6a Memo

PORT OF SEATTLE 
MEMORANDUM 

COMMISSION AGENDA             Item No.      6a 
Date of Meeting     April 27, 2010 
DATE:    April 9, 2010 
TO:      Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
FROM:    M. Luisa Bangs, Senior Maintenance Manager, Aviation Maintenance 
Wayne Grotheer, Director Aviation Capital Improvement Program 
SUBJECT: Main Terminal South End Roof Replacement (CIP # C800360). 
This Request: $120,000                Source of Funds: Airport Development Fund 
Total Project Budget: $2,640,000 
ACTION REQUESTED: 
Request Commission authorization for the Chief Executive Officer to prepare design and
construction bid documents for the replacement of approximately 90,000 square feet of roof
systems located on the south end of the Main Terminal at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport 
(Airport). This authorization is for $120,000 of a total estimated project cost of $2,640,000 (CIP 
# C800360).
SYNOPSIS: 
This memorandum requests authorization to proceed with the design that would remove and
replace the current roofing system on the south end of the Main Terminal in order to avoid leaks
that cause damage to the underlying infrastructure, equipment, and interior facilities. Portions of
the roof being replaced were installed in 1993, 1994 and 1996 and will be at or beyond their
useful life expectancy when replacement takes place. The airlines have approved this project. 
BACKGROUND: 
In 1991, the Airport began a major Terminal Facility re-roofing program that was completed in
1997. Since 1997, many Airport roofs have been replaced on a project/roof specific basis. 
This project is initiating the next cycle of roof replacements. The Airport's current roofs have a
15 year life expectancy of which a large percentage have expired or will expire shortly. 
The Airport's roof replacement program has been prioritized and phased over the next 6-10 years
by a team comprised of Engineering, Maintenance, and Project Management. This first phase of

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
April 9, 2010 
Page 2 of 5 
the program was triggered by leaks and the discovery of fractured roof membranes over the last
several years. Replacement reduces the potential for facility damage and liability risks
associated with roof leaks. This is necessary in order to provide safe and reliable facilities to our
business partners, tenants, and the traveling public. 
The ability to eliminate leaks by reroofing will mitigate the cost of leak investigation,
maintenance and repairs associated with responding to and "tracking down" the root cause of the 
roof leaks. Tracking leaks and making repairs is labor intensive and does not always solve the
problem. When the roof systems are in a fractured and deteriorated state, more leaks are created
by walking on the roof looking for the original problem. This tracking work can take anywhere
from days to months as this effort is weather dependent and success cannot be verified until the
next heavy rain. 
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF WORK: 
Project Objectives: 
This project will remove and replace the existing roof system at the south end of the Main
Terminal, eliminating costly leak repair and potential damage to existing infrastructure. 
Scope of Work: 
Remove and replace existing roof system and install a new 65 millimeter elastomeric roofing
system on the south end of the Main Terminal, sections: M-1, M-2, M-10, M-12, MP-2 and MP-
3 (see attached map), which is approximately 90,000 square feet. 
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES: 
This project supports the Port-wide strategic objective of Ensuring Airport and Seaport Vitality.
We will maximize facility and asset utilization by replacing the Airport's roof systems before
they fail through a systemic and timely roof replacement program. We will reduce risk and
liability issues, and safeguard the integrity of the building envelope and underlying infrastructure
from water infiltration due to failing roof systems.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: 
Budget/Authorization Summary 
Original Budget                          $2,640,000 
Budget Increase                          $ 0 
Budget Transfers                         $ 0 
Revised Budget                         $2,640,000 

