PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 
COMMISSION AGENDA                   Item No.        6c 
Date of Meeting     December 7, 2010 

DATE:      December 1, 2010 
TO:        Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:     Stephanie Jones Stebbins, Director, Seaport Environmental & Planning 
Elizabeth Leavitt, Director, Aviation Planning and Environmental Services 
SUBJECT:   2011-2015 Environmental Remediation Liability Program.
Amount of This Request: $31,200,000       Source of Funds: Airport  Airport Development
Fund; Real Estate and Seaport  Operating Funds and
Tax Levy 
Est. State and Local Taxes: N/A                 Est. Jobs Generated:
ACTIONS REQUESTED:
Requst Commission authorization for:
1) spending $15,000,000 in 2011 for Environmental Remediation Liability.
2) obligating $16,200,000 in 2011 for work that will be performed in later years, and
3) Commission approval of the five-year spending plan of $67,960,000 for the Environmental
Remediation Liability Program for Seaport, Real Estate and Airport for 2011 through 2015. 
SYNOPSIS: 
As a major industrial and commercial land owner, the Port has significant environmental cleanup
liabilities due to historic contamination of its properties. Since 1993, the Port has booked liabilities to
recognize these obligations. While Port environmental cleanup projects typically span several years,
more complex projects have been active for over 10 years. This  $15,000,000 authorization for 2011
will allow us to continue ongoing environmental testing, analysis, design, cleanup, and monitoring for
our active sites and will initiate similar activities for new sites, as noted in this memorandum.
The approval of the five year plan gives greater visibility to our projected upcoming environmental
remediation liability spending. In addition, the authorization to enter multi-year contracts and service
directives will allow us to more efficiently contract for work of multiyear duration. The actual funds in
years beyond 2011 will not be spent until the spending is authorized by a future Commission action
(i.e., next year's Environmental Remediation Liability spending authorization).

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
December 1, 2010 
Page 2 of 10 

BACKGROUND: 
The Port has identified a number of contaminated sites on Seaport, Real Estate and Aviation properties
that must be investigated and remediated in compliance with federal and state environmental laws and
regulations. In some cases, the Port has been designated by the federal government as a "Potentially
Responsible Party" (PRP), and/or by the state government as a "Potentially Liable Party" (PLP) for the
investigation and cleanup of properties owned by the Port or where the Port may have contributed to
site contamination.
Although the Port may not bear ultimate liability for the contamination, under federal and state law, the
Port is presumptively liable as the property owner, and it is often practically and financially beneficial
for the Port to take initial responsibility to manage and pay for the cleanup.
In many cases, the Port has successfully recovered and/or will seek recovery from other responsible
parties for Port-incurred investigation and cleanup costs.   The Port also has been successful in
receiving Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) grant funds to pay part of the cleanup costs. The Port's
goals are to cost-effectively complete this environmentally responsible work and to maximize work
accomplished by or paid for by the parties responsible for the conditions encountered (or others, such
as insurance companies, who represent them).
To mitigate such environmental expenditures, the Port also encourages, coordinates with, and oversees
the investigation and cleanup of sites by other responsible parties, to assure that legal requirements are
met and that Port liabilities are minimized. Regardless of whether the Port conducts the investigation
and remediation directly, or oversees the proper performance of that work by other responsible parties,
the  Port  provides  a  valuable  public  benefit  by  acting  as  a  catalyst  in  expediting  appropriate
environmental management of these sites. 
Accounting rules require that the Port establish liabilities for environmental remediation when the
Port's obligation meets specified definitions of certainty and the liability amount can be reasonably
estimated. When an environmental remediation liability is booked means an expense is recorded in the
current period for the future expenditures. The Port develops its environmental remediationliaibility
forecasts in compliance with Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) issued Statement No.
49 "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations".
Environmental liability expenditures are authorized in one of two ways. If the environmental costs are
incurred in the course of or incidental to a construction project, then the Commission authorization
occurs as part of the authorization for the overall construction project.  Examples of this include
asbestos removal, offsite soil disposal during construction, or upland dredge material disposal. 
If  the  environmental  cost  is  not  associated  with  a  capital  construction  project  or  maintenance
(including asbestos), but  is a stand-alone pollution  remediation project, then  the expenditure  is
authorized through one annual action. Since 1993, the Commission has approved annual environmental
expenditures.
Consistent with past practices, the duration of the authorization continues to be an annual spending
authorization.  However, starting this year, it will also include a rolling five-year spending plan to
reflect the level of resources expected to be required over the next five years.  Executing contract
obligations for a longer duration will minimize the need to rework all contract amendme nts and service

