Minutes Exhibit A
Minutes ExhibitA Port Commission Regular. Meeting of March 27, 2018 THE BRIEFING EPISODE 4 WHAT WENT WRONG, PART I - TRANSCRIPT I'm Steve Edmiston. I'm here to continue the briefing you should have received last year on NextGen and the impact of increased overflights two minutes at a time. Today l'll begin to discuss what went wrong with last year's briefing. I won't reach topics inexplicably omitted like the impact of airport noise on the human species until later comments. Today is about what went wrong with the topics your staff chose to include. For the very first topic, Mr. Shepherd, your Manager of Airport Noise Services, chose to update you on the noise complaint hot line. He showed increases. He never you a slide with three years of substantial complaint claimed any noise call was false or fraudulent. The problem was that Mr. Shepherd used the data to deliver a tactical punch: that a large number of the calls are made by a small number of people. In other words, the noise complaint data was used to question the citizen credibility. The current popular term is to weaponize. And consider this: just one month before an article your briefing was requested, the thinktank Mercatus published asserting activists must never be allowed to impede aviation growth, and so airports should discredit citizens by showing that a large number of airport complaints come from a small group of people. I don't know if this is where your staff got the idea. But I do know that discrediting citizens that complain about airport burdens is incompatible with what you say that our communities are unfairly burdened with the regional cost of noise and pollution and that our quality of life matters to you. The second thing that went wrong happened when your Director of Aviation Environmental Services, Ms. Purcell, showed you 260 additional flights are coming over our homes every day but then used the data only to circle back and state that this frequency growth was the cause of the increased hotline complaints. The problem is this: by choosing to plant the "it's only frequency" seed, Ms. Purcell appeared to promote a disquieting narrative right out of the Mercatus and Big Tobacco playbooks of shifting focus away from discussing the burdens to communities, and back to citizens as complainers, who had the poorjudgment to become addicted to smoking, or to move next to an airport. Thank you for giving a citizen twominutes to comment. THE BRIEFING THE BRIEFING YOU ASKED FOR BUT DID NOT RECEIVE IN TWO MINUTE PUBLIC COMMENTS PORT OF SEATTLE COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 27, 2018 STEVE EDMISTON Episode 4 What Went Wrong, Part | 1. What went wrong with what you were to d at the Apri 25, 2017, POS staf" noise briefing |\.) . Wi anyone brief on the 'rrpact of noise on the numan soeoies? \iCDO'I-DOO. Cold water on a hot comp'aint line. The 260 (more flig'its over homes past 3 years). Weaoonizing the data. Planting the bad "it's orly frequency" seed . What each of you say about the unfair erdens and quality of ife Why using the number of hotline calls is statistically invalid as a measurement of community dissatisfaction - We didn't study or poll our community to determine level of actual dissatisfaction in relation to aircraft operations from 2014-201 6. - We have not shown that in response to a noise hotline complaint, actua remedy or change is consistently provided to callers. Accordingly, we cannot possibly know ow this lack of response suppresses use of hotlines. - We have never studied or polled to determine how fight, and subsequent controversial increased -~ Runway, has contributed to suppression of co noise hotline will be effective tool for change. - Because we don't know how upset the communis is, . comment on the impact of NextGen or more igh . fre - upon this factor. Why we didn't research and present the pro's and con's of NextGen - You asked for briefing, here are the reasons we didn't understand that you wanted the negatives, too - We didn't mean to imply that economic benefits are a consideration when thinking about the human hea th a . Item No. 3c supp Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Noise Programs Er NextGen Briefing Arlyn Purcell, Director Aviation Environmental Services Stan Shepherd, Manager Airport Noise Programs David Suomi, FAA Deputy Regional Administrator Steve Karnes, FAA Senior Technical Advisor -_,_.,s_. ....l i "N" Port " of Seattle" Presentation Overview - Noise Information Hotline - Increased Operations - Economiclmpacts - Noise Contours - Noise Mitigation Programs - Fight Procedures _ Noise Information Hotline Noise Office Inquiries Noise Hotline Er online comment forms 2016: 2,959 10 people = 55% of comments ' 2015: 2,632 4 people = 59% of comments ' 2014: 2,172 4 people = 63% of comments Aircraft Operations - 2016: 412,170 operations 8%increase - 2015: 381,408 operations - 12%increase - 2014: 340,478 operations 7%increase - 2013: 317,186 operations The difference between 2013 and 2016 was 94,984 operations. That's 260 more aircraft going over homes per day. Sea-Tac Airport Economic Impacts - Economic Impact = $16.3 bil-ion annua--y in business revenue 0 Generates 171,769 jobs / 19,000 directly related to he airport - Approximately 4,000 airport employees live in the loca- cities - Each international flight generates $75 million annually to the economy - Tourism creates $365 million annually in state Er local taxes and approximately 140,000 jobs. Noise Contour Er Noise Remedy Boundary 2018 w "If Noise Remedy 65 DNL ,1. _ ' _L' "BEES ___' i . Boundary Contour j i. .7 ~ r" s. , _ .1 1' Seattle ' :1: Des Moines HI 'i' Federal Wavegf 5:? " a ' ""2 ""*"'=""'"*' U '-' "s, - a"? is!" SeaTac Accomplishments to Date 9400 Single-family homes sound insulated 8 Schools sound insulated 14 College buildings sound insulated 246 Condo units sound insulated 359 Mobile home units acquired and residents relocated Part 150 Approved Sound Mitigation Programs ' Single-Fami-y Residential Insulation Continuation of 1985 program - Condominium Insulation - Apartment Insulation - Pilot Project - Places of Worship Insulation - Pilot Project - South Approach Transition Zone Voluntary Residential Acquisition - School Insulation MOA with FAA Er School District Noise Abatement - Flight Procedure Monitoring Jet Noise Abatement Procedures North Flow Daytime North Flow Nighttime South Flow Noise / Departure Corridor Departure Corridor Abatement Procedures 06:00 - 21:59 + / 22:00 - 05:59 X + North of the + 520 bridge 8 nm and 8 nm and / 4k feet r" __ Initial Initial f _' '5 nm 9 "Departure Departure _{;orn'dor ' Corridor" ' 'opa'rtigm; i? av- - ' 3 Corridor Ly< 5 nm and 3kft Flight Paths Norm .F ow ot'1 F ow Ham"mul"t. pk. Ll. In, in. V.9 Ve, n p Ia"C"e. S.m...H.c.e 1 a? er" 9.. 9.0 . V , . NextGen And Conventional Approaches At SEA South Flow North Flow Conventional Approach Segment Black Dashed ' Line NextGen Track Segment Red Line South Flow Before and After Greener Skies March 28, 2012 March 29, 2017 '- \my . r \\ " \h .I/ A A. ' : E: 'f'?'"'&srej5;1;'kiesapproaefae's'arewaggiae'amy North Flow Before and After Greener Skies January 31, 2017 NextGen Narrowed A. roach Path NextGennNarrowe" A. o roach Path
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.