8h. Memo - Shilshole Bay Marina M2 Building Conversion
COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM Item No. 8h ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting December 14, 2021 DATE: November 5, 2021 TO: Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director FROM: Kenneth R. Lyles, Director of Maritime Operations and Security Robert A. Hoyman, Facilities Project Manager III SUBJECT: Shilshole Bay Marina M2 Building Conversion (CIP C801088, WP #N00035) Amount of this request: $80,000 Total estimated project cost: $330,000 ACTION REQUESTED Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to 1) proceed with completion of the Shilshole Bay Marina M2 Building Conversion and 2) use of Port crews to complete these installations. The amount of this request is $80,000 for a total project cost of $330,000. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This project performs a conversion of an existing 834 S.F. building which was formerly used by the marina as a restroom and shower facility up until 2020 and is now void of interior walls in preparation for use as an operations storage facility. JUSTIFICATION Shilshole Bay Marina Operations and Marine Maintenance are currently storing materials critical to the regular upkeep and operations of the marina throughout the marina property, and in cases which conflict with standards and regulatory practices. There have been incidences in which valuable materials and equipment have been stolen from gated areas. Application of the M2 Building conversion to become a controlled dry storage for operational needs will alleviate nearly all these challenges and will enable the operations staff to securely store materials and preserve those materials which would otherwise be exposed to the elements. The roof repairs performed were necessary to preserve the buildings integrity and ensure the safety of persons entering the building. Diversity in Contracting The work performed to date includes work performed by a WMBE & Small Business Certified Contractor. Template revised January 10, 2019. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 8h Page 2 of 4 December 14, 2021 DETAILS The SBM M2 Building Conversion was budgeted for $250,000 in 2020 for work in 2021. In 2021 $70,000 was allocated and approved for an Environmental Remediation Liability (ERL) Project (N04401) for the purpose of abatement and demolition including materials containing asbestos and lead. The remaining $180,000 was approved for construction. Included in the $180,000 is design costs, Craft Labor costs, Project Management, and other related costs typical of remodel/construction work. At the very tail end of demolition, Port Construction Services (PCS) uncovered extensive rot damage over the shower area of the existing restroom building. It was determined that the best approach to correcting these issues was to utilize the Port's Small Works On-Call Roof Repair Portwide Contract managed by Aviation Maintenance. A quote was received for approximately $72,000 and the work was executed to restore the building's integrity in this area. The roof repairs have been completed, the building's interior walls have been removed and all the structural work is complete. REMAINING SCOPE OF WORK Work remaining to complete the conversion of the M2 Building includes the following: (1) Contracted installation of coiling doors in the building's exterior. (2) Interior finishes including repairs to locations where masonry walls were removed, floor repairs and painting. (3) Installation of lighting and power supply. (4) Purchase and installation of shelving systems. Schedule Installation of the Coiling Doors will take place in Q4 2021. The remaining interior work will be completed by Q1 2022. Activity Previous Budget Authorization Q1 2021 Construction Start Q3 2021 Commission authorization Q4 2021 Construction Completion Q1 2022 In-use date Q1, 2022 Cost Breakdown This Request Total Project Design $0 $25,000 Construction $80,000 $305,000 Total $80,000 $330,000 ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED Alternative 1 Install a less costly gate system and leave the interior unfinished Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting). COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 8h Page 3 of 4 December 14, 2021 Cost Implications: The project can be completed within budget. Pros: (1) The project can be completed using Port Crafts to fabricate chain link gates. Cons: (1) The building will not be entirely secure. (2) The contents will have exposure to the elements. This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 2 Commission approval of necessary funding to complete the work. Cost Implications: The Project will cost the Port $80,000 more than anticipated. Pros: (1) The building conversion will be completed as planned. (2) The building will be secure and kept protected from the elements. Cons: (1) Aside from cost implications, there are no adversities to this solution. This is the recommended alternative. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary Capital Expense Total COST ESTIMATE Original estimate $180,000 $70,000 $250,000 Previous changes net $229,000 $21,000 $250,000 Current change $80,000 $0 $80,000 Revised estimate $309,000 $21,000 $330,000 AUTHORIZATION Previous authorizations $229,000 $21,000 $250,000 Current request for authorization $80,000 0 $80,000 Total authorizations, including this request $309,000 $21,000 $330,000 Remaining amount to be authorized $0 $0 $0 Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds This project is part of C801088 Maritime: 2020 Small Projects and has been included in both the 2021 Capital Plan and the draft 2022 Capital Plan. This project is funded by the General Fund. Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting). COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 8h Page 4 of 4 December 14, 2021 Financial Analysis and Summary Project cost for analysis $330,000 (of which $309,000 is expected to be capital) Business Unit (BU) Recreational Boating Effect on business performance This project will maintain current revenue from (NOI after depreciation) Shilshole Bay Marina Operations. Depreciation will increase by about $20,600 per year for 15 years. IRR/NPV (if relevant) No incremental revenue. The NPV is the present value of the project cost CPE Impact N/A Future Revenues and Expenses (Total cost of ownership) Extending the useful service life of our existing assets defers eventual replacement costs for a longer period, supporting the economic vitality of our operations. Other economic benefits include cost effectiveness and minimum disruption to the terminal operations. ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST (1) Presentation PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS None. Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.