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
December 1, 2010 
Page 3 of 10 

directives that are aligned with the endof-year authorization.  It will also provide greater visibility of
the environmental liability costs.
BUSINESS PLAN OBJECTIVES: 
Environmental  remediation  projects  define  and  minimize  to  acceptable  levels  threats  to  the
environment caused by prior Port operations, prior tenant operations, and by the historical effects of
industrial activity on properties acquired by the Port. Generally, the product of these efforts, as well as
the attendant compliance with regulatory mandates, management of Port liabilities, and support of the
local community, aligns with the goals and objectives of the Seaport, Aviation, and Real Estate
Division Business Plans 
SCOPE OF WORK: 
The environmental investigation and remediation actions described in this Scope of Work section are
required under federal and/or state law. Remedial actions continue to focus on cost-effective study,
analysis, and implementation of cleanup actions; coordination with capital planning, design, and
construction; and negotiation with agencies, tenants, other PRPs and insurance companies.
Seaport Sites/Projects 
Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund  The Lower Duwamish Waterway is a Federal Superfund
Site.  The Lower Duwamish Work Group (LDWG), consisting of the Port, the City of Seattle, King
County and Boeing, are conducting a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) of the
Waterway under an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the Department of Ecology (DOE).  The Port is the contracting agent for the
LDWG. A revised draft Feasibility Study (FS) was submitted to the agencies in October 2010. Public
and agency comment will occur through December 23, 2010. EPA and DOE will use public input to
finalize the FS and develop a Proposed Plan  for remediation of the site.   The Proposed Plan  is
scheduled to be issued for public review and comment early in 2012. Public comment on the Proposed
Plan will be used by EPA to develop its Record of Decision for the final cleanup plan.  EPA will issue
the Record of Decision in 2013, after seeking concurrence from Ecology. 
Terminal 117 Sediments, Bank and Uplands  As part of the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund
effort, the LDWG identified several sediment hot spots that warranted early cleanup action, including
this site, which is owned in part by the Port. In 2005, the Commission authorized the signing of an
Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (ASAOC) with EPA for the final design
and construction of the sediment and bank cleanup. However, the extensive contamination discovered
during the 2006 upland investigation necessitated a re-evaluation of the T117 Sediments and Bank
Project,  with the outcome being  to combine the  Terminal 117 Uplands Project  with the  T117
Sediments and Bank Project. The Port, along with the City of Seattle, signed a new Statement of Work
(SOW) for the 2005 ASAOC, providing for the revision of the Engineering Evaluation and Cost
Analysis (EE/CA).  The final EE/CA was issued on June 3, followed by the Public Meeting on June
17, 2010. Based on these findings, the EPA issued an Action Memorandum which identified the EPA-
selected cleanup action.  The Port and City will begin negotiation of an amendment to the 2005 order,
or a new order to perform the selected cleanup action.  Cleanup design and contractor selection will
occur through 2012.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
December 1, 2010 
Page 4 of 10 

