6e

PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 
COMMISSION AGENDA               Item No.      6e 
ACTION ITEM 
Date of Meeting    November 19, 2013 
DATE:    November 11, 2013 
TO:      Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:   David Soike, Director, Aviation Facilities and Capital Program 
Wayne Grotheer, Director, Aviation Project Management Group 
SUBJECT:  Vertical Conveyance Modernization, Aero Phase 1 (CIP #C800251) and Aero
Phase 2 (CIP #C800375) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport 
Amount of This Request:   $ 11,090,400         Source of  Existing Revenue Bonds
Funds:    and Future Revenue
Est. Total Project Cost:     $ 24,556,408                   Bonds 
Est. State and Local      $ 1,441,800 
Taxes: 
ACTION REQUESTED 
Request Commission authorization for the Chief Executive Officer to: (1) adjust scope to
reallocate the various elevators and escalators between Vertical Conveyance Modernization,
Aero Phase 1 and Phase 2 CIPs to best address operational concerns and coordinate with the
NorthSTAR program; (2) combine both Vertical Conveyance Modernization Aero Phase 1 and
Aero Phase 2 CIPs into a single CIP; and (3) advertise for bids and execute construction
contracts for the Vertical Conveyance Modernization, Aero Phase 1 including associated
regulated materials abatement and removal for a project total of $14,999,000. The combined
project total will be $24,556,408. 
SYNOPSIS 
The Airport has developed a renewal and replacement program for both the elevators and
escalators throughout the main terminal and satellites. Many of the elevators and escalators are
over 40 years old and are at the end of their service lives. The Vertical Conveyance
Modernization Aero projects will update old elevators and escalators over a two-year period. 
Passengers will benefit from this project by using faster, more reliable elevators and escalators.
A year ago, the Commission authorized the design and regulated materials abatement for the
Vertical Conveyance Modernization, Aero Phase 1 project. Concurrently, the Commission
authorized design and abatement for the Vertical Conveyance Modernization, Aero Phase 2
project. Subsequent to those authorizations, two elevators and four escalators at the North
Satellite, one elevator and four escalators at the end of Concourse C, along with associated
design funds, were transferred to the NorthSTAR program  in order to gain construction

Template revised May 30, 2013.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 11, 2013 
Page 2 of 8 
efficiencies. Both of the Vertical Conveyance CIPs are included in the 2014  2018 capital
budget and plan of finance. 
The transfer of the above cited units to the NorthSTAR program, design delays resulting from
technical difficulties associated with the design of the two new elevators at South Satellite, and
ongoing operational/maintenance concerns necessitated a re-alignment of Aero Phase 1 project
elements. Combining the Aero Phase I and Aero Phase II CIPs into one CIP will facilitate
ongoing efficiencies in the management of this program. 
BACKGROUND 
The existing elevators included in this project were installed in the 1960's and 1970's and the 
existing escalators were installed in 1970 and upgraded in 1990. Due to their age and technology,
the controls, drives, and door actuators of these elevators and escalators have become
uneconomical to maintain. Two elevators in this project (SSAF and MT-2) are currently out of
service and cannot be repaired. The unavailability of the freight elevator (SSAF) is causing
problems such as having to move concessions goods through smaller passenger elevators. 
Installation of hydraulic oil cooling packages will improve the reliability of the existing
hydraulic elevators by eliminating or decreasing outages due to overheating, thus improving the
Airport's experience of passengers who are unable to use the stairs or escalators. 
Below is an updated listing of elevators and escalators in this authorization request: 
Elevator #    Location                    Action           Year Installed 
SSAF      Freight Elevator at SSAT        Modernize       1970 
MT-2      Passenger elevator in Main Terminal  Modernize       1970 
MT-3      Public elevator to Police Department Modernize       1964 
stops at ramp, ticketing and floors 2,
3, and 4. 
MT-4      Police Service elevator, stops at Modernize       1964 
ramp, ticketing, floor 2, 3, and 4 
MT-5      Police service elevator, stops at Modernize       1964 
ramp, ticketing, and floors 2, 3, & 4 
MT-6      Passenger elevator in Main Terminal  Modernize       1970 
MT-7      Passenger elevator in Main Terminal  Modernize       1970 
Twelve     B, J, K, L, Q, D1, MT-8, MT-9, MT- Add hydraulic oil Various 
hydraulic    20, MT-30, MT-40, MT-50        cooling packages 
elevators 
Escalator# 
601,   602, North end of Main Terminal, serving Modernize        1970 
611 & 612    Sky Bridge #6 
The table below lists the elevators and escalators originally in Aero Phase 1 and Phase 2 from
December 11, 2012, Commission memoranda and their current alignment:

