Attachment 8a Memo IAF Guaranteed Maximum Price for Regular Meeting held Sep 25, 2018 12:00pm at SEA

8a Memo IAF Guaranteed Maximum Price

COMMISSION
AGENDA MEMORANDUM Item No. 8a
ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting September 25, 2018
DATE: September 15, 2018
TO: Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director
FROM: Dave Soike, Chief Operating Officer
SUBJECT: International Arrivals Facility (IAF): Request Balance of Program Funding, the
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Contract Amendment, and necessary consulting
contracts. (CIPs #C800583, #C800781, and #C800836)
Amount of this request: $ 177,463,250
Total estimated program cost: $ 968,445,000

ACTION REQUESTED
Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to: (1) fund the $177,463,250
balance of the program for a total cost of $968,445,000 for the International Arrivals Facility
(IAF); (2) execute the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contract amendment with the designbuild
team including schedule extension for substantial completion to May 30, 2020, and
November 20, 2020, as described in the agenda memorandum, and (3) execute any necessary
change orders, work authorizations, contract amendments, and contracts to complete the IAF
at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport within the approved total program cost.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Port contracted with a Design-Build team, Clark/SOM, to design and construct a new
International Arrivals facility (IAF) at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport using a
Progressive-Design-Build project delivery method. The Port Commission received a
comprehensive briefing on the entire program on September 11, 2018 that included testimony
from 14 individuals including the port's Executive Director, the program executive, and airport
director; the design -builder's leaders; the Commission's independent Executive Review Panel
that independently reviewed the program and provided recommendatons to move the
program forward; and from airline representatives who commented and urged completion of
the IAF. The Commission took the testimony under advisement with a plan for this action
request to come forward at the next regulary scheduled Commission meeting. During the
intervening time the program team has developed a work plan to incorporate the
recommendations of the Executive Review Panel. Staff now requests full authorization to move
forward with the IAF program.

Template revised September 22, 2016.

COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _8a_ Page 2 of 7
Meeting Date: September 25, 2018

JUSTIFICATION
The Airport reaches full capacity every day during the noon-hour peak arrival time of inbound
international aircraft. After 10 to 15 hour flights, some passengers are often either held on
board until an aircraft gate is available, or held on board the aircraft while at the aircraft gate
until crowding subsides inside the 45 year old arrival facility, or held waiting in upper level
narrow corridors until congestion dissipates enough to move down into the US Customs and
Border Protection passport areas. The IAF program is necessary to accomodate airport growth
that already exists as a result of the broad economic growth across the region in the last 5 to 10
years. Each international airline service that has come to Seattle has provided approximately
$74 million in economic benefit to the region in terms of jobs, payroll, business connections, tax
base, etc.
GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE AND SCHEDULE INFORMATION
The request for Commission consideration from the design-builder and Port staff is a
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment for the construction elements of $773,945,385
with a substantial completion of construction work on May 30, 2020. Following substantial
completion, Operational Readiness and Activation Testing will commence, and contingency
time reserved for any issues unforeseeable at this time, are expected to take up to 60 days to
ensure the entire 537,062 square feet physical facility is functional, all Port and federal
employees are trained, and all building systems are robustly tested to ensure 24/7/365
operational uptime. This culminates in a projected in-service opening date for airline customer
operations of July 30, 2020.
This in-service date includes three major components of the project:
First, the IAF landside grand hall for international travelers that houses baggage
reclaim, US Customs and Border Protection various passport and immigration
functions, and US Transportation Security Administration checkpoint and baggage
functions. The lowest level of the grand hall includes secure operational space and
equipment for combined airport and airline baggage operations.
Second, three flexible airside swing-gate structures that allow both domestic and
international airlines to share and operate on the aircraft gates depending upon
their time-of-day operations.
Third, the pedestrian overhead walkway that links the South Satellite gates to the
airside international swing gate overhead walkway corridor and on to the IAF grand
hall where traditional baggage claim and passport control occur.
A long-planned, separate, and later substantial completion of construction work date is
November 20, 2020 for the fourth major portion of the project that is comprised of three swing
gates that includes two international swing-gates and one domestic gate. This completion

