7b supp IAF
Item No.: 7b_supp Meeting Date: November 10, 2015 REVISED: November 5, 2015 International Arrivals Facility (IAF) Update Briefing November 10, 2015 Agenda Airline Engagement Design-Build Contract Overview Three Contract Periods Validation Work Performed Conclusions Reached Deliverables Next Steps Target Budget & Schedule Contract Execution Timetable 2 Airline Engagement Two Airline Technical Representatives (ATR) Role on the International Arrivals Facility: Ensure the airlines are kept up-to-date on the Airport's IAF planning activities Communicate airline ideas/concerns to the Airport Useful Information Routinely Posted on the Airline Collaboration Site Ongoing and Open Communication with the Airlines 3 Airline Engagement 45 Airlines Briefings from 2010 to Present Commission-lead 90-day review & 4 Airline discussions Upcoming Stakeholder Meetings: November 18: Airline Tech Review /Planning Update Other briefing as requested Airline Involvement Continually Encouraged 4 Airline Action on IAF Funding First $300M was included in Exhibit F and approved when SLOA III was executed by the airlines in November 2013 $608M updated estimate was the focus of the recent MII Ballot MII Ballot Mailed - September 9, 2015 Rejected: 19 Against; 5 Airlines For, 5 Abstained 6 month rejection waiting period ends March 6, 2016 The airlines have currently approved $300M for the IAF 5 Design-Build Contract Selection Process - August 2014 to July 2015 Clark/SOM Selected June 24, 2015 Contract Execution - July 20, 2015 New York CLARK SOM San Francisco Los Angeles CONSTRUCTION Toronto, Canada Berlin, Germany The Design-Build Team is Now Engaged 6 Design-Build Contract Validation GMP Development Post-GMP Period Period Period Today 4Q16 Commence Design, Develop GMP, Preliminary Construction & Long Lead Time Item Procurement Working towards Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) 7 Validation Period The 120-Day Period Commenced at Contract Signing (July 20, 2015) First 60 Days (Completed): Reviewed 4,500 Page Project Definition Document Evaluated Current IAF Concept in PDD Evaluated Peer Review Recommendations from Commission Sponsored 90 Day Program Review Developed/Analyzed Numerous Alternative Configurations Narrowed Analysis to One Concept Design-Builder Gains Understanding of the Project 8 Validation Period Second 60 Days (Underway Ends 11/17/15): Prepare Key Contract Deliverables: Early Schematic Design Target Schedule Target Budget Prepare Other Plans & Reports Develop a Contract Execution Timetable (Commitments vs. Cash Flow over Project Duration) Design-Builder to Submit Contract Deliverables at End of Validation 9 Validation Period Plans & Reports: Basis of Design Design Review & Control Plan PDD Validation Report Design-Builder Implementation Partnering Charter Plan Stakeholder Engagement Plan Subcontracting Plan Performance Incentive Plan Subcontractor Procurement Plan BIM Model & Execution Plan Small Business Participation Plan QA/QC Plan Contractor Access Plan Site Specific Safety Plan Security Plan Project Management Plan Contract Close-out Plan Other Contract Deliverables 10 Second Contract Period GMP Development Period: Advance design to 60% level (or beyond) Undertake preliminary construction Purchase long lead-time items (e.g., steel, curtain wall and escalators/elevators) Negotiate Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for the work (4Q16) Advance Design and Develop a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) 11 Third Contract Period Post-GMP Period: Complete design Complete construction Activate the facility (4Q19) Complete and Open the New International Arrivals Facility 12 Project Elements Evaluated in First 60 Days 1. Passenger Movement: Bridge or Tunnel 2. Passenger Bridge: Alignment - Gates A7/A8 or Gates A10/A11 Type - Arch, Truss or Cable-Stayed Width & Direction of