10b. Memo
International Market Feasibility Study
COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM Item No. 10b ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting March 28, 2023 DATE: March 14, 2023 TO: Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director FROM: David McFadden, Managing Director, Economic Development Division Annie Tran, Economic Development Program Manager SUBJECT: Approve Memorandum of Understanding with King County to Support International Market feasibility Study Total estimated project cost: $199,999 ACTION REQUESTED Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with King County that formalizes the county’s funding support and participation in the International Public Market feasibility study. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Port of Seattle and King County are interested in conducting a feasibility study surrounding the concept of developing of an International Public Market facility in South King County that will attract tourists and visitors, provide a gathering space, showcase local cultural attributes, and support economic development and entrepreneurship for small businesses, (with an emphasis on supporting small ethnic businesses). The proposed study will not exceed $199,999 and the MOU formalizes the County’s financial commitment of $50,000 to support this effort. The MOU also establishes a partnership with King County to manage the feasibility study including participation in the RFP selection process and project advisory committee. The scope of this feasibility study includes the following elements: 1. Determine Feasibility and Benefits of an International Public Market – If we build it will they come? Who will come? Will there be enough venders/customers/etc.? 2. Identify Preferred Market Attributes – Planning for size of market, number of vendors, parking considerations, accessibility considerations, etc. Template revised January 10, 2019. COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 10b Page 2 of 4 Meeting Date: March 28, 2023 3. Identify Market Site Requirements – Identifies preferred size, zoning, proximity to infrastructure/utilities, proximity to transportation, proximity to other amenities, visibility and aesthetics etc. 4. Identify Site Possibilities – Will look at candidate sites and evaluate how certain properties fit with overall Market attributes and requirements. This may include some preliminary work related to cost of property acquisition, development, etc. 5. Proforma Capital and Operating Cost Projection – Showing revenues/expenses and grounding financials into core assumptions about Public Market operations (including operator/concessions assumptions) 6. Community engagement elements and impact on existing and prospective businesses (emphasis on ethnic businesses). 7. Recommendations/Next Steps JUSTIFICATION Development of an International Public Market facility in South King County supports the Port’s Century Agenda. An international marketplace can help advance this region as a leading tourism destination and business gateway. The proposed international market would be very proximate to and accessible from SEA. It would be a draw for SEA passengers from domestic or international locations. It would also attract residents and visitors from surrounding communities. An international marketplace can also promote regional growth and benefit the Cities of Tukwila, SeaTac and other communities in South King County. The marketplace would generate economic activity, support jobs, and support small businesses. It would also help prevent some of the displacement of small businesses that result as the region continues to grow and change. Developing an international marketplace can also advance equity, diversity and inclusion. South King County is home to large immigrant and refugee communities that are often disadvantaged in terms of benefiting and participating in the region’s growth. An international marketplace can support ethnic entrepreneurs and be a source of jobs and wealth generation for the area’s diverse communities. Diversity in Contracting Staff has contacted the Diversity in Contracting Department regarding this procurement and included several WMBE firms in the solicitation. Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting). COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 10b Page 3 of 4 Meeting Date: March 28, 2023 Schedule Draft report on current market conditions and June 15, 2023 interviews from local stakeholders Identify Market attributes and preferred site August 30, 2023 requirements and potential sites Identify public market site possibilities September 30, 2023 Develop Proforma capital and operating cost November 15, 2023 projections Final feasibility report for the International December 31, 2023 Public Market concept Present findings to stakeholders January/February 2024 ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED Alternative 1 – Do not execute MOU and do not complete feasibility study. Cost Implications: $149,999 savings to Port from not doing study. Pros: (1) Saves funding for other Port projects and priorities. (2) Avoids raising expectations surrounding Port investment in South King County. Cons: (1) May miss opportunity to advance equitable economic development. (2) Undercuts partnership with King County to jointly evaluate public market development opportunity. This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 2 – Delay adoption of MOU and project. Cost Implications: $149,999 investment would be deferred to a future date. Pros: (1) Allows time to build awareness and partnership with South King County cities and communities. Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting). COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 10b Page 4 of 4 Meeting Date: March 28, 2023 (2) Helps EDD staff manage multiple projects with limited capacity. Cons: (1) Delay not consistent with external messaging around project and could create issues. (2) Delay could jeopardize partnership with King County surrounding this project. This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 3 – Execute MOU and complete feasibility study. Cost Implications: $149,999 (total cost to Port). Pros: (1) Advances partnership surrounding potential development of International Public Market. (2) Support Century Agenda priorities advancing equity, tourism and regional growth. Cons: (1) Staff capacity is limited especially if any public facility development is anticipated. (2) Legal authority for Port to build/fund market still unclear. This is the recommended alternative. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary Expense Total COST ESTIMATE Original estimate $199,999 $199,999 AUTHORIZATION Previous authorizations 0 0 Remaining amount to be authorized $0 $0 Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds Port funding to support this feasibility study is in the Economic Development Division’s 2023 budget. This project will be funded by the Port property tax levy. ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST (1) Draft memorandum of understanding (2) Presentation slides PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS None Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.