This version as revised 9/16/2016

COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _8a_ Page 3 of 7
Meeting Date: September 25, 2018

would be followed by similar necessary activation and readiness testing work that leads to an
in-use date for airlines and travelers of December 31, 2020.
The GMP Amendment itself was the result of substantial negotiation between the Port and
Clark/SOM, with the assistance of senior leaders of both the Port and the design builder,
outside counsel for both parties, and many contributing team members. Generally speaking,
and if the Commission approves its execution, the GMP Amendment will reset the project as of
the date of execution of the GMP Amendment.
Scope of Work
Authorization of this request will enable the project team to move into the final phase of the
contract, the Post-GMP Period for full build.
At completion, the IAF will include:
(1) World-class facility capable of processing 2,600 passengers per peak hour and a
Minimum Connect Time (MCT) goal of 75 minutes
(2) First Port facility to have pursued LEED certification under the new Version 4 standard
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The GMP as presented in this memo would increase total program cost from $790,981,750 to
$968,445,000.
Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary Capital Expense Total
PROGRAM COST ESTIMATE
Cost estimate on August 15, 2017 $785,500,000 $4,500,000 $790,000,000
Changes since August 15th 2017 - net $169,945,000 $8,500,000 $178,445,000
Revised estmate on September 11, 2018 $955,445,000 $13,000,000 $968,445,000
PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION
Previous authorizations $786,481,750 $4,500,000 $790,981,750
Current request for authorization $168,963,250 $8,500,000 $177,463,250
Total authorizations, including this request $955,445,000 $13,000,000 $968,445,000
Remaining amount to be authorized $0 $0 $0
This program cost includes the following categories:
Description CIP # Cost
International Arrivals Facilty C800583 $931,445,000
International Arrivals Facility - Expense N/A $13,000,000

This version as revised 9/16/2016

COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _8a_ Page 4 of 7
Meeting Date: September 25, 2018
SSAT Narrow Body Gates C800781 $5,500,000
Outbound Baggage C800836 $18,500,000
Total $968,445,000
Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds
The capital budget increase for the IAF will be transferred from the Aeronautical Allowance CIP
(C800753), resulting in no net change to the Aviation Division capital budget. As presented to
the Commission on July 12, 2016, the funding plan includes $200 million of cash (Airport
Development Fund), $100 million of Passenger Facility Charges (PFCs) and the remaining
budget funded with revenue bonds. Consistent with this plan, the capital cost increase will be
funded with revenue bonds. The other two projects in the program are funded with a
combination of the Airport Development Fund and revenue bonds.
Financial Analysis and Summary
No local or county tax dollars are used to fund the IAF program. Costs are recovered from the
airlines that use the the facility based on a per passenger charge. In accordance with previous
negotiations with airlines, the costs of the IAF will be included within the Federal Inspection
Services (FIS) cost center as opposed to other airport cost allocation centers. In order to reduce
the FIS cost, the $200 million of cash to fund construction costs will not be amortized in the
airline rate base (per provision in the Signatory Lease and Operating Agreement). Additionally,
as with all PFC funded projects, the $100 million of capital costs funded with PFCs will be
excluded from the airline rate base. The annual debt service relating to the revenue bond
funded portions of the project will be included in the FIS cost center unless the debt service is
paid by PFCs. Debt service paid by PFCs is excluded from airline rate bases. The funding plan
for the IAF does include the use of PFCs to pay some level of ongoing revenue bond debt
service. Consistent with the commission funding motion of May 26, 2015 and the funding plan
update presented on May 17, 2016, the Port's goal is to maintain a competitive FIS rate
compared to peer airports. To the extent possible, and considering other rate management
priorities, sufficient PFCs will be used to pay ongoing revenue bond debt service to manage the
FIS rate base, and thus the FIS rate, to a competitive level.

Project cost for analysis $931,445,000
Business Unit (BU) FIS cost center
Effect on business performance Could be positive or negative depending on level of PFCs
(NOI after depreciation) used. Increasing use of PFCs reduces Port revenues as
capital costs are excluded from airline rate base.
IRR/NPV (if relevant) N/A
CPE Impact CPE will increase approximately $2.20 by 2021

