Minutes

Audio and  video  recordings of  the  meeting  proceedings  and  meeting  materials  are  available  on  the 
Port  of  Seattle  web  site – www.portseattle.org.   The  approximate  point  in  the video  recording  for 
each agenda item is identified by hours, minutes, and seconds; example:  00:01:30. 
APPROVED MINUTES 
COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 13, 2011 
The Port of Seattle Commission met in a regular meeting Tuesday, December 13, 2011, at Port of 
Seattle  Headquarters,  Commission  Chambers,  2711  Alaskan  Way,  Seattle,  Washington.  
Commissioners Albro,  Creighton,  Holland, and  Tarleton  were  present.  Commissioner Bryant was 
absent. 

1. CALL TO ORDER 
The regular meeting was called to order at 1:05 p.m. by Rob Holland, Commission Vice President. 

2. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to RCW 42.30.110 
None. 

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 

3. (00:02:10) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 
Special meeting of October 11, 2011. 

Motion for approval of minutes for the October 11, 2011, special meeting – Tarleton 
Second – Albro 
Motion carried by the following vote: 
In Favor:  Albro, Creighton, Holland, Tarleton (4) 
Absent for the vote:  Bryant 

4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS 
None. 

5. (00:02:44) UNANIMOUS CONSENT CALENDAR 
At  the  request  of  Commissioner Tarleton, item  5h was  removed  from  the unanimous consent 
calendar for separate discussion and vote. 
Commissioners 
Bill Bryant 
Commission President 
Tom Albro 
John Creighton 
Rob Holland 
Gael Tarleton 
P.O. Box 1209 
Seattle, Washington  98111 
www.portseattle.org 
206.787.3000 
Tay Yoshitani 
Chief Executive Officer

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 2 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

5a. Approval  of claims  and  obligations for  the  period  of  November  1,  2011,  through 
November 30, 2011, in the amount $51,777,590.34. 
5b. Authorization  for  the  Chief Executive Officer  to enter  into  an interlocal agreement  with 
King  County  for  emergency  medical  services  effective  March  1,  2012,  through 
December 31,  2019,  with  two six-year  options  to  extend the  agreement  for  a  maximum 
length  of  20  years.  The  Port  of  Seattle  will pay  King  County  $41,196  in  2012,  and 
$41,200 annually thereafter, subject to an annual Consumer Price Index adjustment, for 
services from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019. 
Request document(s):  Commission agenda memorandum dated December 2, 2011, and interlocal 
agreement provided by Randy Krause, Port of Seattle Fire Chief. 

5c. Authorization  for  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  to  execute  a  new  collective  bargaining 
agreement  (CBA)  between  the  Port  of  Seattle  and  the  International  Association  of 
Firefighters  Local  1257.  The  CBA  covers  the  period  from  January  1,  2012,  through 
December 31, 2013. 
Request document(s):  Commission agenda memorandum dated December 7, 2011, and collective 
bargaining agreement provided by Trish Murphy, Labor Relations Manager. 

5d. Authorization  for  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  to  issue  Change  Order  #030  for  the  North 
Expressway  Relocation  (NER),  Phase  1,  Final  Paving  Landscaping  and  Reclamation 
Project,  to  grant  a  time  extension  of  163  days  for  a  revised  contract  completion  date  of 
November 18, 2011, and in the amount of $17,178.  No new funding is requested as funds 
have been previously authorized in the NER Phase 1 program budget (MC-0316561). 
Request  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated  December  6,  2011, provided  by 
Ralph Graves, Managing Director, Capital Development Division. 

5e. Ratification  of  the  issuance  of  1)  Change  Order  #3  in  the  amount  of  $186,000  and 
authorization  for  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  to  issue  a  second  as  yet  unnumbered 
change order for up to $239,000 to install four new stainless steel enclosures under four 
main  terminal  skybridges  at  the  Seattle-Tacoma  International  Airport  for  up  to  a  total 
amount  of  $425,000;  and  2)  as  yet  unnumbered  change  order(s)  for  up  to  $640,000  to 
complete  the  North  and  South  Satellite  Transit  System  Station  escalators in  two  phases 
at each location instead of one phase.  Funds to cover the cost of the change orders are 
part  of  the  project  contingency  funds  that  were  included  in  the  previously  approved 
Terminal Escalators Modernization authorizations (MC-0316531/CIP #C800237). 
Request  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated December  2,  2011, provided  by 
Ralph Graves, Managing Director, Capital Development Division. 

5f. Authorization  for  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  to  execute  appropriate  contract 
documents  to  renew  our  existing  Microsoft  enterprise  software  license  agreement  for 
another three years, through December 31, 2014, at a cost not to exceed $2.5 million. 
Request  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated December  5,  2011, provided  by 
Peter Garlock, Chief Information Officer.

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 3 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

5g. Authorization  for  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  to  execute  a  new memorandum  of 
agreement between the Port of Seattle and the International Longshore and Warehouse 
Union  Local  9  Aviation  Operations/Aviation  Security,  to  provide  for  the  temporary 
assignment of bargaining unit members to positions outside of the bargaining unit. 
Request  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated December  7,  2011,  and 
memorandum of agreement provided by Kim Ramsey, Labor Relations Manager. 

Motion for approval of consent items 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, and 5g – Creighton 
Second – Tarleton 
Motion carried by the following vote: 
In Favor: Albro, Creighton, Holland, Tarleton (4) 
Absent for the vote:  Bryant 

5h. (00:03:50) Authorization  for  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  to  execute  an  agreed  order 
with  the  Washington  State  Department  of  Ecology,  related  to  the  Seattle-Tacoma 
International  Airport’s  National  Pollutant  Discharge  Elimination  Systems  permit,  to 
conduct  an  environmental  investigation,  and  to  implement  corrective  actions  as 
needed, to address stormwater discharges with elevated pH (alkaline). 
Request  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated December  2,  2011, and Agreed 
Order No.  8755 provided  by Elizabeth  Leavitt,  Director,  Aviation Planning and Environmental; and 
Robert Duffner, Environmental Compliance Program Manager. 

