04 RealEstatePortfolioDepartment

PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 
DATE:    December 4, 2012 
TO:      Audit Committee and CEO 
FROM:    Joyce Kirangi, Director, Internal Audit Department 
SUBJECT:  Risk-Based Audit Approach for Audit Report No. 2012-19 

On November 13, 2012, the Internal Audit Department issued an audit report of the Real Estate
Portfolio Department (Report No.2012-19). This was a comprehensive operational audit of the
Department. After the audit presentation, the Audit Committee requested further explanation as
to why the auditor had focused the audit on Real Estate Policies 1 and 2. This memo provides 
that explanation.
To gain efficiency and effectiveness in its audits, Internal Audit conducts its audits using a riskbased
approach. The process involves, first, gaining a thorough understanding of the business
unit  objectives, environment, operations, activities, and assessing the risks  that could
significantly interfere with, or hinder, the business unit from meeting its objectives. Second, the
audit is planned to focus on those high-risk areas of the operations, where Internal Audit believes 
it can add value. 
For the Real Estate Portfolio Department, we specifically: 
Met with management and staff to gain an understanding of the Departmentoperations 
and activities. 
Reviewed Port and Department policies and procedures that govern various activities. 
Conducted detailed financial and non-financial analytics of the Department activities 
including payroll, expenses, disbursements, etc. 
Evaluated prior external and internal audit reports and findings. 
Identified risks that could interfere with the Department's mission. 
Evaluated and assessed the established controls to mitigate or reduce perceived risks. 
Based on our understanding and assessment of the Department operations, and working closely
with Department management, we made a professional judgment to focus our audit (for further
detailed testing) in the following two areas: 
1.  Development of real estate agreements for the Real Estate Division properties. 
2.  Management of the Real Estate and Seaport Division properties in the Port's
PROPWorks system. 
The first objective was developed in consideration of the Department's business objectives and
the significant risks associated with real estate development activities, including potential noncompliance
with the Port's Real Estate Policies. We evaluated all policies and sub-procedures to
N:\Internal Audit\Audit Committee\Audit Committee Briefings\2012 Committee Meeting\2012_12_04\Risk Based Audit _ Real Estate Portfolio
Department.docx                           Page 1 of 2

Memorandum 
Page 2 of 2 

determine which individual elements were directly related to the significant risks identified in the
first objective. 
Below is a review of the Port's Real Estate Policies and sub-procedures that were evaluated as
part of the audit planning and risk assessment. We have included a brief explanation as to why
the policy or procedure was included as part of the audit plan. 
Real Estate Policy 1 (RE-1) and Real Estate Procedure (REP-1) 
The Port's RE-1 Policy covers all agreement types for Port properties, including the
requirements for departmental review, identifying prevailing market conditions, and conducting
a financial risk analysis for future and potential tenants seeking business agreements with the
Port. REP-1 has specific requirements for month-to-month agreements, but the auditor's review
concluded that they did not rise above the requirements of RE-1. 
Real Estate Policy 2 (RE-2) and Real Estate Procedures (REP-2, REP-3, REP-4, REP-5, REP-6) 
The Port's RE-2 Policy offers strategic requirements for the acquisition, use, and divesture of
Port properties. The Real Estate Portfolio Department is only subject to the use clause, as it does
not acquire or divest properties for the Real Estate Division. The auditor reviewed during
planning the sub-procedures, as they pertain to existing Port properties actively managed by the
Department: 
REP-2 provides additional detail for how Real Estate Division agreements should be
developed in accordance with RCW 53.08.It primarily concerns Seaport properties and, 
as such, it is considered outside the scope. 
REP-3 is for aquatic leases, which are predominately outside the scope of the Portfolio
Department. The auditors found good controls for ensuring environmental and legal
review for aquatic leases and did not review further. 
REP-4 is for the sale and divesture of Port Real Estate properties. The Portfolio
Department only manages properties. It does not buy or sell properties, so this procedure
was excluded from the audit scope. 
REP-5 concerns broker commissions for the sale and leasing of properties. The auditors
had conducted analytical reviews of commissions paid to brokers and deemed this an area
of low risk. 
REP-6 concerns criteria for major real estate transactions, and largely falls outside of the
scope of the Real Estate Department. Much of REP-6 is included in RE-1.

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.