6f

PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 

COMMISSION AGENDA              Item No.       6f 
ACTION ITEM             Date of Meeting       April 28, 2015 
DATE:    April 21, 2015 
TO:     Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:    Jasmin Contreras, Property Manager, Seaport, Lease Management 
Russ Read, Manager, Security 
SUBJECT:  Authorization to execute a new service contract for security services at Terminal 5. 
Amount of this request:        $400,000 - $600,000 per year for up to 5 years 
Source of Funds:            Seaport Operating Expense Budget 
Estimated Workers Employed:   4 Full Time Equivalents 
ACTION REQUESTED
Request authorization for the Chief Executive Officer to execute a contract for security services to be
performed at Terminal 5 ranging from approximately $400,000-$600,000 annually with a five year
estimated value of $3,000,000. The initial contract will be competitively bid and will be executed for a
one year term with (4) four annual renewal options at the discretion of the Port for a maximum term of
five (5) years (through April 30, 2020).
SYNOPSIS
The purpose of this contract is to provide perimeter security support services for operational activities at
Terminal 5 (T-5), including the following: (1) continual security staffing throughout the year; (2)
deterrence of theft, vandalism and property damage and; (3) operational management of security due to
T-5 being an multiple-tenant facility for about three years during the T-5 modernization project and until
a new container terminal tenant leases the entire terminal; and (4) compliance with U.S. Coast Guard
regulations for berthing of Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) vessels (5) provision of a safe
working environment for all employees, visitors, and customer/tenants. The contract provides flexibility
in terminating the contract early for the Port's convenience at any time and for any reason by giving a
written termination notice to the contractor. 
BACKGROUND 
The Port has utilized contracted security guard services to perform this type of work at T-5 since the
lease for the entire facility terminated in September 2014. Actual cost for contracted security services at
T-5 for three months in 2014 totaled $98,250. The Port has also successfully utilized contracted security
guard services to perform this type of work at Terminal 91.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer 
April 21, 2015 
Page 2 of 3 

T-5 consists of a 187-acre terminal that is currently leased to an interim tenant until the facility is
undergoes proposed improvements to the wharf structure, fender system replacement, berth deepening,
slope stabilization, and upgraded electrical supply/distribution ("T-5 Project"), and until the greater part
of the terminal is leased to a long-term tenant. T-5 has a gated access that serves as a secured access
point 24/7. Under the current interim tenant's terminal operations, public access into the terminal is not
allowed, and access is only permitted to authorized tenants, tenant's employees, and tenant and Port
contractors and agents. 
For the Port of Seattle to utilize the facility to berth Coast Guard regulated vessels outside of the current
leased areas, security guards are required for compliance with MTSA regulations. 
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION AND DETAILS 
Terminal security for T-5 was previously handled by the previous long-term tenant leasing the entire 
facility. That lease terminated in the fall of 2014, and the Port expects to have interim tenants lease 
different parts of the facility. In order to support business opportunities including berthing of Coast
Guard regulated vessels under MTSA, security guards are required for implementation of the Port of
Seattle Coast Guard approved Facility Security Plan. Port staff have also determined that it is critical to
establish a protected perimeter to prevent vandalism or unauthorized access to the facility. In order to
protect the facility and assets from unauthorized persons, the Seaport would like to continue security of
the facility; at minimum, secure the T-5 perimeter 24/7 with a minimum of three (3) guards. The
contracted security services utilized under this new service contract will provide the minimum personnel
necessary to provide security T-5 24/7; personnel to manage terminal access control, and roving security
personnel to maintain minimum security of the terminal and compliance with Coast Guard regulations. 
Scope of Work and Schedule 
Procurement has drafted and issued an Invitation to Bid (Bid No. ITB 15-08). The solicitation was
advertised 3/25/15. Submittals are due 4/15/15; the award of contract is scheduled for 4/30/15. 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
Cost Estimate 
The estimated contract capacity for the security services defined for this new service contract is based on
an estimate using years of actual cost for similar contracted services at Terminal 91 and on Seaport
security and operations staff potential needs for the future. In support of the current preferred alternative,
Port staff estimates that the cost for services to be received under this new service contract will be in the
range of $400,000 to $600,000 per year. The new contract would be executed for the initial term of one
year and can be renewed on an annual basis at the Ports discretion for a maximum term of five years. 
Budget Status and Source of Funds 
The 2015 operating budget included $500,000 for contract security services at Terminal 5. Expenses in
excess of $500,000 during 2015 will result in an unfavorable operating expense variance.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Ted Fick, Chief Executive Officer 
April 21, 2015 
Page 3 of 3 

This operating expense will be funded from the General Fund. 
Financial Analysis Summary 
CIP Category            Major Expense Project 
Project Type             Compliance 
Key risk factors            None identified 
Business Unit (BU)         Lease and Asset Management, Seaport Division 
Effect on business           The 2015 operating budget included $500,000 for T-5 contract
performance               security services. Expenses in excess of $500,000 during 2015
will result in an unfavorable operating expense variance. 
For years 2015-2020 of this proposed contract, the operating
budget will include the best estimate each year, within the
parameters of this contract, of annual security costs necessary
for T-5 to maintain security as determined by the Port. 
IRR/NPV              N/A 
STRATEGIES AND OBJECTIVES 
This contract will be conducted in accordance with the Port's security and operational objectives and the
Seaport's goal to protect a valuable asset and maintain compliance with federal regulations. 
This contract aligns with the Port's Century Agenda to position the Puget Sound region as a premier
international logistics hub.  Proceeding with this contract will allow continued safe and productive use
of the terminal in compliance with federal regulations during its transition to a prospective new tenant. 
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED 
Discontinue security at T-5. The Port has experienced vandalism, theft, and damage at other
terminals such as Terminal 106 and Terminal 104 when they were vacant. Not having minimum
security at the terminal is a high risk to the Port and will not allow berthing of MTSA regulated
vessels foregoing revenue opportunities. This is not the preferred alternative. 
Procure a security contract for T-5 and continue minimum security and regulatory compliance of the
facility. With this alternative, the Port will seek reimbursement for some of the costs for security
from the interim tenant(s). The Port is currently recovering approximately 25% of security costs
from the current interim tenant. This is the preferred alternative. 
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST 
None 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
None

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.