6c

PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 

COMMISSION AGENDA             Item No.      6c 
ACTION ITEM             Date of Meeting Date of Meeting     May 3, 2011 
DATE:    April 25, 2011 
TO:      Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:    Lindsay Pulsifer, General Manager, Marine Maintenance 
Rees Robinson, Project Manager, Marine Maintenance 
SUBJECT: Request for Funding Increase for the Terminal 91 Cruise Terminal Restroom Expansion
(Project #104448, CIP C800311) 
Amount of This Request: $110,000      Source of Funds: General Fund 
Total Project Cost:     $370,000       State and Local Taxes Paid: $6,100 
ACTION REQUESTED:
Request Commission authorization for additional funding to complete the in-progress construction of the 
Terminal 91 Smith Cove Cruise Terminal Restroom Expansion project at an additional cost of $110,000
for a total project cost of $370,000. This is a capital project funded in the 2010 Seaport Small Project
CIP C800311. Additional funds for the project are available due to under-spending in the 2011 Seaport
Small Project CIP C800358. Marine Maintenance crews are performing the work. 
SYNOPSIS: 
The Smith Cove Cruise Terminal (SCCT) was built with only two unisex toilet rooms available for
passenger use in the front lobby area of the terminal. The access to these restrooms is from the outside
of the terminal. After the 2010 cruise season, the construction of additional restrooms in the front lobby
became a priority because of the lengthy lines that had formed outside the restrooms during the first two
seasons that SCCT was open. Additional restrooms, with internal access, are required to improve
customer satisfaction and provide necessary restroom capacity for the number of passengers using
SCCT.
The authorized budget for the restroom expansion project was $260,000. The project is over budget
because the consultant underestimated material and labor costs, the project drawings were of low quality
and, due to the changes in allocation methods, allocated overhead is over $100,000. It was also assumed
that a contractor would do the work, but it was impossible to bid out the contract in time to finish the
restrooms before the opening of the cruise season on May 7, 2011. Port staff are requesting $110,000 to
finish the in-progress project. 
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND: 
During the 2010 capital planning process, construction of additional restrooms in the front lobby of the
Cruise Terminal became a priority because of the lengthy lines that had formed outside of the restrooms
during the first two seasons that SCCT was open, and a restroom expansion project was proposed to be

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
April 28, 2011 
Page 2 of 4 
included in the Seaport Small Project CIP. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the project was scoped, 
and funding became available in the 2010 Small Project CIP due to cancelled and delayed projects. 
Preliminary design work evaluated alternatives for increasing restroom capacity while minimizing
disruption to the terminal. The selected alternative retains the existing front lobby restrooms with access
from outside the building. New restrooms are built around the existing restrooms with access from
inside the building. 
The preferred alternative was finalized in January 2011. The authorized project budget of $260,000 was
determined based on a construction cost estimate prepared by a consultant assuming a contractor would
do the work. The building permit was obtained on February 3. Construction work requires a minimum
of eight weeks assuming all materials are purchased and available. Cruise ships begin arriving at the
Smith Cove Cruise Terminal on May 7, 2011. 
Schedule constraints did not allow sufficient time to put the project out to bid. During acquisition
planning, it was decided that Marine Maintenance crews would do the work with support from Port
Construction Services. 
Despite construction challenges, the Restroom Expansion Project has remained on schedule. However,
the project is over budget. 
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: 
The project is over budget due to a combination of the following factors: 
The authorized project cost was based on a consultant's construction cost estimate calculated at
the end of the preliminary design phase. At that time, we were assuming a contractor would be
performing the work. 
Based on material costs only, the consultant grossly under-estimated costs. The consultant's total
estimated material cost was approximately $30,000. Actual material costs, including sales taxes, 
are expected to be approximately $70,000. It is likely that the consultant's estimated labor costs
would also have been low if we had used a contractor. 
The project drawings were of low quality. Marine Maintenance crews spent a lot of time
rectifying drawing errors and omissions. Examples include, but are not limited to: inadequate
space allotted in the plumbing walls; incorrect ADA dimensions; misrepresented vents and
sprinkler systems; and, specified plumbing fixtures not corresponding to the plumbing
infrastructure. If these drawings had gone out to bid, the resulting change orders would have
resulted in an even greater project cost. 
The Marine Maintenance 2011 burden rate has had a large impact on the budget. Over $100,000
will be charged to the project in allocated overhead. 
PROJECT SCHEDULE: 
The new restrooms are nearing completion. The restrooms are expected to be operational before May 7,
2011.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
April 28, 2011 
Page 3 of 4 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: 
Budget/Authorization Summary 
Original Budget                                                $260,000 
Previous Authorizations                                            $260,000 
Current request for authorization                                        $110,000 
Total Authorizations, including this request                                 $370,000 
Remaining budget to be authorized                                       $0 
Total Estimated Project Cost                                        $370,000 

