Minutes Exhibit E
Port Commission Special Meeting
of April 10, 2018

EXHIBIT 1

Proposed 2018 Supplemental Operating Budget
PSHB 2299 (H-4871.2) By Representativegm
February 20, 2018 Ofce of Program Research
H-4871.2I18 2nd draft

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

General FundState Appropriation (FY 2018)

*'ki'

The appropriations in this section are subject to the following conditions and limitations:

tit

SECTION 126
(54)(a) $400,000 of the general fundstate appropriation for scal year 2019 and
$400,000 of the general fundlocal appropriation age provided solely for the
department to contract with a consultant to study the current and ongoing impacts of the
SeaTac international airport. The general fundstate funding provided in this
subsection serves as a state match and may not be spent unless $400,000 of local
matching funds is transferred to the department. The department must seek feedback
this
on project scoping and consultant selection from the cities listed in (b) of
subsection.

(b) The study must include, but not be limited to:

(i) The impacts that the current and ongoing airport operations have on quality of
life associated with air trafc noise, public health, trafc, congestion, and parking
in residential areas, pedestrian access to and around the airport, public safety
and crime within the cities, effects on residential and nonresidential property
values, and economic development opportunities, in the cities of SeaTac, Burien,
Des Moines, Tukwila, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and other impacted
neighborhoods; and

(ii) Options and recommendations for mitigating any negative impacts identied
through the analysis.

(0) The department must collect data and relevant information from various sources
including the port of Seattle, listed cities and communities, and other studies.

(d) The study must be delivered to the legislature by December 1, 2019.

EXHIBIT 2

RE: Follow up query on Sheila Brush public comment


March 19, 2018 a14216 PM
,,
RE: Follow up query on Sheila Brush public comment

To: Steve W Edmiston
<9 1 V

Hi Steve 
The Port provided the language below to Representative-ft- consideration.

'
B_udge__m_th__tP     Language
are
$400,000 ofthe generalmdstate appropriationforscal year 2019 and $400,000 ofthe generalfund local appropriation
the SeaTac International
provided solelyfor the department to contract with a consultant to study the current and ongoing impacts of
and may not be spent unless $400,000 of
Airport. The generalfundstatefunding provided in this subsection serves as a state match
local matchingfunds is transferred to the department.

or entities including
(b) Thenal study scope shall be developed by the Department ofCommerce, in consultation with organizations
members of the Washington State Legislature, the Port ofSeattle, and the cities listed in subsection (c)(i).

(c) The study scope must include, but not be limited to:
(i)          The impacts that the current and ongoing airport operations have air traic noise, public health, tra'ic, congestion, and
in the
parking in residential areas, effects on residential and nonresidential property values, and economic development opportunities,
cities ofSeaTac, Burien, Des Moines, Tukwila, Federal Way, Normandy Park
(ii)          The benets to the some cities referenced in paragraph (ii) derived due to proximity to the airport, including wages and
tied to airport-related operations, and
taxesfrom airport-related operations, property tax derivedfrom commercial development directly
improved access to transit resultingfrom proximity to the airport
the
(iii)         Options and recommendationsfor mitigating any negative impacts, or bolstering potential benets identied through
analysis, including what role the state plays in addressing impacts and benets.
listed cities and
(c) The department must collect data and relevant informationom various sources including the port ofSeattle,
communities, regional planning agencies, and other studies.
(d) The study must be delivered to the legislature by December 1, 2019.


00638

EXHIBIT 3 (redline of Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2)



Hi Steve 
The Port provided the language below to Representativ. for I-Jnslderatlon.
budget Proviso Language
$400,000 of the generalfundstate appropriation forfiscal year 2019 and $400,000 of the general
fundlocal appropriation are provided solelyfor the department to contract with a consultant to study
the current and ongoing impacts of the SeaTac intemaenatairporhlntematianal Airport. The general
fundstatefunding provided In this subsection serves as a state match and may not be spent unless
$400,000 oflocal matchingfunds is transferred to the department"Phe-departmentmastseek-feedbaek
Wmmmmmmmmm_
ib) The nal study scope shall be developed by the Department of Commerce, in consultation with
organizations or entities Includinq members of the Washinqton State Legislature, the Port ofSeattle, and
the cities listed In subsection (CHI).

(c) The study scope must include, but not be limited to:
(I)         The impacts that the current and ongoing airport operations-_have enqualltyof-llfe
asseeiatedwiteair traffic noise, public-health, traffic, congestion, and parking in residential
areas,pedeanaeeeswmwmkpenrpubhafemdfmewlthmthede effects on
residential and nonresidential property-values, and economic development opportunities, in the cities
of_$eaTac, Burien, Des Moines, Tukwila, Federal Way, Normandy Park
(ii)         The benets to the some cities referenced in paraqraph (ii) derived due to proximity to the
airport includinq wages and taxes from airport-related operations, property tax derived from
commercial development directly tied to airport-related operations, and otheHmpaeEed
neighboeheedsaendimproved access to transit resultinq from proximity to the airport
(+i-Hill)        Options and recommendationsfor mitigating any negative Impacts, or bolstering
the state plays In addressing
poten tial benets Identified through the analysis, Includinq what role
impacts and benets.
(c) The department must collect data and relevant Information from various sources including the port of
Seattle, listed cities and communities, regional planning aqencIes, and other studies._
(d) The study must be delivered to the legislature by December 1, 2019.


