6d Deicing memo

COMMISSION 
AGENDA MEMORANDUM                        Item No.          6d 
ACTION ITEM                            Date of Meeting    September 11, 2018 
DATE:     August 8, 2018 
TO:        Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director 
FROM:    Brendalynn Taulelei, Senior Maintenance Manager, Asset Management and Logistics 
Rob Lane, Maintenance Manager, Logistics 
SUBJECT:  Purchase of Liquid and Solid Pavement Deicers for the Airport 
Amount of this request:               $2,200,000 
Total estimated project cost:          $2,200,000 
ACTION REQUESTED 
Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to execute a contract for the
purchase of liquid and solid pavement deicing agents for use at Seattle-Tacoma International
Airport. The contract shall be structured as a one-year agreement with up to four one-year
renewal options. The estimated value of this contract is $2,200,000. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
Aviation Maintenance uses a combination of snow removal equipment and deicing agents
during snow and ice conditions, to maintain surfaces for arriving and departing aircraft and
vehicle traffic that uses the airport roadways.  In a typical snow season at the airport, it is
necessary to execute multiple short-notice, high dollar-value purchases of liquid or solid deicer
to prevent impacts to Airport operations on the runways and roadways. Executing procurement
for liquid and solid deicer will allow the aviation division to be well prepared for winter weather
operations. 
JUSTIFICATION 
This contract authorization will allow us to keep Sea-Tac Airport open for public travel and
regional commerce by providing the chemicals needed for deicing operations during a winter
weather event. The Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 150/5200-30D requires as
follows: "If the runway pavement temperature is warm enough for snow to compact and bond,
or if freezing rain is forecasted, approved anti-icing chemicals and/or heated sand should be
applied prior to the start of precipitation or as soon as precipitation starts." Heated sand is not
utilized at Sea-Tac Airport since it is less effective than deicer products, the sediment runoff
impacts the performance of stormwater best management practices and requires a storage and
warming facility. Deicer availability is critical during a winter weather event; therefore, the
ability of contracted suppliers to provide timely delivery of deicer products when requested

Template revised April 12, 2018.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. _6d_                                Page 2 of 4 
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 
either before or during an active snow event prevents significant negative impacts to airport
operations. If deicer is not available, snow and ice accumulation will lead to unsafe runway and
roadway conditions due to accumulation, and an airport closure is likely. 
DETAILS 
For over 25 years, the Port of Seattle at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport has used liquid
and solid runway and roadway deicing products manufactured by Cryotech  Deicing
Technologies when snow and ice control efforts are required. We currently have an approved
contract (S-00317793) that has been in effect for over four years; however, the current
agreement expires on November 7, 2018. 
To provide safe operating surfaces, control chemicals must be applied to prevent snow and ice
from bonding to our pavement surfaces, or to melt and break the bond of ice that has adhered
to the surfaces. In order to accomplish these requirements, Aviation Maintenance stocks both
liquid potassium acetate and solid sodium acetate snow and ice control chemicals at the
airport. 
Deicing chemicals have the potential to impact water quality as they degrade and wash off with
stormwater runoff.  To address this concern, the Port uses acetate-based deicing products
which have a lower biochemical oxygen demand as it degrades in the environment than glycolbased
fluids. In addition, over the past twenty years, Port Environmental has completed many
studies demonstrating that Cryotech potassium acetate and sodium acetate products do not
impact water quality. The study results have been reviewed and approved by the Department
of Ecology. 
The provider of the deicing chemicals must have a proven track record and is expected to
remain or be in business for the foreseeable future. In addition, the provider must have the
required infrastructure, have demonstrated their local production and storage capabilities, and 
have the capacities to meet delivery requirements of these mission-critical chemicals even
during significant regional snow and ice events. 
For the above environmental and operational reasons, we received a competition waiver for
the procurement of the Cryotech deicer products E-36 liquid potassium acetate and NAAC 
solid sodium acetate. 
Scope of Work 
This contract is for the purchase of liquid potassium acetate and granular deicer sodium acetate 
to support runway and roadway deicing operations located at Seattle-Tacoma International
Airport. Liquid product shall be Potassium Acetate and must meet requirements of the Society
for Automotive and Aerospace Engineers (SAE) Aerospace Material Specifications (AMS) 1435.
Solid product shall be Sodium Acetate and must meet requirements of SAE AMS 1431. 

