures to areas with the highest likelihood of significant
negative impact as follows: 
1.  To determine whether Port management monitoring controls are adequate and effective to
ensure whether reported Concession fees were complete, properly calculated, and remitted
timely to the Port, we: 
Reviewed the lessee's chart of accounts to determine whether all revenue accounts were
included in the reported revenues to the Port. 
Reconciled the reported revenues to detail business records by revenue category. 
Tested a risk-based sample of 14 closed car rental agreements to determine whether: 

5

SEATAC RENTALS INC dba PAYLESS CAR RENTAL                          INTERNAL AUDIT 
MAY 17, 2012  MAY 31, 2014 
o  Revenue adjustments and/or reductions were valid and refunded. 
o  Concession revenue items on RA agreed to the amount recorded in the DBR. 
Analyzed Port records to determine the timeliness of submitted MAG/Concession Fee
payments. 
Verified and tested that the car rental agreements were not sequentially numbered. 

2.  To determine whether SeaTac Rentals complied with significant financial terms of the Lease and
Concession Agreement, as amended. We reviewed the: 
Agreement to identify significant financial compliance requirements. 
Insurance coverage and surety company bond to ensure amounts were sufficient and in
effect during the audit period. 
Non-RAC Concession Contract and North Parcel Rents to ensure they were properly
maintained and calculated. 
Certified Audited Statement of Gross Revenues for compliance and timely submission. 
Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) for accuracy of calculation and that Port management
obtained Port Commission approval for Exceptions Relief of MAG, if applicable. 

3.  To determine whether Customer Facility Charges (CFC) were properly collected and remitted
timely to the Port. We: 
Analyzed the CFC calculation and reporting. 
Recalculated CFC based on the lessee's accounting records for all rental agreements under
the audit period. We reconciled the calculated result to the CFC amount reported to the
Port. 
Tested a risk-based sample of 35 closed car rental agreements to determine whether lessee
calculated CFC was based on the correct check-out and return date/time. 
Analyzed all payment records for the audit period to determine whether payments were
remitted by the required due dates. 

CONCLUSION 
CONCLUSION 
Management controls are effective to ensure that reported concession fees were materially complete,
properly calculated, and remitted timely to the Port. The Lessee materially complied with the
significant terms of the Lease and Concession Agreement, as amended. 
However, we determined that Customer Facility Charge (CFC) was underreported. We recommend
Port management seek recovery of $19,682 in CFC charges and audit costs. We also recommend Port
management consider assessing a one-time late fee and accrued interest and seek recovery from the
tenant as appropriate. See Finding 1 on the Schedule of Findings. 




6

SEATAC RENTALS INC dba PAYLESS CAR RENTAL                          INTERNAL AUDIT 
MAY 17, 2012  MAY 31, 2014 
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

1.  CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGE (CFC) WAS UNDERREPORTED 
The analysis of the lessee's financial records and detailed rental agreements determined the
lessee did not report CFC completely. The agreement, Section 6.2, stipulates: 
"Operator shall collect a daily Customer Facility Charge on all vehicle rental
transactions with Airport Customers EachOperator must collect the Customer
Facility Charge at the time of the first payment is made for a qualifying vehicle
rental transaction, and must remit the full amount of the Customer Facility
Charge to the Port regardless of whether or not the full amount such Customer
Facility Charge is actually collected by the Operator from the person who rented
the Automobile." 
A recalculation of the CFC based on the Daily Business Reports (DBR) vehicle check-out and
return dates for the audit period (excluded cancellation car rental agreement), revealed the 
CFC was underreported by approximately $19,682. 
UNDERREPORTED CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGE FOR SEATAC RENTAL 
REPORTED CFC UNDERREPORTED
AGREEMENT YEAR   AUDITED CFC FEES          FEES      CFC FEES 
2012 - 2013                  $945,210            $934,764          $10,446 
2013 - 2014                   915,984            906,738            9,236 
TOTAL                  $1,861,194         $1,841,194          $19,682 
TOTAL DUE TO PORT                                      $19,682 
Data Source: SeaTac Rental Monthly Schedule Report, PeopleSoft Financials 
Data Note: 1 5/17/2012  5/31/2013 
In addition, Section 8.2.1 of the Lease Agreement requires "the full cost of the audit be 
borne by the lessee in the event an audit reveals a discrepancy of more than 1% of CFC for
any 12-month period." As indicated below, the discrepancy was greater than 1% for each of
the two years in the audit period as follows: 
PERCENTAGE OF
UNDERREPORTED    REPORTED CFC UNDERREPORTED
AGREEMENT YEAR        CFC FEES          FEES      CFC FEES 
2012 - 2013                   $10,446            $934,764           1.12% 
2013 - 2014                    9,236            906,738           1.02% 
Data Note: 5/17/2012  5/31/2013 



7

SEATAC RENTALS INC dba PAYLESS CAR RENTAL                          INTERNAL AUDIT 
MAY 17, 2012  MAY 31, 2014 
Recommendations: 
We recommend management 
1)  Seek recovery of $19,682 for the underreported customer facility charge (CFC). 
2)  Assess the applicability of the one-time late charge and accrue interest caused by
the above underreporting. Seek recovery if appropriate. 
3)  Seek recovery of the audit costs, in accordance with the terms of the lease
agreement. 
Management Response 
Management will work with tenant to ensure their understanding of CFC collection
protocols, as well as pursue recovery of the underpaid CFC's. In addition, we will
negotiate with tenant regarding late charge and interest accruals as a result of the
CFC underreporting, as well as the recovery of audit costs. 



AUDIT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 










8

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.