PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 
COMMISSION AGENDA               Item No.      6a 
ACTION ITEM 
Date of Meeting    December 3, 2013 
DATE:    November 20, 2013 
TO:      Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:   Stephanie Jones Stebbins, Director, Seaport Environmental & Planning 
Elizabeth Leavitt, Director, Aviation Planning & Environmental Services 
SUBJECT:  2014-2018 Environmental Remediation Liability Program 
Amount of This Request:    $42,180,000   Source of Funds:   Airport  Airport
Development Fund; Real
Estate and Seaport  Tax
Levy 
Est. State and Local Taxes:   $1,481,000   Est. Jobs Created:              222 
ACTION REQUESTED 
Request Commission authorization of (1) a five-year spending plan of $106,740,000 for the
Environmental Remediation Liability (ERL) Program for the Seaport, Real Estate, and Aviation
Divisions for 2014-2018; and (2) environmental remediation liabilities funds for 2014 in the
amount of $42,180,000, of which (a) $22,180,000 is forecasted to be spent in 2014 and (b) an
amount estimated not to exceed $20,000,000 of the remaining funds approved in the five-year plan
will be obligated during 2014 to be spent in future years. 
SYNOPSIS 
As a major industrial and commercial land owner, the Port has significant environmental cleanup
liabilities due to historic contamination of its properties. Since 1993, the Port has booked liabilities
to recognize these obligations. While Port environmental cleanup projects typically span several
years, more complex projects have been active for over 10 years. From 2008 to 2012, the amount
spent under the annual ERL authorization was $51,776,000. The $22,180,000 requested spending
authorization for 2014 will allow continuation of ongoing environmental investigation, testing,
analysis, design, cleanup, and monitoring for active sites and will initiate similar activities for new
sites, as noted in this memorandum. The authorization to obligate $20,000,000 in 2014 will allow
the Port to enter into contracts for continuing this work in future years, as much of this work spans
multiple years. Prior to actual spending of these funds, Commission authorization will be needed,
likely through a future annual ERL authorization. 
The approval of the five-year plan gives greater visibility to our projected upcoming environmental
remediation liability spending. In addition, the authorization to enter multi-year contracts and
service directives allows the Port to more efficiently contract for work of multi-year duration.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 2 of 14 
Funds projected for years beyond 2014 will not be spent until authorized by a future Commission
action (i.e., next year's ERL spending authorization). 
BACKGROUND 
The Port has identified a number of contaminated sites on Seaport, Real Estate and Aviation
properties that must  be investigated and remediated in compliance with federal and state
environmental laws and regulations. In some cases, the Port has been designated by the federal
government as a "Potentially Responsible Party" (PRP), and/or by the state government as a
"Potentially Liable Party" (PLP) for the investigation and cleanup of properties owned by the Port
or where the Port may have contributed to site contamination. 
Although the Port may not bear ultimate liability for the contamination, under federal and state law,
the Port is presumptively liable as the property owner, and it is often practically and financially
beneficial for the Port to take initial responsibility to manage and pay for the cleanup. 
In many cases, the Port has successfully recovered and/or will seek recovery from other responsible
parties for Port-incurred investigation and cleanup costs. The Port also has been successful in
receiving Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) grant funds to pay part of the cleanup costs. The
Port's goals are to cost-effectively complete this environmentally responsible work and to
maximize work accomplished by or paid for by the parties responsible for the conditions
encountered (or others, such as insurance companies, who represent them).
To mitigate such environmental expenditures, the Port also encourages, coordinates with, and
oversees the investigation and cleanup of sites by other responsible parties, to assure that legal
requirements are met and that Port liabilities are minimized. Regardless of whether the Port
conducts the investigation and remediation directly, or oversees the proper performance of that
work by other responsible parties, the Port provides a valuable public benefit by acting as a catalyst
in expediting appropriate environmental management of these sites. 
Accounting rules require that the Port "book" or establish a liability on its balance sheet for
environmental remediation when the Port's obligation meets specified definitions of certainty and
the liability amount can be reasonably estimated. When an environmental remediation liability is
booked, an expense is also recorded in the current period for the future expenditures. The Port
develops its environmental remediation liability forecasts in compliance with Government
Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 49 "Accounting and Financial Reporting for
Pollution Remediation Obligations." 
Environmental liability expenditures are authorized in one of two ways. If the environmental costs
are incurred in the course of, or incidental to, a construction project, the Commission authorization
occurs as part of the authorization for the overall construction project. Examples of this include
asbestos removal, offsite soil disposal during construction, or upland dredge material disposal. 
