8a Motion 2019-13
Item Number: ____8a__________ Meeting Date: December 10, 2019 1 MOTION 2019-13: 2 A MOTION OF THE PORT OF SEATTLE COMMISSION 3 4 adopting guiding principles for the public-facing use of 5 biometric technology at Port of Seattle maritime and 6 aviation facilities; establishing a working group to 7 develop policy recommendations governing public- 8 facing biometric use at the port; and establishing 9 deadlines for further actions. 10 11 PROPOSED 12 DECEMBER 10, 2019 13 14 INTRODUCTION 15 16 Biometrics is the measurement and analysis of physical and behavioral characteristics that are 17 used to identify individuals through technology. An example of a physical characteristic includes 18 the unique features of an individual's face or their fingerprint. An example of a behavioral 19 characteristic includes an individual's voice, signature, or how they walk. 20 21 The Port of Seattle has long used various forms of biometrics at its aviation and maritime 22 facilities for access control and verification of employee, contractor, vendor, consultant 23 identity. However, biometric technology particularly facial recognition is increasingly being 24 deployed on the customer-facing side of airport and cruise operations, as both an identity 25 validation as well as a customer facilitation tool to speed up check-in, boarding and screening 26 processes. 27 28 As with any developing technology, public sector leaders have an obligation to ensure 29 appropriate and responsible use of not only the technology itself, but the related data that is 30 generated. The port commission believes proper biometric policy should balance operational 31 needs, business priorities and regulatory mandates with protections for the interests and rights 32 of passengers, employees and other visitors to our facilities. 33 34 TEXT OF THE MOTION 35 36 Port of Seattle Principles for Public-Facing Biometric Technology 37 The Commission hereby adopts the following principles to guide the use of public-facing 38 biometric technology at Port of Seattle facilities: 39 40 1) Justified: Biometric technology at port facilities should be used only for a clear intended 41 purpose that furthers a specific operational need. The port does not condone biometrics Motion 2019-13, Biometrics Principles and Biometrics Working Group Page 1 of 5 42 for "mass surveillance" for example, use of facial recognition on large groups of people 43 without a lawful purpose, rather than single-use for travelers. 44 45 2) Voluntary: The use of biometrics to identify and validate travelers through port facilities 46 should be voluntary, and reasonable alternatives should be provided for those who do 47 not wish to participate through a convenient "opt-in" or "opt-out" process, except in 48 specific situations authorized by the port or required by federal law such as U.S. 49 Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) entry and exit requirements for non-U.S. 50 citizens. Unintended capture of data by biometric technology from those travelers 51 opting out of such biometric data collection, or of any non-travelers or other visitors at 52 the airport, should be prevented; any unintended capture of this data should not be 53 stored. 54 55 3) Private: Data collected by biometric technology at port facilities or by port employees 56 from travelers through port facilities should be stored only if needed, for no longer than 57 required by applicable law or regulations, and should be protected against unauthorized 58 access. The port opposes this data being knowingly sold or used for commercial 59 purposes unrelated to processing travelers at port facilities without their clear and 60 informed consent. 61 62 4) Equitable: The port opposes discrimination or systemic bias based on religion, age, 63 gender, race or other demographic identifiers. Biometric technology used at port 64 facilities or by port employees should be reasonably accurate in identifying people of all 65 backgrounds, and systems should be in place to treat mismatching issues with proper 66 cultural sensitivity and discretion. 67 68 5) Transparent: Use of biometric technology for passenger processing at port facilities 69 should be communicated to visitors and travelers. Individuals should be notified about 70 any collection of their biometric data to facilitate travel at port facilities, and how that 71 data may be used, in easily understood terms. Reports on the performance and 72 effectiveness of the technology should also be made public to ensure accountability. 73 74 6) Lawful: Use of biometric technology and/or access to associated biometric data 75 collected should comply with all laws, including privacy laws and laws prohibiting 76 discrimination or illegal search against individuals or groups. 77 78 7) Ethical: The port and its partners should act ethically when deploying biometric 79 technology or handling biometric data. Ethical behavior means actions which respect 80 key moral principles that include honesty, fairness, equality, dignity, diversity and 81 individual rights. In particular, use of biometrics at port facilities should comply with 82 Resolution No. 3747, establishing the port's Welcoming Port Policy Directive to increase 83 engagement with, and support for, immigrant and refugee communities. 84 Motion 2019-13, Biometrics Principles and Biometrics Working Group Page 2 of 5 85 These principles will apply until a more comprehensive policy is put in place, through the 86 working group process laid out below. 87 88 Implementation of Biometric Principles for Maritime and Aviation Use 89 Port leadership will implement an approval process for any proposals for new or expanded use 90 of public-facing biometric technology to ensure alignment with these principles. Any proposal 91 for new or expanded use of public-facing biometric technology will be communicated in 92 advance directly to the port commission and through the port's external communications 93 channels. The use of public-facing biometric technology at port facilities is subject at all times to 94 the port's requirements, which may be revised and changed following implementation of port 95 policies through the working group process described below. Upon implementation, the Port's 96 biometric policies should be incorporated into commitments or agreements governing the use 97 of biometric technology at Port facilities. 98 99 Because the port does not have jurisdiction over the use of biometrics by the federal 100 government at our facilities, the port will communicate these principles to CBP and other 101 federal partners such as the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and U.S. Coast 102 Guard. We will not only notify them of our desired standards, but also work with these agencies 103 and Congress to ensure that federal programs in place at port facilities are aligned as closely as 104 possible with port policy regarding utilization of public-facing biometric technology. 