4f attach reduced
PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6c ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting December 8, 2015 DATE: ; December 2, 2015 TO: Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer FROM: Ralph Graves, Managing Director Capital '_ David Brush, IAF Program Leader George England, NSTAR Program Leader SUBJECT: International Arrivals Facility (IAF) Guaranteedm, J Development Period Authorization a (CIP #C8005 83) North Satellite Renovation & North Sa ,llite Transit Station Lobbies Project (NSAT) 7 (ch #C800556) ACTION REQUESTED " Request Commission authorizatit" re 1ef Executive Ofcer to take the following actions to advance two signicant 0 projects at SeattleTacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), the details of which% ribed in Attachments A and B for: ,g 1) Increasing projeg/t, opiwations, and execute contract amendments and change , orders to; Clarita/1y M h the amount of $275.5 million for the IAF and Hensel 3) Amgnd the previous Commission Authorization for the IAF validation contract t'Ztoexceed to include sales tax for the estimated amount of $570,000. INTRODUCTION Sea-Tac is experiencing record growth driven both by one of the fastest growing regional economies, the draw of the Seattle Tacoma metropolitan area, and by domestic and international airline service successes. This has resulted in a shortage of aircraft gates and existing facilities that cannot accommodate the demands of customers and passengers. Additionally, both the North Satellite and the South Satellite, which houses the existing Federal Inspection Services (FIS) for processing arriving international passengers, were COMMISS ON AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer )ecember 2, 2015 Page 2 of 2 constructed in the early 1970's and have not had any signicant renovations made since their opening. These facilities are in desperate need of modernization and expansion to respond to airportwide growth, and to provide world class facilities for our customers and passengers. To sustain SeaTac's competitive advantage and succeed within the national market place for airports, as laid out in the Century Agenda, the airport must modernize and expand its aging facilities. The IAF and NSAT projects are critical to achieving this. This request allows these two critical projects to continue proceeding forward / , respond to the fast changing dynamics of the airport, meet the needs of multipl alrhnes and make a deliberate and signicant step to improving Sea-Tac' s capac" level of service and competitive ranking among peer airports. Speciji requirements, and supporting information for the requested actions Attachment A for the IAF project and Attachment 3 for the N 'ORT OF SEATTLE A MEMORANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6cattach~a ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting December 8, 2015 Attachment A Subject: International Arrivals Facility (IAF) Guaranteed Maximum Pris '0 Development Period Authorization (CIP #C800583) SYNOPSIS The Port contracted a DesignBuild team to design and constru ew IAF at Sea-Tac using, for the rst time, Progressive Design Bui I'DB) as the delivery method. On I November 17, 2015 the IAF Design-Builder c assumptions, quantied risks, and develope Design that evolved from numerous con working to nd one that best satised t Denition Document (PDD), a g6 Schedule. In order to advan e roject to the next phase, staff is requesting authorization to execute the P ion Amendment and one or more Early Work Amendments to allow desi : minary construction work contemplated during the ' GMP Development P ec'Ember 2015 to 4Q16) to proceed. In order to secure exibility as to when _ sign services and preliminary work are authorized, Port staff is requesti ority to execute these amendments as well as subsequent change orders t pallo individual elements of the scope identied in this memo to , revised budget limit. Design work Will proceed immediately, but ill not proceed until March 6, 2016 as permitted under the terms of MII vote provision of the Signatory Lease and Operating Agreement This amendment would increase the current $24.5M authorization by previou- Commission Authorization for the IAF validation contract not-toexceed to include sales tax for the estimated amount of $570,000. Staff also requests authorization to execute a contract for construction auditing services as provided in the DesignBuild Agreement between the Port and Clark/SOM. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer December 2, 2015 Page 2 of 7 BACKGROUND In July 2013, the Commission approved preliminary funds to program a replacement of the existing undersized and aging FIS facility in the SSAT with a new IAF that will serve the Airport well into the future and facilitate the Port's Century Agenda objective to make the Airport the West Coast "Gateway of Choice" for international travel. The Commission also authorized use of an alternative project delivery method called ~3uild for the IAF program. Progressive Design This method is newly available for use by public agencies in Washington State and allows the Port to select a de31gn-build team based mainly on their qualifications with competitive pricing on certain commerc1al terms (e.g. fee, insurance bond) as an additional selection factor rm of Clark/SOM as the Design project. The contract with Clark/SOM is a phased cont vering three distinct periods: the Validation Period, the GMP Development P d (including some preliminary base building construction e.g., site utilities and footi ' long lead items e.g., steel), and the GMP Execution Subsequent to the signing of the Design-Build Cori Commission passed a motion on May 26, 2015 calling for the following: The Commission will work with the a' gr st to engage key stakeholders in a transparentjomt including senior level representative ofall zgnatory airlines airport/airlinesplanning review over 90 days to discuss keyissues and work towards a solution to c c ised about the project scope andfunding ' Such work will include ou ub ct matter experts with knowledge oflarge airport ., nd guidance. hm al discussions between airline and airport representatives J: y 29 and Commission hearings were held on July 14, 28 and ~Euilder delivered the Target Budget and Target Development Periodduring which design commences and certain preliminary construction work may, to the extent specifically authorized, proceed. During this period, the Design- ~3uilder will continue to work to improve on the Target Budget and Target Schedule in order to establish the GMP. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief 'xecutive Ofcer December 2, 2015 Page 3 of 7 PROJECT D CTAILS Scope of Work This authorization will permit design to commence immediately and will provide that preliminary construction work can proceed once the terms of the M11 provision of the SLOA III are met. Once the GMP has been negotiated, staff will return for Commission auth " )esignBuild Contract. execute the third (and nal) phase of the IAF Schedule Validation Period complete Finalize Target Budget and Target Schedule GMP Development Period start 3egin Design activities egin Construction activities Establish GMP 4Q 1 6 (Estimated) FINANCIAL MPLICATIONS Budget/Authorization Summary rapital Expense Total Project Original Budget _ 3,800,000 $4,600,000 Previous Authorizations > $24,500,000 $275,500,000 $300,000,000 $0 $308,400,000 $603,800,000 the IAF, as currently dened, is $608.4 million. The project the 2015-2019 capital plan and the plan of nance within CIP roject was originally approved by the airlines with the signing of th a budget of $300 million. It should be noted that the $300 million cost def, ied in early 2013, was based on 0% design. As the planning and programming work progressed and the overall scope of the project was better understood, the costs have increased primarily due to an additional 75,000 square feet of space required by CBP in the FIS, rened denition of vertical circulation at the sterile corridor and the width of the bridge, and addition of enabling projects required to be undertaken in order to execute the TAP program within the constraints of the existing airport facilities and operations. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer December 2, 2015 Page 4 of 7 An updated plan of nance will be developed upon completion of the validation period. Funding sources for the updated budget will continue to include the Airport Development Fund, future revenue bonds, and Passenger Facility Charges (PFCs) as presented during ..Commission briengs in July 2015 and consistent with the funding principles included in the May 26, 2015 motion. The funding plan will continue to be modied as needed based on changing circumstances (e. g., project costs, number of deplaning international passengers, FIS rates at other airports, terms of future airline agreement, etc.). STRATEGIES AND OBJECTIVES This project addresses the Port s Century Agenda strategic objectiveigii advance this region as a leading tourism destination and business gateway by making S ttle-Tacoma International Airport the West Coast "Gateway of Choice" for int t1on travel. will enable the Port to commence the second phase of t Development Period and speed completion of the IAF to international trafc at Seattle-Tacoma International ' TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE Economic Development one opportunity to meet the Airport's sustainability goals. Community Benets Arriving at a new modern IAF, instead of to an aging over-crowded facility, will give foreign and returning US Visitors an improved impression of the SeaTac area and the Pacic Northwest region as a whole. The new facility will accommodate existing COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer December 2, 2015 Page 5 of 7 operations, facilitate passenger movement, and provide a higher level of service for international passengers. Additionally, in the course of delivering the project, the IAF team and the Port's Office of Social Responsibility will work together collaboratively to establish small business participation opportunities, in accordance with small business Resolution No. 3618. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSI ERE ) proceeding not before expiration of the SLOAIII prescribed 180 d I MII ballot rejection. This is the recommended alternative. PROS: ' 0 Advances this critically needed project from the rst f t ee contract phases to the second contract phase, the GMP Development Perlod. o Maintains project momentum. o Permits the IAF team to develop the prej: "mtion to the next level of cost certainty from 0% design to GMP with esign-Build partner. CONS: Alternative 2 Postpone appro "'i-ration to further fund this project. This is not the recommended alternative. PROS: . _ CONS: o Delays cu dule and curtails current project momentum. ' 0 Strains 11h rt's ability to sustain international service in a manner consi the Port's Century Agenda. 0 Inc: rial project cost due to escalating labor and material costs. he loss of some key members of the DesignBuilder's team who would lybe deployed to other active projects. Alter t' e 3 Approve authorization to fund an amendment allowing the Design- Builder/to proceed with design only. This is not the recommended alternative. PROS: o Permits the IAF team to develop the project denition to the next level of cost certainty from 0% design to GMP with our Design-Build partner. 0 Provides opportunity for additional airline/airport debate. CONS: 0 Delays current schedule and curtails current project momentum. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer December 2, 2015 Page 6 of 7 0 Strains the Airport's ability to sustain international service in a manner consistent With the Port's Century Agenda. 0 Increases nal project cost due to escalating labor and material costs. 0 Constrains a key benecial feature of the P )B project delivery method; early collaboration between designer and constructor to identify and quantify risk concurrent With design development. 0 Risks default of the current DesignBuilder procurement. 0 Risks the loss of some key members of the DesignBuilder's team he would likely be deployed to other active projects. ATTACHMENTS TO THIS BRIEFING Attachment A PowerPoint presentation PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS November 10,2015 IAF Update. August 11, 20154 Special Meeting, Roundt ble WithAirline Representatives. July 28, 2015 IAF Forum. July 14, 2015 IAF Forum. June 23, 2015 Authorization to EX e a Des1gnBuild Contract. May 26, 2015 IAF Preliminary Fu April 28, 2015 Service Agreem fo' Commissioning Services. April 28, 2015 Request ion to Execute Lease Agreement With ,, SEATAC VENTURES LC for International Arrivals Facility (IAF) 0' Program Management Q aCe near SeaTac International Airport. February 24, 2015 S , "greement for IAF Consultant Program Leader. . 1A3; RFP Advertisement. IAF Update uly22, 2014 IAF Progress Brieng 0 ne 10, 2014 LAF Update and Quarterly Brieng May 6, 2014 IAF Project )elivery Brieng. April 22, 2014 ~ Capital Program Brieng. March 11, 2014 IAF Master Planning Authorization. February 25, 2014 ~ IAF Program Brieng. November 19, 2013 International Arrivals Facility Construction Management, testing and inspection; surveying and locating and safety service agreements. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief *xecutive Ofcer December 2, 2015 Page 7 of 7 July 23, 2013 International Arrivals Facility Project & Program Support; and Price Factor Design-build Methodology authorization. July 9 2013 SeaTac Airport International Arrivals Facility Brieng. July 9 2013 Alternative Public Works Contracting Brieng. April 9 2013 SeaTao Airport International Arrivals Facility Brieng June 26, 2012 Brieng on Airport Terminal Development Challenges at Seattle- Tacoma International Airport June 14, 2011 International Air Service Growth and Future Facility brieng February 2, 2010 Brieng on South Satellite Passenger Growth andFac111ty Considerations, Delta s Proposed Airline Lounge and Other Possible F, ure Aviation Projects PORT OF SEATTLE MEMO {ANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6c_attachb ACTION ITEM ate of Meeting December 8, 2015 Attachment : Subject: North Satellite Renovation & North Satellite Transit Station Lobbies (NS PrOj ct (CIP #C800556) at Seattle Tacoma International Airport SYNOPSIS The NorthSTAR program, which is a collaboration of the Port and Alaska A1 roup (AAG), intends to create and promote a user'friendly'curb-toseat" passenger experience ough the integration of facility improvements, technology, and airline services Th Port and AAG share common goals for the North Satellite (NSAT) including: improved passenger e sed customer level of service, passenger comfort, and compliance with applicable code e sure life safety. A key factor in renovating and expanding the North Satellite is meetin the P nd AAG's vision, project objectives, and programming requirements. Port staff is requesting an increase in project au , z tion of $98,100,000 for additional preconstruction services (up to $1,200,000) and top om iminary construction work. To allow for this , preliminary construction work, (requesting authority to amend the General Contractor/Construction Manageme ith Hensel Phelps. This amendment would include a revision to an existing limit on the y preliminary construction work (currently, no more than _ 10% of the estimated MACC). Fin 21y der to secure exibility as to when specic preconstruction services and preliminary wo thorized, Port staff does not intend to include all of the : preconstruction service and pr 'riary construction work in a single amendment, but instead is requesting the authority 1; e change orders to the amended contract to authorize individual elements of the scope "dent' ; in this memo, all within the revised budget limit. As the nal design building expansion and renovation is being completed, undertaking the eallows preparatory construction to begin and continuing preconstruction tion services covers efforts to reconcile the estimated cost of the project support , eering efforts, develop an optimal construction phasing plan, and will also cover the ced in completing the 60% design phase. This would bring the total authorization for the , 1,218,800. Staff also requests authorization to execute a project specic contract for construction auditing services as per the requirements of the Regulatory Code of Washington (RCW) for the General Contractor/Construction Manager contract with Hensel Phelps. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer December 8, 2015 Page 2 of 10 On March 17, 2015, the Commission previously authorized the use of Port Crews for preliminary construction and during the NSAT building expansion. Port crews may also perform portions of the work now being requested. %ased on the completion of 60% design and reconciliation of the estimated cost, the preliminary NSAT project cost estimate has increased by $79.5 million from $421.7 million established in MarCh 2015 to $501.2 million a growth of 19% The growth in the estimated cost and initial value eng' reductions are detailed below. Though value engineering efforts continue there are1nsuff1c1ent reductions to achieve the original project budget However, the project team is not; re ommending the budget be increased until bid results for the preliminary work are received in to validate I whether actual market conditions, subcontractor pricing, and labor or su , ages have ' escalated as currently estimated. These data will be essential to nal' ated cost of the ' project. Staff currently forecasts the estimated cost of the project to 470,000,000 and $490,000,000 as of the date of this memo and will update the Com 310 h 2016 after actual _ Ma preliminary work bid results and market conditions have been analyzed an design has progressed further toward completion. This project is being coordinated with the Sustainable asteringlan (SAMP) and will not be adversely affected by future development recommendations BACKGROUND In August 2014, the Commission approved a bud I; to expand the building by ve additional air General Contractor/Construction M '- 2015, the Commission approved thec b' get of $421,682,944 with the addition of $14,400,000 for expansion of the baggage handlingts , of the previously authorized S authorized use of $4,900,000 of At the completion 0 esign phase in October 2014, thirteen (13) additional scope items were added to the her refinement and evaluation during 60% design and the revised 60% proj _ imated at $501.2 million. The possibility existed that added costs might be h design allowance or other project contingencies of the estimate during 60% the million or19.%This revised estimate has been reconciled by the Port with the designer s and General Contractor/Construction Manager s independent estimates The result has been a more accurate, but higher estimated cost to accomplish the project. The most signicant contributing factor to the increased current budget estimate, representing about half of the $79.5 million increase, is the thirteen added scope items now estimated at $35.4 million, up $5.4 COMMISSION AG CNDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer December 8, 2015 Page 3 of 10 million from the $30 million estimated at the completion of 30% design. Market conditions in combination with the more developed 60% design represent the other major factors contributing $33.8 million in increases that include: updated subcontractor pricing, labor inefciencies due to now known project logistics, construction worker travel time and new security requirements, impact of the market conditions that continued to strengthen since the 30% estimate increased knowledge of construction methods and means and constructability impacts/costs, further progression of the design fr m 30% to 60% resulting in more accurate cost estimating, increased materials quantities identie ' ' remediation resulting from more extensive reproong overspray removal require design decisions. ' An extensive