Terminal 108   As  mentioned above, LDWG  is conducting the  Lower Duwamish  Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study. As part of this work, the LDWG identified hot spots that may require
early cleanup action, one of which is located in the sediments adjacent to Terminal 108. The DOE
requested, and the Port voluntarily agreed, to perform additional investigation of the groundwater. The
groundwater study determined that the groundwater is not a source of contaminants to the river.
However, Ecology is requiring additional bank, shoreline, and upland assessment of potential river
recontamination sources.  Some engineered mitigation measures may be necessary to control potential
recontamination sources. On October 13, 2009, Commission approved moving forward with this
source control work as an independent action. 
Terminal 115 Contamination  The Port is conducting a continuing program to remove small amounts
of free product (petroleum) from groundwater caused by two leaking underground tanks that were
removed from the southwest portion of the terminal. Investigative groundwater monitoring is also
continuing.  Soils are marginally contaminated at the tank sites but cleanup at this time is not required
by regulatory agencies.  Activities at this site also include coordination with DOE on source control
efforts required as part of the LDW RI/FS process. The Port is currently developing an Environmental
Conditions report for the entire property. This document will then be used to identify potential source
control issues and associated actions needed to reduce recontamination potential to the larger sediment
cleanup. 
T-5 DOE State Cleanup Sites  In the past, as part of the T-5 site redevelopment, the Port completed
remediation at four sites under three Consent Decrees with the DOE.  Current obligations include an
investigation  and  long  term  ground  water  monitoring  program,  on-going  cap  inspection  and
maintenance of the cap in the four areas.
T-5 Pacific Sound Resources (PSR) EPA Superfund Site  This site was cleaned up under an
Agreement on Consent with EPA as part of the T5 Southwest Harbor redevelopment project, Ongoing
obligations include continuing to perform required cap inspection and cap maintenance, product
recovery activities and monitor EPA activities related to the groundwater and the off shore sediments.
EPA recently performed a five year review for this site which identified the need to perform a vapor
intrusion study and to reassess the cleanup levels.
Harbor Island Superfund Site Soil and Groundwater Operable Unit  Cleanup of this site was
performed under a Consent Decree with EPA. Long term groundwater monitoring is being per formed
by the group consultant under a PRP agreement.  Long term cap maintenance and inspections have
been initiated as required under the Record of Decision.  EPA recently completed a 5 year review of
this site which identified the need for additional groundwater monitoring, improved cap inspection
reporting and follow up on institutional controls recording by the PRPs.
Harbor Island Superfund Site East Waterway Sediments Operable Unit  Sediment cleanup via
dredging in the East Waterway navigational channel began in early January 2004, and was completed
in March 2005.   Some of the areas within the cleanup boundary required additional post-dredging
capping due to deeper-level contamination.  Post remediation sampling continues.  In 2006, the Port
signed an ASAOC with EPA for a final Supplemental Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study
(SRI/FS), and a Memorandum of Agreement with the City and the County to share costs and cooperate
in the SRI/FS process.  The Port is acting as the contracting agent  for this work.  A settlement
agreement with Seattle Iron Metals was negotiated for their contribution to the SRI/FS costs. We are
currently conducting the SRI/FS tasks identified in the ASAOC and subsequent work plans.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
December 1, 2010 
Page 5 of 10 

Terminal 18 Jet Fuel Pipeline  This pipeline, which was owned by the Port and operated by Kinder
Morgan, failed the tightness test in November 2003.  A release of jet fuel to the soil has been
documented. The area of the leak was identified and repaired and an investigation was performed to
identify those areas that may require cleanup.  Additional investigation is required to identify the need
for additional cleanup.
Terminal 30 Oil Cleanup  This is the former Chevron site. The Port has removed significant amounts
of free product and conducted an intensive groundwater-monitoring program. This project is currently
being re-evaluated with DOE to determine steps needed to reach agreement on a closure plan and close
out the existing Agreed Order.   The Port is in the process of negotiating final site remedy and
compliance monitoring for the site.
Terminal 10 Lockheed  Lockheed has performed the upland and sediment cleanup required at the site.
The Port's continuing obligation is to maintain the upland cap and the habitat restoratio n area, manage
any contaminated soil and groundwater encountered or removed during redevelopment or maintenance
activities, and to protect Lockheed's groundwater monitoring wells. Under the Terminal 10 Uplands
capital project, improvements are proposed to the site's storm water drainage and upland cap .
T106 Warehouse Building  The former warehouse building contains five underground storage tanks
(USTs) and some cement kiln dusts (CKD) fill material. During future site development or
improvements,  UST decommissioning and  limited soil  remediation  will  be required.   If  site
development encounters or disturbs underlying CKD fill, generated material will be profiled, handled,
and disposed of offsite. 
Natural Resource Damages (NRD) Habitat Planning  After the Record of Decision is complete,
Superfund liability for LDW will also include injury to natural resources from contamination.  The
Port is negotiating with the NRD Trustees for a settlement of these liabilities that will likely include
habitat restoration as a component.  Settlement could take the form of either a final settlement or a
credits agreement. The purpose of the credit agreement (if needed), is to allow creation of habitat now
and to receive credit for the habitat when a settlement agreement is finalized. On May 13, 2008, the
Commission approved signing a Credits Agreement MOA and execution of a professional service
agreement for environmental review, permiting and preparation of plans and specifications for habitat
design at T-117 under the MOA, for $210,000. A contract with a design consultant has been executed
and predesign work has began but a final signed MOA has not yet been executed.  At this point, the
NRD Trustees have expressed a preference for a final settlement rather than a credits agreement.
New Seaport Sites 
Terminal 115 North In late January 2009, the Port received from DOE a Notice of Potential MTCA
Liability and a Notice of Intent to Conduct a Site Hazard Assessment.   DOE identified this site as a
result of their source control activities related to one of the high priority sediment sites (Glacier Bay)
within the Lower Duwamish Superfund site. Glacier Bay is located north of Terminal 115. The Port
conducted an initial assessment of the environmental contamination at the site. The Port recently
negotiated an Agreed Order with Ecology, under which the Port will further characterize the site and
develop a draft cleanup action plan.  Authorization to enter into this Order was received at the
November 2, 2010, Commission meeting.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
December 1, 2010 
Page 6 of 10 

