6a

PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 
COMMISSION AGENDA             Item No.      6a 
ACTION ITEM             Date of Meeting   October 2, 2012 
DATE:    September 14, 2012 
TO:     Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:    Michael Ehl, Director, Airport Operations 
Wayne Grotheer, Director, Aviation Project Management Group 
SUBJECT:  Passenger Loading Bridge Replacement Project  Airline Realignment Request to
Rebid Concourse B Scope of Work (CIP #C800467) 
Amount of This Request: $1,570,000    Source of Funds: Existing and future revenue
bonds 
Est. State and Local Taxes: $99,000     Est. Construction Jobs Generated: 13 
Total Project Cost: $14,850,000 
ACTION REQUESTED:
Request Port Commission authorization for the Chief Executive Officer to re-advertise and
execute one construction contract to install one new Passenger Loading Bridge (PLB) at Gate B1
and to refurbish one PLB at Gate B11. The total estimated cost for this phase of the project is 
$1,570,000. 
SYNOPSIS:
On March 27, 2012, the Commission authorized advertisement of a construction contract to
install one PLB at Gate B1 and to refurbish one PLB at Gate B11. The engineer's cost estimate
for this work was $393,349. The estimate was based on data from previous projects of similar
scope and was validated by the Port's in-house estimating staff.
When bids were received on July 24, 2012, the proposals from the only two bidders came in at
$781,530 and $776,776, which were 98% and 97% higher than the engineer's cost estimate.
These high bids are characterized as a bid irregularity requiring further Commission action in
accordance with Section 4.2.3.4 of Resolution 3605, as amended. After analysis, staff decided to
reject all bids and recommend to the Port Commission that the Port re-advertise this procurement 
with revised contracting requirements, including the elimination of the small contractor and
supplier (SCS) participation requirement.
The current airline realignment schedule will not be affected by this rebid provided the work can
be completed by March 8, 2013. Staff has reworked the procurement and construction schedules
and is confident that this date can be achieved.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
September 14, 2012 
Page 2 of 7 
BACKGROUND: 
In the original procurement, Small Contractors and Suppliers participation requirement of 6%
was established for this project. While the Port's goal is to encourage small business
participation in our projects, staff believes that the subcontracting strategies of both bidders,
coupled with the current market conditions, put a single SCS firm in a non-competitive and
advantageous position. Staff further believes that this situation made it difficult for other bidders
to participate and was the primary cause for the high bids received.
In the original bid package, the work at B1 was scheduled to be completed before the work at
B11 began in order to coincide with other work taking place at Concourse B. This consecutive
phasing may also have contributed to the bid overrun.
Staff is confident that the engineer's cost estimate is sound and is not recommending any
changes. The Office of Social Responsibility has agreed to remove the SCS requirement.
Further, the work at B1 and B11 will now be phased to take place at the same time.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: 
The work planned under this authorization represents the next phase in a time-critical sequence
supporting the broader airline realignment effort while also providing improved operational
flexibility and efficiency at the Airport.
PROJECT STATEMENT AND OBJECTIVES: 
Project Statement: 
In order to accommodate airlines relocating to Concourse B as part of the airline realignment,
install one new PLB at Gate B1 and refurbish one PLB at Gate B11 to extend its operational life.
The B11 PLB has been evaluated by Aviation Maintenance and determined to be a good
candidate for refurbishment as opposed to replacement. Where feasible, the refurbishment of
PLBs is a more attractive option than outright replacement since the cost of refurbishment is
approximately half the cost of a new PLB. 
Project Objectives: 
This project advances the Airport's goal of standardizing Airport-owned PLBs for a common
use environment.
The refurbishment of PLBs that have reached the end of their service life will result in
decreased maintenance costs while extending the useful life of the PLBs and thereby
allowing the Airport to more cost effectively provide upgraded equipment at more gates. 
Refurbishing PLBs instead of replacing them keeps approximately 20 tons of demolition
debris per bridge out of the waste stream.
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE: 
Scope of Work: 
This scope of work will take place at Concourse B and includes the following: 
Design  completed.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
September 14, 2012 
Page 3 of 7 
Provide one new PLB as owner-furnished equipment for installation at Gate B1 by a major 
works contractor.
Proprietary and long-lead components have been purchased by the Port for the PLB
refurbishment at Gate B11. These items will be provided to the major works contractor as
owner-furnished equipment. Nonproprietary long-lead equipment and components
associated with the refurbishment at Gate B11 will be furnished and installed by a major
works contractor.
Installation, testing, and commissioning by a major works contractor of one new PLB and
associated equipment and components at Gate B1, to include installation of a new PLB
foundation along with architectural, electrical, data, mechanical, and infrastructure upgrades
as necessary to meet new PLB standards and current code requirements. 
