PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 
COMMISSION AGENDA             Item No.      6a 
Date of Meeting   December 6, 2011 

DATE:    November 22, 2011 
TO:     Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:    Stephanie Jones Stebbins, Director, Seaport Environmental & Planning Programs 
Elizabeth Leavitt, Director, Aviation Planning and Environmental Services 
SUBJECT:  2012-2016 Environmental Remediation Liability Program. 
Amount of This Request: $56,500,000    Source of Funds: Airport  Airport
Development Fund; Real Estate and Seaport  
Tax Levy 
Est. State and Local Taxes: N/A         Est. Jobs Generated: 
ACTIONS REQUESTED:
Request Commission authorization for: 
1)  Annual authorization for a total of $56,500,000 including 
a.  Spending $23,600,000 in 2012 for Environmental Remediation Liabilities. 
b.  Obligating contracts (POs) valued at $32,900,000 in 2012 for work that will be
performed in later years. 
2)  Commission approval of the five-year spending plan of $91,100,000   for the
Environmental Remediation Liability Program for Seaport, Real Estate and Airport for
2012 through 2016. 
SYNOPSIS: 
As a major industrial and commercial land owner, the Port has significant environmental cleanup
liabilities due to historic contamination of its properties. Since 1993, the Port has booked
liabilities to recognize these obligations. While Port environmental cleanup projects typically
span several years, more complex projects have been active for over 10 years. This $56,500,000
authorization for 2012 will allow us to continue ongoing environmental investigation, testing,
analysis, design, cleanup, and monitoring for our active sites and will initiate similar activities
for new sites, as noted in this memorandum. 
The approval of the five-year plan gives  greater visibility to our projected upcoming
environmental remediation liability spending. In addition, the authorization to enter multi-year
contracts and service directives will allow us to more efficiently contract for work of multiyear
duration. Funds projected for years beyond 2012 will not be spent until authorized by a future

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 2 of 11 

Commission action (i.e., next year's Environmental Remediation Liability spending
authorization). 
BACKGROUND: 
The Port has identified a number of contaminated sites on Seaport, Real Estate and Aviation
properties that must be investigated and remediated in compliance with federal and state
environmental laws and regulations. In some cases, the Port has been designated by the federal
government as a "Potentially Responsible Party" (PRP), and/or by the state government as a
"Potentially Liable Party" (PLP) for the investigation and cleanup of properties owned by the
Port or where the Port may have contributed to site contamination. 
Although the Port may not bear ultimate liability for the contamination, under federal and state
law, the Port is presumptively liable as the property owner, and it is often practically and
financially beneficial for the Port to take initial responsibility to manage and pay for the cleanup. 
In many cases, the Port has successfully recovered and/or will seek recovery from other
responsible parties for Port-incurred investigation and cleanup costs. The Port also has been
successful in receiving Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) grant funds to pay part of the cleanup
costs. The Port's goals are to cost-effectivelycomplete this environmentally responsible work
and to maximize work accomplished by or paid for by the parties responsible for the conditions
encountered (or others, such as insurance companies, who represent them).
To mitigate such environmental expenditures, the Port also encourages, coordinates with, and
oversees the investigation and cleanup of sites by other responsible parties, to assure that legal
requirements are met and that Port liabilities are minimized. Regardless of whether the Port
conducts the investigation and remediation directly, or oversees the proper performance of that
work by other responsible parties, the Port provides a valuable public benefit by acting as a
catalyst in expediting appropriate environmental management of these sites. 
Accounting rules require that the Port "book" or establish a liability on its balance sheet for
environmental remediation when the Port's obligation meets specified definitions of certainty and
the liability amount can be reasonably estimated. When an environmental remediation liability is
booked, an expense is also recorded in the current period for the future expenditures. The Port
develops its environmental remediation liaibility forecasts in compliance with Government
Accounting Standards Board (GASB) issued Statement No. 49 "Accounting and Financial
Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations". 
Environmental liability expenditures are authorized in one of two ways. If the environmental
costs are incurred in the course of or incidental to a construction project, then the Commission
authorization occurs as part of the authorization for the overall construction project. Examples
of this include asbestos removal, offsite soil disposal during construction, or upland dredge
material disposal. 
If the environmental cost is not associated with a capital construction project or maintenance
(including asbestos and lead), but is a stand-alone pollution remediation project, then the
expenditure is authorized through one annual action. Since 1993, the Commission has approved