Terminal 104  The Port will be conducting an initial assessment of the environmental contamination
and potential future course of action for this site.  The site has been identified by Ecology has having
data gaps in relation to source control related to the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund site. 
Real Estate Sites 
Terminal 91 Cleanup  Investigation and cleanup of this site is being administered by the DOE under a
State Dangerous Waste Permit and an Agreed Order.  The draft Feasibility Study (FS) went out for
public comment last December and was finalized with no changes.  A draft Cleanup Action Plan
(CAP), which identifies the cleanup approach selected by DOE, and SEPA checklist are out for public
comment. After public comment, a new Order or an amendment to the existing order will be negotiated
for performance of the cleanup. 
Fishermen's Terminal  The Porthas removed contaminated soils in the uplands, capped the uplands
as a voluntary cleanup measure, and is conducting a continuing program of investigative groundwater
monitoring at and near the Fishing Vessel Owners (FVO) tenant site.  Some dredging of contaminated
sediments occurred as part of the Docks 5-10 renewal and replacement and berth dredging project.
T-5 DOE State Cleanup Sites (CEM) Site  In addition to the 4 sites listed under Seaport sites, as part
of  the  T-5  redevelopment,  the  Port  purchased  the  old  West  Seattle  Landfill  and  installed  an
environmental cap and a methane collection system.  These systems require long term operation and 
maintenance, inspection and reporting which is continuing. 
Aviation Sites/Projects 
Aircraft Fuel Farms and Fueling Systems  Five underground aircraft fueling systems were constructed
and operated by individual airlines beginning in the early 1960s.  As of January 2007, each of these
systems has been decommissioned. Appropriate environmental cleanup has been achieved for three of
the systems and is in progress for two others. Long-term monitoring continues as noted below: 
Investigation and remediation of an area impacted by operations of the former United Airlines and
Continental Airlines fuel farms are anticipated to continue for an additional two to three years. The
Port is a member of the PLP group for this multiple-source site. 
The Northwest Airlines and Pan Am Airlines systems have been appropriately remediated, but
continue to require monitoring. In 2011-2015 the Port (as a result of Pan Am Airlines bankruptcy)
and Delta Airlines (successor by merger to Northwest Airlines) will monitor the former Pan Am
and Northwest systems in the context of the STIA Ground Water Study, described below 
STIA Ground Water Study  In May 1999, the Port and the DOE executed a MTCA Agreed Order that
required the Port to conduct a study of ground water conditions in the uppermost regional aquifer in
the vicinity of the airport.  The study has been completed. The results demonstrate that there is little
potential for airport operations to impact ground water conditions beyond the airport boundary, and
threaten local ground water receptors (public drinking water supplies, creeks, etc.). DOE has accepted
the study findings and designated the Port's obligations under the Agreed Order as complete. DOE and
the Port have agreed to a plan for long-term ground water monitoring to confirm the results of the
models used in the study. Under the terms of a responsible party agreement, Delta Airlines will
implement the monitoring program on behalf of the Port and several Rent-A-Car tenants. We
anticipate completion of long term monitoring in 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
December 1, 2010 
Page 7 of 10 