value engineering effort is being conducted with over 50 priority focusis on scope items that maintain the base program obj ecti more analysis due to modications to Port standards and/or program ob cti es. Evaluation factors include construction cost savings, maintenance/life cycle cost impa assenger experience, operational impacts, additional design fee impacts, and schedule impacts. T te, approximately $18.5 million in cost savings have been identied and are bein orporated into the project with minimal impact to the schedule. The Port is continuing validatio of estimated cost ranging from $470490 million with the General Contractor/Construction Manager co ra r. Uncertainty in the nal projected budget will remain, though value engineering efforts continu *"Seek additional cost reductions, until the General Contractor/Construction Manager Contr bids the project and the Port and Contractor negotiate the maximum allowable construction ). In accordance with the Letter of Und stand en the Port and Alaska Airlines Group (AAG) " dated April 5, 2012, the Port will seek ence for various project elements, in particular, for construction phasing and the project b e Port continues to collaborate with AAG to optimize package move forward separate from and ahead of the base building 6. The preliminary work package includes preparatory work in advance of 1 building expansion and the subsequent Phase 2 renovation of the existing ase The cost estimate for the preliminary work is $98.1 million. This construction is in addition to the $3. 5 million previously authorized on March 24, 2015 for relocation of loading bridges, for a total of $101.6 million construction authorization Staff will solicit and contract for project specic independent construction auditing services. The use of existing Indenite Delivery Indenite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts were considered but are not viable COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer December 8, 2015 Page 4 of 10 options due to the duration of this project and the General Contractor/Construction Manager contract with Hensel Phelps. Staff requests the preconstruction services being provided by Hensel Phelps continue until the Phase 1 construction of the building is underway, currently forecast to begin July 2016 Signicantly more hours have been spent on preconstruction services than originally anticipated due to delays incurred concluding the 60% design and additional effort required for reconciling the cost " 0 conducting value engineering efforts, and optimizing the construction phasing plan. An a of $1,200,000 is estimated for these preconstruction services. The cost for the aud-i" preconstruction services are both included in the $98.1 million authorizationreque rid the" overall budget. Project Objectives 0 Extend the length of NSAT by approximately two hundred forty to improve customer service and accommodate additional aircraft and passengers. 0 Seismically strengthen NSAT and expand the existing? ' frastructure. 0 Balance and integrate NSAT functional areas 'd equirements (concessions, holdrooms, amenities, airline operations and airline services) g a renovation and expansion of the ' NSATs terminal area to achieve acceptable levels of s ' o Align near term and forecasted airport-wide te use and capacity by providing a total of 20 contact gates at NSAT. o Optimize gate door contact points, loadi hydrants and other support utilities. 0 Meet or exceed current sust- certication. 0 Create a f''ictionless" and st 0 Create an exciting and at concessions. 0. Maintain and pro "orthwest sense of place through the design of architecture and connected technolo Scope of Work This request in e be following elements associated with the requested authorizations: work to relocate existing passenger loading bridges and aircraft positions, recon gure 1e1 pits, relocate gate infrastructure, re--route site utilities, construct access stairs for 11nd boarded aircraft, mass excavation, shoring, concrete panels and drill shaft foundations, p chase and install a section of xed loading bridge, selective demolition, construct a Waterproof enclosure the north end of the building, and purchase the structural steel, vertical circulation components, major electrical and mechanical equipment, fuel hydrants, curtainwall system and other long-lead items for the entire project. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer December 8, 2015 Page 5 of 10 0 Conduct independent construction auditing to comply with the requirements of RCW 39.103 85 (11) to conrm the proper accrual of costs as outlined in the General Contractor/Construction Manager contract with Hensel Phelps. 