If the environmental cost is not associated with a capital construction project or maintenance
(including asbestos and lead), but is a stand-alone pollution remediation project, the expenditure is
authorized through one annual action. Since 1993, the Commission has approved annual
environmental expenditures. In addition, Commission authorization is obtained prior to entering
into legal commitments  for investigation or cleanup actions, such as an Agreed Order,

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 3 of 14 
Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) or Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on
Consent (ASAOC) referred to as Orders. The Port is required to pay agency oversight costs.
Further, to the extent required by Resolution No. 3605, as amended by Resolution No. 3628,
Central Procurement Office contract actions in support of approved environmental projects may
require additional Commission authorization. 
REQUEST JUSTIFICATION AND DETAILS 
Consistent with past practices, the duration of the authorization continues to be an annual spending
authorization. However, since 2011, the authorization requests have also provided a rolling fiveyear
spending plan to reflect the level of resources expected to be required over the next five years.
Executing contract obligations for a longer duration minimizes the need to rework all contract
amendments and service directives that are aligned with the end-of-year authorization. It also
provides greater visibility of the environmental liability costs. 
The environmental investigation and remediation actions described below are usually required
under federal and/or state law. Remedial actions continue to focus on cost-effective study, analysis,
and implementation of cleanup actions; coordination with capital planning, design, and
construction; and negotiation with agencies, tenants, other PRPs and insurance companies. 
Request Objectives: 
Perform the remediation work at the various sites in accordance with the various agreed orders. 
Manage and perform the work, with project controls and contract systems in place. 
Identify and  consider community values and concerns as part of the various public
participation plans. 
Remediation investigations, designs and implementations will be carried out in a manner that
considers current and potential uses for the sites. 
Seaport Sites/Projects 
Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund  The Lower Duwamish Waterway is a Federal Superfund
Site. The Lower Duwamish Work Group (LDWG), consisting of the Port, the City of Seattle, King
County and Boeing, has completed a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) of the
Waterway under Order with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of
Ecology (Ecology). The Port is the contracting agent for the LDWG. The final FS was issued
October 2012 and EPA's Proposed Plan was issued for public review and comment in late February
2013. Public comment on the Proposed Plan closed in June 2013 and will be used by EPA to
develop its Record of Decision for the final cleanup plan. EPA will issue the Record of Decision in
late 2014, after seeking concurrence from Ecology. In 2014, as part of the ongoing FS design, 
LDWG will complete a Fisher Study to determine who is using the river for fishing and conduct
scoping for a carbon amendment pilot study. In addition, the Port will be conducting stormwater
line cleanouts on Port-owned properties along the LDW. 
Terminal 117 Sediments, Bank and Uplands  As part of the Lower Duwamish Waterway
Superfund effort, EPA identified several sediment hot spots that warranted early cleanup action as
an Early Action Area (EAA), including the Port's Terminal 117 (T-117) in South Park. The EPA
has issued an Action Memorandum for T-117 that identifies the EPA-selected cleanup action. The

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 4 of 14 
current EPA Order for T-117 removal design and removal action (RD/RA) was signed by the Port
and City on June 9, 2011. EPA approved the final design on October 15, 2012. As of June 2013,
the removal action has been contracted and is ongoing. A majority of the uplands portion of the
cleanup has been completed, and the remaining portion is anticipated to be completed by the first
half of 2014. The in-water portion of the cleanup work will start in December 2013 and should be
completed during the work window that ends on February 15, 2014. 
Terminal 108  As part of the effort to control sources of contamination to the LDW, the LDWG
identified potential source sites that could require early cleanup action. One such site is located in
the sediments adjacent to Terminal 108. Ecology requested, and the Port voluntarily agreed, to
perform additional investigation of the groundwater. The groundwater study determined that the
groundwater is not a source of contaminants to the river. However, Ecology is requiring additional
bank, shoreline, and upland assessment of potential river recontamination sources. Engineered
mitigation measures may be necessary to control potential recontamination sources. On October 13,
2009, Commission approved a proposal to conduct a bank stabilization pilot study at Terminal 108
as an independent action. 
Terminal 115  The Port has been conducting a continuing program to remove small amounts of
free product (petroleum) from groundwater caused by two leaking underground tanks that were
removed from the southwest portion of the terminal. Investigative groundwater monitoring is also
continuing.  Soils are marginally contaminated at the tank sites; cleanup is not required by
regulatory agencies at this time. 