Lora Lake Apartments  Under the terms of the agreement settling the King County Housing Authority
condemnation of the Lora Lake Apartment complex, the Port retained responsibility for future
contamination remediation of the property. On July 10, 2009, the Port and the DOE executed a MTCA
Agreed Order that requires the Port to conduct a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS)
for the cleanup of the Lora Lake Apartment Property.  An RI/FS Work Plan for the apartment parcel
was implemented this year. A work plan to investigate the sediments and upland areas of the Lora
Lake parcel is being developed this year, with data collection beginning next spring.  A report that
presents the findings of both investigations and analysis of clean up alternatives will be submitted to
DOE in late 2011 or early 2012. Actual clean up will be accomplished under a follow-on order
negotiated after the completion of the RI/FS.
SeaTac Fuel Facilities Fuel Farm  Groundwater contamination was discovered at this facility, the
former Olympic Fuel Farm, during an investigation to define post-construction conditions as required
by the lease between the Port and the SeaTac Fuel Facilities LLC. The extent of the contamination has
been determined, and pilot testing of  remediation systems  has been completed.  Remediation,
consisting of passive collection of free product and ground water monitoring, continues.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: 
The following table summarizes 2011 through 2015 forecasted spending for environmental
remediation projects. orecasted spending for "Booked Liabilities" reflects projects described in the
Scope of Work.
Five-Year Spending Plan
$'s in Thousands               2011     2012     2013    2014     2015    2011-2015
Booked Liabilities 
Project Spending               $15,000  $25,000  $17,600   $1,600     $500    $59,700 
Cash from 3rd Parties          (5,200)  (6,800)  (5,400)    (200)    (100)   (17,700)
$1,400 
Port Share                       $9,800  $18,200  $12,200              $400    $42,000 
Anticipated Future Liabilities 
Project Spending                $1,880   $5,800   $6,200   $2,615   $9,465    $25,960 
Total Forecasted Spending    $11,680  $24,000  $18,400   $4,015   $9,865    $67,960 

Note: Forecasted payments by potentially liable parties included only for booked liabilities. Amounts do not include
estimates of possible recoveries from grants, insurance or litigation. 
Source of Funds 
Environmental cleanup projects have multiple funding sources: (1) Seaport non-operating projects and
Real Estate operating and non-operating projects are funded by the Port's Tax Levy; (2) Seaport
operating projects are funded by the General Fund; (3) Airport projects a re funded by the Airport
Development Fund.  In addition, there are supplementary outside sources of funding, including the
following: 
Cost sharing agreements with other PLPs (or PRPs), wherein the Port functions as a funding
conduit for the other PLPs and the Port holds contracts on behalf of these other PLPs 
Invoicing and payment directly from other PLPs, such as tenants

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
December 1, 2010 
Page 8 of 10 