Presenter(s):  Mr. Duffner. 

Mr.  Duffner  explained  the  purpose  of  the  agreed  order  in  outlining  and  implementing  corrective 
action  to  address elevated pH levels in  stormwater discharges at  the  Airport.    He summarized  the 
National  Pollutant  Discharge  Elimination  Systems  (NPDES)  permit  issued  by  the  Department  of 
Ecology  requiring  regular  monitoring  of  all  Airport  water  discharges  for  pollutants  and  pH  levels 
prior  to  mixture  with  receiving waters,  such  as  streams  leading  to  Puget  Sound.    Mr.  Duffner 
described  allowable  pH  levels  and  explained  that  routine  monitoring  had  detected  elevated  pH 
levels in three stormwater ponds on the west side of the Airport.  He stated that testing showed the 
receiving waters of Miller and Walker Creeks had remained within the acceptable pH range. 

Mr.  Duffner  reported  that  a  likely  cause  of  the  increased  pH  might  be  algal  growth  during  sunny 
periods  associated  with  the  sediment  settling  features  built  into  the stormwater  detention  ponds 
and stated  that  the  agreed  order  establishes  the  basis  for  corrective  action  to  bring  the  Airport’s 
facilities  into  compliance  with  the  requirements  of  the  NPDES  permit.    He  distinguished  between 
the  agreed  order  presented  and  an action  order,  which  would  have  required  immediate  action  on 
the part of the Port and emphasized the collaborative nature of the agreed order. 

Commissioner  Tarleton  commented  on  her  interest  in  dealing  with  the  agenda  item  transparently 
for  the  benefit  of the  public,  especially  the  communities  surrounding  the  Airport.    She  noted  that

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 4 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

study  of  the  causes  of  the  elevated  pH  levels  would  continue  through  October  2012,  with 
completion of mitigation actions by October 2013. 

In  response  to  Commissioner  Albro,  Mr.  Duffner  stated  that  the  stormwater  ponds  are  quite  large 
and perform very well at draining stormwater runoff from the Airport’s runways. 

Motion for approval of item 5h – Tarleton 
Second – Albro 
Motion carried by the following vote: 
In Favor: Albro, Creighton, Holland, Tarleton (4) 
Absent for the vote:  Bryant 

6. DIVISION, CORPORATE, AND COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS 
6a. (00:12:50) Authorization  for  1)  the  Chief  Executive  Office  to  execute  the  Argo  Yard 
Truck  Roadway  memorandum  of  understanding  with  the  Freight  Mobility  Strategic 
Investment  Board,  the  City  of  Seattle,  the  Union  Pacific  Railroad, and  Prologis  L.P.; 
2) approval of Port of Seattle funds of $2,200,000 for the project; and 3) approval of the 
project, including initial steps of right-of-way acquisition and completion of design. 
Request  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated December  2,  2011, 
attachment A, memorandum  of  understanding, and computer  slide presentation provided  by Dan 
Burke, Regional Transportation, Public Affairs; and Eric Hanson, Seaport Planning Manager. 

Presenter(s):  Mr. Hanson and Mr. Burke. 

Mr. Burke described the project location south of Spokane Street and east of Terminal 106 and the 
congested  traffic  conditions  at  the  location.    He  presented  a  graphic  showing  the  project 
components,  which  are  related  to  the  East  Marginal  Way  grade  separation  project  and the 
southward relocation of an underpass of the East Marginal Way trestle. 

Mr.  Burke noted  the  overall  project  cost  is  $7.8  million  and  outlined  three project  elements, 
including  a  new  southbound  16-foot-wide  truck  roadway  primarily  on  property owned  by the 
industrial real estate  company  Prologis,  movement  of  the  roadway  and  other improvements  in  the 
current  public  right-of-way  of  Colorado  Street,  and  installation  by  the  Union  Pacific  Railroad  of  a 
new automated gate system to streamline traffic flow into the Argo Yard. 

Mr. Burke outlined the project benefits including a safer route for trucks and general purpose traffic, 
reduced  greenhouse  gas  emissions,  and  faster  drayage  route  and  faster  gate  processing  that 
translates into increased drays per trucking shift. 

Mr. Burke explained that, although it is a FMSIB project, the Port will be the project lead for the first 
two  project  elements.    In  response  to  Commissioner  Creighton’s  question  about  responsibility  for 
cost  overruns,  Mr.  Burke  stated  that  the  Port  is  contributing  $2.2  million  along  with  funding  from 
FMSIB and the Union Pacific Railroad and that regulatory requirements for the private road portion

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 5 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

of the project are somewhat less than for a project involving public roads.  He said the project is at 
about 10 percent design and that it is a candidate for grant funding, although there is some risk the 
Port would be expected to fund cost overruns. 

Commissioner  Creighton  commented  on  his  support  for  the  project,  which  he  said  is  important  to 
explanding freight capacity of the Port and explained that because he is a FMSIB board member, he 
would abstain from the authorization vote in order to avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest. 

Commissioner  Albro  stated  that,  in  addition  to  contributing  to  freight  capacity  goals,  the  project  also 
supports environmental goals of the Century Agenda by reducing diesel particulate matter emissions. 

Public comment was received from the following individuals: 
 Kent  Christopher, President  of  Western  Ports  Transportation  and  President  of  the 
Intermodal Group of the Washington Trucking Association.  Mr. Christopher commented 
on the importance of access to the Argo Yard and the safety and congestion concerns at 
the intersection and voiced support for the project. 
 Karen  Schmidt,  Executive  Director  of  FMSIB, submitted a  letter  dated  December  7, 
2011,  expressing  FMSIB’s  commitment  to  the  project.   A  copy  of  the letter is,  by 
reference,  made  a  part  of  these  minutes,  is  marked exhibit A,  and  is  available  for 
inspection in Port offices. 