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 3 of 11 

annual environmental expenditures. In addition, Commission authorization is obtained prior to
entering into legal commitments, such as an Agreed Order for investigation or cleanup actions. 
Consistent with past practices, the duration of the authorization continues to be an annual
spending authorization. However, starting last  year, we also began to include a rolling fiveyear
spending plan to reflect the level of resources expected to be required over the next five
years. Executing contract obligations for a longer duration will minimize the need to rework all
contract amendments and service directives that are aligned with the endof-year authorization.
It will also provide greater visibility of the environmental liability costs. 
BUSINESS PLAN OBJECTIVES: 
Environmental remediation projects define and minimize to acceptable levels threats to the
environment caused by prior Port operations, prior tenant operations, and by the historical effects
of industrial activity on properties acquired by the Port. Generally, the product of these efforts, as
well as the attendant compliance with regulatory mandates, management of Port liabilities, and
support of the local community, aligns with the goals and objectives of the Seaport, Aviation,
and Real Estate Division Business Plans 
SCOPE OF WORK: 
The environmental investigation and remediation actions described in this Scope of Work section
are required under federal and/or state law. Remedial actions continue to focus on cost-effective
study, analysis, and implementation of cleanup actions; coordination with capital planning,
design, and construction; and negotiation with agencies, tenants, other PRPs and insurance
companies. 
Seaport Sites/Projects 
Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund  The Lower Duwamish Waterway is a Federal
Superfund Site. The Lower Duwamish Work Group (LDWG), consisting of the Port, the City of
Seattle, King County and Boeing, are conducting a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study
(RI/FS) of the Waterway under an Administrative Order on Consent  (AOC) with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Ecology (DOE). The Port is the
contracting agent for the LDWG. A revised draft Feasibility Study (FS) was submitted to the
agencies in October 2010. Public and agency comment have been received and the document is
being revised to address the comments. EPA and DOE will use the information in the FS to 
develop a Proposed Plan for remediation of the site.  The Proposed Plan and final FS is
scheduled to be issued for public review and comment early in 2012. Public comment on the
Proposed Plan will be used by EPA to develop its Record of Decision for the final cleanup plan.
EPA will issue the Record of Decision in 2013, after seeking concurrence from Ecology. 
Terminal 117 Sediments, Bank and Uplands  As part of the Lower Duwamish Waterway
Superfund effort, the LDWG identified several sediment hot spots that warranted early cleanup
action, including the T-117 Early Action Area (EAA), which is owned in part by the Port. The
EPA has issued an Action Memorandum which identifies the EPA-selected cleanup action. The 
current Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (ASAOC)  for T-117

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 4 of 11 

removal design and removal action (RD/RA) was signed by the Port and City on June 9, 2011.
Cleanup design and contractor selection will occur through 2013. 
Terminal 108  As mentioned above, LDWG is conducting the Lower Duwamish Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study. As part of this work, the LDWG identified hot spots that may
require early cleanup action, one of which is located in the sediments adjacent to Terminal 108.
The DOE requested, and the Port voluntarily agreed, to perform additional investigation of the
groundwater.  The groundwater study determined that the groundwater is not a source of
contaminants to the river. However, Ecology is requiring additional bank, shoreline, and upland
assessment of potential river recontamination sources. Some engineered mitigation measures
may be necessary to control potential recontamination sources. On October 13, 2009,
Commission approved moving forward with this source control work as an independent action. 
Terminal 115  The Port is conducting a continuing program to remove small amounts of free
product (petroleum) from groundwater caused by two leaking underground tanks that were
removed from the southwest portion of the terminal. Investigative groundwater monitoring is 
also continuing. Soils are marginally contaminated at the tank sites but cleanup at this time is
not required by regulatory agencies. 
Activities at this site also include coordination with DOE on source control efforts required as
part of the LDW RI/FS process. The Port has recently conducted an Environmental Conditions
investigation  for the entire property. This investigation will then be used to identify potential
source control issues and associated actions needed to reduce recontamination potential to the
larger sediment cleanup. 
Terminal 115 North (T115N)  In late January 2009, the Port received from DOE a Notice of
Potential MTCA Liability and a Notice of Intent to Conduct a Site Hazard Assessment.  DOE
identified this site as a result of their source control activities related to one of the high priority
sediment sites (Glacier Bay) within the Lower Duwamish Superfund site. Glacier Bay is located
north of Terminal 115. The Port conducted an initial assessment of the environmental
contamination at the site. The Port recently negotiated an Agreed Order with Ecology, under
which the Port will further characterize the site and develop a draft cleanup action plan.
Authorization to enter into this Order was received at the November 2, 2010, Commission
meeting. 
T-5 DOE State Cleanup Sites  In the past, as part of the T-5 site redevelopment, the Port
completed remediation at four sites under three Consent Decrees with the DOE. Current
obligations include an investigation and long term ground water monitoring program, on-going
cap inspection and maintenance of the cap in the four areas. 
T-5 Pacific Sound Resources (PSR) EPA Superfund Site  This site was cleaned up under an
Agreement on Consent with EPA as part of the T5 Southwest Harbor redevelopment project,
Ongoing obligations include continuing to perform required cap inspection and cap maintenance,
product recovery activities and monitor EPA activities related to the groundwater and the off
shore sediments. EPA recently performed a five year review for this site which identified the
need to perform a vapor intrusion study and to reassess the cleanup levels.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 5 of 11 