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 11, 2013 
Page 3 of 8 
Elevator #    Location                   Original Phase    Current
Alignment 
SSAF      Freight Elevator at SSAT        Phase 1       Phase 1 
MT-2      Passenger elevator in Main Terminal  Phase 1       Phase 1 
MT-3      Public elevator to Police Department Phase 2       Phase 1 
stops at ramp, ticketing and floors 2,
3, and 4. 
MT-4      Police Service elevator, stops at Phase 2       Phase 1 
ramp, ticketing, floor 2, 3, and 4 
MT-5      Police service elevator, stops at Phase 2       Phase 1 
ramp, ticketing, and floors 2, 3, & 4 
MT-6      Passenger elevator in Main Terminal  Phase 1       Phase 1 
MT-7      Passenger elevator in Main Terminal  Phase 1       Phase 1 
SSB       Passenger elevator at SSAT, serves Phase 1       Phase 2 
STS, Ramp & FIS 
SSC       Passenger elevator at SSAT, serves Phase 1       Phase 2 
STS, Ramp, FIS and Concourse 
SSM      New passenger elevator at SSAT, Phase 1       Phase 2 
serving STS, and Concourse 
SSN      New passenger elevator at SSAT, Phase 1       Phase 2 
serving STS, and Concourse 
NSCF     Freight elevator at North Satellite   Phase 1       NorthSTAR 
C4        Passenger  elevator  at  end  of Phase 1        NorthSTAR 
Concourse C, serving STS Transit
Station 
Eleven     B, J, K, L, D1, MT-8, MT-9, MT- Phase 1        Phase 1, added a 
Hydraulic    20, MT-30, MT-40, MT-50. Add
12th elevator "Q" 
Elevators     hydraulic oil cooling packages. 

Escalators# 
601,   602, North end of Main Terminal, serving Phase 2        Phase 1 
611 & 612    Sky Bridge #6 
C-1 thru C-4   Concourse C, ticketing to STS Phase 2         NorthSTAR 
Station 
NS-1 thru    North Satellite, STS to Concourse    Phase 2         NorthSTAR 
NS-4