Motion for approval of item 6a – Albro 
Second – Tarleton 
Motion carried by the following vote: 
In Favor:  Albro, Creighton, Holland, Tarleton (3) 
Abstaining:  Creighton (1) 
Absent for the vote:  Bryant 

6b. (00:32:08) Authorization  for  the  Chief Executive  Officer  to  execute  a  settlement 
agreement  that  grants  the  Boeing  Company  access  to  undertake  environmental 
cleanup,  bankline  corrective  measures,  habitat  restoration,  and  install/improve 
stormwater  infrastructure  on  former  Commercial  Waterway  District  No.  1  property.  In 
exchange,  Boeing  will  provide  $1.5  million  in  compensation  as  well  as  allow  the  Port 
temporary access to a portion of  the Boeing Developmental Center for construction of 
the Terminal 117 Natural Resource Damage Habitat Restoration project. 
Request  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum with  attachments dated December  5, 
2011, provided  by Joe  McWilliams,  Managing  Director,  Real  Estate  and  Property  Management;  and 
Tom  Tanaka,  Senior  Port  Counsel.  The  attachments  included a  draft  Boeing/Port  agreement  with 
exhibits 1 and 2; a Duwamish and Southwest Bank site access agreement with exhibits A, B, C, and 
D; a habitat restoration easement agreement with exhibits A, B, and C; a declaration of conservation 
easement with exhibit A; a stormwater outfall easement agreement with exhibits A and B; and a site 
access agreement for the Port of Seattle on Boeing property.

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 6 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

Presenter(s):  Mr. McWilliams. 

Mr.  McWilliams  reported  that  the  Boeing  Company  has  a  restoration  project  underway  on  the 
Duwamish River but that the Port owns the bankline.  He stated the authorization is the result of a 
year  of  negotiation  to  provide  the  necessary  access.    At  the  request  of  Commissioner  Creighton, 
Mr. McWilliams explained that the settlement agreement aligns with Port objectives in the areas of 
stormwater  management  and  habitat  restoration along  the  Duwamish  River.    Commissioner  Albro 
noted  that  the  Commission  is  very  familiar  with  the  settlement  agreement,  on  which  he  said  the 
Commissioners had been briefed several times. 

Motion for approval of item 6b – Tarleton 
Second – Creighton 
Motion carried by the following vote: 
In Favor:  Albro, Creighton, Holland, Tarleton (4) 
Absent for the vote:  Bryant 

At the discretion of the Chair, the Commission advanced to consideration of – 

8. NEW BUSINESS 
8a. (00:34:52) Authorization for the Chief Executive Officer to execute a purchase and sale 
agreement  with  the  City  of  Kirkland  for  the  sale  of  a  portion  of  the Woodinville 
Subdivision (“Eastside Corridor”). 
Request  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated  December 13,  2011, and 
unexecuted  purchase  and  sale agreement provided  by Joe  McWilliams,  Managing  Director,  Real 
Estate and Property Management; and Isabel Safora, Deputy General Counsel. 

Presenter(s):  Mr. McWilliams. 

Mr.  McWilliams  reported  that  the  Port  is  working  to  close  sale of  a  portion  of  the  Eastside  Rail 
Corridor to the City of Kirkland in the first quarter of 2012.  He stated the transaction requires a 60-
day  due  diligence  period  that  would  not  commence  until Commission  approval of the  terms  of  the 
purchase  and  sale  agreement.   He  said  that  closer  to  the  closing  date,  a  property  surplus 
resolution  would  be  presented  for  Commission  approval.    Mr.  McWilliams  commented  on  the 
interest of the City of Kirkland in using this portion of the rail corridor to link newly annexed areas to 
the  north  with  the  rest  of  the  community  through  the  downtown  area,  and  stated  that  the  Kirkland 
City Council unanimously approved the transaction on December 12, 2011. 

Commissioner  Creighton  commented  on  the  Chief  Executive  Officer’s  efforts  to  bring  the  critical 
asset of the Eastside Rail Corridor into public ownership.  In response to Commissioner Albro, Mr. 
McWilliams  confirmed  that  the  City of  Kirkland  is  purchasing  the  corridor  segment  in  an  as-is, 
where-is condition and assuming responsibility for environmental studies.

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 7 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

At  the  request  of  Commissioner  Creighton,  General  Counsel  Craig  Watson  announced  that  in  the 
Lane taxpayer challenge to the Port’s authority to purchase the rail corridor in the first instance, on 
December 9, 2011, the Port’s motion was granted to dismiss the suit. 

Motion for approval of item 8a – Tarleton 
Second – Albro 
Motion carried by the following vote: 
In Favor:  Albro, Creighton, Holland, Tarleton (4) 
Absent for the vote:  Bryant 

Following consideration of agenda item 8a, the Commission returned to consideration of – 

7. STAFF BRIEFINGS 
At the discretion of the Chair, the Commission advanced to consideration of – 

7b. (00:43:30) Year-End  Briefing – Update  on  the  Consolidated  Rental  Car  Facility 
Program. 
Presentation document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated  December 6,  2011, briefing 
attachment, and computer slide presentation provided by Michael Ehl, Director Airport Operations; 
George  England,  Program  Leader,  Project  Management  Group;  and Janice  Zahn,  Assistant 
Director Engineering Construction Services. 

Presenter(s):  Mr. England and Ms. Zahn. 

Mr. England described 2011 as a successful year for the rental car program.  Ms. Zahn highlighted 
the following overall or 2011 accomplishments in the Consolidated Rental Car Facility program: 
 Overall 1.5 million labor hours worked; 
 Overall 4,200 new jobs created, which is higher than original projections; 
 Over 97 percent recycling on RCF project in 2011; 
 Submission of all LEED certification documentation, with a silver rating anticipated; 
 Employment  of  two  former  veterans  on  the  project  through  the  Helmets-to-Hardhats 
program; 
 Acceptance of 29 buses; and 
 Better safety records than industrywide for lost time. 