0 Additional preconstruction services for Hensel Phelps to continue to undertake cost estimating and validation participate in value engineering, construction phasing, and subcontr tor bidding for construction. Ongoing key elements associated with the overall NSAT renovation and expansion is: o Renovation of concourse level nishes, structure and amenities _ 0 Expansion of the NSAT STS, baggage and concourse levels by up to nine structu bays .0 Addition of 5 new NSAT aircraft gates With passenger loading brid (for a total of 20) 0 Seismic reinforcement 0 Addition of an Alaska Airlines premium traveler lounge (Alask Boar Room) 0 NSAT Train System lobby enhancements construction (including th SAT, Concourse C and Main Terminal stations) 0 Expansion, renewal and replacement of mechanic lumbing, vertical transportation, and communication systems 0 Aircraft taxi lane changes around the NSAT 0 Signicant sustainability features and compon ts 0 Design development of the north end ramp l to integrate baggage operations with other ramp and building requirements. Schedule Preliminary Work Package Design C 2nd Quarter 2016 2nd Quarter 2016 4th Quarter 2017 3rd Quarter 2016 4th Quarter 2016 4th Quarter 2017 4th Quarter 2020 Budget/A thorization Summary Capital Expense Total Project Original Budget 1 $194,300,000 $5,000,000] Previous budget increase $221,582,944 $800,000 1 $222,382,944$199,300,000'! I Proposed budget increase $0 $0) $01 COMM SSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief *'Xecutive Ofcer December 8, 2015 Page 6 of 10 Revised budget 1 $415,882,944 $5,800,000 $421,682,944 Previous Authorizations I $62, 118,800 $1,000,000 ' $63,118,800 Current request for authorization I $95,600,:00+ $2,500,000 $98,100,000 Total Authorizations, including this request+ $157,718 800 $3,500,000 $161,218,800 Remaining budget to be authorized $258,164,144 l $2,300,000 $260,464,144 Total *'stimated Project Cost 1 $415,882,944 1 $5,800,000 $421,682,944 Note: The estimated cost of the project is currently forecasted at $470490 million project cost will be determined after the Port and Contractor negotiate the nal M imum Allowable Construction Cost (MACC) based on actual bid results Project Cost Breakdown This Re Budget _$90,415,000 334,344,600 Design Phase - $0 $58,386,744 ' State & Local Taxes (estimated) $7,685,000 $28,951,600 Total $98 100,000 $421,682,944 Budget Status and Source ofFunds project will be funded with a combination of Facility Charge revenues (PFCs). be briefed in the second or third majority-in-interest (M11) proj' ' Agreement (SLOA) may b , the increased project budge Und r SLOA, the Port as an option may elect to use Management Reserve funds in lieu of theM11 approval process The requested authorization for the Preliminary Work Packageis Within the current MII approved amount. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer December 8, 2015 Page 7 of 10 FinancialAnalysis and Summary CIP Categ Renewal and Replacement 'ro'ect T e Terminal Infrastructure Risk ad'usted discount rate N/A Key risk factors N/A Project cost for analysis $422M Business Unit BU Terminal Effect on business erformance NOI after depreciation will increase IRR/NPV N/A CPE Impact $1.32 by 2021. The actual CP] building is still in development as the project elemen regarding product, materials, and equipment. However, s progresses. It is already understood that the additional expan n ea Wlll1ncur additional maintenance expense. A key objective of the project is installing su 1e materials and to maximize the maintainability of the new equipment. The 'c e renovation/replacement of the mechanical, electrical, baggage and other major systems an opportunity to achieve life cycle cost ,_ efciencies and savings. STRATEGIES AND OBJECTIVES"; This project supports the Port's Cen a objective of meeting the region's air transportation , needs at Sea-Tao Airport for th years. This project also supports the Aviation ivision's strategy of anticipating and me ' ' eeds of our tenants, passengers, and the region's economy. The NSAT expansion is a gmnent with Airport master plan development objectives that identify the NSAT as the most tion for nearterm expansion of Airport capacity. increase the longterm ability of the Airport to serve the airlines and AAG's future e airport facing record growth, this project cost effectively adds new gates to benet the _. id _gate shortfall. It also meets AAG's growth needs by expanding the Satellite and renovating the existing building with entirely new systems. Environmental Responsibility The North Satellite renovation project allows the Port unique opportunities to incorporate sustainable features into the design and construction of the facility. The project scope has been developed to meet COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief Executive Ofcer December 8 2015 Page 8 of 10 the project objectives, the Port Century Agenda goals, and the Airport's Environmental Strategy. Port staff has engaged AAG in developing the environmental aspects and process. Each scope item has been evaluated individually based upon the total cost of ownership for the expected life of the facility. The specic scope features include: 0 Energy conservation for building infrastructure 0 Water conservation for the facility including rainwater harvesting for use in the buildin 0 Construction and operations waste minimization o Incorporation of new technology. 