Flow - One-Way vs. Two-Way Vertical Circulation Cores - Number & Locations 3. Secure Corridor Location - Interior or Exterior 4. IAF Layout: Pilot Program or Traditional One or Two Floors Bus operation under the IAF Yes/No Project Elements Reviewed by the Design-Builder 13 Validation Conclusions The work undertaken by Port staff & its consultants over past two years was validated by Clark/SOM and deemed to be robust and comprehensive. Additionally, the Design-Builder found several opportunities to enhance the Port's earlier work product. Port's Advance Planning Work Validated by the Design-Builder 14 Validation Conclusions 1. Passenger Movement - Validated Bridge or Tunnel PDD Connection from SSAT to Concourse A Validated by Design-Builder 15 Validation Conclusions 1. Passenger Movement: Bridge or Tunnel 2. Passenger Bridge Validated and Enhanced Alignment - Between A10 & A11 Type - Arch Width 42' vs Tapered from 16' to 35' Direction of Flow - Two-Way Vertical Circulation Cores - 4 @ the Sterile Corridor and 1 @ the Bridge Bridge Design Elements Validated by the Design-Builder 16 Bridge Alignment Options Considered 17 Aircraft Layout Enhanced & Bridge Alignment Validated 18 Early Schematic of Arch Concept Proposed by the Design-Builder 19 Arch Concept Modified and Refined by the Design-Builder 20 Validation Conclusions 1. Passenger Movement: 2. Passenger Bridge: Alignment Type Width & Direction of Flow Vertical Circulation Cores 3. Secure Corridor Location Validated Interior or Exterior Location of Secure Corridor on Concourse A Validated by Design-Builder 21 Exterior Position of Sterile Corridor Validated by the Design-Builder 22 Validation Conclusion 1. Passenger Movement 2. Passenger Bridge: Alignment Type Width & Direction of Flow Vertical Circulation Cores 3. Secure Corridor Location 4. IAF Layout Validated Pilot Program (Automated Primary) or Conventional One or Two Floors Bus operation under the IAF Yes No IAF Design Elements Validated by the Design-Builder 23 IAF Two-Floor Design Concept Validated by the Design-Builder 24 Next Steps Refine the Validated PDD Concept in Order to: Develop a Target Schedule Generate a Target Budget Create a Contract Execution Timetable Design-Builder Developing Key Deliverables Based on Validated Concept 25 Target Budget: GMP: Final Project Cost: Design-Builder deliverable Target Budget advanced The Design-Builder is at the end of Validation through +/-60% design incentivized to reduce Period. A not-to-exceed development to a guaranteed costs. Shares 25% of (NTE) "design-to" budget. maximum. the cost savings between the GMP & Final Project Cost. Shared Savings $ $ $ UNDERWAY 4Q2016 4Q2019 GMP Delivers Price & Schedule Certainty 26 Target Schedule Start Subcontractor Procurement- February, 2016 Start Early Construction - March, 2016 Complete 30% Design - June, 2016 Complete 60% Design - November, 2016 Complete 90% Design - March, 2017 Complete Design-June 2017 Construction Complete 3Q19 IAF Opening- 4Q19 Design-Builder Submits a Target Schedule Based on Validation Concept 27 Target Budget Design $ Construction - Bridge $ - Sterile Corridor $ - IAF $ WA State Tax $ Program Support $ _______ IAF Total $ Design-Builder Submits Target Budget Based on Validation Concept 28 Schematic Contract Execution Timetable Total Program Port Budget Program Budget Port Program Support Authorization Target Budget Design-Builder Due Target Budget GMP 12/8/15 Procure Steel Procure Escalators/Elevators Design-Builder Cash Flow Preliminary Construction Design Current Auth. 12/08/15 4Q16 4Q19 Time Contractual Commitments Cash Expenditure to Meet Commitments and Build Project Contract Execution Timetable Recommended to Take Full Advantage of Progressive Design Build 29 Thank you Tentatively Scheduled to Return on 12/08/15 at Completion of Validation 30
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.