Ms. Zahn reported that the project is on track for opening in April and that costs are trending within 
the  authorized  budget.    In  response  to  Commissioner  Creighton,  Mr.  England  stated  that  the 
opening date is set for April 19, 2012.  Mr. England described preparations for testing the capacity 
of the facility and the signage and wayfinding for the facility.  He noted that all but one company are 
permitted for tenant improvements, and stated that LEED certification would be just shy of the Gold 
rating due to the decision not to buy points for the project.

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 8 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

Mr. England  noted  changes  to  program costs as  of  December 6, 2011, and  reported  that  revenue 
from customer facilities charges is $1.7 million ahead of forecast.  He noted upcoming requests for 
Commission  action  on  January  10,  2012,  including  an  amendment  to  the  Walker  agreement 
relating  to  extension  of  the  Turner  contract  and  a  request  for  authorization  under  critical  work 
provisions to advertise an open-order major works contract to install furniture and close scope gaps 
in the Turner contract.  He noted that a request for property surplus for water lines to be transferred 
to the Highline Water District will also be coming the Commission for future approval. 

At the discretion of the Chair, the Commission advanced to consideration of – 

8. NEW BUSINESS 
8b. (00:58:15) Port  of  Seattle  Commission  Motion  to  Retain  Outside  Counsel to  Review  a 
Worker  Retention  Policy  for  the  Seattle-Tacoma  International  Airport Concessions 
Program. 

Request document(s):  Text of motion and statement in support of motion presented at the meeting. 

Commissioner  Creighton  explained  that  over  the  next  three  to  five  years,  the  Airport’s  master 
concessions  process  would  be  under  consideration.    He  noted  the  variety  of  models  for  airport 
concessions  programs  with  various  legal  considerations.    Commissioner  Creighton  presented  a 
motion  to  retain  outside  counsel  to  review  a  worker  retention  policy  for  the  Airport  concessions 
program and read a statement in support of the motion into the record. 

The motion reads as follows: 
1. The  Port  of  Seattle  Commission  shall  retain  its  own  outside  legal  counsel  to 
provide  an  independent  review  and  analysis  of  the  legal  basis  for  a  worker 
retention policy and any related issues as determined by the Commission. 
2. In retaining the services of outside counsel, the Commission would like to find 
an  approach  that  addresses  concerns  of  job  security  for  workers  currently 
employed  at  the  Airport  while  providing  meaningful business  opportunities  for 
DBE and other small concessionaires. 
3. The  Commission  may  expend  up to  twenty-five  thousand dollars  ($25,000) for 
these  outside  legal  services.    If  further  funding  is  required,  the  Commission  will 
discuss the need for additional funding in open public session. 

Commissioner  Tarleton  spoke  in  support  of  the  motion  and  commented  in  appreciation of the 
stakeholder  process  and  assistance  from  staff.    She  remarked  on  the  importance  for  the 
Commission to have a solid understanding of the implications of its decisions.  Commissioner Albro 
also  spoke  in  support  of  the  motion,  which  he  said  would  be  the  most  effective  way  for  the 
Commission to understand the legal matters from a fact-based perspective. 

Motion to  retain  outside  counsel  to review  a  worker  retention  policy  for  the  Seattle-Tcoma 
International Airport concessions program – Creighton

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 9 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

Second – Tarleton 
Motion carried by the following vote: 
In Favor:  Albro, Creighton, Holland, Tarleton (4) 
Absent for the vote:  Bryant 

Following consideration of agenda items 7b and 8b, the Commission returned to consideration of – 

7a. (01:06:30) Aviation Concessions Program Principles and Practices. 
Presentation  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated  November  28,  2011, 
computer  slide  presentation,  and  attachments  concerning  the  concessions  policy  and  principles 
stakeholder  process (exhibit A),  draft  principles  and  practices  guidance  document  (exhibit B), 
concessions  focus  group  summary  (exhibit  C),  outreach  meeting  summaries  (exhibit  D), 
concessions stakeholder process discussion summary (exhibit E), combined stakeholder meetings 
summary  (exhibit  F),  best  practices  table  (exhibit  G),  Airport  Cooperative  Resource  Program 
resource  manual  section  8  excerpts  (exhibit  H),  build-out  costs  and  lease  terms  study  (exhibit I), 
Airport  Cooperative  Resource  Program  resource  manual  section 9 excerpts  (exhibit J),  and  order 
on motions for summary judgment in the case of Flying Eagle Esspresso Inc. v. Host International 
Inc. provided  by Mark  Reis,  Managing  Director,  Aviation  Division;  and Deanna  Zachrisson, 
Manager, Aviation Concessions Business. 

Presenter(s):  Mr. Reis and Ms. Zachrisson. 

Mr.  Reis outlined  the  anticipated  transition  in  the  Airport  concessions  program  in  the  2015-2017 
time frame noting 90 percent of the Airport’s concessions leases will be available for renewal.  He 
commented  on  the  last  major  concessions  transition  at  the  Airport  during  2004-2005,  when  the 
Airport  shifted  from  having  a  single  master  concessionaire  to  its  current  hybrid model  of  prime 
concessionaires, subtenants, and direct leases.  He noted the composition of the current program, 
in  which  64  percent  of  units  are  operated  by  prime  concessionaires,  13  percent  by  airport 
concessions  disadvantaged  business  enterprise  (ACDBE) subtenants,  18  percent  by  non-ACDBE 
direct  leases,  and  5  percent  by  ACDBE  direct  leases.    In  response  to  Commissioner  Albro,  Mr. 
Reis  confirmed  that  selection  of  ACDBE  subtenants  and  allocation  of  unit  space  to  them  is 
controlled by the prime concessionaires. 

Between  2003  and  2010,  Mr.  Reis  reported  that  sales rose  approximately 75  percent,  increasing 
Port revenue  82  percent, and  concessions  employment  increased  by  more  than  100  percent  from 
732 to 1,508, while enplanements rose only 10 percent.  He outlined the current concessionaires at 
the Airport, identifying those that are locally owned and operated.  Ms. Zachrisson identified four of 
the 11 locally owned and operated concessions that are subtenants of a prime concessionaire. 