Activities at this site also include coordination with Ecology on source control efforts required as
part of the LDW RI/FS process. The Port has conducted an Environmental Conditions investigation
for the entire property. Ecology has developed a Source Control Action Plan for T115 based on
their review of the Environmental Conditions investigation. Ecology staff may want to enter into a
negotiation for an Order at the site but have not yet made a formal request to the Port. 
Terminal 115 North  In late January 2009, the Port received from Ecology a Notice of Potential
MTCA Liability. Ecology has focused on this site because it is located adjacent to Glacier Bay, one
of the high priority sediment sites (Glacier Bay) within the Lower Duwamish Superfund site.
Glacier Bay is located north of Terminal 115. On November 2, 2010, the Commission authorized
entering into a MTCA Order for this site, under which the Port will further characterize the site and
develop a draft cleanup action plan. Since then the scope of work for the remedial investigation has
been finalized and the field work has begun. 
Terminal 5 Ecology State Cleanup Sites  In the past, as part of the Terminal 5 Southwest Harbor
redevelopment, the Port completed remediation at four sites under three Consent Decrees with
Ecology. Current obligations include on-going cap inspection and maintenance of the cap in the
four areas, and coordination and review of the future adjacent sediment cleanup work to be
performed by Lockheed. 
Terminal 5 Pacific Sound Resources (PSR) EPA Superfund Site  This site was cleaned up under
an Order with EPA as part of the Terminal 5 Southwest Harbor redevelopment project. Ongoing
obligations include continuing to perform required cap inspection and cap maintenance, product
recovery activities and monitoring EPA activities related to the groundwater and the off shore

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 5 of 14 
sediments. EPA recently opened to the public the beach at Jack Block Park, located just north of the
site, following cleanup of the adjacent sediments.
Harbor Island Superfund Site Soil and Groundwater Operable Unit  Terminal 18 is located within
this Superfund site. Cleanup of this site was performed under a Consent Decree with EPA. Longterm
groundwater monitoring is being performed by the group consultant under a PRP agreement.
Long-term cap maintenance and inspections have been initiated as required under the Record of
Decision. At the request of the EPA, new restrictive covenants for Port-owned property on Harbor
Island where completed in 2012.
Harbor Island Superfund Site East Waterway Sediments Operable Unit  In 2006, the Port signed
an Order with EPA for a final Supplemental Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (SRI/FS),
and a Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Seattle and King County to share costs and
cooperate in the SRI/FS process. The Port is acting as the contracting agent for this work. A
settlement agreement with Seattle Iron Metals was negotiated for their contribution to the SRI/FS
costs. We are currently conducting the SRI/FS tasks identified in the EPA Order and subsequent
work plans. The draft final RI was submitted in early 2013, and the final remedial investigation was
submitted in September 2013. A draft Feasibility Study will be submitted in sections in late 2013
and early 2014. The Port is also conducting source control work, as required by EPA under the
ASAOC. In 2014, this will include some additional stormwater line cleanouts. 
Terminal 30 Oil Cleanup  Terminal 30 is a former Chevron bulk storage site. Since the 1990's,
the Port has removed significant amounts of free product and conducted an extensive groundwatermonitoring
program. The Port is in the process of negotiating final site remedy and compliance
monitoring for the site. Design of the cleanup will start in early 2014. 
Terminal 10 Lockheed  Lockheed previously performed the upland and sediment cleanup required
at the site. The Port's continuing obligation is to maintain the upland cap and the habitat restoration
area, manage  any contaminated soil and groundwater  encountered or removed during 
redevelopment or maintenance activities, and to protect Lockheed's groundwater monitoring wells.
Under the Terminal 10 Uplands capital project, storm water drainage and upland cap improvements
were completed in early 2012. Long term stormwater solids sampling was intiated afer the capital
project as a condition of EPA approval.
Terminals 103/104/105/107  These sites have been identified by Ecology as having source control
data gaps in relation to the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund site. Ecology may require the
Port to perform investigation work at these sites in the future. 
Terminal 106 Warehouse Building  The former warehouse building contains five underground
storage tanks (USTs) and some cement kiln dusts (CKD) fill material. During future site
development or improvements, UST decommissioning and limited soil remediation will be
required. If site development encounters or disturbs underlying CKD fill, generated material will
be profiled, handled, and disposed of offsite. 