Renew / replace primary PLB systems, equipment, components and finishes at Gate B11 in
order to meet new PLB standards and current code requirements.
New PLB and PLB component purchases utilized an existing competition waiver allowing
for sole source procurement of these items directly from the manufacturer. 
Schedule: 
Activity                            Dates 
Bids Rejected                                           August 17, 2012 
Authorize Advertisement                                  October 2, 2012 
Advertise Bid Package                                    October 4, 2012 
Receive Bids                                          October 30, 2012 
Award and Execute Bid Package                           November 30, 2012 
Construction Work Start                                   January 28, 2013 
Construction Work Completed                               March 8, 2013 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: 
Budget/Authorization Summary         Capital      Expense     Total Project 
Original Budget                     $14,850,000          $0    $14,850,000 
Current Budget                     $14,850,000          $0    $14,850,000 
Budget Increases                           $0          $0          $0 
Revised Budget                     $14,850,000          $0    $14,850,000 
Previous authorizations for this CIP          $6,700,000           $0     $6,700,000 
Current request for authorization           $1,570,000           $0     $1,570,000 
Total authorizations including this request     $8,270,000           $0     $8,270,000 
Remaining Budget to be authorized          $6,580,000          $0     $6,580,000 
Project Cost Breakdown               This Request       Total Project 
Construction                              $1,125,000         $10,897,000 
Construction Management                     $54,000           $518,000 
Design                                     $0           $750,000 
Project Management                         $54,000           $518,000 
Administrative Soft Costs                       $238,000          $1,159,000

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
September 14, 2012 
Page 4 of 7 
State and Local Taxes (estimated)                   $99,000          $1,008,000 
Total                                     $1,570,000          $14,850,000 
Budget Status and Source of Funds: 
This project was included in the 2012-16 capital budget and plan of finance within CIP
#C800467, Passenger Loading Bridge Replacement  Airline Realignment with a budget of
$14,850,000. The funding sources will include existing 2010 revenue bonds and future revenue
bonds. 
Financial Analysis Summary:
CIP Category                         Renewal/Enhancement 
Project Type                           Renewal & Replacement 
Risk adjusted Discount rate                  N/A 
Key risk factors                          N/A 
Project cost for analysis                      $14,850,000 
Business Unit (BU)                       Terminal  Airline Equipment 
Effect on business performance               NOI after depreciation will increase 
IRR/NPV                       N/A 
CPE Impact                        CPE will increase by $.10 by 2014, but
no change to the business plan forecast
as this project was included. The
airlines will realize lower operating and
maintenance costs. 
Lifecycle Cost and Savings: 
Annual operating and maintenance costs have been calculated by Aviation Maintenance at
approximately $12,600 per PLB per year or a total of $25,200 for the first year plus an estimated
3% inflation escalation thereafter. 
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES: 
By providing improved PLBs, this project supports the Port's strategic objectives to: 
Ensure Airport vitality by providing airlines with reliable and efficient gate services. 
Lead the U.S. airport industry in environmental innovation and minimize the Airport's
environmental impacts.
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: 
This project will install new equipment at one gate and refurbish the existing PLB at one gate to
replace aging, less energy efficient equipment. Refurbishing PLBs instead of replacing them
prevents up to 20 tons of demolition debris per bridge from entering the waste stream. New and
refurbished PLBs employ the use of advanced electronics, materials and finishes that provide
enhanced energy efficiency and improved air quality through: 
Installation of EnergyStar compliant equipment/components where applicable. 
Use of up to 30% pre-consumer recycled content in PLB flooring.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
September 14, 2012 
Page 5 of 7 
Use of repurposed rubber from used aircraft tires for PLB control cab drive wheel
assemblies. 
Use of No/Low VOC (Volatile Organic Compound) paints, adhesives and finishes wherever
possible.
Use of LED light fixture lamps in place of fluorescent lamps. 
Provision for increased passive ventilation in newly manufactured PLBs over older models. 
BUSINESS PLAN OBJECTIVES: 
The Passenger Loading Bridge Replacement Project  Airline Realignment supports the
Airport's strategy to operate a world class airport by managing our assets to minimize the long
term cost of ownership. Additionally, Airport owned PLBs enable flexible gate operations that
will allow for greater and more efficient utilization of the Airport's existing resources. 
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE: 
The improvement to the Port's PLB inventory resulting from this project will promote net
operating income through new and ongoing gate leases to airlines, with a corresponding decrease
in maintenance expenditures. 
This project will allow the Port to deliver a significant benefit to the traveling public while
providing tenant airlines with the updated and more dependable facilities needed to support and
grow their businesses.
This project also demonstrates the Port's commitment to environmental sustainability by
replacing outdated, inefficient and unreliable PLBs and refurbishing viable existing PLBs.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS: 
Alternative #1: Continue with the installation of the new PLB at Gate B1 and delete the
refurbishment of the PLB at Gate B11 from the scope of work and defer it until a later date. This
option is not consistent with the Port's goal of providing relocated airlines with like-for-like
equipment. This alternative is not recommended.