105 106 Through this motion, a port working group is established to develop further recommendations 107 governing port policy related to use of public-facing biometric technology, which shall be 108 submitted to the commission by the end of the 2nd quarter of 2020. Issues to be addressed by 109 this working group include: 110 111 the strategic use and objectives of biometrics; 112 procurement; 113 transparency and accountability for biometric implementation; 114 auditing of this technology to ensure compliance and accuracy, and auditing prior to 115 approval of expansion of technology; 116 commitments or agreements with airlines, cruise operators, and other Port tenants and 117 users; 118 handling biometric data collected and stored from the technology; 119 protection of personally identifying information; 120 data security protocols and protection from unlawful or unauthorized access; 121 alignment with the port's Welcoming Port Policy; 122 state and federal policy priorities; 123 outreach and public awareness strategy to prepare travelers and community members; 124 and any other relevant topics that arise. 125 126 In addition, the working group should develop a comprehensive list of known public-facing 127 biometric implementation being planned at port facilities over the next five years. Motion 2019-13, Biometrics Principles and Biometrics Working Group Page 3 of 5 128 129 The working group will include, but not be limited to, representatives from the following port 130 departments: Aviation Security; Aviation Operations; Airport Innovation; Maritime Security; 131 Maritime Operations; Commission Office; Office of Equity, Diversity & Inclusion; Information 132 and Communications Technology; Information Security; Government Relations; Legal; and 133 Police. The working group shall also seek input from maritime and aviation industry partners 134 and other stakeholders. The policy recommendations shall be delivered to Commission by the 135 end of the 2nd quarter of 2020, and the Commission may create an ad hoc, limited term 136 Commission Committee to oversee these efforts. 137 138 STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION 139 140 Due to technological advances, perceived customer benefits and federal requirements, there 141 will be a significant increase in public-facing facial recognition technology deployment by public 142 and private sector users over the next few years, including in airport and seaport settings that 143 will impact travelers and other visitors to our facilities. In advance of this expansion, the port 144 commission believes that it has an obligation to institute proper policy frameworks and clear 145 guidelines to reduce potential misuse and abuse, while improving public understanding of the 146 benefits and risks. Specifically, the port must ensure individual privacy, civil liberties, and 147 equity, and that biometric technology and use of the associated data is aligned with state and 148 federal laws intended to protect those rights. 149 150 Biometrics are used in various forms at the port's aviation and maritime facilities: 151 152 Across the port, port-issued identification cards currently utilize fingerprint biometrics 153 to access secure or restricted areas or to permit authorized personnel access to port 154 facilities outside of normal business hours or in locations where there is no other 155 monitoring of access. In addition, many port employees are issued iPhones with 156 fingerprint and facial recognition as an alternative to password protection, and facial 157 recognition is also used on Microsoft Windows 10. 158 159 At Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), airport employees are required to 160 scan their fingerprint at many secure doors throughout the facility. Sea-Tac also offers 161 travelers the option of using CLEAR to validate the identity of a traveler as they process 162 through TSA checkpoints using biometric technology instead of using traditional 163 identification and validation methods. 164 165 On the maritime side, biometric data is required by federal regulation for issuance of 166 TSA-issued Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) smart cards that are 167 required to access maritime facilities regulated by the U.S. Coast Guard and cruise 168 terminal operational areas. In addition, the cruise industry is increasingly taking 169 advantage of biometrics as a passenger facilitation tool; for example, Norwegian Cruise 170 Line and CBP have partnered for use of facial recognition for disembarkation of guests at 171 Pier 66. Motion 2019-13, Biometrics Principles and Biometrics Working Group Page 4 of 5 172 173 One of the leading drivers of the expected deployment of public-facing biometrics over the next 174 few years is implementation by CBP of a Congressionally mandated biometric exit-entry 175 screening process for international air passengers. Sea-Tac's International Arrivals Facility will 176 incorporate facial recognition for almost all arriving passengers (other than those U.S. citizens 177 who opt-out), and CBP is working with the port and its airline partners to incorporate this 178 technology into departing international passenger processes. 179 180 Facial recognition is also increasingly being utilized by the port's private sector partners. Delta 181 Air Lines opened the first full biometric airport terminal in Atlanta in November 2018, and is 182 working to bring aspects of their "curb to gate" experience to Sea-Tac. Similarly, many of the 183 port's cruise partners are working to streamline the check-in and boarding process for their 184 travelers through facial recognition. 185 186 Some members of the public and various advocacy organizations have expressed concerns 187 about the rapidly expanding use of facial recognition. These stakeholders have raised issues 188 around privacy, equity and civil liberties, although their main focus has been on broad law 189 enforcement use of this technology for "mass surveillance" rather than the kind of customer 190 facilitation uses that are being considered at port facilities. They support the use of appropriate 191 regulation to ensure protections against abuse, discrimination and unintended consequences. 192 193 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED 194 Presentation slides Motion 2019-13, Biometrics Principles and Biometrics Working Group Page 5 of 5
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.