Natural Resource Damages (NRD) Habitat Restoration  Superfund liability for LDW and Harbor
Island sediments also includes injury to natural resources from contamination.  The Port is
negotiating with the Elliott Bay Trustee Council (Trustees) for a settlement of these liabilities that
will likely include habitat restoration as a component. On June 7, 2011, the Commission approved

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 6 of 14 
the design and permitting of an expanded restoration project at Terminal 117. The 90% design
work for the restoration is nearing completion, and a possible project-specific letter agreement is
presently being negotiated. Upon receipt of the letter, staff will be coming back to Commission to
request authorization to bid, award and construct the habitat project. 
Real Estate Sites 
Terminal 91 Cleanup  Investigation and cleanup of this site is being administered by Ecology 
under a State Dangerous Waste Permit and a MTCA Order. The draft Feasibility Study (FS) went
out for public comment December 2009 and was finalized with no changes. A draft Cleanup
Action Plan (CAP), which identifies the cleanup approach selected by Ecology, and State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist went out for public comment October 2010 and was
finalized. A new MTCA Order for performance of the cleanup was issued in the spring of 2012.
The design has been approved by Ecology. On August 6, 2013, the Commission approved the CEO
to advertise and execute a major construction project and to self-perform using Port crews, to
implement the cleanup action required by the Order. The self -performed cleanup work on Pier 91
has begun. The bid package for the main cleanup in the former tank farm area is scheduled to be
advertised in mid to late December. Investigation and cleanup of discrete units continues. Limited
sediment investigation and possible removal action may be performed in 2014 in support of
maintenance dredging. 
Fishermen's Terminal  The Port has removed contaminated soils in the uplands, capped the
uplands as a voluntary cleanup measure, and is conducting a continuing program of investigative
groundwater monitoring at and near the Fishing Vessel Owners tenant site. Some dredging of
contaminated sediments occurred as part of the Docks 5-10 renewal and replacement and berth
dredging project. An assessment of site-wide contamination is planned. 
Terminal 5 CEM Ecology State Cleanup Sites Site  In addition to the four sites listed under
Seaport sites, as part of the T-5 redevelopment, the Port purchased the old West Seattle Landfill and
installed an environmental cap and a methane collection system. These systems require long-term
operation and maintenance, inspection, and reporting, which is continuing. 
Aviation Sites/Projects 
Aircraft Fuel Farms and Fueling Systems  Five underground aircraft fueling systems were
constructed and operated by individual airlines beginning in the early 1960s. As of January 2007,
each of these systems has been decommissioned. Appropriate environmental cleanup has been
achieved for three of the systems and is in progress for two others. Long-term monitoring continues
as noted below: 
Remediation of an area impacted by operations of the former United Airlines and Continental
Airlines fuel farms is anticipated to continue into 2014 with confirmation monitoring to follow.
The Port is a member of the PLP group for this multiple-source site. 
The Northwest Airlines and Pan Am Airlines systems have been appropriately remediated, but
continue to require monitoring. The Port (as a result of Pan Am Airlines bankruptcy) and Delta
Airlines (successor by merger to Northwest Airlines) will continue to monitor the former Pan
Am and Northwest systems in the context of the STIA Ground Water Study, described below:

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 7 of 14 
STIA Ground Water Study  In May 1999, the Port and Ecology executed an MTCA Order that
required that the Port conduct a study of ground water conditions in the uppermost regional aquifer
in the vicinity of the Airport. The study has been completed. The results demonstrate that there is
little potential for Airport operations to impact ground water conditions beyond the Airport
boundary, or threaten local ground water receptors (public drinking water supplies, creeks, etc.).
Ecology accepted the study findings and designated the Port's obligations under the Agreed Order
as complete. Ecology and the Port have agreed to a plan for long-term ground water monitoring to
confirm the results of the models used in the study. Under the terms of a responsible party
agreement, Delta Airlines will implement the monitoring program on behalf of the Port and several
rental car tenants. We anticipate completion of long-term monitoring in 2015. 
Lora Lake Apartments  On July 10, 2009, the Port and Ecology executed a MTCA Order that
required the Port to conduct a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for the cleanup
of the Lora Lake Apartment Property. The RI/FS report, which presents the findings of
investigations and analysis of cleanup alternatives, was submitted to Ecology in January 2012.
These documents were subsequently revised to address Ecology's comments and accepted for
public comment in January 2013. A follow-on Consent Decree to complete the cleanup was
negotiated in 2013. The  public comment period on the RI/FS and Consent Decree ended on
November 25th, and Ecology is reviewing comments received from the public and will make a
determination on the remedy by early 2014. Remedial design will take place in 2014 and 2015 with
cleanup of the apartments and lake parcels currently scheduled for 2016 and 2017.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
The following table summarizes 2014 through 2018 forecasted spending for environmental
remediation projects. Forecasted spending reflects projects described in the Scope of Work.