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. _6d_                                Page 3 of 4 
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 
Schedule 
The current contract expires in November 2018. We intend to secure a contractor no later than
October 2018. 
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED 
Alternative 1  Do not execute a new long-term contract for deicer but purchase deicer as
needed from multiple suppliers during a snow event. 
Cost Implications: Pricing consistent with Alternative 2 below. Estimated contract amount $2.2 
million over five years. 
Pros: 
(1)   Flexibility to go with any company who has product available and best current price. 
Cons: 
(1)   Product quantity needed for a single event would exceed direct-buy purchase limits of
$50,000. A purchase of between $50,000 and $150,000 would require three quotes
before issuing a purchase order. A purchase of over $150,000 would require a formal
bid, which would take longer.  These processes take too long for such a critical
operation.  Performing individual purchases may result in a lower quantity of deicer
that could be purchased within the $2.2 million estimated cost. 
(2)   Product quantity needed for a single snow event may exceed purchasing limits as
outlined in the General Delegation of Authority. The  Executive Director purchasing
limit is not to exceed $300,000. 
(3)   Liquid deicing products from different companies may react unpredictably when
mixed together in the same storage tanks. It is possible to create a transition plan to
switch from one product to another, but it would be dangerous to frequently add
different products to the same tanks. 
(4)   Liquid deicing products outside of those already tested and approved from different
companies may have different environmental impacts that are unknown to port staff.
If we went with another product we would have to update our NPDES (National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Permit and get approval from the Washington 
Department of Ecology. This process could take a year and a half, cost over $300,000
for testing, and may result in other corrective actions having to be implemented, or
possibly, our request may be denied outright. 
(5)   Vendors may not store sufficient quantities of product locally unless obligated by
contract requirements. Needed quantity may not be available during an event, which
is a great risk to airport operations. 
(6)   Vendors would fill orders for customers who they have contracted obligations for
before filling requisitions from the port. 
(7)   The port would likely have to pay a premium for delivery charges. 
(8)   Procuring deicer without a contract leads to variable and unpredictable cost per
gallon. 
This is not the recommended alternative. 

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. _6d_                                Page 4 of 4 
Meeting Date: September 11, 2018 

Alternative 2  Authorization to execute a new contract for the purchase of liquid and solid
deicer products for the airport. 
Cost Implications: The contract to purchase liquid and solid deicer products for the airport is
estimated to cost $2.2 million in total over a five-year period.  Over the past five seasons we
have used 300,000 gallons of deicer, for an average usage of 60,000 gallons per year and an
average cost of $276,000 per year. Actual deicer usage is highly variable. In 2015 we used only
225 gallons of deicer. Since the product was already on hand, 2015 had $0 procurement costs.
In contrast, we used over 155,000 gallons of liquid deicer in 2017 at a cost of $776,000. Total
estimate of $2.2 million is based on $300,000 per year for five years plus a contingency in case
any one of the years is equal to our recent single-year high. 
Pros: 
(1)   A new contract is the most reliable and effective method as it enables the port to set
price points and service-level agreement and delivery terms. These items can be
negotiated up front with suppliers and locked in for the duration of the contract: 
(a)    We can specify delivery terms and conditions, to ensure the deicer products
are readily available to be transported during a heavy snow event. 
(b)   Contracted pricing protects the port from market fluctuations. 
(2)   The contract may be able to specify the vendor's use of small businesses in their
supply chain. 
(3)   Contracting with a single company would not limit our ability to issue purchase orders
to other companies if our need exceeded the vendor's capacity. 
Cons: 
(1)   May not be able to take advantage of price drops due to market conditions. 
This is the recommended alternative. 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
Annual expenditures under this contract will be incorporated into the Aviation Maintenance
operating budget.  For example, the proposed 2019 Aviation Maintenance baseline budget
includes $269,200 for deicing product. The funding source is the Airport Development Fund.
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST 
None 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
October 22, 2013  The Commission authorized for the Chief Executive Officer to execute a
five-year contract for the purchase of liquid and solid pavement deicing agents for use
at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport for an estimated total amount of $3,000,000. 

Template revised September 22, 2016; format updates October 19, 2016.

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.