exhibit A

tempt:Germs-:7" R

PM $0?"angig;,3&91___
Dear Port Commissioners,                                                                                   October 28, 2014
freeting of L+ 3%, 301'!
As retail workers at SeaTac airport, we want to thank you for showing concern about the quality of ourjobs. Many of us have worked here for years, working hard to give great customer
service to the thousands of passengers for whom we are the face of the airport. Although we appreciate your efforts, we are still disappointed that you have not accepted the job quality
standards passed by SeaTac voters in Proposition 1. The draft resolution for Airport Dining and Retail falls short of the wage and leave policies many of us campaigned for. Despite our
disappointment, we recognize that the draft resolution would provide important minimum standards, and we support them, even while encouraging you to do more. The resolution is an
important step toward greaterjob security, recognition of the importance of union representation, living wages and fair PTO policies. We know you are probably hearing from some
employers that your proposed policies overreach. In your deliberations, please remember the retail and dining workers at SeaTac who work hard every day - many holding down two or
more jobsjust to pay the rent ~ who will benefit from the proposed improvements in airportjob quality.

Sincerely,
/'
_'Am ,\'r;cc_.m/
Wu.__ '. .
:
4%     Mung;u          a-/}"'W'"'q-  ~          gf  ,; V      x1 'u'dxzaL      I or
an
.- 'wma.
'                                             w"
26/)                  gwm      "Q7
- .1?-               'yj ' '8m its M'd'aswat c
.W'Me
we."
.
7&1                                           E/WW WW       "WP-=5 ' WW '
OMa/                   Wait-1'4
.-
ALDw 
.
W1. . 6 P WWW"
an" M W ..       Haw-0+ Ami-ML K.' . h    My
9
_mmm           '
'
,
t                                ,7

.                           am am         as                  armv

'
"
'                                                              Mum gm.            .                             M:                   wto
W,
M 9M     s
V_ - bL)
l 'so Q Maw LKQLKO
I
ROXCUK gelled            /4/                                  n
kQZW/XJQFL A'M   4A....-       Ae is.
_omzam
' '
a "u u .        r,   "HL '4     _p;4....            be
.n     I    a 1 n,
gt -
V                                I                                           I"?
CL'"""                                                   V
4/3 i!  '_i- A           gui           REM                                          \72? *
-
-
u                                                                                 H70?
.                      a." m a
[6"         't'."                               I       t 2%
-/:5514                                                '
'
m,                            Kr, +ol            it
9
_.
all".                                      14701443:
~  AL,  ("I          Jcc-w/N D' CABRAL         51%; '._ .- .'                         M in                     Maul
.                                     km.
.
.
F '' Mal/agZ7.
sq      '
a
.  "a       c .
"at    WALL/x   rm"; ' '~                     .      sag Iggy,
_

V
0""'1/0 (4:6      "ML/4  v0 AL      R'Wd'lorq        Qasldq 'thm                   "40"" I W
'

.
vt'tv '<
.
lA/ _'
A.  1  (at   Hmnma; [11:1ng     1,4,.'4 \'                 Ada/'21:? 427,1   ,  5
ZaMM."       Z M"        emu'k, .__                                      ' -7'V1dteu_u.4
' MW
- S"/

            

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.