COMMISSION 
AGENDA MEMORANDUM                Item No.       6a 
ACTION ITEM                   Date of Meeting     January 9, 2018 
DATE:    January 2, 2018 
TO:     Dave Soike, Interim Executive Director 
FROM:   Peter Garlock, Chief Information Officer 
SUBJECT:  Technology Consulting Services for future projects and operations 
Amount of this request:                $0 
Maximum Contract Value:        $3,000,000 
ACTION REQUESTED 
Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to execute two indefinite delivery,
indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts for technology contractors as needed to support systems,
projects, and services for a total amount not to exceed $3,000,000, with a contract ordering
period not to exceed five years. There is no funding request associated with this authorization. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
The Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department must intermittently utilize
information technology contractors whenever specific services or unique technical skills are
required. In the past, examples of specialized systems skills have included wireless network
redesign, and upgrades to Maximo, PeopleSoft and SharePoint. Resource requirements for
these specialized services and skills can fluctuate significantly with project workloads and
system maintenance requirements. It is therefore impractical to hire full time staff to meet
these short term specialized needs. In addition, there are numerous occasions where these
specialized skills are needed on short notice to resolve problems, implement a necessary
system enhancement, or quickly meet an unanticipated compliance issue. To more effectively
meet these needs, in December 2006, November 2009, and December 2012, the Commission
authorized ICT to utilize IDIQ contracts  to streamline the process of hiring temporary
contractors to supplement Port technical staff.
IDIQ contracts provide the Port with the flexibility to meet business requirements as they arise
by issuing individual service directives to accomplish tasks within a general, pre-defined scope
of work on an as needed basis for a fixed period of time and a maximum contract amount. 
This request is to execute two contracts. The first will be valued at $2,500,000 and will be
awarded to the highest-ranked qualified firm. The second will be valued at $500,000 and will be
awarded to the highest-ranked qualified Certified Small Business. If the highest ranked firm is

Template revised September 22, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 6a                       Page 2 of 3 
Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 
itself a Small Business Enterprise, the entire $3,000,000 will be awarded to this firm. If either
firm is unable to supply qualified candidates, any remaining funds may be transferred to the
other contract. 
DETAILS 
Technical consulting services will include of a variety of skillsets including Project Management,
Testing, Client Support, Development, and Engineering. In the previous five years, ICT has
issued 23 service directives against the current IDIQ contracts. 
Scope of Work 
Service directives will be written with stipulated not-to-exceed amounts and will identify the
scope of services. The contracts will have a duration of five years; however, because there is a
five-year ordering period, contract duration may be extended to allow for work initiated during
the contract ordering period to be fully implemented. Each service directive will specify the
specific scope, duration, and schedule associated with the work. 
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED 
Alternative 1  Complete a separate procurement each time technical services are required 
Pros: 
(1)   Separate contract procurements would allow consulting firms multiple opportunities
to compete for each individual project. 
Cons: 
(1)   Reduces our ability to quickly react to emerging business requirements. 
(2)   This alternative would increase overhead and administrative costs to the Port as we
would need to manage more procurement processes and contracts. 
This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 2  Increase Port Staff to provide technical services 
Cons: 
(1)   It will take significant time to hire staff with the necessary skill sets. This would delay
critical projects. 
(2)   New Port Staff would need to have a broad set of specific skills which would be
difficult to acquire in a manageable number of additions. Consultants have staff with
these skills and can utilize them on an hour by hour basis as needed. 
This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 3  Procure two IDIQ contracts to provide Technical Consulting services. 
Pros: 
(1)   This alternative would ensure the Port has the functional or technical resources with
the necessary skills to assist with future projects as needed. 

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 6a                       Page 3 of 3 
Meeting Date: January 9, 2018 
(2)   Significant time and procurement cost would be saved by consolidating procurements
for future projects. 
(3)   Improves ability to react quickly to emerging business requirements. 
Cons: 
(1)   The number of opportunities available to firms to compete for individual projects is
limited. 
This is the recommended alternative. 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
The total estimated project services will not exceed $3,000,000. No work is guaranteed to the
consultants and the Port is not obligated to pay the consultant until a service directive is
executed and services are provided. After receiving authorization for each project in
accordance with Port policy, the actual work will be fully defined and the Port will issue
individual project-specific service directives. 
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST 
None 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
December 12, 2012  The Commission authorized multiple IDIQ contracts for a total not to
exceed $6,000,000 over five years 
November 23, 2009  The Commission authorized multiple IDIQ contracts for a total not to
exceed $11,000,000 over three years 
December 12, 2006  The Commission authorized multiple contracts for a total not to
exceed $3,500,000 over three years 







Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.