Harbor Island Superfund Site Soil and Groundwater Operable Unit  Cleanup of this site was
performed under a Consent Decree with EPA. Long-term groundwater monitoring is being
performed by the group consultant under a PRP agreement. Long-term cap maintenance and
inspections have been initiated as required under the Record of Decision.  EPA recently
completed a five-year review of this site which identified the need for additional groundwater
monitoring, improved cap inspection reporting and follow up on institutional controls recording
by the PRPs which are being implemented.
Harbor Island Superfund Site East Waterway Sediments Operable Unit  In 2006, the Port
signed an ASAOC with EPA for a final Supplemental Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study (SRI/FS), and a Memorandum of Agreement with the City and the County to share costs
and cooperate in the SRI/FS process. The Port is acting as the contracting agent for this work. A
settlement agreement with Seattle Iron Metals was negotiated for their contribution to the SRI/FS
costs. We are currently conducting the SRI/FS tasks identified in the ASAOC and subsequent
work plans. The draft RI will be out for review in early 2012.
Terminal 18 Jet Fuel Pipeline  This pipeline, which was owned by the Port and operated by
Kinder Morgan, failed the tightness test in November 2003. A release of jet fuel to the soil has
been documented. The area of the leak was identified and repaired and an investigation was
performed to identify those areas that may require cleanup. Additional investigation is required
to identify the need for additional cleanup. 
Terminal 30 Oil Cleanup  This is the former Chevron bulk storage site. The Port has removed
significant amounts of free product and conducted an intensive groundwater-monitoring
program. This project is currently being re-evaluated with DOE to determine steps needed to
reach agreement on a closure plan and close out the existing Agreed Order. The Port is in the
process of negotiating final site remedy and compliance monitoring for the site.
Terminal 10 Lockheed  Lockheed has performed the upland and sediment cleanup required at
the site. The Port's continuing obligation is to maintain the upland cap and the habitat
restoration area, manage any contaminated soil and groundwater encountered or removed during
redevelopment or maintenance activities, and to protect Lockheed's groundwater monitoring
wells. Under the Terminal 10 Uplands capital project, storm water drainage and upland cap
improvements are underway.
Terminal 104  The Port will be conducting an initial source control assessment of the
environmental contamination and potential future course of action for this site. The site has been
identified by Ecology as having source control data gaps in relation to the Lower Duwamish
Waterway Superfund site. 
T106 Warehouse Building  The former warehouse building contains five underground storage
tanks (USTs) and some cement kiln dusts (CKD) fill material. During future site development or
improvements, UST decommissioning and limited soil remediation will be required. If site
development encounters or disturbs underlying CKD fill, generated material will be profiled,
handled, and disposed of offsite.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 6 of 11 