Five-Year Spending Plan 
$s in Thousands        2014    2015    2016    2017    2018   2014-2018
Gross Project Spending     $22,180   $13,084    $26,744   $21,726   $23,005   $106,740
Cash from 3rd Parties*         $(4,150)    $(136)     $(161)     $(119)      $(40)    $ (4,606) 
Net Port Share              $18,031   $12,947    $26,583   $21,607   $22,965   $102,133
*Note: "Cash from 3rd parties" is defined below. Forecasts for payments from third parties are only included when the
liabilities have been booked. Forecasted amounts do not include estimates of possible recoveries from grants, insurance
or legal settlements. 
Budget Status and Source of Funds 
Environmental cleanup projects have multiple funding sources: (1) Seaport non-operating projects
and Real Estate operating and non-operating projects are funded by the Port's Tax Levy; (2)
Seaport operating projects are funded by the General Fund; (3) Airport projects are funded by the
Airport Development Fund. In addition, there are supplementary outside sources of funding,
including the following:

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 8 of 14 
Cash from 3rd parties - Payment from cost sharing agreements with other potentially liable
parties (PLPs), where the Port functions as a funding conduit for the other PLPs and the Port
holds contracts on behalf of these other PLPs. 
Litigation settlements with other PLPs. 
Insurance recoveries from both the Port's insurers and other PLPs' insurers. 
Interlocal Agreement with Department of Ecology for source control activities in the amount of
$2,000,000. 
Work at the following sites is expected to receive funding through an interlocal agreement:
T108 and Lower Duwamish. 
Grants. 
o The existing projects have received MTCA grants: T91 Cleanup for $3,000,000. 
o New grants for Terminal 117 Sediments, Bank and Uplands for $13,100,000 and Lora Lake for
$5,000,000. 
Budget/Authorization Summary       Actuals thru      Budget    Remaining 
9/30/3013 
2013                $8,038,000   $21,179,000   $13,141,000 
Note: Budget does not carry over. 
STRATEGIES AND OBJECTIVES 
Environmental remediation projects define and minimize to acceptable levels threats to the
environment caused by prior Port operations, prior tenant operations, and by the historical effects of
industrial activity on properties acquired by the Port. Generally, the result of these efforts, as well
as the attendant compliance with regulatory mandates, management of Port liabilities, and support
of the local community, aligns with the goals and objectives of the Century Agenda and Seaport,
Aviation, and Real Estate Division Business Plans. 
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE 
Economic Development 
Cleanup of contaminated sites help bring sites back to a more productive use and support possible
re-development. 
Environmental Responsibility 
State and federal laws require elimination of unacceptable levels of environmental risk caused by
the presence of contaminants in soil, groundwater and sediment. Project planning and design
efforts will consider and incorporate opportunities for materials reuse, recycling, and/or reduction.
Implementation of cleanup remedies will include significant environmental controls and
performance monitoring to ensure public health and safety. 
Community Benefits 
Elimination of unacceptable levels of environmental risk caused by the presence of contaminants in
upland soil, in marine sediments, and groundwater is the hallmark of responsible environmental

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 9 of 14 
stewardship, from the perspectives of both the surrounding residential and business communities
and the customers that we serve. 
The environmental remediation authorization will fund a mix of Port staff and outside consultant
services and contractors that maximizes the effectiveness of staff. 
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED 
The following alternatives were considered for accomplishing the work described above: 
Alternative 1) 
Do not complete the work. If the Port chose not to complete the work, federal and/or state
regulatory agencies could mandate the work be accomplished, either by the Port under an
enforcement or similar order, or by the agency. In many cases, such arrangements already exist
between the Port and regulatory agencies. In either case, the Port would lose the opportunity to
employ the flexibility contained in the controlling regulations, to define and direct the work, and to
manage costs. This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 2) 
Complete the work using Port staff. Port staff is already heavily involved in project direction, legal
analysis, and project management, and will continue to perform these services. The nature and
extent of the technical and legal work required to complete this work is substantial, and would
require a large number of additional staff with additional expertise. In addition contracts would still
be required for such work as laboratory analysis. This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 3) 
Complete the work using outside consultants and contractors. Outside consultants and contractors
have sufficient numbers and types of specialists necessary for timely and cost effective completion
of this work; however, the work would be more costly than if some Port staff were also involved.
