10a Presentation FT Maritime Innovation Center
Item No. 10a_Supp
Date of Meeting December 8, 2020
Maritime Innovation Center Construction Authorization
December 8, 2020
Advancing the Maritime Innovation Center
Seeking authorization to execute an interagency agreement with Washington
State Dept. of Commerce to accept a $5M grant from the Clean Energy Fund
Program to support the construction of the Maritime Innovation Center (MInC)
As part of this agreement Commerce is asking the Port to formalize support for the project
by authorizing construction of the MInC
Staff will add an additional authorization step for the MInC and come back to commission to
authorize funding for the project when we are ready to start construction
No funding requested at this time
Part of 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan
Vision: Washington State becomes a world leading hub for sustainable maritime and ocean industries... 2
Maritime Innovation Center Progress
2016 2017 2018 2019
Fishermen's Initial Port creates Port signs Port partners
Terminal Plan Community WA State MInC MOU with with
Engagement Commission
includes creates Advisory WA Maritime Blue
authorizes
Maritime and Innovation strategy Committee & Maritime to launch
incubator Center design for
for a Blue Creates Blue to Maritime Blue
Feasibility MInC
development Economy Business Plan partner on innovation
Study innovation accelerator
Establishing a Foundation for Maritime Innovation 3
Maritime Innovation Center
"The center will be used to
support technology
acceleration and incubation,
and act as a focal point for
maritime sustainability,
including, but not limited to,
supporting technology
development for maritime
decarbonization and
electrification."
Excerpt from interagency agreement
Port of Seattle helps anchor global leadership in BlueTech 4
State Investment and Partnership
$5 Million State Commitment
Part of Governor Inslee's 2013 Jobs Plan
2018 State Capital Budget / Clean Energy Fund
Included in Governor's, House and Senate Budgets
Informed by SEEP Executive Order & Strategy
for the Blue Economy
Contracting underway
5
Blue Facility / Blue Finance
Global Developing Maritime Innovation Center w/ Port of Seattle
Innovation Maritime Blue Innovation Accelerator
Hub Capital Landscape Study for WA's Blue Economy
Hub & Spoke Incubation around the State
6
Maritime Blue: Advancing Innovation
7
Maritime Blue Innovation Accelerator
Startup investments/sales related to first cohort of 11 startups in an Accelerator
$32M in Private Capital Investments (associated startups)
$6M in Business Sales (associated startups)
Several Demonstration Projects and Costumer acquisitions
Combined reports of over 500% increase in sales
At least 50 jobs created
8
Innovation Center Strategic Objectives
Be a focal point for maritime
innovation
Offer incubator and accelerator
environment
Support investment in BlueTech
start-ups and new technologies
Drive equitable economic
development
Support workforce development
and maritime career exploration
First Maritime Blue Innovation Accelerator Cohort
9
WW
ati
ke s pl
1
|
i
,Bit aH
=" D i {lg
1 rata
10
Ship Supply Building: Assets for Innovation
Accessibility
Access to water
Access to laydown area
Proximity to Maritime Suppliers
and Manufacturers
Visibility
Historic Preservation, Aesthetics
& Ability to Leverage Capital
Equity & Diversity
11
Proposed Building Improvements
Abatement of regulated materials in existing structure
Partial existing building demolition (timber structural framework to be preserved)
Enhancement of structural piles and framework
Construction of new MInC building core and shell
Utility services removal and replacement
New building perimeter and parking lot paving
12
SUSTAINABILITY TARGET MInC
BE THE GREENEST AND MOST ENERGY
EFFICIENT PORT IN NORTH AMERICA SALMON 2030 LEED V4 LBC LBC FULL
WATER ENERGY CARBON SAFE CHALLENGE CREDIT CORE PETAL LBC
S
GOOD (Salmon Safer)
WATER BETTER (Reclamation)
BEST (Net Positive)
ENERGY BETTER (2030)
BEST (Net Positive)
MATERIALS BETTER (8 Red List Matl's)
BEST (Full Red List)
13
Sustainability Framework
14
MInC: Status & Certainty
33
DIVISION APPROVEDDIVISION APPROVED 44
AUTHORIZEDAUTHORIZED
55
Managing Director Commission authorized design
Degree of Uncertainty approved Refine cost and schedule estimates up to 100%
IN PROGRESSIN PROGRESS 66
Staff level authorization for cost 10% 30% 60% Commission Authorization COMPLETECOMPLETE
and schedule estimates design design design Construction
Ship
Supply
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
15
Maritime Innovation Center
Project Cost Summary (pre-60% Design Estimate*)
Description Estimated % of Total
Costs Project Cost
Engineer's Estimate of Direct Constr. Costs $7 M 43.5%
Other Construction Costs $5.2 M 33%
Soft Costs $3.6 M 22.5%
Art Program $160 K 1%
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $16 M 100%
* The pre-60% Project Cost is based on a cost estimate developed post 30% Design, and pre 60% Design, which carries a level of uncertainty
that will progressively reduce as design reaches full definition. The project has been included in the Port of Seattle's approved 2021-2025
CIP with a total project cost of $16,000,000.
