4f Economic Development partnership program memo
COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM Item No. 4f ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting November 14, 2017 DATE: November 7, 2017 TO: Dave Soike, Interim Executive Director FROM: Dave McFadden, Managing Director, Economic Development Division SUBJECT: Approve Port Economic Development Partnership Applications Amount of this request: $76,265 Total estimated project cost: $965,000 ACTION REQUESTED Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to execute Economic Development Partnership Program contracts with the Cities ofCarnation, Woodinville, Pacific, Bothel, and Lake Forest Park to implement local economic development initiatives for an amount not to exceed $76,265, as detailed below. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following five cities have completed their partnership applications and staff is recommending the Port execute contracts with these jurisdictions. Staff have reviewed each city application and is confident each local partnership initiative is impactful and ties to Port business interests. Other participating cities are finalizing applications for review at the November Commission meeting. Carnation - $5,000 o Assist in building out improvements to the Tolt Avenue's historic Central Business District improvements as Carnation pursues a tourism economic development strategy. o Support the construction of new gateway landmarking poles at planned central festival street concept at intersection located between Bird St and Tolt Ave. in downtown Carnation. Woodinville - $11,570 o Support the City of Woodinville's downtown placemaking efforts as an oucome of their Wine and Tourism Study, Downtown Little Bear Creek Corridor Master Plan and Downtown Streetscape Master Plan. o The City will work with the Woodinville Chamber of Commerce and local businesses to paint a mural in event staged with the local community on a gateway feature to downtownthe historic train trestleand use the art Template revised September 22, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 4f Page 2 of 6 Meeting Date: November 14, 2017 piece in subsequent marketing efforts to better connect downtown shops with wine tourism. Pacific-- $6,835 o Hire an intern to support the City's Community Development Manager in improving business sector data collection and bolster business outreach and recruitment through a better understanding of existing companies. o Research on businesses will be utilized in support of the City's on-going efforts to designate and certify their new Manufacturing Industrial Center with its neighboring city of Sumner. Bothell -- $26,860 o Continuation and additional phase planning and development work applied for last year for improvements to the Canyon Park office campuses where major stakeholders (business tenants, property owners, workers, and relevant governmental entities) are convened for how best to reposition the suburban employment zone to complement planned investments from Sound Transit. Lake Forest Park--$26,000 o The City of Lake Forest Park is requesting a dollar amount that reflects a twoyear period of per capita grant funding. The City had a larger project it wanted to fund in 2016 and asked the Port to consider earmarking last year's funds for this year's grant cycle. o Support for a study by the City of how best to capitalize the transit-oriented development opportunities from Sound Transit's bus rapid transit system's new route through their central district and major shopping center. o The Port will help Lake Forest Park hire professional services to determine the market feasibility of a new town center design which would include new development opportunities for a mixed-use center with housing, retail, commercial, and new public spaces around a planned bus stop and 300 vehicle parking garage. JUSTIFICATION In June 2016 the Commission created a new economic development grant fund that provides 38 King County cities per capita funding to advance local economic development throughout the region. Annual grant funding is being provided on a $1 per capita formula with a maximum of $65,000 while ensuring each city receives at least $5,000 (see allocations on next page) The Economic Development Partnership program is structured to drive meaningful outcomes: Provide some flexibility to define local economic development projects Tie to economic development (ideally the Century Agenda although not required) Require a 50 percent local match to ensure cities are also committed to project success Port staff met with cities in June to discuss 2016 results and kick off the 2017 grant cycle. Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 4f Page 3 of 6 Meeting Date: November 14, 2017 This project supports the Century Agenda vision of adding 100,000 jobs through economic growth led by the Port of Seattle. Grant funds will be distributed to 38 city partners in King County so a larger team is working to create middle class jobs within the region. Through purposeful contracts with local governments, the Port can extend its economic development reach to all parts of King County. Creating a Port Economic Development Partnership Program also honors the Port's commitment to create economic opportunity for all, partner with surrounding communities, and promote social responsibility. The new grant program also can help: Position the Puget Sound region as a premier international logistics hub; Advance this region as a leading tourism destination and business gateway; Promote small business growth; and Anchor Puget Sound urban-industrial land use to prevent sprawl in less developed areas. DETAILS The Port's new Port Economic Development Partnership Program grant program helps address the lack of economic development funding for local projects. The Port will also use this new program to accomplish Century Agenda goals through purposeful economic development partnerships with local cities. Project Objectives The Port Economic Development Partnership Program will help the Port advance regional economic vitality through focused partnerships with King County cities. Grants will be made to each city to pursue programs and projects that stimulate business development, job creation and community revitalization. Each participating city may in turn contract with local nonprofits (ex. Chamber of Commerce, Visitor Bureau, etc.) to carry out specific initiatives. Port Economic Development Partnership Programs can be used to support the following