Mr.  Reis  described  the  goals  driving  the  2004-2005  redevelopment,  including  emphasis  on  local 
flavor,  downward  adjustment  to  street  pricing,  direct  competition  including  shorter  leases, use  of 
direct leases, and promotion of small businesses, and outlined redevelopment outcomes, including 
higher  sales,  higher  revenues, increased jobs,  better  customer  service,  and  national program 
recognition.

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 10 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

In response to Commissioner Tarleton, Mr. Reis stated that the tiered structure of the concessions 
program  was  developed  in  discussions  with  the  Port  Commission  to  accommodate  the 
recommendation of organized labor to retain more concessionaires that had labor contracts. 

Ms. Zachrisson described the concessions stakeholder process, listing various stakeholder groups 
and  outlining  the process components.    She  stated  that  to  ensure  impartiality,  experienced third-
party public involvement professionals were engaged to facilitate and document the process, led by 
the community involvement firm PRR.  Ms. Zachrisson reported that 56 individuals from a range of 
36  companies  participated  in  the  stakeholder  process  and  that  three  focus  groups  engaged  the 
traveling  public.    She  said  the  principles  and  practices  for  discussion  included  customer 
experience, social and environmental responsibility, financial stewardship, and selection process. 

Ms. Zachrisson outlined areas of agreement and disagreement arising from the process.  Areas of 
agreement  included  that  there  should  be  a  mix  of  offerings;  that  it is  important  to  encourage  a 
strong  sense  of  place;  that environmentally  sustainable  practices  should  be  encouraged;  that  the 
selection  process  should  be  efficient,  fair,  and  reduce  barriers  to  entry;  and  that  the  high  cost  of 
doing business at the Airport should be reflected in concessions policies. 

Mr.  Reis reported  on  five  main  areas  of  disagreement  arising  out  of  the  stakeholder  process,  as 
follows, and elaborated on the factors to be considered for each area of disagreement: 
 How best to balance the mixture of multi-unit, prime concessionaires with direct leases; 
 How to maintain or increase participation by small or ACDBE businesses; 
 How  the  Port can reduce  high  costs  of  investment  and  other barriers to  its  concessions 
program; 
 Whether the Port should continue to require street pricing; and 
 Whether the Port should place requirements on the labor practices of concessionaires. 

Regarding  balance  of  prime  concessionaires  with  direct  leases, Mr.  Reis  stated  labor  prefers  a 
model  in  which  two  or  three  prime  operators  employ  90  percent  of  the  concessions  workers, 
whereas  local  businesses  tend  to  prefer  local  ownership  and  a  direct-lease  structure.    He  added 
that none of the prime concessionaires are local companies. 

Regarding  participation  by  ACDBE  businesses,  Mr.  Reis  reported  the  dominant  preference  by 
ACDBEs  voiced  through  the  stakeholder  process  is  to  operate  under  direct  leases,  although  the 
majority  of  current  ACDBEs  are  subtenants.    In  response  to  Commissioner  Tarleton,  Mr.  Reis 
stated  that  the  Airport’s  access  to  federal  funding  attaches  ACDBE  requirements to  the 
concessions  program.   In  response  to  Commissioner  Holland,  Mr.  Yoshitani  explained  that  the 
ACDBE goals differ from airport to airport.  Mr. Reis commented on factors affecting certifiability of 
ACDBE  businesses  and  the  small  available  pool  of  businesses  from  which  to  attract 
concessionaires.  Commissioner Holland commented on the lack of a study on ACDBE business at 
the  Airport  and  opined  that  the  goal  for  ACDBE  businesses  should  be  higher  than  20  percent  of 
gross sales.  Mr. Reis noted that ACDBE businesses are not necessarily local businesses. 

Commissioner  Creighton  stated  that  promoting  small  business  is  a  policy  priority  of  the  Port  and 
noted  that  build-out  costs  at  the  Airport  are  high.    He  asked  for  clarification  on  the  process  for

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 11 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

identifying small  or  disadvantaged  businesses  to  fill  concessions  opportunities  at  the  Airport.    Ms. 
Zachrisson  said  that  a  request  for  proposals  process  would  not  be  necessary  and  that  leasing 
directly to disadvantaged businesses is a more direct route. 

Commissioner  Albro  noted  that  concessions  sales  volumes  and  jobs  grew  dramatically  after 
terminating the master lease agreement previously in place at the Airport.  He stated that focusing 
on job growth, increased sales, and reflecting the local community is important whether the vehicle 
is through a prime concessionaire or smaller direct leases. 

In  response  to  Commissioner  Tarleton’s  questions  about  a  large  turnover  of  concessions  leases, 
Mr. Reis stated  that staff  recommends staggering  leases  so  they  do  not  all  end at  the  same  time.  
Commissioner  Creighton  recommended  adjusting  lease  terms  so  businesses  located  on  poor 
performing concourses would be able to appropriately amortize their infrastructure investments. 

Mr. Reis explained that a requests for proposal (RFPs) for a prime concessionaire are very explicit as 
to the mix of business concepts and locations desired by the Airport.  He added that the RFP process 
is  extensive  and  complex  and  by  its  nature  poses  a  barrier  to  small  business  and  reported  that  the 
trend in the industry is toward more direct leases and smaller prime concessionaire arrangements. 

Regarding  street  pricing,  Mr.  Reis  stated  that  some  stakeholders prefer a  model with  higher-than-
street  pricing  as  a  way  to  offset  the  high  cost  of  development  for  direct  lessees.    He  stated  that 
local  businesses  operating  the  same  concept  at  the  Airport  and  in  the  community  point  out  that 
they  are  restricted  to  using  street  pricing  at  both  venues.    He  reported  that  labor  representatives 
advocated  higher-than-street  pricing  with  the  expectation  that  the  additional  revenue  would  be 
applied  toward  higher  employee  wages  and  benefits,  and  stated  that  customers  in  focus  groups 
emphasized  their  preference  for street  pricing.    He  remarked  that  there  are examples in  the 
industry for  both street-pricing  and  higher-than-street-pricing models.    Mr.  Reis  suggested  that 
higher-than-street pricing should not be used to correct the problem of high development costs, or 
other  challenges  to  small  business,  that  could  be  addressed  through  other  means,  such  as 
progressive rate structures.  Commissioner Albro voiced his support for continuing street pricing in 
the Airport concessions program. 