Previous Authorizations                     $ 0

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
April 9, 2010 
Page 3 of 5 
Current request for authorization                $ 120,000 
Total Authorizations, including this request         $ 120,000 
Remaining budget to be authorized              $2,520,000 
Project Cost Breakdown               This Request    Total Project 
Construction costs                                      $1,992,000 
Sales tax                                                 $188,000 
In-house design                             $79,000 
Aviation PMG and other soft costs                $41,000        $460,000 
Total                                    $120,000       $2,640,000 
Source of Funds: 
This project, CIP # C800360, is included in the 2010  2014 capital budget and plan of finance
as a business plan prospective project. The funding source for this project will be the Airport 
Development Fund. The airline representatives reviewed this project in February 2010, voiced
positive support, and voted favorably through a Majority-In-Interest vote in March 2010. In
February, the airlines were made aware of upcoming roof replacements in future years that will
be voted then on a project-by-project basis. 
Financial Analysis Summary 
CIP Category               Renewal/Enhancement 
Project Type                 Renewal & Replacement 
Risk adjusted Discount Rate       N/A 
Key risk factors                N/A 
Project cost for analysis           $2,640,000 
Business Unit (BU)            Terminal 
Effect on Business Performance    NOI after depreciation will increase 
IRR/NPV               N/A 
$0.01 in 2012 but no change compared to business
CPE Impact 
plan forecast as this project was included. 
As a cost recovery project, traditional financial analysis measures such as net present value
(NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) are not meaningful.

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
April 9, 2010 
Page 4 of 5 
ECONOMIC IMPACTS: 
This project does not create any incremental economic impacts apart from supporting the
existing substantial economic impacts of the Airport. 
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY/COMMUNITY BENEFITS: 
The new roof will have a minimum solar reflective index that exceeds 78, which is the value
required to obtain the LEED Credit NC7.2. This will reduce air conditioning loads and save
energy. The new roofing systems will also be Energy Star rated. The insulating value of the
new roof will be greater than that of the existing roof, because of new energy requirements. By
replacing the roof and preventing damage to the underlying building systems, the life of the
existing building systems will be prolonged.
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE SUMMARY: 
This roof replacement project represents an investment in our current facility and supports the
long-term vitality of the Airport, businesses within the Airport, and the traveling public.
Installation of new Energy Star roofing system will reduce the energy demand of the Airport
through insulating against heat loss. Replacing the roof will prevent water leak damage to other
building systems, disruption of Airport operations, and will prevent perceptions of poor customer
service. 
PROJECT SCHEDULE: 
The following is a list of key milestone dates for the Main Terminal South End Roof
Replacement: 
Request for Commission Authorization for Design           April 2010 
Request for Commission Authorization to Advertise         October 2010 
Request for an Authorization to Award the Contract (if needed)   March 2011 
Project Completion                          November 2011 
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED/RECOMMENDED ACTION: 
Alternative 1: Develop a systematic replacement program for the Airport's roof systems. Phase
the replacement program over multiple years, which allows the Airport to sustain serviceable
roof systems and provide safe and productive environments for our business partners and
passengers. Through roof inspection and analysis, the first phase of the roof replacement
program has identified 90,000 square feet of roof at the south end of the Main Terminal. This
phase is intended to be designed in 2010 with actual roof replacement to be accomplished 2011.
The rest of this prioritized replacement program would be accomplished over the next ten years 
and be approved on a project-by-project basis. This process/alternative requires securing

COMMISSION AGENDA 
T. Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer 
April 9, 2010 
Page 5 of 5 
necessary approvals and funding for each specific phase of the roof replacement program. This
is the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 2: Install a green roof system. Green roofs are complete roof systems comprised of
vegetation, soil, drainage and waterproof membrane, requiring specific structural integrity not
currently in place as part of the Airport structure. This alternative would create an environment
that would attract birds and other wildlife; increase bird strike hazards; and escalate nuisancewildlife
control. Installing a green roof would be in direct conflict with the Airport's Wildlife
Hazard Mitigation and Wildlife conservation Program and the FAA approved Airport
Certification Manual. This is not the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 3: Continue to patch and repair the leaks risking continued retrogressive
deterioration throughout the entire roof system (terminal and concourses). This alternative
increases maintenance and emergency repair response and costs, not only due to the continual
patching of the existing roof system but also due to ceiling, floor, and equipment damage caused
by the leaks. This also increases liability should customers slip and fall. This is not the
recommended alternative. 
ATTACHMENTS:
Roof Replacement Planning Map. 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: 
On September 22, 2009, the Commission was briefed on facility renewal projects that were
necessary in future years. The Airport re-roofing program was included in the presentation.

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.