Natural Resource Damages (NRD) Habitat Restoration  Superfund liability for LDW also
includes injury to natural resources from contamination. The Port is negotiating with the Elliott
Bay Trustee Council (Trustees) for a settlement of these liabilities that will likely include habitat
restoration as a component.  On June 7, 2011, the Commission approved the design and
permitting of an expanded restoration project at Terminal 117.  Pre-design work is nearing
completion and the details of a possible project-specific Credits Agreement are presently being
negotiated.
New Seaport Sites 
Terminals 103/105/107  As discussed above, LDWG is conducting the Lower Duwamish
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study. As part of this comprehensive work, the project
includes efforts by multi-agency group (the Source Control Working Group) to identify and
manage or eliminate current and future sources of recontamination to the river. Termianls
103/105/107 are included in LDW Source Control project and as such, require an evaluation of
historic and current potential sources of recontamination, either from historic impacts or current
uses. The DOE requested, and the Port voluntarily agreed, to perform additional evaluation of
these three terminals, which lead to the development of a terminal-wide Environmental
Conditions Report. The Port is awaiting further input and direction from Ecology. 
T-115 New dock  In 2009, the Port conducted a project that included maintenance dredging,
dock recconstruction and shoreside infrastructure improvements at Berth 1. As a function of the
federal permitting process, the EPA required the Port to sample and analyze post-dredge
sediments in the berth and surrounding stormwater system for a three-year period. The purpose
of the sampling and analysis requirement is to measure whether, and to what degree, the berth is
recontaminating over time. This work is now 75% complete. 
Real Estate Sites 
Terminal 91 Cleanup  Investigation and cleanup of this site is being administered by the DOE
under a State Dangerous Waste Permit and an Agreed Order. The draft Feasibility Study (FS)
went out for public comment December 2009 and was finalized with no changes. A draft
Cleanup Action Plan (CAP), which identifies the cleanup approach selected by DOE, and SEPA
checklist went out for public comment October 2010 and was finalized  A new Order is being 
negotiated for performance of the cleanup. 
Fishermen's Terminal  ThePort has removed contaminated soils in the uplands, capped the
uplands as a voluntary cleanup measure, and is conducting a continuing program of investigative
groundwater monitoring at and near the Fishing Vessel Owners (FVO) tenant site. Some
dredging of contaminated sediments occurred as part of the Docks 5-10 renewal and replacement
and berth dredging project.
T-5 DOE State Cleanup Sites (CEM) Site  In addition to the four sites listed under Seaport sites,
as part of the T-5 redevelopment, the Port purchased the old West Seattle Landfill and installed
an environmental cap and a methane collection system.  These systems require long-term
operation and maintenance, inspection and reporting which is continuing.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 7 of 11 

