4e
COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM Item No. 4e ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting September 12, 2017 DATE: August 24, 2017 TO: Dave Soike, Interim Executive Director FROM: Wayne Grotheer, Director, Aviation Project Management Group Michael Ehl, Director, Aviation Operations SUBJECT: Gate D6 Modifications at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (CIP #C800771) Amount of this request: $467,000 Total estimated project cost: $2,200,000 ACTION REQUESTED Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to increase the budget for the D6 Gate Modifications project by $467,000. The new authorized total project cost will be $2,200,000. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On January 26, 2016, the Commission authorized the design, execution of a procurement contract for structural steel and the use of Port Construction Services to construct a sloped walkway ramp for Gate D6 to serve passenger loading for hardstand operations. The steel procurement incurred additional costs due to quality issues. In order to meet crucial deadlines additional labor costs have been incurred as well. The sloped walkway opened for use in a partially complete state in June 2017. JUSTIFICATION Steel fabrication and preparation have been a problem on this project requiring extra time and additional costs. In September 2016 the Port opened bids for steel fabrication for this project. While the bid was surprisingly low, the bidder assured staff it could complete the work. As part of the inspection process for the structural steel procurement for the project, staff became aware of deficiencies in its quality. This became critical during the finishing stage when the galvanizing began delaminating and peeling off the steel. Ultimately it became clear that in order to stay on schedule to complete the project the Port needed to take possession of the steel and complete its finishing and delivery to the site. During construction additional dimensional deficiencies were encountered that required further work to correct. This work now requires the steel be re-painted as the work to repair these deficiencies defaced the original finish. The project manager is working with CPO to determine whether we have a means to recover some of the costs back from the steel fabricator. Template revised September 22, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _4e___ Page 2 of 4 Meeting Date: September 12, 2017 During construction as these delays and need for additional work surfaced, the team anticipated using project savings primarily from the low bid in order to stay within budget. As the delays mounted additional resources were required in order to open this facility and serve its intended need. Thus this request is now necessary in order to complete the project. The final phase of construction to install glazing around the ramp structure and thus provide an inclement weather shield has been placed on hold pending the outcome of this request. DETAILS Scope of Work (1) Re-painting the structural steel (2) Glazing the walkway Small Business This on-going project has achieved 32% small business utilization thus far. The above scope of work will provide additional small business opportunities. Project management staff will continue to work with the Port's small business group in their continuing efforts to promote and outreach to interested small and diverse businesses. Schedule The project will now be completed in Q3 2017. Cost Breakdown This Request Total Project Design $0 $239,000 Construction $467,000 $1,961,000 Total $467,000 $2,200,000 ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED Alternative 1 Do not repaint or add glazing to the walkway Cost Implications: $0 Pros: (1) No additional funding needed (2) Project will be completed sooner Cons: (1) The walkway will not be presentable (2) The passengers will not be sheltered from inclement weather This is not the recommended alternative. Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _4e___ Page 3 of 4 Meeting Date: September 12, 2017 Alternative 2 Complete the project with painting and glazing at an additional cost Cost Implications: $467,000 Pros: (1) The walkway will be presentable to arriving customers (2) The passengers will stay dry during inclement weather Cons: (1) It will require additional funds (2) The project will take a little longer to complete This is the recommended alternative. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary Capital Expense Total COST ESTIMATE Original estimate $1,400,000 $0 $1,400,000 Previous changes $333,000 0 $333,000 Current change $467,000 0 $467,000 Revised estimate $2,200,000 0 $2,200,000 AUTHORIZATION Previous authorizations $1,733,000 0 $1,733,000 Current request for authorization $467,000 0 $467,000 Total authorizations, including this request $2,200,000 0 $2,200,000 Remaining amount to be authorized $0 $0 $0 Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds The Gate D6 Modification (CIP #C800771) was included in the 2017-20121 capital budget and plan of finance with a budget of $1,733,000. A budget increase of $467,000 will be transferred from the Aeronautical Allowance CIP #C800753 resulting in a zero net change to the Airport capital budget. The funding source for this project is the Airport Development Fund. Financial Analysis and Summary Project cost for analysis $2,200,000 Business Unit (BU) Terminal Effect on business performance (NOI after NOI after depreciation will decrease depreciation) IRR/NPV (if relevant) N/A CPE Impact $.01 in 2017 Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _4e___ Page 4 of 4 Meeting Date: September 12, 2017 ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST Presentation slides PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS January 26, 2016 The Commission authorized in a single authorization the design, procurement of the steel walkway, casework and equipment and the use of Port Construction Services at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport for a total estimated project cost of $1,733,000. May 26, 2015 Aviation Division Business Plan Overview April 28, 2015 Commission Briefing: Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.