6b supp

Item No.       6b_supp 
Date of Meeting     June 23, 2015 
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport 
International Arrivals Facility 
Authorization to Execute a
Design-Build Contract and
Commence Project
Validation

May 26 Commission Motion 
"Given significant changes in cost projections, technology and airline
service patterns since the initial IAF plan options were considered, and
the airport's other large capital infrastructure programs (NorthStar,
baggage handling), the Commission will work with the airport staff to
engage key stakeholders, including senior level representatives of all
signatory airlines, in a transparent joint airport/airlines planning
review to be held over 90 days to discuss key issues and work towards
a solution to concerns raised about the project scope and funding.
Such work will include outside subject matter experts with knowledge
of large airport capital projects to provide input and guidance." 


Directive from adopted Commission motion 
2

Joint Airport/Airline Planning Review 
June 23 
Outline schedule for IAF review 
Request authorization for CEO to negotiate and execute a contract
with the IAF design-builder 
July 14 
Present overall airport funding methods/considerations 
Overview of how airports plan, fund and recover costs of
international facilities (including Sea-Tac) 
Discuss critical metrics for planning international arrivals facilities 
Review of current IAF program and scope 
July 28 
Review of planning work that led to the current IAF scope 
August 11 
Roundtable on IAF funding model with airline representatives 
September 
Review of 90-day process 
Responding to Issues of Airport Finance and IAF Scope 
2

Project Finance & Procurement Timelines for IAF 
Today 
May 26, 2015           June 23, 2015        July 14, 2015       July 28, 2015       August 11, 2015        August 25, 2015             September, 2015             October, 2015          December 22, 2015 
Joint Airline/Airport Planning Review
90 Days
Finance                       Report Out: 
Scope 
Report Out: 
Options 
Status 

Procurement 
Execution                                          Commission Action 
Target Budget 
Target Schedule 
Validation Period 
150 Days 
6/24/15   DB Selected     7/15/15   DB Contract  Award     8/3/15   DB Workshop                  10/21/15  DB Conceptual  Options      11/23/15   DB Target  Budget &  Schedule

Design-Builder Selection Update: 
Design-Build Team Selection Timeline: 
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issued August 7, 2014 
Request for Proposal (RFP) issued February 13, 2015 
Final selection on June 24, 2015 
Proposer Engagement: 
Airport and IAF site tour 
Proprietary meetings 
Management approach 
Design excellence 
Contract commercial term 
Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) with Certain Price
Factors 
IAF Design-Build Procurement Nearing Completion 
3

Progressive Design-Build Contract Lifecycle: 


Validation    GMP Development         Post-GMP 
Period          Period               Period 

Today        12/15  Early Construction   2Q17 

Three Design-Build Contract Phases 
4

Project Validation Deliverables 
Develop Three Concepts Based on the Current Plan 
Permits limited variations in building location, footprint and
passenger flow 
Target Budget & Schedule based on one concept 




Current Program Concept 
5

Validation Period Deliverables 
Early Schematic Plan (based on one of the three
concepts evaluated by the Design-Builder) 
Target Budget 
Target Schedule 
Validation Report 
Various Plans e.g., 
Stakeholders Engagement 
Subcontracting 
Safety 
Security 

6

Action Requested 
Authorization for CEO to negotiate and
execute a Design-Build contract and
commence with project validation. 


Project Validation will yield a Target Budget & Target Schedule 
7

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.