economic development activities: Business recruitment initiatives designed to attract new companies to a region or city Small business development (including incubator/accelerator projects) Industry retention and expansion assistance (ex. Maritime, Aerospace, etc.) Tourism development Downtown revitalization Commercial or industrial property development Other community or economic development projects that support new investment and job creation The Revised Code of Washington article 53.08.245 authorizes the port to engage in economic development programs. While RCW 53.08.245 specifically permits ports to engage with non- Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 4f Page 4 of 6 Meeting Date: November 14, 2017 profit corporations in furtherance of such programs, it does not address port engagement with other governmental agencies. Another port district statute, RCW 53.08.240 (2) permits the Port to enter into contracts with other municipal corporations (as well as counties, US government and State). The Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 RCW, and specifically RCW 39.34.080, also permit such joint activity. The general requirement is that in all the joint activities, the two agencies must be able to exercise the same power separately as they intend to exercise jointly. RCW 35.21.703 authorizes cities to enter into economic development programs. These statutes allow the Port to make funds available to King County cities for the purpose of advancing programs that are consistent with Port related/authorized activities. Contracts or inter-local agreements will identify the specific obligations of each party (and the specific use of the Port funds) to ensure that partnerships and initiatives pursued are appropriate. Schedule June 26 Meeting with cities to highlight 2016 results and provide overview on 2017 program June 27 Public information (including web content) about Port Economic Development Partnership Program available August to November 2017 Agreements negotiated and approved with King County Cities June 2017 to May 2018 Project implementation June 2018 Project evaluation ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED Alternative 1 Delay action until October Cost Implications: Alternative 1 would cost nothing. Pros: (1) This provides time for Port to see what all the cities are doing before the Commission makes numerous individual commitments (2) A later deadline gives cities more time to develop their initiatives and complete their partnership grant applications. Cons: (1) The Port may not know what every city intends to do with partnership funds until October and the comprehensive view of program impacts still may not be completely clear (2) The Century Agenda's success depends in part on teamwork. Without active economic development partnerships with King County cities the Port may not realize Century Agenda aspirations and goals. Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 4f Page 5 of 6 Meeting Date: November 14, 2017 This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 2 Have each city present its proposed partnership initiative to the Commission as a basis for contract approval. Cost Implications: If the Commission approves (or declines) each city project it is difficult to pinpoint overall costs for the program. At the most, the cost would still be approximately $962,000 annually. Pros: (1) Allows the Commission to understand and approve each partnership project (2) Builds rapport between applicant cities and the Port Commission Cons: (1) It may be unwieldy to schedule 38 cities into Commission meetings (2) This process will likely create delays in overall project implementation This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 3 Approve partnership agreements for the three cities that are ready to implement economic development projects Cost Implications: The cost of these agreements is $124,320. If the Port entered into agreement with the other cities the program would cost approximately $965,000 annually (not including staff time) Pros: (1) Taking action on these agreements today is consistent with process timelines staff shared with cities at application workshops and in program literature. (2) Supporting agreements with three cities allows these jurisdictions to start work on their economic development initiatives right away. Cons: (1) It will be hard for the Commission to contrast details of each city grant and see how the broader grant program is being implemented when contracts are approved over several Commission meetings. This is the recommended alternative. Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 4f Page 6 of 6 Meeting Date: November 14, 2017 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds The Port Economic Development Partnership Program is a new initiative that will cost approximately $965,000 to implement in 2017. The Port property tax levy will be used to support the 2017 grant program. Future Revenues and Expenses (Total cost of ownership) The Port Economic Development Partnership Program is anticipated to operate annually. It will likely cost between $950,000 and $1,000,000 per year unless the Commission changes or eliminates the program. ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST (1) 2017 Economic Development Partnership Program (2) 2016 Summary Economic Development Partnership Grant Report PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS October 10, 2017 Commission authorized the Executive Director to execute twelve city contracts totaling $414,150 September 12, 2017 Commission authorized the Executive Director to execute six city contracts totaling $212,610 August 15, 2017 Commission authorized Executive Director to execute six city contracts totaling $235,785 June 27, 2017 Commission briefing on 2016 results November 8, 2017 Commission authorized CEO to execute four city contracts totaling $81,770 October 11, 2016 Commission authorized CEO to execute fifteen city contracts totaling $411,170 September 27, 2016 - Commission authorized CEO to execute three city contracts worth $132,350 August 23, 2016 Commission authorized CEO to execute nine city contracts worth $294,335 June 14, 2016 Commission authorized the Chief Executive Officer to: (1) establish a new economic development grant fund; (2) authorize up to $1,000,000 for 2016 grants to King County cities; and (3) perform necessary project management and contract administration to support the new grant program. Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.