5b
PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 5b Date of Meeting November 8, 2011 DATE: October 27, 2011 TO: Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Ofcer FROM: "0'Mike Campagnaro, Manager, Leasing and Asset Management Paul Meyer, Manager, Environmental Programs M SUBJECT: Terminal 10 Stormwater Outfall Easement Agreement Amount of This Request: $45,750 Source of Funds: Operating Revenues Est. State and Local Taxes: N/A Est. Construction Jobs Generated: N/A Total Project Cost: N/A ACTION REQUESTED: Request Commission authorization for the Chief Executive Ofcer (CEO) to execute an easement agreement with the Washington State Department ofNatural Resources (DNR) for an initial term of 10 years and the potential for two additional 10-year terms for the use of State- owned aquatic land at Terminal 10 to install a connection to a new stormwater conveyance system, improve an existing upland cap, and install an outfall structure. SYNOPSIS: The construction ofTerminal 10 utility improvement project was previously authorized by the Commission on June 22, 2010. The Port desires to use State-owned aquatic lands for the purpose of installing a connection to a new stormwater conveyance system, improving an existing upland cap and installing an outfall structure. The State is willing to grant an easement for these purposes for a term of 10 years, with potential to renew the easement for two additional terms of 10 years each. The Port would agree, among other things, to construct and operate the stormwater conveyance system and outfall in compliance with all laws and permits and in the manner as described in all regulatory authorizations. The cost for the 10-year easement is $45,750. The cost was set by DNR in accordance with RCW 79.110.240. COMMISSION AGENDA Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Ofcer October 27, 2011 Page 2 of 4 EASEMENT AGREEMENT: The agreement is made by and between the State of Washington, acting through the Department of Natural Resources ("State"), and Port of Seattle, a municipal corporation ("Port"). The Port desires to use approximately 0.09 acres (4,039 square feet) of these State-owned aquatic lands for the purpose of installing a connection to a new stormwater conveyance system, improving an existing upland cap installed under a separate consent decree and installing an outfall structure. The Port coordinated its plans with Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed") and the US. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and has obtained Lockheed's waiver for any claims against the State for granting an easement to the Port for this outfall. The State is willing to grant an easement for a term of 10 years, with potential for two 10-year renewal terms, to the Port in reliance upon Lockheed's waiver and the Port's promises to construct and operate the stormwater conveyance system and outfall in compliance with all laws and permits and in the manner as described in all regulatory authorizations. Future grants of easement rights will depend on the Port's satisfactory progress toward implementation of reasonably practical disposal alternatives, if any. JUSTIFICATION: Access to the State-owned parcel is necessary to complete and operate the Terminal 10 utility improvement project previously approved by Commission. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Budget/Authorization Summary: Previous Authorizations _m Current re . uest for authonzatlon $45,750 Total Authorizations, including this re uest $45,750 Remaining budget to be authorized -m Project Cost Breakdown: Easement Fee $44,520 $1,230 $45,750 COMMISSION AGENDA Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Ofcer October 27, 2011 Page 3 of 4 Budget Status and Source of Funds: The funding associated with this easement was not included in the 2011 Operating Budget. The proposed mding required of $45,750 will result in an unfavorable operating expense variance as noted below. However, this amount will be offset by savings in other areas. The easement cost will be funded from operating revenues. Financial Anal sis and Summa cu" Cam Risk adjusted N/A Discount rate 0 Renewal of easement conditioned upon DNR's approval and Port's Key risk factors ability to conduct stormwater management alternatives investigation and analysis. Upon expiration of the easement the Port13 required to remove im - rovements. anal sis Seaport Industrial Properties BU) Effect on business Upon execution of the easement the Port will pay DNR $45,750. The performance easement fee ($44,520) will be amortized throughout the 10-year term of the easement. The impact to Net Operating Income (N01) and N01 Aer Depreciation resulting from the initial ve-year term of the easement is shown below. 4min000's M M m M 2m NOI ($2) ($4) ($4) ($4) ($4) Depreciation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NOI After Depreciation ($2) ($4) ($4) ($4) ($4) LEGAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL: The easement agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by Port legal counsel. COMMISSION AGENDA Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Ofcer October 27, 2011 Page 4 of 4 OTHER DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST: - Aquatic Lands Outfall Easement Terminal 10 Stormwater Outfall between the State of Washington and Port of Seattle, with Exhibits A, B and C. PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS: 0 May 20, 2010 The Commission approved an additional $180,000 to continue work necessary for nal approvals essential to the Terminal 10 utility improvement project due to the need for extended review and response by federal, state, and local government agencies. 0 April 14, 2009 The Commission approved an additional $270,000 to include a new stormwater outfall in the permit and design and to accommodate increased costs associated with EPA and City of Seattle coordination on construction issues. 0 September 2, 2008 The Commission was advised by staff that design and permitting cost may exceed the authorized amount of $530,000 by up to several hundred thousand dollars. 0 March 25, 2008 The Commission approved $530,000 for staff to complete 100% design and permitting for the redevelopment ofTerminal 10 uplands into truck parking.
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.