16
Next Steps
Complete design work
Refine cost estimates
Secure permits
Secure construction funding
Partner with Maritime Blue to
evaluate tenant options as facility
starts construction
Achieve Living Building Challenge
A hub for maritime innovation and education 17
APPENDIX
18
19
Facility Location Criteria May 2019
Commission request to
authorize MInC design
Accessibility
Access to water
Access to laydown area
Proximity to Maritime
Suppliers and Manufacturers
Visibility
Historic Preservation,
Aesthetics & Ability to
Leverage Capital
20
Site Evaluation May 2019
Commission request to
authorize MInC design
Fishermen's Terminal (FT) site options ranked higher than
Terminal 91 options:
More proximate to suppliers and partners
More visible and accessible
Better access to water
FT's Gateway and Historic Ship Supply sites ranked similarly
Ship Supply slightly better based on historic preservation
opportunity
Capital development costs not considered
21
Maritime Innovation Center Site EvaluationMay 2019Commission request to authorize MInC design
Site 1: Ship Supply Building Site 2: T91 Uplands Site 3: FT Gateway
No Site Selection Criteria Weight
Score Weighted Score Score Weighted Score Score Weighted Score
I Accessiility 20% 3 0.6 1 0.2 4 0.8
4 = Facility is within 200 yards of public transit and within 20 minute commute from partners
(UW Applied Physics Lab, Maritime Blue, etc.)
3 = Facility is within 1/4 mile of public transit and within 20 commute from partners
2 = Facility is within 1/2 mile of public transit and within 30 minute commute from partners
1 = Facility is more than 30 minutes drive from partners
II Access to water 20% 4 0.8 2 0.4 3 0.6
4 = Facility is on fresh or salt water with moorage capacity
3 = Facility is within 1/4 mile of fresh or salt water - limited moorage capacity
2 = Facility is within 1/2 mile of fresh or salt water - limited moorage available
1 = Access to fresh or salt water difficult or not optimal
III Access to laydown area for staging 20% 4 0.8 4 0.8 3 0.6
4 = Facility provides a laydown area
3 = Facility is within 200 yards of a laydown area
2 = Facility is within 1/4 mile of a laydown area
1 = Access to laydown area is difficult or not optimal
IV Proximity to Maritime Suppliers and Manufacturers 20% 4 0.8 3 0.6 4 0.8
4 = Faciltiy is within 1/2 mile of machine shops and maritime suppliers (inc. chandlery)
3 = Facility is within 1 mile of machine shops and maritime suppliers (inc. chandlery)
2 = Facility is within 3 miles of machine shops and maritime suppliers (inc. chandlery)
1 = Facility not located in proximity to maritime supply chain
V Historic Preservation, Aesthetics & Ability to Leverage Partner Capital 10% 4 0.4 3 0.3 3 0.3
4 = Faciltiy is historic and can leverage other capital $
3 = Facility is new and can leverage other capital $
2 = Facility is new but it may not leverage other capital $
1 = Facility not located in proximity to maritime supply chain
VI Visibility 10% 3 0.3 1 0.1 3 0.3
4 = Visible from Seattle arterials and surrounding streets
3 = Visible from property entrance
2 = Visibility possible from property entrance with signage or other building improvements
1 = Not immediately visible
Total Scores 100% 3.7 3.7 2.3 2.4 3.3 3.4
Site Ranking 1 3 2
Fishermen's Terminal offers best location options for Maritime Innovation Center 22
Maritime Innovation Center
Development Schedule
Maritime/Economic Development Project 2018 2019 20 20 2021 2022 2023
Maritime Innovation Center
at Fishermen's Terminal
Community Engagement* Commission Approval Bid & Award
Environmental Review Design/Permitting Construction
* Community engagement tasks will vary by project needs 23
HEATING + COOLING SYSTEMS COMPARISON MInC All systems will have a DOAS paired with the
heating and cooling systems below.
GOOD VRF BETTER WSHP BEST GSHP
MAJOR 15* year: Circ. Refrigerant 20 year: Circ. Water Pumps 20 year: Circ. Water Pumps
COMPONENTS 15 year: Heat Pumps 25 year: Heat Pumps (Ducted) 25 year: Heat Pumps (Ducted)
+ SERVICE LIFE 15 year: Outdoor Condenser 20-25 yr: Cooling Tower (Closed) 75+ year: Ground Loop
20-25 yr: Electric Boiler 20-25 yr: Electric Boiler (Back-up)
ADVANTAGES + Smaller Units/Zones + Higher Efficiency + Most efficient
+ Low(er) First Cost + Less visible equipment
DISADVANTAGES - Refrigerant, Lbs - High(er) First Costs - Higher First Cost (Loop)
- Least efficient - Water Treatment - Glycol Treatment
- Visible ductwork, piping - Large/Visible Cooling Tower
FLEXIBILITY - Limited flexibility for TIs + Very flexible for TIs + Very flexible for TIs
- Hard to expand capacity + Easy to expand heating capacity + Easy to add a boiler
- Limited capability to add more + Can add units easily + Can add units easily
to existing system - Hard to expand cooling capacity - Difficult/expensive to add
capacity in bores
INITIAL COST $265,000 (3.3%) $320,000 (4%) $375,000 (4.7%)
EUI ESTIMATE 25 KBTU/SF/YR 24 KBTU/SF/YR 23 KBTU/SF/YR
Center Will Be Built on Partnership 25
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.