7a supp
Item No.: 7a_supp Date of Meeting: June 23, 2015 Baggage Optimization Program Commission Briefing June 23, 2015 Baggage Optimization The checked baggage optimization project replaces six individual baggage screening systems with a centralized system that optimizes the operation and functionality of the bag system. Purpose: Optimize the baggage system to achieve maximum capacity within current airport footprint. Outcome: Increased capacity (no limitations on number of checked bags), reliability, redundancy, and security Flexibility in Airline ticket counter use and related gate assignments Reduce minimum connect times where possible Long term energy savings Optimization provides adequate capacity to match growing traveler needs. Existing Baggage System Existing separate systems cannot grow to meet future demand. TSA Checked Baggage Resolution Area Optimized baggage handling system A combined single system can meet future growth needs. Airport Passenger Growth (million annual passenger: MAP) Annual Projections from Basis of Annual Current Projections: Design Report 2012: 2014 -33.9 MAP 2014 -37.5 MAP 2015 -35.3 MAP 2015 -41.2 MAP 2020 -39.1 MAP 2020 -45 MAP 2022 -40.7 MAP 2024 -52 MAP 2034 -66 MAP Growth is faster than predicted three years ago when project was scoped. This creates need for acceleration and additional interim projects. Impact of Very Rapid Growth Scope of 2012 Baggage Optimization project: Design and build to 45 MAP over the next 10 years with built in flexibility for the system to be later expanded to 60 MAP. Today's need: Construct interim projects to meet Airline growth needs per SAMP to achieve 66 MAP C60 capacity: Increased make-up and screening ($10M) Other projects scope and cost to be determined Accelerate where possible Cost to be determined Additional capacity investments needed sooner. Optimization Budget 2012 Estimated Cost $320,400,000 Total TSA Contribution (OTA commitment: September 2013) $ 93,220,422 Net Estimated Cost to Port $227,179,578 Total Commission Authorization to Date $ 20,225,000 Amount Spent to Date (as of April 2015) $ 7,080,551 TSA Reimbursement to Date (as of April 2015) $ 5,231,891 ON BUDGET PER ORIGINAL PROJECT SCOPE Optimization Schedule 70% Design Documents to TSA April, 2015 Currently under TSA review 100% Design Documents to TSA Q4, 2015 Commission Briefings and requested Approval Phase 1 Construction: Notice to Proceed Q2, 2016 Beneficial Occupancy Q2, 2019 Overall Project Completion: Beneficial Occupancy Q3, 2023 ON SCHEDULE PER ORIGINAL SCOPE. HOWEVER, NEED TO ACCELERATE. Rapid Growth Adds Complexity Early Bag Storage South Satellite BHS Make-up International Growth Tunnel Conveyor Domestic Growth Baggage Claim Cruise Ship Inputs IAF BHS RFID Tracking Growth drives baggage needs in many areas. IAF Baggage The IAF cost estimate includes baggage. No cost increase to Baggage Optimization. International Growth International growth generates additional baggage handling and requires storage. Early Bag Storage Current Early Bag Storage Automated Early Bag Storage Existing storage is manual. Future storage must be automated to meet growth. Domestic Growth Domestic growth adds bag volume quicker than anticipated. Cruise Ship Inputs Cruise passengers add a peak baggage load on top of baseline Airport summer peak. South Satellite BHS South Satellite Make-up Device C-25 Baggage System Future South Satellite baggage renovations will be necessary. RFID RFID Tag Current Airline Bag Tag Current tracking system is bar code. Airlines are moving to RFID tracking. Baggage Claim Peak arriving passengers require more claim devices in baggage claim. Make-up No building footprint for increased make-up capacity for Airlines use. Tunnel Conveyor Future Existing Future South Satellite may require added conveyor capacity, redundancy. Top 3 Project Challenges 1. Accommodating Faster Growth Rate in Passengers Projected MAP (published by Airport Planning Department) 2020 45 million 2024 52 million 2034 66 million Mitigation: Build to 45 MAP design flexibility with capacity for 66 MAP Add separate projects to meet rapid passenger growth rate Being studied within SAMP Seek to accelerate Status: Current growth rate projects the Airport exceeding 45 MAP by 2020 Increased growth will require more capacity to be built sooner. Interim projects will be necessary to keep up with growth. Top 3 Project Challenges 2. Maintain 24/7 Operations During Construction Mitigation: System acceptance testing prior to cutovers Detailed phasing plan Operational contingency and fallback plans Include Holiday and peak periods blackouts in construction contracts Consider temporary screening and other facilities Status: Port baggage team is engaging all involved departments and Airlines Proactive efforts underway with all stakeholders Top 3 Project Challenges 3. TSA Explosive Detection System (EDS) machine not yet selected Mitigation: Design BHS to the largest EDS machine footprint Design options are the Morpho (CTX 9800), L3 and Smith Detection Status: TSA selected new Morpho (CTX 9800) machine No Longer a risk. TSA determined Machine (CTX 9800) on March 30, 2015 Summary of Project Objectives Project Objective to Increase: Achieved in 70% Design? 1. Screening/conveyor capacity to match airport growth yes 2. Energy efficiency yes 3. Flexibility and redundancy to send bags from any ticket yes counter to any CTX to any make-up device 4. Baggage system performance yes 5. Compliance to meet Federal mandates yes Each project objectives has measurable metrics. Project Metrics Objective #1: Baggage handling system capacity to match airport growth: Metrics Current 45 MAP Number of bags per day (average) 103K 124K Objective #2: Flexibility and redundancy to send bags from any ticket counter to any CTX to any make-up device: Metrics Current 45 MAP Any ticket counter to any CTX to any makeup No Yes Number of separate screening systems 6 1 Project Metrics Objective #3: Energy Efficiency Metrics Current 45 MAP Energy consumption Full load Up to 35% reduction Conveyor run time after last bag 10 min 2 min Clutch brake repair costs per month $30K $2K Objective #4: Baggage System Performance Metrics Current 45 MAP Bag transit time NSAT to SSAT Not possible 30 min Bag transit time SSAT to NSAT 30 min 30 min Tracking rate percentage 97% 99.5% Project Metrics Objective #5: Compliance to meet Federal mandates Metrics Current 45 MAP Meet Federal Safety Mandate compliance Yes Yes Meet Current TSA Standards (PGDS v4.2) No Yes Optimize Federal Operational Staffing No Yes Integrated Local Design Team End of Briefing
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.