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 11, 2013 
Page 4 of 8 
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION AND DETAILS 
The work planned under this project represents a critical component in the improvement of the
vertical conveyance system throughout the Airport. This project will provide complete
modernization of seven elevators, four escalators and the installation of hydraulic oil cooling
packages for 12 hydraulic elevators in Phase 1, and the construction of two new elevators and
complete the modernization of two elevators in Phase 2. 
Project Objectives 
Provide a safe and reliable delivery route for concessions products at the South
Satellite. 
Improve  overall  system  reliability  and  performance  by  providing  efficient
microprocessor logic for elevator dispatch and individual motor control. 
Replace aging components to ensure 20-plus years of reliable service without the need
for additional investments other than normal maintenance costs. 
Provide firefighters' operation to comply with current life/safety code requirements. 
Upgrade existing car and hoist way door equipment to provide reliable operation. 
Upgrade elevator car and corridor pushbuttons and signal fixtures to comply with
current requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 
Upgrade existing building conditions in the vicinity of the elevators to current national,
state and city elevator safety codes and building code requirements. 
Remove regulated materials via Port or contracted crews. 
Work with building officials to accommodate code required upgrades to structural
seismic and shaft wall fire rating performance criteria. 
Provide components that reduce overall energy consumption. 
Connect to the Port elevator/escalator monitoring system, LiftNet, for quick response in
case of failure. 
Improve reliability to handle current and future passenger loads. 
Scope of Work 
Develop infrastructure to modernize seven existing elevators and four escalators and retrofit
twelve hydraulic elevators with hydraulic oil cooling systems in Phase 1; develop infrastructure
to modernize two existing elevators and the construction of two new elevators in Phase 2 .
Infrastructure development will, at a minimum include: 
1)  Site preparations for installation of hydraulic oil/chilled water cooling systems. 
2)  Removal of regulated materials as required. 
3)  Installation of electrical power and control systems. 
4)  Installation of communication system. 
5)  Structural, electrical and mechanical revisions to the base building. 
6)  Commissioning of elevator and escalator systems. 
7)  Testing of installed elevator and escalator systems. 
8)  Closeout of completed project.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 11, 2013 
Page 5 of 8 
Schedule  Phase 1 
Authorize design  original scope                 October 2011 
Authorize design  amended scope               December 2012 
Complete design                        September 2013 
Authorize Construction Contract                 November 2013 
Advertise for Construction                     December 2013 
Construction Start                         May 2014 
Construction Complete                     May 2016 
Schedule  Phase 2 
Authorize design  original scope                 December 2012 
Complete design  revised scope                 April 2014 
Authorize Construction Contract                 May 2014 
Advertise for Construction                     May 2014 
Construction Start                         August 2014 
Construction Complete                     October 2016 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
Combined Budget/Authorization Summary       Capital     Expense   Total Project 
Original Budget                     $29,894,000    $2,283,000   $32,177,000 
Previous budget and scope changes          $3,719,020     $250,000    $3,969,020 
Previous budget transfer to NorthSTAR     ($11,276,401)    ($800,000)  ($12,076,401) 
Current budget increase                   $486,789                 $486,789 
Revised budget                     $22,823,408    $1,733,000   $24,556,408 
Previous Authorizations                 $6,066,000    $1,346,850    $7,412,850 
Authorization transferred to NorthSTAR      ($1,904,500    ($200,000)   ($2,104,500) 
Current request for authorization            $11,090,400          $0    $11,090,400 
Total Authorizations, including this request    $15,251,900    $1,146,850    $16,398,750 
Remaining budget to be authorized         $7,571,508     $586,150     8,157,658 
Total Estimated Project Cost             $22,823,408    $1,733,000   $24,556,408 
Project Cost Breakdown                     This Request       Total Project 
Construction                               $7,754,800        $15,824,224 
Construction Management                    $1,612,290        $2,477,090 
Design                                       $0         $2,561,145 
Project Management                         $865,210        $2,121,249 
Permitting                                   $40,100          $130,900 
State & Local Taxes (estimated)                   $818,000         $1,441,800 
Total                                     $11,090,400        $$24,556,408