This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 4) 
Complete the work using a combination of Port staff (Alternative 2) and outside consultants and
contractors (Alternative 3) that maximizes the ability for the Port to direct cleanup efforts and
maximize the effectiveness of staff. This is the recommended alternative. 
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST 
Map of ERL Sites North Properties (Seaport and Real Estate) 
Map of ERL sites South Properties (Seaport and Real Estate) 
Map of ERL Sites Aviation 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
July 13, 1993 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,050,000 for eight projects
during 1993. 
March 8, 1994 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $776,000 for eleven projects
during 1994.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 10 of 14 
March 28, 1995 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,875,000 for nine projects
during 1995. 
February 27, 1996 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $2,325,000 for eleven
projects during 1996. 
February 25, 1997 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,100,000 to conduct the
STIA Ground Water Study required by a Washington Ecology Model Toxics Control Act
(MTCA) Agreed Order. 
June 8, 1999 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $300,000 to conduct the
Industrial Waste System Hydrogeological Study required by the Ecology as a performance
condition of the 1998 National Pollution Discharge and Elimination System Permit. 
August 24, 1999 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $800,000 for environmental
cleanup of Port property adjacent to the Malarkey Asphalt Co. site. 
March 14, 2000 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,000,000 for aquatic
sediment management for participating in the development and implementation of federal
and state laws and regulations relating to the disposition of contaminated aquatic sediments,
and the expenditure of $2,000,000 for cleanup-related investigations at the former Chevron
Oil Terminal site at Terminal 30. 
July 10, 2001 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $5,100,000 for nine Aviation
projects and six Seaport projects during 2001. 
June 11, 2002 - the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,500,000 and contract
amendments for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Order on Consent to
continue work on the Lower Duwamish Sediments Superfund site and the East Waterway 
Sediment Operable Unit of the Harbor Island Superfund Site.
March 11, 2003 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$4,999,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties and for potential
environmental liabilities during 2003. Actual expenditures for 2003 were ultimately limited
to $2,459,870.
March 23, 2004 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$8,081,000, for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2004. Actual
expenditures for 2004 were ultimately limited to $2,136,943. 
March 23, 2005 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$8,102,222, for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2005. Actual
expenditures for 2005 were ultimately limited to $6,255,791. 
December 13, 2005 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure
of $8,705,760 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2006. 
June 27, 2006 -  the Commission approved an increase in the 2006 project-wide
authorization for environmental cleanup action on Port properties, to increase the
authorization in the amount of $6,000,000 to $14,705,760. Expenditures for 2006 were
ultimately limited to $11,087,873.38. 
December 12, 2006 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure
of $7,756,549  for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2007.
Expenditures for 2007 were ultimately limited to $7,537,286.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 11 of 14 
December 1, 2007 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$11,833,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2008. Expenditures
for 2008 were ultimately limited to $11,322,258. 
December 9, 2008 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$10,396,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2009. Expenditures
for 2009 were ultimately limited to 7,455,000. 
November 30, 2009 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure
of $13,141,000  for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2010.
Expenditures for 2010 -  through December 31, 2010, were ultimately limited to
$10,529,000. 
December 7, 2010 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$14,974,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2011. Obligation of
work in later years for $16,200,000. Expenditures for 2011 - through December 2011 were
$11,389,000 and obligation of work in later years for 4,200,000. 
December 6, 2011 - the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$23,600,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2012. Obligating
contracts (POs) valued at $32,900,000 in 2012 for work that will be performed in later
years. Commission approved the five-year spending plan of $91,100,000 for the
Environmental Remediation Liability Program for Seaport, Real Estate and Airport for 2012
through 2016. Expenditures for 2012 were $11,081,000. 
December 4, 2012 -  the Commission approved the project-wide authorization of
environmental remediation liabilities funds for 2013 in the amount of $44,179,000, of which
(a) $21,179,000 may be spent in 2013 and (b) an amount estimated not to exceed
$23,000,000 of the remaining funds approved in the five-year plan will be obligated during
2013 to be spent in future years. Commission approved a five-year spending plan of
$116,182,000 for the Environmental Remediation Liability Program for the Seaport, Real
Estate, and Aviation Divisions for 2013-2017. Expenditures for 2013 through September 30,
2013 were $8,038,000.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 12 of 14

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 13 of 14

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 20, 2013 
Page 14 of 14