Regarding  labor  practices  and  the  Port’s  role  in  placing  requirements  for  labor  practices  in  the 
concessions program, Mr. Reis reported that labor representatives advocate worker retention or labor 
harmony programs, whereas most stakeholders did not favor the Port placing such requirements.  In 
response  to  Commissioner  Holland,  Mr.  Reis  stated  that staff  is  aware  of worker  retention 
requirements at  the San  Francisco,  Oakland,  Los  Angeles,  San  Diego,  Phoenix,  Miami,  and  New 
York-New Jersey airports, many of which also have small businesses.  He commented that many of 
those  airports  are  run  by  general purpose  governments,  which  have  more  flexibility  regarding  social 
policies.    San  Diego  and  New  York-New  Jersey  are  operated  as  special  purpose  districts,  similar to 
the  Port  of  Seattle,  but  those  programs  either  do  not  aggressively  pursue  small  business  or exempt 
small  business  from  their worker  retention  requirements.    Commissioner  Albro  requested  more 
discussion of the issues of worker retention and labor harmony as separate issues. 

General  Counsel  Craig  Watson  reported  that  the  Port  has  some  unique  circumstances  that  have  to 
be taken into account and for which little guidance is available.  He spoke in favor of outside counsel

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 12 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

having an  opportunity  to  provide  an  opinion  on  the  subject  of  worker  retention  and he  characterized 
the legal debate over worker retention as a close question whenever it comes up.  He mentioned the 
permanent injunction issued in connection with the City Ice decision and the fact that the Port is not a 
general purpose government  with  broader  latitude  where  social  policy  is  concerned.    He  said  the 
Commission  would  have  to  decide  what  its  appropriate  level  of  risk  is  as  it  considers  such  policies.  
Commissioner  Tarleton  commented  on  the  importance  that  the  Port  take  a  position  early  on  labor 
practices rather than wait for the legal challenges elsewhere to be sorted out. 

Mr.  Reis noted that  a  worker  retention  requirement  would  introduce  risk  during  pendency  of 
litigation,  would  discourage  small  business  participation,  and  would  affect  recruitment  of 
concessionaires during pendency of litigation.  He pointed out that during the last redevelopment of 
the  concessions  program,  despite  not  having  a  worker  retention  requirement,  jobs  increased  over 
100 percent, and represented jobs increased by 47 percent.  He also noted that employee turnover 
is about  20  percent annually  and  stated  that about 75 percent  of  concessions  employees became 
employed  at  the  Airport  since  the  last  concessions  transition.  Mr.  Reis  stated  that  Airport 
concessionaires  are  interested  in  recruiting  employees  with  experience  working  at  the Airport,  as 
shown  during  the  recent  closure  of  Borders  Bookstore  and  the  recent  transition  of  the  duty-free 
concession from HMS Host to Hudson. 

Mr. Reis summarized the following recommendations for the Airport concessions program: 
 Management of the program as a hybrid model with a 50/50 mix of multi-unit contracts of 
six or more units with small packages of three units or less; 
 Meet or exceed the current 20-percent gross sales goal for ACDBE businesses and seek 
additional small and local business participation; 
 Revise the tenant build-out review process to reduce capital costs with the Port providing 
all infrastructure to the lease line; 
 Study the overall cost picture for concessionaires prior to finalizing a street-pricing policy 
for the 2015-2017 recruitment; and 
 Encourage, but not require, new concessions employers to hire current employees. 

Public comment was received from the following individuals: 
 Cindy  Richardson,  Vice  President  of  Unite  HERE  Local  8.  Ms.  Richardson commented 
that the opinions of Airport workers had been mischaracterized, that the Airport has been 
a  union  airport  for  decades, and  that  labor  harmony  and  worker  retention  were  widely 
accepted  by  the  concessionaires  who  participated  in  the  stakeholder  process.    She 
spoke  of  reorganizing the union  following  a  concessions  transition  and criticized  the 
stakeholder  process  for  not  inviting  input  from  positive  labor  and  small  business 
relationships.    Ms.  Richardson submitted her comments in  written  form,  and  a copy  of 
the document is, by reference, made a part of these minutes, is marked exhibit B, and is 
available for inspection in Port offices. 
 Julia  Nottingham,  employed  by  HMS  Host.    Ms.  Nottingham commented  on  the 
importance  of  employee  benefits  and  her  satisfaction in working  at  the  Airport.    She 
stated  she  was  shocked  at  staff’s  proposal  to  leave  Airport  workers  completely 
unprotected when their employer’s lease expires.

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 13 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

