10e. Memo

T91 Trail Bridge Removal and Widening

COMMISSION 
AGENDA MEMORANDUM                        Item No.          10e 
ACTION ITEM                            Date of Meeting     September 12,2023 

DATE:     July 26, 2023 
TO:        Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director 
FROM:    David McFadden, Managing Director, Economic Development Division 
Kyra Lise, Director of Real Estate Development 
Stefan Wynn, Capital Project Manager IV 
SUBJECT:  T91 Trail Bridge Removal and Segment Widening (CIP# C801192) 
Amount of this request:               $1,475,000 
Total requested project cost:          $1,525,000 
ACTION REQUESTED 
Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to proceed with design and
construction for the T91 Trail Bridge Removal and Segment Widening. This single authorization
is for $1,475,000 of a total estimated project cost of $1,525,000. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
This project will remove the existing pedestrian/bicycle bridge and replace with an on-grade path,
widen the existing pinch point south of the pedestrian/bicycle bridge and upgrade the existing
rail crossing. 
JUSTIFICATION 
1)  Improve Public Safety - This project improves public safety by upgrading these trail
segments to American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 
design standards where applicable to allow for two-way traffic and reduce risk of
collisions. 
2)  Improve  Accessibility   -   This  project  addresses  accessibility   challenges   at  the
pedestrian/bicycle bridge and the rail crossing to expand the number of users who can
enjoy and utilize this unique non-vehicular route between Interbay and Downtown. 
Diversity in Contracting 
Design is being executed through an existing IDIQ with preestablished contracting goals of 25%.
With the small nature of this project, it presents a great opportunity to have high WMBE 

Template revised January 10, 2019.

             COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 10e                                 Page 2 of 4 
Meeting Date: September 12, 2023 
participation. The Diversity in Contracting Department will be engaged as part of the Bid
Document preparation to establish these goals. 
DETAILS 
Scope of Work 
Work included to widen the two trail segments, about 750 feet of trail in total. 
(1)   Remove the existing pedestrian/bicycle bridge and replace with an on-grade path to
meet standard design criteria of a ten-foot paved trail (10’-0”) with two-foot (2’-0”) 
buffers areas consistent with existing tree planting wherever possible. 
(2)   Widen the existing pinch point south of the pedestrian/bicycle bridge to a paved width
of 8-feet 6-inches (8’-6”) with no buffer by moving the east fence per an easement with
BNSF railroad. This is an acceptable alternate when existing fixed elements like train
tracks and buildings exist. 
(3)   Upgrade the rail crossing in the south pinch point segment to AASHTO or National
Association of Transportation Officials (NACTO) design standards address safety and
accessibility issues, which ever is the higher standard. 
(4)   Revise grading to direct flow to existing stormwater conveyance system. Coat new and
existing fences within the project boundary to reduce zinc runoff. 
(5)   Install new fencing where required and paint existing fence in segment areas to remain. 
(6)   Install conduit sleeves under the trail for future lighting opportunities. 
Schedule 
Activity 
Commission design authorization               2023 Quarter 3 
Design start                                       2023 Quarter 3 
Commission construction authorization          2023 Quarter 3 
Construction start                                2024 Quarter 3 
In-use date                                       2024 Quarter 4 
Cost Breakdown                                     This Request           Total Project 
Design                                                    $525,000               $575,000 
Construction                                              $950,000               $950,000 
Total                                                         $1,475,000              $1,525,000 



Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).

             COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 10e                                 Page 3 of 4 
Meeting Date: September 12, 2023 
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED 
Alternative 1 – Maintain the current condition. 
Cost Implications: None. 
Pros: 
(1)   No additional cost to the Port. 
(2)   No trail closure during construction. 
Cons: 
(1)   Existing safety issues remain which could present the Port with potential Liabilities. 
(2)   Existing accessibility issues remain which limit usability and access to some users. 
This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 2 – In addition to the proposed alternative, move the west fence three feet six inches 
(3’-6”) at the southern pinch point to achieve a full 10-foot (10’-0”) paved width with 2-foot 
(2’-0”) buffers on each side. 
Cost Implications: $4,000,000 - $7,000,000 
Pros: 
(1)   Trail segments will meet minimum design standards to the full extent, including at the
southern pinch point. 
Cons: 
(1)   The rail spur would need to be shifted which would add considerable cost, extend the
construction duration, and cut off all rail access to the Port during construction. 
This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 3 – Remove the existing pedestrian/bicycle bridge and replace with an on-grade path 
meeting minimum design standards and  widen the existing pinch point south of the
pedestrian/bicycle bridge as much as feasible per an easement with BNSF Railways. 
Cost Implications: $1,525,000 
Pros: 
(1)   Improves safety and accessibility. 
(2)   Limited project scope will facilitate a shorter construction period and impact to daily
users from the trail closure. 
Cons: 
(1)   Due to the existing constraints of the existing rail lines on both sides of the trail, the full
standards design width with buffers cannot be achieved at the southern pinch point and
therefore tree planting is limited. 
(2)   Does not include time-intensive sustainability and equity elements, lighting installation, 
or waste receptacles. 
This is the recommended alternative. 

Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).

             COMMISSION AGENDA – Action Item No. 10e                                 Page 4 of 4 
Meeting Date: September 12, 2023 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary              Capital        Expense           Total 
COST ESTIMATE 
Original estimate                                 $1,525,000               $0      $1,525,000 
AUTHORIZATION 
Previous authorizations                             $50,000                0         $50,000 
Current request for authorization                $1,475,000                0     $1,1475,000 
Total authorizations, including this request       $1,525,000                0      $1,525,000 
Remaining amount to be authorized                    $0             $0             $0 
Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds 
This project was included in the 2023 Capital Plan under C801192 T91 Trail Improvements with a
total estimated cost of $1,200,000. The current total project estimate is $1,525,000. The
additional cost will be covered by management reserves. 
The project will be funded by the General Fund. 
A separate easement deal with BNSF includes a land transfer that will net cash proceeds to the
Port. 
Financial Analysis and Summary 
Project cost for analysis              $1,525,000 
Business Unit (BU)                  Portfolio Management/Parks 
Effect on business performance     This project is expected to increase annual depreciation
(NOI after depreciation)             by approximately $50K. 
IRR/NPV (if relevant)                NA 
CPE Impact                       NA 
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST 
(1)   Presentation 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
None 



Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).



Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.