7c supp
ITEM NO: 7c_Supp . DATE OF MEETING: August 23, 2016 SUSTAINABLE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN (SAMP) UPDATE August 23, 2016 Briefing overview Current work Development concept progression Implementation plan Program cost model Next steps 2 Current work Implementation plan Project phasing Program cost model Landside & airside people movers/passenger flow analysis Landside concept refinement South Aviation Support Area (SASA) concept refinement No action alternative Airside modeling Determine annualized delay for 2029 & 2034 Determine delay reduction benefit of potential airside improvements Airfield compliance study to determine safety & efficiency improvements 3 Development concept progression Early development concept iterations Concept 1 Concept 2 Concept 3 NOTE: Development concepts illustrate major plan elements independent of 1 vs 2 terminals Concepts 1-3 do not meet airport wide program needs 4 Development concept progression Concept 4 provided basis for development concept Major elements New widebody international gates on Concourse B Gate expansion to the north Aircraft hold positions provided north and south of existing and future gates SASA to accommodate functions displaced by gate and hardstand expansion Primary advantages Primary challenges Meets program needs Complexity of developing new airfield- Best operational layout connected land Complexity of construction phasing Concept 4 Concept 4 meets airport wide program needs 5 Development concept progression Variations on gate expansion Three pier gate expansion to the north U-shaped gate expansion to the north Variations on gate expansion involve pros and cons 6 Development concept progression Pros & cons of U-shaped gate expansion concept Pros: Cons: Provides same gate capacity as three piers Relatively inflexible string of Additional aircraft hold positions provided dimensions from west to east in ideal location west of gates Difficult to integrate with roadways Greater flexibility for gating airlines Single loaded concourse provides less Greater flexibility for phasing in gates opportunity for shared holdrooms and Relatively flexible string of dimension concessions from south to north U-shaped concept provides additional aircraft hold positions and operational flexibility 7 Development concept progression Variations on aircraft maintenance locations All aircraft maintenance in SASA Aircraft maintenance split between SASA and north cargo area Aircraft maintenance in north cargo area involves trade-offs with cargo 8 Development concept progression SASA alternative facilities layouts Aircraft maintenance split between SASA and north cargo area Would reduce the overall number of cargo aircraft parking positions GRE not located in convenient place for north end maintenance Aircraft maintenance in north cargo area involves trade-offs with cargo 9 Development concept progression SASA 3D model perspectives Aerial view of SASA looking southeast 10 Development concept progression SASA 3D model perspectives Aerial view of SASA looking west 11 Development concept progression SASA 3D model perspectives Aerial view of SASA looking west Ground level view of SASA looking northwest SASA cut walls on east side serve as a buffer to land uses to the east 12 Development concept progression Status of current development concept On-going study to determine recommendations for the following: Airside improvements Landside and airside people movers Commercial development in SASA (working with CoST) Working toward development concept recommendation 13 Implementation plan Major driver for capital program is gate & hardstand demand Deficit of approximately 17 gates in the mid-term 87 gates post opening of IAF & NorthSTAR 104 gate demand forecasted by 2024 at 440,000 annual operations Need approximately 35 gates in the long-term 122 gate demand forecasted by 2034 at 530,000 annual operations 125 122 gates 120 115 113 gates 110 Gate 105 Demand 104 gates 100 95 90 440,000 490,000 530,000 Annual Operations Deficit of approximately 17 gates at 440,000 annual operations 14 Implementation plan Purpose Determine logical sequence of projects to deliver needed capacity thru full build-out of airport facilities Target capital investments to minimize throwaway Determine high level scope, purpose and timing of projects to inform environmental review Identify enabling & capacity enhancement projects Identify near-term projects requiring "project specific" environmental review Build program cost model to inform plan of finance Determine order of magnitude project costs Approximate mid point of construction & day of operation Implementation plan purpose is high level phasing/definition of projects 15 Implementation plan Approach Sequence projects to add gate & hardstand capacity as soon as possible Sequence North Terminal to align with gate expansion Roadway improvements to connect North Terminal to regional network, local streets, and Main Terminal Pedestrian bridge to connect North Terminal to new gates Minimize impacts to cargo facilities until additional capacity is constructed in SASA Construct landside & airside people movers and improved light rail access as soon as possible Maintain Airport Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) response capabilities (airside, terminal & landside) Implementation plan approach - deliver needed capacity as soon as possible 16 Implementation plan Phase 1 construction 1. SASA platform & aircraft bridge, aircraft maintenance hangars to clear site for south hardstand, and cargo facilities to enable additional impacts to cargo in phase 2 2. West side maintenance campus to clear SASA site and area for north hardstand 3. Gate & hardstand expansion with minimal impact to cargo, roadway improvements, landside & airside people movers, and north terminal connected to gates 2 West side maintenance campus 3 Gate & hardstand expansion, roadways, people movers and north terminal 1 SASA 17 Implementation plan Phase 2 construction 1. South hardstand expansion 2. Concourse B reconstruction to provide international widebody capable gates 3. Gate expansion to the north with significant impacts to cargo 4. North end cargo facilities redevelopment 2 Concourse B 4 Cargo 1 South hardstand reconstruction 3 Gate expansion redevelopment expansion 18 Implementation plan Phase 1A Expand Cargo 5 hardstand Vacate and demolish Swissport cargo building Construct interim secondary ARFF Vacate and renovate United Airlines aircraft maintenance Construct primary ARFF in GA area (not shown) Hardstand Expn. Swissport UA Maint. Interim Secondary ARFF 19 Implementation plan Phase 1B Clear area for gate expansion Relocate southbound lanes of North Airport Expressway (NAE) Relocate fuel rack & demolish ARFF Expand Cargo 4/3 hardstand Vacate and demolish Port maintenance (requires west side maintenance campus) Clear area for construction of North Terminal Vacate and demolish Gate Gourmet and Port field offices Hardstand Expn. Fuel Rack Port Maint. ARFF Gate Gourmet NAE Doug Fox Parking Relocation Port Field Offices 20 Implementation plan Phase 1C Construct gate expansion Construct ARFF Construct North Terminal & parking garage Pedestrian bridge connection to gates Curbs and roadway connections to regional and local network Construct landside & airside people movers and improved LRT access Gate Expn. Secondary Improved ARFF LRT Access Landside People Mover North Terminal & 21 Parking Garage Implementation plan Phase 1D Construct gate expansion to Concourse D Demolish interim ARFF Gate Expn. to Concourse D 22 Implementation plan Factors that could impact project delivery Funding Economic downturn Resource availability Project approvals Utilities Environmental review/permitting Project linkages Many factors could impact project delivery 23 SAMP program cost model Preliminary range of full program costs At this stage, program cost range is very preliminary: $10B - $15B Includes prospective placeholder estimates for individual projects Some project scopes and placeholder estimates are not yet fully synced up with phasing plan which is in progress Some potential projects are still being studied and so have not been adequately defined examples include: Airside & landside people movers End around taxiways Program cost range is very preliminary 24 SAMP program cost model Several factors can influence project cost post SAMP Additional layers of project planning and definition Utilities survey, planning and design Project phasing/ constructability Program cost range is very preliminary 25 Next steps Implementation plan Finalize phasing plan recommendation Refine program cost model Continued coordination with FAA Airfield compliance and airside modeling SAMP documentation Finalize passenger flow analysis and recommendation for airside and landside people movers Refine North Terminal roadway and curbside concept Continued work with environmental review team to define no action alternative and draft project descriptions Commission update in September 26
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.