Alternative #2: Delete the work at both B1 and B11 and postpone until a later date. This option
will not provide a new gate or a suitable PLB for airlines relocating to Concourse B. This
alternative is not recommended.
Alternative #1: Modify and rebid the scope of work as described above. This option will allow
the airline realignment schedule to be maintained. This is the preferred alternative. 
OTHER DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST: 
None. 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS: 
On July 10, 2012, the Port Commission authorized Airline Realignment Tenant Improvements in
the amount of $4,243,400 to advertise and execute a construction contract and use of Port Crews
for Airline Tenant Improvements  Airline Realignment.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
September 14, 2012 
Page 6 of 7 
On July 10, 2012, the Port Commission authorized CUSE construction at ticket counters and
gates, and seating in the amount of $1,887,000. 
On June 26, 2012, the Port Commission was provided an update briefing with the NorthSTAR
budget restructuring. 
On June 26, 2012, the Port Commission authorized additional budget of $400,000 to add two
fuel pits (C800472). 
On April 24, 2012, the Port Commission authorized Airline Realignment Tenant Improvements
in the amount of $225,000 for regulated materials management. 
On April 10, 2012, the Port Commission authorized additional budget to enter into a construction
contract for airfield improvements including Exterior Gate Improvements  Airline Realignment
(C800472) 
On March 27, 2012, the Port Commission authorized design and construction of gate B1 and
B11 jet bridges as elements of Passenger Loading Bridge Replacement Project- Airline
Realignment (C800467) in the amount of $1,570,000 
On January 24, 2012, the Port Commission received a briefing on the Airport Realignment
Program. 
On January 24, 2012, the Port Commission authorized construction of Exterior Gate
Improvements  Airline Realignment (C800472) in the amount of $2,613,000. 
On January 24, 2012, the Port Commission authorized design for CUSE at Ticket Counter/Gates
& Seating (C800473) in the amount of $484,000. 
On December 6, 2011, the Port Commission authorized construction of Baggage Handling
System (BHS) Improvements  C22 BHS Connection to C1/C1-MK1 Replacement (C800382) at
the Airport in the amount of $3,604,000. 
On December 6, 2011, the Port Commission authorized design of the Miscellaneous Building
Improvements  Airline Realignment (C800475) at the Airport in the amount of $1,721,000. 
On December 6, 2011, the Port Commission authorized design of the Airline Tenant
Improvements  Airline Realignment (expense) at the Airport in the amount of $3,776,000. 
On November 22, 2011, the Port Commission was provided with a verbal preliminary briefing of
December 6, 2011, items with a diagram. 
On September 27, 2011, the Port Commission authorized execution of an IDIQ contract for
Airline Realignment Tenant Improvements and Ticket Counter Design services totaling
$10,000,000. 
On September 12, 2011, the Port Commission received a summary briefing on the Airport
Realignment Program at the Airport. 
On June 14, 2011, the Port Commission authorized design of the Exterior Gate Improvements  
Airline Realignment project (C800472) at the Airport in the amount of $499,000.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
September 14, 2012 
Page 7 of 7 
On June 14, 2011, the Port Commission authorized design of the Airport Signage  Airline
Realignment project (C800474) at the Airport in the amount of $238,000. 
On March 1, 2011, the Port Commission authorized design and some construction of the
Baggage Handling System (BHS) Improvements - C22 BHS connection to C1/C1-MK1
Replacement /TC3 Replacement (C800382) in the amount of $1,731,000. 
On February 22, 2011, the Port Commission authorized the first phase of the Passenger Loading
Bridge Replacement  Airline Realignment Project (C800467) including design, purchase, and
execution to replace, refurbish and relocate PLBs at Concourse D.
On February 22, 2011, the Port Commission was shown a summary listing of realignment
projects and authorized Planning for Terminal Realignment in the amount of $713,000. 
On January 25, 2011, the Port Commission was briefed on several projects that are part of the
overall airline realignment program and which required a single Commission authorization in
order to meet the realignment schedule. The first part of the realignment program was authorized
by the Commission on this date under the Concourse D Common Use Expansion Project
(C800455). 
On September 28, 2010, the Port Commission was given a summary briefing of the upcoming
2011 capital improvement plan that included the airline realignment program elements. 
On July 9, 2010, the Port Commission was notified that the CEO would enter into a 5 year sole
source contract with JBT AeroTech for the procurement of PLBs and PLB components. 
On June 8, 2010, the Port Commission authorized execution of an IDIQ contract for the
Terminal Development Strategy Campus Planning Services IDIQ in the amount of $1,300,000.

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.