 Pascasie  Mukaruziga,  employed  by  HMS  Host.    Ms. Mukaruziga commented  on  her 
work at the Airport and her immigration to the United States.  She spoke of the benefits 
of  her employment  at  the Airport and  stated  she  hoped  the  Commission  would  consider 
working people’s needs, not just the interests of business. 
 Grant  McClamrock,  employed  by  HMS  Host.    Mr.  McClamrock spoke  of  working  at  the 
Airport  for  37  years  as  an  employee  of  HMS  Host  and  the  ability  to  transfer  over  the 
years  due  to  working  for  a  prime  concessionaire  with  a  worker  retention  policy.    He 
stated  the  prime  concessionaire  model  provides  for  a  stable  workforce  by  providing 
higher employee wages and benefits. 
 Stefan Moritz, Director of Strategic Affairs for Unite HERE Local 8.  Mr. Moritz stated staff 
ignored the needs and opinions of the represented employees who are the most important 
stakeholders in  ensuring a  successful  concessions  program.    He  said  the 
recommendations  were  not  in  the  best  interest  of  the  Port  of  Seattle  or  King  County 
taxpayers and commented  on labor  harmony  agreements  at  many  airports  around  the 
country  that  do  not  mandate  unionization.  Mr.  Moritz  commented  on  the  federally 
protected right of workers to organize, which he said is not at the discretion of employers. 
 Michael  Abate,  Organizer  with  Unite  HERE  Local  8.    Mr.  Abate  commented  on  the 
federally protected  right  of  workers to  organize,  which he  said  is not  at  the  discretion  of 
employers.    He  stated  that  any  business  that  cannot  commit  to  a  process  of  labor 
organization that maintains harmonious airport operations should not be considered for a 
lease at the Airport, regardless of the business’s size.  He stated stakeholder opposition 
to worker retention and labor harmony policies was misrepresented by Airport staff. 
 Bruce  Beckett,  Vice  President  of  the  Washington  Restaurant  Association.    Mr.  Beckett 
commended  the  positive  changes  resulting  from  the  2004-2005  concessions  program 
redevelopment.    He  provided  various  statistics  relating  to  potential  lessees  of 
concessions  spaces  and  stated  that  small  local  operators  want  flexibility  in  their  lease 
arrangements.    He  spoke  in  favor of  the  hybrid  concessions  program  model  that 
provides for both large prime concessionaires and smaller direct leases. 
 David  Mendoza,  Policy  Analyst  for  Puget  Sound  Sage.    Mr.  Mendoza encouraged  further 
study and eventual enactment of a worker retention/labor harmony policy, which he stated 
would provide security for concessions workers and help prevent them being forced to rely 
on  public  health  care  assistance.    He  stated  that  many  airports  around  the  United  States 
with worker retention policies also have vigorous small business programs. 
 LeeAnn Subelbia, Owner of Filo Foods/BK Foods.  Ms. Subelbia spoke of the sacrifices 
she has made  to  conduct  business  at  the  Airport.    She  commented  on  legal  and 
contractual  difficulties  arising  from  her  business’s  status  as  a  subtenant  and  advocated 
direct  leases  for  small  and  disadvantaged  businesses.    She  stated  that  in  her  30  years 
operating a business at the Airport there has never been an issue with worker retention. 
 Maxwell  Heigh,  Manager  for  Filo  Foods/BK  Foods.    Mr. Heigh commented  on  the 
sacrifices made by his family to operate their business at the Airport.  He commented on 
the  cooperative  relationship  between the company  and  its  employees  and  asked  that 
their business practices not be dictated to them. 
 William Hager, employed by Filo Foods/BK Foods.  Mr. Hager contrasted his experience 
working for Filo Foods and HMS Host and spoke in support of Filo Foods.

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 14 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

 Dan Bent of Bent Burgers.  Mr. Bent commented on his employment by HMS Host for 30 
years  and  his  ownership  of his  own  small  business.    He  complimented  the  stakeholder 
process  and  questioned  why  labor  representatives  attended  meetings  geared  toward 
gathering  feedback  from  business  owners.    Mr.  Bent  advocated  a  simplified  request  for 
proposal  process.    Mr.  Bent submitted his comments  in  written  form,  and  a  copy  of  the 
document  is,  by  reference,  made  a  part  of  these  minutes,  is  marked exhibit C,  and  is 
available for inspection in Port offices. 
 Heather  Arceo,  employed  by  Filo  Foods/BK  Foods.    Ms.  Arceo contrasted  her 
employment  for  Filo  Foods  with  that  at  HMS  Host  and  stated  she  preferred  the 
atmosphere of working for a family-oriented business. 
 Leonard  Lagmay,  employed  by  Filo  Foods/BK  Foods.    Mr.  Lagmay commented  on  his 
employment  by  Alaska  Airlines,  HMS  Host,  and  Filo  Foods  and  stated  he  appreciated 
the opportunity to work for a small, non-union employer.  He said his experience of being 
able  to  work  for  different  concessions  operators  at  the  Airport  showed  that  a  worker 
retention policy  was  unnecessary.  He added that if HMS Host had been the only prime 
concessionaire at the Airport, he would not have had the opportunity to continue to work 
at the Airport after leaving HMS Host. 
 Cecilia  Cordova  of  Connell  Cordova  Hunter  &  Gautschi,  representing  Filo  Foods/BK 
Foods.    Ms.  Cordova presented  a  memorandum  supporting  the  Aviation  Concessions 
Program’s recommendations  regarding  a  worker  retention  policy.    A copy  of  the 
document  is,  by  reference,  made  a  part  of  these  minutes,  is  marked exhibit D,  and  is 
available for inspection in Port offices.  Ms. Cordova spoke in support of the Commission 
motion  to  seek  outside  legal  counsel  and  stated  that  her  client  is  not  opposed  to  union 
organization,  but  that  small  companies  want  their  protected  right  to  assign  work  to  their 
own workforce. 
 Paul  Lawson,  District  Manager for Ivars.    Mr.  Lawson commented  on  the  importance  of 
Ivars’  employees  at  the  Airport  and  Ivars’  low  employee  turnover  rate.    He  commented 
on employee benefits and better-than-minimum-wage pay at Ivars. 
 Bob  Donegan,  President of  Ivars.    Mr.  Donegan commented  on  his  participation  in 
concessions  planning  at  the  Airport  for  over  20  years.  As  a  member  of  the  board  of 
directors  of  the  Seattle  Restaurant  Association,  Mr.  Donegan  commented  on  the 
association’s  role  in  identifying direct-lease  tenants at the  Airport.    He  pointed  out  that 
local operators provide local jobs and economic impact, revenues have increased at the 
Airport using  local operators,  direct  leases  are  the  most  productive  leases,  Ivars prefers 
to maintain control over their business practices, street pricing at the Airport needs to be 
communicated  better,  the  people  who  work  at  the  Airport  are  also  concessions 
customers, and build-out costs need to be reduced at the Airport. 
 Kehala  Ngiraidong-Omengkar,  employed  by Concourse  Concessions.    Ms.  Ngiraidong-
Omengkar commented  on  her  work  history  and  her  favorable  experience  working  for 
Concourse Concessions. 
 Takara Smith, employed by Lupiva Café and Tully’s Coffee.  Ms. Smith spoke of her four 
years of nonunion employment and the good benefits provided by her employer. 
 Emilie  Antiporda,  employed  by  Concourse  Concessions.    Ms.  Antiporda commented  on 
her  work  for  Concourse  Concessions  since  moving  into  the  area  following  Hurricane 
Katrina  in  2005.  She  spoke  of  the  flexibility  and  benefits  associated  with  her  job  and 
stated she preferred to work for a nonunion company.