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 11, 2013 
Page 6 of 8 
Budget Status and Source of Funds 
This project (CIP #C800251) was included in the 2014-2018 capital budget and plan of finance 
with a budget of $13,502,211. A budget increase of $486,789 is due to the addition of one
additional hydraulic elevator oil cooling system as well as updated program support costs. The
funding sources will include existing revenue bonds and future revenue bonds. As explained in
connection with the 2014  2018 plan of finance, The Port plans to issue revenue bonds in 2014
to fund a number of projects included in the 2014-2018 capital budget. 
Vertical Conveyance Modernization Aero, Phase 2 (CIP #C800375) is also included in the 2014-
2018 capital budget and plan of finance with a budget of $8,834,408. This project will also be
funded by a combination of existing and future revenue bonds. 
Expense funds will be used for the regulated materials management major construction contract,
support/monitoring work performed by Port Construction Services, and the necessary nonwarranty
maintenance activity during the twelve-month warranty period for the seven elevators
and four elevators. 
Financial Analysis and Summary 
CIP Category             Renewal/Enhancement 
Project Type              Infrastructure Upgrade 
Risk adjusted discount rate     N/A 
Key risk factors             N/A 
Project cost for analysis         $24,556,408 
Business Unit (BU)          Terminal Building cost center 
Effect on business performance  NOI after depreciation will increase 
IRR/NPV             N/A 
CPE Impact             CPE will increase by $.09 by 2016, but no change to
business plan forecast as this project was included. 
Lifecycle Cost and Savings 
From a financial perspective, the Port will experience ongoing maintenance and periodic
component renewal. However, these are normal operations and maintenance costs, which are
expected to be offset to some degree by reduced repairs on an emergency and/or urgent repair
basis to aging existing vertical conveyance equipment. 
The primary benefit of the elevators in this project will be realized by inbound and outbound
passengers who are not able to use escalators. There will be increased availability of elevators for
these passengers. 
This project is in alignment with the Port's goal of improving the long-term sustainability of its
facilities and operations. This project will provide a generally positive effect on the environment
to the extent that modernized elevators and escalators will reduce the Airport's reliance on older
and less energy efficient vertical conveyances.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 11, 2013 
Page 7 of 8 
STRATEGIES AND OBJECTIVES 
This project contributes to accommodating the Port's Century Agenda Goal to meet the region's
air transportation needs at Sea-Tac Airport for the next 25 years. The project provides enhanced
capacity and flexibility in critical terminal vertical circulation infrastructure, complementing the
recently completed Terminal Escalator Modernization (44 escalators) project. 
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE 
Economic Development 
This project will increase the long-term ability of the Airport to serve the airline industry's future
passenger growth. This project improves the efficiency of the existing systems and adds longterm
reliability before major component replacement is required.
The project manager will work with the Office of Social Responsibility to determine small
business participation opportunities, in accordance with the small business resolution 3618. 
The Commission previously authorized execution of a project labor agreement for the project. 
Environmental Responsibility 
The project demonstrates environmental sustainability by improving existing Port assets to
extend their life and better utilizing existing resources. In addition, the modernized escalators
will have the ability to go into sleep mode, further reducing energy demand during non-peak
passenger times. 
Community Benefits 
This project will increase the capacity of future Airlines growth. Long-term vitality of the
Airport benefits the regional economy, the local environment, and nearby communities. 
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED 
Alternative 1)  Do nothing. This would not address the Airport's urgent need to return
inoperable elevators to service, and would continue placing increased demands on the remaining
operating elevators and escalators as well as inconveniencing the traveling public. This is not the
recommended alternative. 
Alternative 2)  Repair/modernize only those elevators that are inoperable plus those elevators
for which parts are no longer available. This alternative only delays the inevitable modernization
of the remaining elevators and escalators and exposes the Airport to costly emergency and/or
urgent repairs when breakdowns do occur. This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 3)  Perform the modernizations to the elevators and escalators, upgrade the service
life of the vertical circulation components to realize the benefits of reliable equipment and the
energy savings resulting from the solid state controls and escalator sleep mode operations, and be
assured of the availability of maintenance and repair parts for the next foreseeable future. This is
the recommended alternative. 
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST 
Diagram of elevators and escalators in this project.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 11, 2013 
Page 8 of 8 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
On August 6, 2013, The Commission authorized the execution of project labor
agreements for seven projects including the Vertical Conveyance Modernization, Aero 
Phase 1 project. 
December 11, 2012  the Commission authorized $1,625,000 for design, Vertical
Conveyance Modernization Project, Aero Phase 1. 
December 11, 2012  the Commission authorized $2,796,000 for design, Vertical
Conveyance Modernization Project, Aero Phase 2. 
October 25, 2011  the Commission authorized $2,991,850 for design and regulated
materials management and abatement (CIP #C800251).

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.