This version as revised 9/16/2016

COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _8a_ Page 5 of 7
Meeting Date: September 25, 2018
Consultant Contract Amendment Summary
The IAF project relies on contract amendments and specific Service Agreements to augment the
Port's Program and Construction Management staff. This request includes authority to
execute amendments exceeding $300,000 of the following Service Agreements to increase
capacity as required to complete the IAF Program:
Agreement Firm Service
P-00317740 AECOM Technical Services Program Management Services
Construction Management
P-00318626 Parsons Transportation Group Services
Third Party Commissioning
P-00318275 McKinstry Services
P-00319044 Mayes Testing Special Inspection Services
The IAF Program Management service agreement requires additional time and level of effort to
support project completion. The original duration for the IAF Program Management contract
with AECOM Technical Services was intended to coincide with the completion of the IAF project
planning, design, construction and closeout. Extensions of schedule throughout the project
have lengthened the overall project duration and shifted the completion date into early 2021.
This amendment serves to extend the AECOM Agreement to that adjusted end date. Now that
a GMP has been agreed to, it is necessary to issue additional service directives for scope
necessary to help manage the project toward substantial completion. An added necessary
amendment of $12 million would increase the current contract value from $17 million to a new
total of $29 million. While these services are related to this public works program, they are not
technically subject to RCW 53.19.060 that applies to personal services contracts; however
consistent with past Port practice, staff follows the above RCW and notified Commission that
this contract amendment will exceed fifty percent of the original contract value. As such staff
will follow our long standing past procedure and make the amendment available for public
inspection.
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST
(1) Presentation slides
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS
September 11, 2018 The Commission received a comprehensive briefing regarding the
program and Guaranteed Maximum Price negotiated with the design-builder.
March 20, 2018 The Commission was briefed on IAF progress.
November 14, 2017 The Commission was briefed on 3rd quarter 2017 progress.
August 15, 2017 The Commission authorized the balance of IAF funding in a joint request
with the NSAT project.
March 28, 2017 - The Commission authorized additional IAF funding.

This version as revised 9/16/2016

COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _8a_ Page 6 of 7
Meeting Date: September 25, 2018
October 11, 2016 The Commission authorized IAF to add balance of Phase 2 for
accelerated execution.
September 27, 2016 The Commission was briefed on IAF reconsidering phasing and
project update.
September 13, 2016 The Commission authorized IAF FAA reimbursement agreement.
July 12, 2016 The Commission authorized IAF to add Phase 2 scope to meet continuing
rapid growth.
June 28, 2016 The Commission was briefed on two additional international aircraft gates
at IAF to meet continuing rapid growth briefing.
May 17, 2016 The Commission was briefed on Plan of Finance update.
April 26, 2016 The Commission was briefed on IAF 1Q2016 update.
February 9, 2016 - The Commission was briefed on IAF 4Q2015 update.
December 8, 2015 IAF guaranteed maximum price (GMP) Development Period
authorization (presented in combination with NSAT authorization request).
November 10, 2015 The Commission was briefed on IAF update.
August 11, 2015 The Commission lead a special meeting, roundtable with airline
representatives.
July 28, 2015 The Commission lead an IAF forum.
July 14, 2015 The Commission lead an IAF forum.
June 23, 2015 The Commission authorized execution of the IAF Design-Build Contract.
May 26, 2015 The Commission approved IAF preliminary funding plan motion.
April 28, 2015 The Commission authorized a service agreement for Commissioning
Services.
April 28, 2015 The Commission authorized execution of a lease agreement with SEATAC
VENTURES 2010 LLC for IAF program management office space near Sea-Tac
International Airport.
February 24, 2015 The Commission authorized a service agreement for IAF consultant
program leader.
January 27, 2015 The Commission was briefed on IAF funding plan.
January 27, 2015 The Commission approved IAF request for proposals advertisement.
January 13, 2015 The Commission was briefed on IAF update.
December 2, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF scope and budget update.
October 28, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF 3Q2014 update.
August 19, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF 2Q2014 update.
August 5, 2014 The Commission authorized IAF request for qualifications advertisement.
July 22, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF progress.
June 10, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF 1Q2014 update.
May 6, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF project delivery.
April 22, 2014 The Commission was briefed on capital program.
March 11, 2014 The Commission authorized IAF master planning.
February 25, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF program.
November 19, 2013 The Commission authorized IAF construction management, testing
and inspection; surveying and locating and safety service agreements.

This version as revised 9/16/2016

COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. _8a_ Page 7 of 7
Meeting Date: September 25, 2018
July 23, 2013 The Commission authorized IAF project and program support; and price
factor design-build methodology.
July 9, 2013 The Commission was briefed on IAF.
July 9, 2013 The Commission was briefed on alternative public works contracting.
April 9, 2013 The Commission was briefed on IAF.
June 26, 2012 The Commission was briefed on airport terminal development challenges at
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
June 14, 2011 The Commission was briefed on international air service growth and future
facility.
February 2, 2010 The Commission was briefed on South Satellite passenger growth and
facility considerations, Delta's proposed airline lounge and other possible future
aviation projects.

This version as revised 9/16/2016

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.

Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.

PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.