Litigation settlements with other PLPs 
Insurance recoveries from both the Port's insurers and other PLPs' insurers 
Grant funding from the Washington DOE and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
The following projects received grant funding in 2010 for existing projects: T30 and the Lower
Duwamish Superfund site including early action sites T117 and T108.
New grants were received in 2009 for T91 and East Waterway Superfund sites. These grants are
complete unitl Washington DOE provides additional grants. 
In August 2010 DOE awarded a fifty-percent matching grant in the amount of $1.5 million to
support the Lora Lake Apartments RI/FS 
COMMUNITY / CUSTOMER / ORGANIZATION IMPACTS: 
Elimination of unacceptable levels of environmental risk caused by the presence of contaminants in
upland soil, in marine sediments, and groundwater is not only required by state and federal law, it is
the hallmark of responsible environmental stewardship, from the perspectives of both the surrounding
residential and business communities and the customers that we serve.
The environmental remediation authorization will fund a mix of Port staff and outside cons ultant
services that maximizes the effectiveness of staff.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: 
This authorization is for funds forecasted to be spent during 2011 to 2015. 
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED/RECOMMENDED ACTION: 
The following alternatives were considered for accomplishing the work described in the Scope of
Work: 
Alternative 1 
Do not complete the work. If the Port chose to not complete the work, federal and/or state regulatory
agencies could mandate the work be accomplished, either by the Port under an enforcement or similar
order, or by the agency. In many cases, such arrangements already exist between the Port and
regulatory agencies. In either case, the Port would lose the opportunity to employ the flexibility
contained in the controlling regulations, to define and direct the work, and to manage costs. 
Alternative 2 
Complete the work using Port staff.  Port staff is already heavily involved in project direction, legal
analysis, and project management, and will continue to perform these services. The nature and extent
of the technical and legal work required to complete this work is substantial, and would require a large
number of additional staff with additional expertise.  In addition contracts would still be required for
such work as laboratory analysis. 
Alternative 3 
Complete the work using outside consultants and contractors. Outside consultants and contractors have
sufficient numbers and types of specialists necessary for timely and cost effective completion of this
work; however the work would be more costly than if some Port staff were also involved.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
December 1, 2010 
Page 9 of 10 

Alternative 4 
Complete the work using a combination of Port staff (Alternative 2) and outside consultants and
contractors (Alternative 3) that maximizes the ability for the Port to direct cleanup efforts and
maximize the effectiveness of staff. Alternative 4 is recommended. 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: 
On July 13, 1993, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,050,000 for eight projects during
1993. 
On March 8, 1994, the Commission approved the expenditure of $776,000 for eleven projects during
1994. 
On March 28, 1995, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,875,000 for nine projects during
1995. 
On February 27, 1996, the Commission approved the expenditure of $2,325,000 for eleven projects
during 1996. 
On February 25, 1997, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,100,000 to conduct the STIA
Ground Water Study required by a Washington DOE Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Agreed
Order. 
On June 8, 1999, the Commission approved the expenditure of $300,000 to conduct the Industrial
Waste System Hydrogeological Study required by the DOE as a performance condition of the 1998
National Pollution Discharge and Elimination System Permit. 
On August 24, 1999, the Commission approved the expenditure of $800,000 for environmental
cleanup of Port property adjacent to the Malarkey Asphalt Co. site. 
On March 14, 2000, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,000,000 for aquatic sediment
management for participating in the development and implementation of federal and state laws and
regulations relating to the disposition of contaminated aquatic sediments, and the expenditure of
$2,000,000 for cleanup-related investigations at the former Chevron Oil Terminal site at Terminal 30. 
On July 10, 2001, the Commission approved the expenditure of $5,100,000 for nine Aviation projects
and six Seaport projects during 2001. 
On June 11, 2002, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,500,000 and contract amendments
for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Order on Consent to continue work on the Lower
Duwamish Sediments Superfund site and the East Waterway Sediment Operable Unit of the Harbor
Island Superfund Site.
On March 11, 2003, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$4,999,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties and for potential environmental
liabilities during 2003. Actual expenditures for 2003 were ultimately limited to $2,459,870.
On March 23, 2004, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$8,081,000, for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2004. Actual expenditures for
2004 were ultimately limited to $2,136,943.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
December 1, 2010 
Page 10 of 10 

On March 23, 2005, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$8,102,222, for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2005. Actual expenditures for
2005 were ultimately limited to $6,255,791. 
On December 13, 2005, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$8,705,760 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2006.
On June 27, 2006, the Commission approved an increase in the 2006 project-wide authorization for
environmental cleanup action on Port properties, to increase the authorization in the amount of
$6,000,000 to $14,705,760. Expenditures for 2006 were ultimately limited to $11,087,873.38. 
On December 12, 2006 the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$7,756,549 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2007. Expenditures for 2007
were ultimately limited to $7,537,286. 
On December 1, 2007 the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$11,833,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2008. Expenditures for 2008
were ultimately limited to $11,322,258.
On December 9, 2008 the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$10,396,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2009. Expenditures for 2009
were ultimately limited to 7,455,000. 
On November 30, 2009 the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$13,141,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2010. Expenditures for 2010 - 
through September 30, 2010 were $6,523,000.