4c
PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 40 ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting May 12, 2015 DATE: May 5, 2015 TO: Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer FROM: Robin A. Romeo, Director, Labor Relations Kim Ramsey, Labor Relations Manager SUBJECT: Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Port of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 117 representing the Port of Seattle Police Department Non-Sworn Supervisors ACTION REQUESTED Request Commission authorization for the Chief Executive Ofcer to execute a new collective bargaining agreement between the Port of Seattle and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 117 covering the Port of Seattle Police Department Non-Swom Supervisors. This contract has a three-year term from January 1, 2014 December 31, 2016. SYNOPSIS This three year agreement provides cost of living increases, restructured pay scales, introduces for the rst time premium share on medical. The agreement also includes other non-wage terms and conditions of employment for the three (3) FTE POS Police Department Non-Sworn Supervisor bargaining unit. The estimated total three year cost of this agreement is $27,413 9. . BACKGROUND The agreement is the result of good faith bargaining and has been ratied and executed by the Union. This unit includes one Administrative Supervisor and two Communication Supervisors. Employees in this bargaining unit supervise the day to day activities of the Police Administrative Specialists and Police Communication Specialists (Police and Fire Dispatchers) within the Port's Police Department. SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT 0 Term of the Agreement: January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Pick, Chief Executive Ofcer May 5, 2015 Page 2 of 3 . 0 Modifications in Article 3 - Union Security language is updated to include the non- association exception in RCW 41.56 and inserts due process requirements for employees terminated for non-payment of dues. Modification in Article 7 Equal Employment Opportunity to standardize language across contracts. - Modification in Article 9 ~ Seniority and Reduction in Force to provide a "return to former position" optiOn for probationary employees in the bargaining unit. Addition oflanguage in Article 12 - Hours of Work to incorporate a previously negotiated MOU providing the Administrative Supervisor with an unpaid lunch period in exchange for a wage increase. Modification to Article 13 - Vacation to 1) eliminate "p001ed leave" provisions; 2) establish the vacation leave accrual rates and cap at Port or Department standard; and, 3) provide a vacation cash out option consistent with Port policy. All modications for consistency and ease of administration purposes. Modification to Article 19 Sick Leave to eliminate the sick leave cap and pooled leave provision consistent with Port standard. Modication to Article 21 Health and Welfare that provides; 1) continuation of coverage under Washington Teamsters Welfare Trust; 2) for a $75/month premium share for bargaining unit employees; and 3) union cooperation regarding Affordable Care Act requirements. Appendix A Pay Rates establishes multi-step pay scales replacing single rates for each classication, annual COLAs, and longevity and education incentive premiums comparable with other Police Department contracts. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The cost impact of this agreement is based on the estimated increase in the medical benets premiums of eight percent (8%) per year and a two percent (2%) cost of living increase in 2016. $8,912 $5,154 $5,012 _$2,868 $1,973 $3,521 Total $11,779 $7,127 $8 533 9 COMMISSION'AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief EXecutive Ofcer May 5, 2015' Page 3 013 This increase in expense is included in the 2014, 2015, and 2016 budgets of the Port of Seattle ' Police Depattrnent. ATTACHMENTS TO THIS RE! QUEST o The collective bargailng agreement PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 0 None
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.