7a Attach 5
ITEM NO 7a-Attach 5 DATE OF MEETING 8/02/2011 Terminal 91 Today 2 Guiding Principles Driven by Century Agenda Guidelines Attract expansion of "core mission" customers Attract "broader types of economic activity" that comply with the existing industrial zoning Incorporate revenue streams expected from full, fair market value leases into the financial analysis in order to test the financial sustainability of total site development Explore models of sustainable growth 3 Policy Questions What is the appropriate level of Port investment in new infrastructure? What is the optimal balance between: Economic vitality/Jobs Environmental stewardship Financial goals How should any new investment be funded? 4 Completed Work Identification of existing core mission tenant needs Industrial market assessment Site planning of Development Zones and Options Construction cost estimates for anticipated Port projects Financial analysis Economic benefits analysis 5 Planning Strategy Six zones Accommodate existing tenants expressed expansion needs Consolidate footprints and/or relocate activity south of the bridge Free up land available for new tenants 6 Utility improvements north of bridge New road network Integrated storm water system Upgraded electrical Water and Sewer Other Cost: $20 $24 million 7 Zone Review North of Bridge Key Messages Investments in utilities at best break even Tank Farm is not ideal for new buildings Positive NPV results from Port constructed industrial buildings are unlikely Ground leasing as alternative means to meet existing tenant expansion should be considered 8 Zone Review North of Bridge - Continued Key Messages Investments in utilities cannot be recovered A garage may be worthy of consideration to efficiently use land and maximize economic benefits Key Issues Expected financial targets? Seek public partners for cost sharing of utilities? Invest in utilities or leave this to a 3rd party developer? Timing of investments? 9 Zone Review South of Bridge - West Yard Key Messages Demand for new office space not anticipated for several years Non-accessory office development requires zoning modification Ground leasing may provide a positive NPV Key Issue Exploring potential land swap and CSO placement with City / County 10 Zone Review South of Bridge - Shortfill Key Messages The existing use and configuration provides a positive NPV Opening up additional land north of the bridge for new tenants by investing south of the bridge may be costly to pursue 11 Zone Review South of Bridge Pier 90 Key Messages Positive NPV results from Port constructed industrial buildings are unlikely Rebuilding berths 6 / 8 has significantly negative impact on financial results Key Issue Consider berth construction as an asset management investment and remove from financial results 12 Option #1 Economic Benefits Option 1 Jobs Direct 388 Induced 323 Indirect 218 Total 929 Income ($1000) Direct $22,797 Induced $11,676 Indirect $9,947 Total $44,420 Direct Business Revenue ($1000) $75,064 State and Local Taxes ($1000) $4,131 13 Option #2 Economic Benefits Option 2 Jobs Direct 506 Induced 437 Indirect 295 Total 1,238 Income ($1000) Direct $30,746 Induced $15,804 Indirect $13,568 Total $60,118 Direct Business Revenue ($1000) $103,049 State and Local Taxes ($1000) $5,591 14 Option #3 Economic Benefits Option 3 Jobs Direct 783 Induced 648 Indirect 458 Total 1,890 Income ($1000) Direct $44,367 Induced $23,431 Indirect $21,351 Total $89,149 Direct Business Revenue ($1000) $157,231 State and Local Taxes ($1000) $8,291 15 Option #4 Economic Benefits Option 4 Jobs Direct 3,198 Induced 3,936 Indirect 3,050 Total 10,185 Income ($1000) Direct $241,422 Induced $142,611 Indirect $159,580 Total $543,613 Direct Business Revenue ($1000) $1,191,319 State and Local Taxes ($1000) $50,556 16 FINANCIAL RESULTS Zone Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Pier 90 Scenario Berth & Buildings Berth & Buildings Berth & Buildings Berth & Buildings Port Investment $73.9 $73.9 $73.9 $73.9 NPV ($40.4) ($40.4) ($40.4) ($40.4) Shortfill Scenario Yard with No Fill Yard with No Fill Apron Extension - Notches Full Apron with Garage Port Investment $0.0 $0.0 $8.8 $111.3 NPV $3.3 $3.3 ($4.3) ($67.8) NW Yard Scenario Existing Cruise Parking Existing Cruise Parking Garage & Leases Development & Yard Port Investment $0.4 $0.4 $33.6 $0.5 NPV $2.6 $2.6 $0.8 $10.1 Tank Farm Scenario Warehouse Warehouse & Office Warehouse & Office Warehouse Port Investment $22.0 $26.7 $26.7 $22.0 NPV ($9.7) ($10.4) ($10.4) ($9.7) West Yard Scenario Development & Yard Development & Yard Development & Yard Development & Yard Port Investment $0.5 $0.5 $0.5 $0.5 NPV $3.3 $3.3 $3.3 $3.3 Uplands Scenario Development & Yard Development & Yard Development Development Port Investment $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 NPV $15.1 $15.1 $13.4 $13.4 Utilities Scenario Port Investment $22.7 $23.4 $25.3 $26.6 NPV ($17.4) ($17.9) ($19.4) ($20.4) Total Port Investment $120.4 $125.8 $169.7 $235.6 NPV ($43.2) ($44.4) ($56.9) ($111.5) IRR 5.8% 6.0% 6.5% 4.5% Note: $ (000,000's) 17 Status Quo Key Messages Investments in berth reconstruction and storm water management systems are likely to be needed Removing estimated asset management costs significantly improves financial results but projected return remains negative If no significant investment is authorized, staff will likely seek longer term leases for open storage Key Issue: What is optimal balance between economic benefits and financial goals? 18 FINANCIAL RESULTS - Continued The financial results excluding costs associated with asset management issues are shown below. Though results improve significantly, all options retain a negative NPV. Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Total Port Investment $68.0 $73.4 $117.7 $183.8 (excluding Berth & NPV ($4.5) ($5.6) ($18.5) ($73.3) Stormwater costs) IRR 10.3% 10.1% 9.0% 5.8% Note: $ (000,000's) 19 NEXT STEPS Outreach to current tenants and the public Additional analysis Prepare recommended development option Commission briefing this fall on recommended option 20
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.