Aviation Sites/Projects 
Aircraft Fuel Farms and Fueling Systems  Five underground aircraft fueling systems were
constructed and operated by individual airlines beginning in the early 1960s. As of January
2007, each of these systems has been decommissioned. Appropriate environmental cleanup has
been achieved for three of the systems and is in progress for two others. Long-term monitoring
continues as noted below: 
Remediation of an area impacted by operations of the former United Airlines and Continental
Airlines fuel farms is anticipated to continue into 2013 with confirmation monitoring to
follow. The Port is a member of the PLP group for this multiple-source site. 
The Northwest Airlines and Pan Am Airlines systems have been appropriately remediated,
but continue to require monitoring. In 2011-2015 the Port (as a result of Pan Am Airlines
bankruptcy) and Delta Airlines (successor by merger to Northwest Airlines) will monitor the
former Pan Am and Northwest systems in the context of the STIA Ground Water Study,
described below 
STIA Ground Water Study  In May 1999, the Port and the DOE executed a MTCA Agreed
Order that required the Port to conduct a study of ground water conditions in the uppermost
regional aquifer in the vicinity of the airport.  The study has been completed. The results
demonstrate that there is little potential for airport operations to impact ground water conditions
beyond the airport boundary, or threaten local ground water receptors (public drinking water
supplies, creeks, etc.). DOE has accepted the study findings and designated the Port's obligations
under the Agreed Order as complete. DOE and the Port have agreed to a plan for long-term
ground water monitoring to confirm the results of the models used in the study. Under the terms
of a responsible party agreement, Delta Airlines will implement the monitoring program on
behalf of the Port and several Rent-A-Car tenants. We anticipate completion of long term
monitoring in 2016. 
Lora Lake Apartments  On July 10, 2009, the Port and the DOE executed a MTCA Agreed
Order that requires the Port to conduct a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS)
for the cleanup of the Lora Lake Apartment Property. An RI/FS Work Plan for the apartment
parcel was implemented in 2010. A work plan to investigate the sediments and upland areas of
the Lora Lake parcel was implemented in 2011. A report that presents the findings of both
investigations and analysis of clean up alternatives will be submitted to DOE in January of 2012.
Actual clean up will be accomplished under a follow-on order negotiated after the completion of
the RI/FS. 
SeaTac Fuel Facilities Fuel Farm  Groundwater contamination was discovered at this facility,
the former Olympic Fuel Farm, during an investigation to define post-construction conditions as
required by the lease between the Port and the SeaTac Fuel Facilities LLC. The extent of the
contamination has been determined, and pilot testing of remediation systems has been
completed. Remediation, consisting of passive collection of free product and ground water
monitoring was upgraded in 2011 to reduce the restoration timeframe. Cleanup is projected to be
complete by 2012, with confirmation monitoring to follow.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 8 of 11 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: 
The following table summarizes 2011 through 2015 forecasted spending for environmental
remediation projects. Forecasted spending reflects projects described in the Scope of Work.
Five-Year Spending Plan 
$s in Thousands          2012       2013      2014      2015     2016     2012-
2016 
Gross Project Spending      $ 23,604   $ 25,302    $ 17,569    $ 11,204     $13,378    $ 91,057 
Cash from 3rd Parties       $ (7,183)   $ (5,664)     $ (103)  $ (132)     $ (60)    $13,142) 
Net Port Share           $ 16,421   $ 19,638     $ 17,467  $ 11,072     $13,318    $ 77,915 
Note: Cash from 3rd parties are reimbursments for shared contracted costs performed under Memorandum of
Agreements where the Port is the contracting agent. Forecasted payments by potentially liable parties included only
for booked liabilities. Amounts do not include estimates of possible recoveries from grants, insurance or litigation.
2012 gross project spending combined with the $32,900,000 PO obligations result in the $56,500,000 amount of
this request. 
Source of Funds 
Environmental cleanup projects have multiple funding sources: (1) Seaport non-operating
projects and Real Estate operating and non-operating projects are funded by the Port's Tax Levy;
(2) Seaport operating projects are funded by the General Fund; (3) Airport projects are funded by
the Airport Development Fund. In addition, there are supplementary outside sources of funding,
including the following: 
Invoicing and payment from cost sharing agreements with other partner or tenant PLPs (or
PRPs), wherein the Port functions as a funding conduit for the other PLPs and the Port holds
contracts on behalf of these other PLPs 
Litigation settlements with other PLPs 
Insurance recoveries from both the Port's insurers and other PLPs' insurers 
Grant funding from the Washington DOE and  joint Washington DOE /U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency grants in 2012. 
o  The following existing project received grant funding in 2011 : the Lower Duwamish
Superfund early action site at T117 . 
o  New grants were received in 2011 for T91.
COMMUNITY / CUSTOMER / ORGANIZATION IMPACTS: 
Elimination of unacceptable levels of environmental risk caused by the presence of contaminants
in upland soil, in marine sediments, and groundwater is not only required by state and federal
law, it is the hallmark of responsible environmental stewardship, from the perspectives of both
the surrounding residential and business communities and the customers that we serve. 
The environmental remediation authorization will fund a mix of Port staff and outside consultant
services that maximizes the effectiveness of staff.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 9 of 11 