Port of Seattle



~
-A- 0... -.-7
.7--_7 ,e.._.a  __..._ -V wwv-w47w  t..V .. .--vr._,__.,____.-V-._.y
A .77
*-___..,-,...r    .77 . ....e.t-~

EXHIBIT 4


From: Quiet Skies qtdetsldespugetsounngmallcom
Subloot: Fwd: Budget proviso on community and eoonomlc Impacts of Sea-Tao International Airport
Date: March 12. 2018 at 2:07 PM
To: Steve W Edmiston steve@braoepointlaw.oom. cheryievanscsr123 corn


Forwarded message
From: Commission-Office commlggjgngmeinlggp
Date: Mon, Mar 12. 2018 512:03 PM
Subject: Budget proviso on community and economic Impacts oI Sea-Tao International Airport
To: "QWQQMQMM"qubukmnuomnomitm
Cc: 'Felioman. Fred" . 'Gregolre. Courtney" Wmegtggp. 'Bowmen. Stephenie'
WW.'Caiklna. Ryan'W I III g>. 'Stelnbrueok. Petal"Wow-19>.
'Matruck. Steve"WW. "Lyme. Laneo'4W>. 'Halse. Katie'WW

Dear Ms. Brush:

Thank you for your letter concerning the proposed Washington State
2018 operating budget proviso to conduct a study of impacts of the
Sea-Tao International Airport.

Our region is experiencing tremendous economic growth and we see
that reflected in the increased operations at Sea-Tao. For the seventh
t.-. .-.
consecutive vear. mum".                                  c
fund a stud'il 'Ufair'pcrt impacts.   .
v .
r                  appears eat to                                    '
The state legasiature_ .            mm. The on rt maintains
- the

' iamentallbuda
t for sca' treat
an                                                                   .7. .._...
"
state {Em};
Enmmiasion remains firm in its belief that               we will
DE                                                                          53"
on othEi' Willa-"That.    I" did
be use'd more productively                               ata
'                                                           inf-otrnatnon an
he stud-hi with
Stild'i' mover; fematd-                                 ,_
V
they need 3'5th _"w-'_ .-a.m.r..uuaoauly'
_
mwer-emISSI'on sustainable aviation fuels to all flights
, ,,...,..-..uw

__
,

'
' ""
"             leaving Sea-Tac. As we evaluate our Sustainable Airport Master Plan,

we will continue to evaluate potential impacts and ensure that local
residents benefit from the growth of the airport.

THE BRIEFING
THE BRIEFING YOU ASKED FOR BUT DID NOT RECEIVE 
IN TWO MINUTE PLBLIC COMMENTS

PORT OF SEATTLE COMMISSION MEETING
APRIL 10, 2018
STEVE EDMISTON

Time Out: Spec'a (Public) Comment on
"Not Neutrality"=
1. The State and the sixcity Mitigation Study
2. A Port of Seattle Dec'aration of Neu:rali:y
3. The docvnent that shouldn't exist
"
4.  Fingerprints, fists, and the definition of "neLtra
5. AbOLt deleting OLr association to duality of ife:
- Corrosive to citizen perceptions of Port's transpa'ency

- Crushing impact on airport ne'ghbor community trust

- Unneasurab e impact on pending SAMP engagement

Time Out: Special (Public) Comment on "Not
Neutrality"
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
- Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride (1987)
neu-tral
/'n(y)o_otrel/ 49
adjective
1.  not helping or supporting either side in a conict. disagreement. etc.; impartiai.
"during the Second World War. Portugal was neutral"
synonyms: impartial, unbiased, unprejudiced. objective, equitable, open-minded. nonpartisan,
disinterested, dispassionate, detached. impersonal, unemotional, indifferent,
uncommitted
"a neutral judge"
- unaligned, nonaligned, unafliated, unallied, uninvolved;
noncombatant
"Switzerland remained neutral'
-
_..'.__._.__.-__~_..,____._.. ___.._.__.' _._._._.____,_ _.

Time Out: Specia' (Public) Comment
Companion Public Records Request
With respect to the fol owing Subjects (identified in Commission President Gregoire's March 12, 2018, e-
mail to Port Commissioners, Executive Director Merrick, Lance Lyttle, and Quiet Skies Puget Sound),
please provide all documents, including but not limited to emails, texts, videos, photographs, data and
other physical or electronic records, or memoranda, whether draft or final, that refer, relate to, or include,
in whole or part, communications by or between Port of Seattle staff, contractors, consultants, any Port of
Seattle Commissioner, state legislator or state legislative staff, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
and/or any other person or entity.

Subjects:
(1) The drafting, comments, revisions, language (initial proposed, drafts at al stages, or final),
and/or purpose of the Washington 2019 supplemental budget proviso for fiscal 2019 studying airport
impacts in Des Moines, Burien, Normandy Park, Federal Way, Kent and Tukwila ("mitigation study").

(2) The drafting, comments, revisions, language (initial proposed, drafts at all stages, or final),
and/or purpose of the UW air quality study legislation focused on aircraft-related ultrafine particulates
(UFPs) around the airport.

Purpose of request: to determine the full scope and extent of Port of Seattle's actions  including proposed changes to
the legislation during the legislative process  relating to the Subjects. This request seeks documents from October 1,
2016, to present.