Project Cost Breakdown 
Material                                                        $64,400 
Taxes                                                      $6,100 
Labor                                                    $130,000 
Project Management / POS Staff                                     $27,500 
Overhead                                                $107,000 
Design                                                    $33,000
Permitting                                                       $2,000 
Total                                                           $370,000 
Source of Funds: 
The Seaport 2010 Small Project CIP C800311 and the Seaport 2011 Small Project CIP C800358 were
included in the 2011 Plan of Finance as Committed projects. The SCCT restroom project was identified
as a planned project under the Seaport 2010 Small Project CIP C800311.
The additional $110,000 required to fund this project is available within the Seaport 2011 Small Project
CIP C800358 due to planned Small Capital projects which have been deferred. 
Financial Analysis and Summary: 
CIP Category             Renewal/Enhancement 
Project Type               Renewal & Replacement 
Risk adjusted Discount rate     N/A 
Key risk factors              No risk factors identified, project is essentially complete. 
Project cost for analysis         $370,000 
Business Unit (BU)           Cruise Services 
Effect on business performance   This asset will not generate any incremental revenue.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
April 28, 2011 
Page 4 of 4 
However, it will improve the customer experience for cruise
passengers traveling through the Smith Cove Cruise Terminal.
Customer satisfaction with their embark/disembark experience
is a key factor in creating and retaining repeat cruise
customers. 
The incremental increase to depreciation expense resulting
from this $110,000 funding request is $5,500/year. Total
depreciation expense from this project is estimated at
$18,500/year, based on a 20 year asset life. NOI after
Depreciation for this facility will decrease by the associated
depreciation expense from this project. 
NOI (in $000's)       Year 1  Year 2  Year 3  Year 4  Year 5
NOI             $0    $0    $0    $0    $0
Depreciation         ($19)   ($19)   ($19)   ($19)   ($19)
NOI After Depreciation   ($19)   ($19)   ($19)   ($19)   ($19)
IRR/NPV              N/A 
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED/RECOMMENDED ACTION: 
Alternative 1: Stop construction of restrooms until the budget over-run is determined and full project
authorization is obtained. This project is on a fast track. Spending is occurring predominately over the
two months of March and April. It wasn't evident until April that the project would be overbudget, and
not until mid-April that the small capital project limit of $300,000 would be exceeded. If work were 
stopped until Commission authorization was obtained, the restrooms would not be finished before the
first cruise ship call on May 7. Our cruise agents, operators and customers would have been
disappointed and inconvenienced. Once authorization was obtained, construction would have had to
proceed in stops and starts as required by the cruise schedule, adding significantly more cost to the
project. This is not the chosen alternative. 
Alternative 2: Maintain the construction schedule while capturing and forecasting remaining project
costs. Once total project cost is determined, obtain appropriate authorization as soon as possible. This
alternative allows the restrooms to be finished on schedule. The $300,000 small capital project limit
will be exceeded before Commission authorization is obtained.required. The Marine Maintenance
General Manager directed that work continue while authorizations are acquired. This is the
recommended alternative. 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS: 
None.

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.