PROJECT SCHEDULE: 
This authorization is for funds forecasted to be spent during 2012 to 2016. 
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED/RECOMMENDED ACTION: 
The following alternatives were considered for accomplishing the work described in the Scope of
Work: 
Alternative 1 
Do not complete the work. If the Port chose to not complete the work, federal and/or state
regulatory agencies could mandate the work be accomplished, either by the Port under an
enforcement or similar order, or by the agency. In many cases, such arrangements already exist
between the Port and regulatory agencies. In either case, the Port would lose the opportunity to
employ the flexibility contained in the controlling regulations, to define and direct the work, and
to manage costs. 
Alternative 2 
Complete the work using Port staff. Port staff is already heavily involved in project direction,
legal analysis, and project management, and will continue to perform these services. The nature
and extent of the technical and legal work required to complete this work is substantial, and
would require a large number of additional staff with additional expertise. In addition contracts
would still be required for such work as laboratory analysis. 
Alternative 3 
Complete the work using outside consultants and contractors. Outside consultants and
contractors have sufficient numbers and types of specialists necessary for timely and cost
effective completion of this work; however the work would be more costly than if some Port
staff were also involved.
Alternative 4 
Complete the work using a combination of Port staff (Alternative 2) and outside consultants and
contractors (Alternative 3) that maximizes the ability for the Port to direct cleanup efforts and
maximize the effectiveness of staff. Alternative 4 is recommended. 
OTHER DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST: 
Map of ERL Sites North Properties (Seaport and Real Estate) 
Map of ERL sites South Properties (Seaport and Real Estate) 
Map of ERL Sites Aviation 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: 
On July 13, 1993, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,050,000 for eight projects
during 1993.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 10 of 11 

On March 8, 1994, the Commission approved the expenditure of $776,000 for eleven projects
during 1994. 
On March 28, 1995, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,875,000 for nine projects
during 1995. 
On February 27, 1996, the Commission approved the expenditure of $2,325,000 for eleven
projects during 1996. 
On February 25, 1997, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,100,000 to conduct the
STIA Ground Water Study required by a Washington DOE Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA)
Agreed Order. 
On June 8, 1999, the Commission approved the expenditure of $300,000 to conduct the
Industrial Waste System Hydrogeological Study required by the DOE as a performance
condition of the 1998 National Pollution Discharge and Elimination System Permit. 
On August 24, 1999, the Commission approved the expenditure of $800,000 for environmental
cleanup of Port property adjacent to the Malarkey Asphalt Co. site. 
On March 14, 2000, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,000,000 for aquatic
sediment management for participating in the development and implementation of federal and
state laws and regulations relating to the disposition of contaminated aquatic sediments, and the
expenditure of $2,000,000 for cleanup-related investigations at the former Chevron Oil Terminal
site at Terminal 30. 
On July 10, 2001, the Commission approved the expenditure of $5,100,000 for nine Aviation
projects and six Seaport projects during 2001. 
On June 11, 2002, the Commission approved the expenditure of $1,500,000 and contract
amendments for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Order on Consent to continue
work on the Lower Duwamish Sediments Superfund site and the East Waterway Sediment
Operable Unit of the Harbor Island Superfund Site.
On March 11, 2003, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$4,999,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties and for potential environmental
liabilities during 2003. Actual expenditures for 2003 were ultimately limited to $2,459,870.
On March 23, 2004, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$8,081,000, for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2004. Actual
expenditures for 2004 were ultimately limited to $2,136,943. 
On March 23, 2005, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$8,102,222, for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2005. Actual
expenditures for 2005 were ultimately limited to $6,255,791. 
On December 13, 2005, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$8,705,760 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2006.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
November 22, 2011 
Page 11 of 11 

On June 27, 2006, the Commission approved an increase in the 2006 project-wide authorization
for environmental cleanup action on Port properties, to increase the authorization in the amount
of $6,000,000 to $14,705,760. Expenditures for 2006 were ultimately limited to $11,087,873.38. 
On December 12, 2006, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$7,756,549 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2007. Expenditures for
2007 were ultimately limited to $7,537,286. 
On December 1, 2007, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$11,833,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2008. Expenditures for
2008 were ultimately limited to $11,322,258. 
On December 9, 2008, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$10,396,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2009. Expenditures for
2009 were ultimately limited to 7,455,000. 
On November 30, 2009, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$13,141,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2010. Expenditures for
2010 - through December 31, 2010, were ultimately limited to $10,529,000 . 
On December 7, 2010, the Commission approved the project-wide authorization expenditure of
$15,000,000 for environmental cleanup action on Port properties during 2011. Obligation of
work in later years for $16,200,000. Expenditures for 2011 - through September 30, 2010was 
$7,514,000 and obligation of work in later years for 4,200,000 for a total authorization of
11,714,000 .