6c
PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6c ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting October 11, 2016 DATE: September 30, 2016 TO: Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer FROM: Ralph Graves, Senior Director, Capital Development David Brush, IAF Program Leader SUBJECT: International Arrivals Facility (IAF) Authorization to Accelerate Phase 2 Execution (CIP #C800583) Amount of this request: $11,000,000 Total estimated project cost: $660,365,000 ACTION REQUESTED Request Commission authorization to add all of the balance of the IAF Phase 2 scope to the current Phase 1 project. The total estimated cost of this added scope is $11,000,000, which will increase the total budget for IAF from $649,365,000 to $660,365,000. Also request Commission authorization for the Chief Executive Officer to execute needed contract amendments and change orders as required to execute this scope. SYNOPSIS The Port contracted a Design-Build team, Clark/SOM, to design and construct a new IAF at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport using an alternative project delivery method, Progressive Design Build. This request adds the balance of the building infrastructure and equipment required for the facility to accommodate a peak hour passenger processing capacity of 2,600 in order to meet existing year over year record growth, anticipated future growth and to take advantage of cost efficiencies of the current contract. These facilities were earlier anticipated and need to be initiated now to be available for operational use in 2020. During the April 26 briefing, staff presented to the Commission that as international traffic at the Airport continues to grow at a record pace and as the Airport continues to engage in conversations with new international entrant carriers, there is a clear need to provide more international capable gates than are currently planned as part of Phase I of the IAF project. During the early programming of the IAF, planners discussed the timing associated with maximizing the number of international wide-body gates, but deferred scalable program components e.g., two out of the total 20 programmed international gates and two out of the total seven programmed bag claims - to a future date based on the more moderate traffic growth known at that time. On July 12, Commission approved staff's proposal to convert the Phase 2 Concourse A gates to international wide-body "swing gates" capable of handling both domestic and international Template revised September 22, 2016. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer October 11, 2016 Page 2 of 6 arriving aircraft and passengers, while the IAF is still in its schematic design phase. Commission also directed that staff reconsider the phasing strategy for execution of the IAF program and return with a recommendation on whether to accelerate the remainder of the Phase 2 scope of work by executing it using the current contract as part of Phase 1. Staff has confirmed that the cost to incorporate this work is $11,000,000 and requests authorization to increase the total IAF cost from $649,365,000 to $660,365,000 to add execution of the entirety of Phase 2 to the current design-build contract. No airline majority-in-interest (MII) approval is required in support of this action in accordance with the current Signatory Lease and Operating Agreement (SLOA III). PROJECT JUSTIFICATION AND DETAILS The IAF Program was planned to accommodate a peak hour passenger processing capacity of 2,600 and to provide a maximum number of FIS connected gates on SSAT and Concourse A. Implementation of the program was divided into two phases based on projected future passenger and service requirements. This request addresses a change in program execution strategy to accommodate the dramatic growth the Airport is experiencing today compared to the 2015 growth forecast used in planning the program by adding the remainder of Phase 2 scope (see July 12, 2016, Commission agenda item 4i.) to the current Phase 1 contract for execution. Project Objectives This initiative provides the opportunity, in advance of negotiation of the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), to enhance the IAF program as follows: Address risk of the Airport's continuing rapid growth outstripping the IAF's Phase 1 passenger processing capacity the original planning projections on which the IAF program was based did not anticipate the actual year over year growth experienced in 2015 and 2016. Take advantage of cost efficiencies by adding the execution of the balance of the Phase 2 scope using the current contract. Scope of Work The remaining scope of work currently programmed as IAF Phase 2 is comprised of the following: additional controls and feed lines to support the two claim devices (Carousels 6 and 7) all work associated with systems and equipment required to support the two claim devices (e.g., Baggage Information Display Systems (BIDS), signage, striping, protection, security and access control, etc.) forty additional automated passport control (APC) kiosks at automated primary eleven additional Document Verification Officer (DVO) podia in the IAF arrivals hall This version as revised 9/16/2016 COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer October 11, 2016 Page 3 of 6 all associated indirect and soft costs (e.g., design, general conditions, overhead and profit, Washington State sales tax, and Port staff costs) Schedule Activity Negotiate Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) 2016 Quarter 4 Additional processing capacity available for 2020 Quarter 2 operational use FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Budget/Authorization Summary Capital Expense Total Original budget $608,365,000 $0 $608,365,000 Previous Changes $41,000,000 $0 $41,000,000 Current Change $11,000,000 $0 $11,000,000 Previous authorizations $341,000,000 $0 $341,000,000 Current request for authorization $11,000,000 $0 $11,000,000 Total authorizations, including this request $352,000,000 $0 $352,000,000 Remaining budget to be authorized $308,365,000 $0 $308,365,000 Budget Status and Source of Funds This project was included in the 2016 2020 capital budget and plan of finance with a budget of $608,365,000. As presented to the Commission on July 12, 2016, the funding plan includes $200 million of cash (Airport Development Fund), $100 million of Passengers Facility Charges (PFCs) and $349 million of future revenue bonds. This action will increase total program cost from $649,365,000 to $660,365,000. The additional costs will be funded with future revenue bonds. Financial Analysis and Summary The costs of the IAF will be recovered from the airlines through a charge on the use of the facility. Consistent with previous funding plans, the Port's goal is to maintain a competitive Federal Inspection Services (FIS) rate compared to peer airports. Sufficient PFCs will be used to pay ongoing revenue bond debt service to manage the FIS rate base, and thus the FIS rate. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED Alternative 1 Accept status quo - Maintain current project phasing and execute Phase 2 as a separate project in the future. Cost Implications: Pros: (1) Maintains current plan of finance assumptions This version as revised 9/16/2016 COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer October 11, 2016 Page 4 of 6 (2) Provides opportunity for the SAMP to consider and proscribe solution Cons: (1) Misses the opportunity to leverage the efficiencies of the current Phase 1 contract (2) Risks curtailing current airport growth by capping the facility's passenger processing volume at 1,900 (3) Risks incurring a cost premium to add this scope after the GMP is executed This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 2 Accelerate a portion of the Phase 2 scope of work but maintain scalable approach advance 1 of 2 bag claims, no additional APC kiosks or DVO podia. Cost Implications: $8,000,000 Pros: (1) Reduces cost commitment (2) Provides opportunity for the SAMP to consider and proscribe solution Cons: (1) Partially addresses risk that growth will outstrip design capacity but does not eliminate Phase 2 construction and associated future impact to operations This is not the recommended alternative. Alternative 3 Authorize adding all of the balance of IAF Phase 2 scope to the current Phase 1 project. Cost Implications: $11,000,000 Pros: (1) Addresses the need for additional processing capacity by the quickest and most efficient means available the Port of Seattle (2) Approving this change prior to the commencement of the negotiation of the GMP in November, will allow the IAF team to incorporate the work within the GMP. Cons: (1) Changes current plan of finance assumptions (2) Risks overbuilding the planned facility if current airport growth ceases and actual passenger per peak hour rate subsides to less than 1,900 This is the recommended alternative. This version as revised 9/16/2016 COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer October 11, 2016 Page 5 of 6 ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST Computer slide presentation. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS September 27, 2016 The Commission was briefed on IAF Reconsidering Phasing and Project Update September 13, 2016 The Commission authorized IAF FAA Reimbursement Agreement July 12, 2016 The Commission authorized IAF to Add Phase 2 Scope to Meet Continuing Rapid Growth June 28, 2016 The Commission was briefed on Two Additional International Aircraft Gates at International Arrivals Facility (IAF) to Meet Continuing Rapid Growth briefing. May 17, 2016 The Commission was briefed on Plan of Finance Update. April 26, 2016 The Commission was briefed on IAF 1Q2016 Update. February 9, 2016 - The Commission was briefed on IAF 4Q2015 Update. December 8, 2015 IAF Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Development Period Authorization (presented in combination with NSAT authorization request). November 10, 2015 The Commission was briefed on IAF Update. August 11, 2015 The Commission lead a Special Meeting, Roundtable with Airline Representatives. July 28, 2015 The Commission lead an IAF Forum. July 14, 2015 The Commission lead an IAF Forum. June 23, 2015 The Commission authorized Execution of the IAF Design-Build Contract. May 26, 2015 The Commission approved IAF Preliminary Funding Plan Motion. April 28, 2015 The Commission authorized a Service Agreement for Commissioning Services. April 28, 2015 The Commission authorized Execution of a Lease Agreement with SEATAC VENTURES 2010 LLC for International Arrivals Facility (IAF) Program Management Office Space near Sea-Tac International Airport. February 24, 2015 The Commission authorized a Service Agreement for IAF Consultant Program Leader. January 27, 2015 The Commission was briefed on IAF Funding Plan. January 27, 2015 The Commission approved IAF RFP Advertisement. January 13, 2015 The Commission was briefed on IAF Update. December 2, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF Scope and Budget Update. October 28, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF 3Q2014 Update. August 19, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF 2Q2014 Update. August 5, 2014 The Commission authorized IAF RFQ Advertisement. July 22, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF Progress. June 10, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF 1Q2014 Update. May 6, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF Project Delivery. April 22, 2014 The Commission was briefed on Capital Program. March 11, 2014 The Commission authorized IAF Master Planning. February 25, 2014 The Commission was briefed on IAF Program. This version as revised 9/16/2016 COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer October 11, 2016 Page 6 of 6 November 19, 2013 The Commission authorized IAF Construction Management, testing and inspection; surveying and locating and safety service agreements. July 23, 2013 The Commission authorized IAF Project & Program Support; and Price Factor Design-build Methodology. July 9, 2013 The Commission was briefed on Sea-Tac Airport International Arrivals Facility. July 9, 2013 The Commission was briefed on Alternative Public Works Contracting. April 9, 2013 The Commission was briefed on Sea-Tac Airport International Arrivals Facility. June 26, 2012 The Commission was briefed on Airport Terminal Development Challenges at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. June 14, 2011 The Commission was briefed on International Air Service Growth and Future Facility. February 2, 2010 The Commission was briefed on South Satellite Passenger Growth and Facility Considerations, Delta's Proposed Airline Lounge and Other Possible Future Aviation Projects. This version as revised 9/16/2016
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.