0 Exceed current building codes. This project intends to pursue Leadership in Energy and Environmental and will continue to evaluate other environmental initiatives as the des Community Benets Project managers are coordinating with the Ofce of Socia sponsibility to maximize small business participation opportunities including, but not limited all Cgentractors and Suppliers (SCS) Alternate 1 - Current Schedule: Proceed with en , expansion/design project scope and phasing with or Without AAG concurrence. This is the reco mended alternative. PROS: ' o Maintains Port's programm es including addition of necessary gates, improved NSAT customer services an increased non-airline revenues, etc. , o Achieves Port function gn objectives. I 0 Savings will be achiev engineering. CON& 0 Project currentic mate exceeds approved $421 million budget and is forecasted to range between 0 and $490,000,000. Proj ect t estimate is greater than 10% above the budget approved in the M11, requiring airlin e or use of SLOA management reserve. relatio hips. Alternati e 2 Defer project budget and Preliminary Work Package authorization until January 2016. PROS: 0 Provides additional time to further reconcile the budget cost estimate before seeking authorization, and provides time for AAG concurrence if not already obtained. COMMISSION AGENDA Ted Fick, Chief 'xecutive Ofcer December 8, 2015 Page 9 of 10 CONS: 0 Delays construction start 48 weeks at an estimated cost of $2 - $4 million. Alternative 3 Redesign NSAT project to existing budget. ROS: 0 Maintain existing budget. CONS: o Requires signicant elimination or reduction of core project scope items. 0 Will not achieve all project objectives/quality/passenger experienc; business goals, or LEED Certication. - Redesign delay estimated at 12 months and $15 - $20 million. 0 Total scope reduction may still not result in budget savings nee ATTACHMENTS TO THIS RESQUEST 0 None PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFIN November 24, 2015 NorthSTAR Program status upd d NSAT budget brieng July 14, 2015 NorthSTAR Program status April 28, 2015 NorthSTAR Program st ncreasing the project scope for $14,400,000 and authorizing $1,954,000 the design. ' o Entering into a devel in reimbursement orary construction ofces. p te construction of a Satellite Transit System (STS) North loop Dynamic 2,000 in expense funds for regulated materials management for AAG'S tenant ovement project. _ Approval to use Port crew labor and small works contractors to complete early project work. 27, 2015 NorthSTAR Program Status Update 1, ary 6, 2015 The Commission authorized (1) $5,000,000 preconstruction services; (2) exeCution of a General Contractor/Construction Manager contract for preconstruction services; and (3) transfer of scope, $1,750,000 budget and authorization for STS station roof replacement to the North Satellite Renovation and Expansion project. October 28, 2014 NorthSTAR Program Status Update COMMISSION AGENDA * Ted Fick, Chief executive Ofcer December 8, 2015 Page 10 of 10 0 August 5, 2014 Commission authorized an estimated $191,323,143 to expand the NSAT by 8 additional gates, an additional $15,717,800 for design completion, and use Of the General Contractor/Construction Manager alternative public works contracting procedure for NSAT expansion construction procurement. 0 July 22, 2014 NSAT Expansion Brieng. 0 April 16, 2014 SeattleTacoma International Airport Capital Program )rieflng 9 January 14, 2014 NorthSTAR Program status update and initial NSAT Expansion 0 September 24, 2013 NorthSTAR Program status update. 0 September 24,2013 The Commission authorized staff to: (1) advertise, aw major public works contract for the construction of the NSAT Refurblsh gage System Proj ect; and (2) authorize the use of Port crews. ,-' 6 0 June 25, 2013 NorthSTAR Program status update. 0 May 28, 2013, Commission authorized the execution of para lce agreements for Construction Management Services and Commissioning Services, of roximate values of $10 million and $1.5 million. 0 April 9, 2013 The Commission authorized the Ch' executive Ofcer to enter into a project fl labor agreement covering the NorthSTAR program majoe onstruction projects. 0 March 26, 2013 NorthSTAR Program status update- 0 December 11, 2012 The Commission was briefed 0 Vertical Conveyance Modernization Project Aero Phases 1 and 2 and the possibilit addi g he specified elevators and escalators to the NorthSTAR program. 0 July 24, 2012 - Commission authorize ,00 000 for the design of the NorthSTAR NSAT Renovation and NSTS Lobbies proj ' . June 26, 2012 - The Port C, briefed on the NorthSTAR program by Wayne \ Grotheer, Director Aviation PI'O] gement Group. ' 0 April 10, 2012 "- The Commi rlzed the execution of consultant contracts for design and construction support servie' ' _,am management'services; and the completion of site surveys for regulated materials " a ment, in the amount of $1,200,000.
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.