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 15 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

 David Fukuhara, Managing Partner, Concourse Concessions.  Mr. Fukuhara commented 
on the importance of his company’s employees and spoke in support of the concessions 
stakeholder  process.    He  stated  his  support  for  direct  leases,  which  he  said  result  in 
higher  revenues  and  more  jobs  and  would  bring  more  efficient  communication  between 
disadvantaged  businesses  and  the  Port.    He  spoke  in  favor  of  increasing  the  goal  of 
ACDBE  revenues  from  20  to  30  percent  and  commented  on  challenges  facing  the 
ACDBE businesses on Concourse A. 
 Cariño Barragan Talancon, Lead Organizer for Casa Latina.  Ms. Talancon commented on 
the challenges facing immigrant workers at the Airport.  She spoke in support of a worker 
retention policy and commented on decreasing services provided by public assistance. 
 Marques  Warren,  Vice  President  of  Operations  for  Warren’s  News  and  Gift  Inc.    Mr. 
Warren commented  on  his  company’s  partnership  with  Hudson  News.    He  said  the 
company’s sales associates are union members, which was not the case when it started 
as  a  subtenant  of  HMS  Host.    He  spoke  of  the  challenges  facing  Concourse  A and 
stated that a 50 percent increase in labor cost resulting from working with a union has a 
tremendous impact on the ability of small businesses to compete at the Airport. 
 Rod  O’Neal,  Partner  at  Seatac  Bar  Group.    Mr.  O’Neal spoke  in  support  of  the  staff 
concessions  program recommendations  and  commented  on  the  challenges  facing 
disadvantaged  businesses  operating  on  Concourse  A.    He  commented  on  the  benefits 
provided  to  the  employees  of  the  Seatac  Bar  Group  and  stated  the  business  wants  to 
maintain control over its labor practices. 

Commissioner  Creighton  commented  on  focusing on  development  of  a  policy  that  ensures 
employee security during concessions transitions without impeding promotion of small business at 
the  Airport;  the  need  to  reflect  the  local  community  in  the  concessions  program;  and  finding 
opportunities  to  provide  small  businesses  an  opportunity  to  amortize  their  investment,  despite 
disparity in performance on different concourses. 

Commissioner Albro stated there is a shared dedication to the workforce at the Airport on the part 
of represented labor and small business and noted his support of the right of workers to organize.  
He  commented  on  the  importance  to  find  a  compromise  between  the  concerns  of  workers 
concerned they will be displaced that also creates meaningful business opportunities.  He spoke in 
favor of direct leases and joint ventures as concessions models. 

Commissioner  Tarleton commented  on  the  diversity  of  the  Airport  concessions  program  and  the 
successes  of  the  concessions  program  participants  since  2004,  including  environmental 
sustainability and participation by immigrants. 

Commissioner  Holland commented  on  the  importance  of increased  small  business  and  minority 
participation in the Airport concessions program, including a higher goal of 30 percent gross sales 
from  minority  businesses.    He stated he would  like  to  see  an  example  of  a  small  business  that  is 
successful  in  an  environment  with  a  worker  retention  policy  and that he  is  concerned  about  the 
difficulties faced at Concourse A. 

Agenda item 7b having been disposed of previously, the Commission advanced to consideration of –

PORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Page 16 of 16 
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2011 

7c. (03:23:25) Capital Improvement Projects for the Third Quarter, 2011. 
Presentation  document(s):    Commission  agenda memorandum dated December  5,  2011, third 
quarter report, and computer  slide presentation provided  by Ralph Graves,  Managing  Director, 
Capital Development. 

Presenter(s):  Mr. Graves. 

Mr. Graves presented capital improvement project summary statistics for the third quarter of 2011, 
which showed comparable project status over a five-quarter period.  He noted six Aviation projects 
that  are  behind  schedule,  including  a  water  system  isolation  valve  upgrade,  parking  system 
replacement,  common  use  equipment  expansion,  Concourse  D  common  use,  South  Satellite 
concessions  physical  layout  project,  and  South  Satellite  additional  gate  lobby.    He  stated  that  the 
delays in these six projects are related to the reduction of the Aviation capital budget. 

Mr.  Graves  reported  that  the  roof  replacement  program anticipates  a  savings  of  approximately 
$1 million.  He commented on delays in the Seaport Security Round 7 schedule, additional funding 
required  for  the  Terminal  86  grain  facility  modernization,  and  delays  in  the  C-15  HVAC 
improvements.    He  noted  other  delays  associated  with  the  enterprise  project  cost  system  for  the 
Capital  Development  Division  and  savings  of  $150,000  anticipated  to  be  saved  from  the  ground 
transportation management system project. 

Mr.  Graves  pointed  out  that  agenda  items  5d,  5e,  and  5f  on  the  consent  agenda  would  not  have 
required  Commission  authorization  if the  Commission  operated  under  staff’s  proposal  regarding 
revision  to  the  Port’s  delegation  of  authority  provisions  for  contracts.    These  three  items  would  have 
been reported to the Commission, but would have been executed by the Chief Executive Officer. 

Agenda  items 8a and  8b having  been  disposed  of  previously,  no  additional  new  business  was 
considered. 

9. POLICY ROUNDTABLE 
None. 

10. ADJOURNMENT 
There being no further business, the regular meeting was adjourned at 4:37 p.m. 



Tom Albro  
Secretary 
Minutes approved:  March 6, 2012.

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.