Audit Report Clear Channel

Internal Audit Report 

Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc 
(dba Clear Channel Airports) 

Lease and Concession Compliance Audit 

August 1, 2007 through July 31, 2009 




Issue Date: February 2, 2010 
Report No. 2010-02

Internal Audit 
Clear Channel Airports (Agreement No. 950) 
Audit Period: July 1, 2007  August 31, 2009 

Audit Period: July 1, 2005  June 30, 2008 
Table of Contents 
Internal Auditor's Report ...................................................................................................... 3 
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 4 
Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 
Audit Objectives .................................................................................................................. 5 
Audit Scope ......................................................................................................................... 6 
Audit Approach .................................................................................................................... 6 
Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 6 











2

Internal Audit 
Clear Channel Airports (Agreement No. 950) 
Audit Period: July 1, 2007  August 31, 2009 

Audit Period: July 1, 2005  June 30, 2008 Internal Auditor's Report 

We have completed an audit of the Lease and Concession Agreement between the Port of Seattle 
and Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., dba Clear Channel Airports. The purpose of this audit was to
determine whether: 
1)  Reported concession was complete, properly calculated and remitted timely to the Port. 
2)  Port and the Lessee complied with provisions of the Lease and Concession Agreement. 
3)  Lease and Concession Agreement complies with applicable state and Port requirements. 
We examined information related to agreement period August 1, 2007 through July 31, 2009. 
We conducted our audit using due professional care, and we planned and performed the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the Port and the lessee had complied with all 
provisions of the agreement. 
We found no significant instances of non-compliance. The agreement complied with applicable
state and Port requirements, and the reported concession was complete and in compliance with
the agreement terms. 
We extend our appreciation to the management and staff of the Aviation Business Development
and Accounting & Financial Reporting (AFR) for their assistance and cooperation during the audit. 


Joyce Kirangi, CPA 
Director, Internal Audit 






3

Internal Audit 
Clear Channel Airports (Agreement No. 950) 
Audit Period: July 1, 2007  August 31, 2009 

Audit Period: July 1, 2005  June 30, 2008 Executive Summary 
Audit Scope and Objective The purpose of the audit was to determine whether: 
1)  Reported concession was complete, properly calculated and remitted timely to the Port. 
2)  Port and the Lessee complied with provisions of the Lease and Concession Agreement. 
3)  Lease and Concession Agreement complies with applicable state and Port requirements. 
We examined the books and records of Clear Channel Airports in order to verify the accuracy and
completeness of reported gross receipts and concession fees paid to the Port from August 1, 2007 
through July  31, 2009.  Aviation Business Development has the primary responsibility for
administering and monitoring the agreement to ensure compliance with agreed-upon terms and
conditions including proper and complete reporting of concessionable gross receipts. 

Agreement Terms  Clear Channel Airports develops, manages, and operates, commercial
advertising and promotions in the airport. Under the terms of the agreement, Clear Channel
Airports agreed to pay concession fees from advertising revenues as follows: 
First Year - 70% concession on gross receipts generated from allowable advertising activity
equal to or in excess of $6.4 million OR Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) of $3,750,000
million. 
Subsequent Year - 67% concession on gross receipts generated from allowable advertising
activity equal to or in excess of $6.4 million OR Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) of
$4,000,000. 

Audit Result Summary  We found no significant instances of non-compliance. The agreement
complied with applicable state and Port requirements, and the reported concession was complete
and in compliance with the agreement terms. 






4

Internal Audit 
Clear Channel Airports (Agreement No. 950) 
Audit Period: July 1, 2007  August 31, 2009 

Audit Period: July 1, 2005  June 30, 2008 
Background 
Paris-based JCDecaux was a concessionaire for advertising venues at the airport until July 2007. 
Upon expiration of the lease, a new agreement was solicited through a public competitive process,
and Clear Channel Airports was selected as the successful bidder.
Clear Channel is one of the leaders in the outdoor advertising industry with worldwide presence.
The company operates at some of the most heavily used airports in the nation including Seattle-
Tacoma International and Dallas Fort Worth, and delivers over one billion targeted advertising
exposures annually. 
Clear Channel develops, operates, and manages various commercial advertising mediums
including banners and printed/digital display cases in the airport. Under the terms of the
agreement, monthly concession fees based on gross receipts from advertising activity are due to
the Port as follows: 
First Year 
o  70% concession on receipts equal to or in excess of $6.4 million, OR 
o  Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) of $3,750,000 million. 
Subsequent Year 
o  67% concession on receipts equal to or in excess of $6.4 million, OR 
o  Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) of $4,000,000. 
In the past two agreement years, the Port has received the following concession fees. 
Fiscal Year Ending 7/31 
2008       2009 
Concessionable Gross Receipts  $5,384,718   $4,114,905 
Concession to the Port         $3,750,000   $4,000,000 
Source: Port Accounting and Lessee's financial records 
Aviation Business Development with the assistance from Accounting and Financial Reporting has
the responsibility for administering and monitoring the agreement to ensure compliance with
agreed-upon terms and conditions including proper and complete reporting of concessionable
gross receipts. 

Audit Objectives 
To determine whether: 
1)   Reported concession was complete, properly calculated and remitted timely to the Port. 
2)  Port and the Lessee complied with provisions of the Lease and Concession Agreement. 
3)  Lease and Concession Agreement complies with applicable state and Port requirements. 
5

Internal Audit 
Clear Channel Airports (Agreement No. 950) 
Audit Period: July 1, 2007  August 31, 2009 

Audit Scope          Audit Period: July 1, 2005  June 30, 2008 
The scope of the audit covered the period of August 1, 2007 through July 31, 2009. 

Audit Approach 
To achieve our audit objectives, we performed the following procedures: 
Obtained an understanding of the lease agreement. 
Identified significant provisions in the agreement to establish the extent of necessary audit
procedures. 
Obtained necessary financial and non-financial data from the lessee 
Analyzed data (internal & external) to determine completeness & compliance: 
Reconciliation of the reported gross to the lessee's accounting records to ensure
consistency. 
Recalculation of concession and related fees to ensure accuracy. 
Walk-through at the airport to ensure the completeness of the lessee's billings as a
basis of concessionable gross receipts. 

Conclusion 
We found no significant instances of non-compliance. The agreement complied with applicable
state and Port requirements, and the reported concession was complete and in compliance with
the agreement terms. 







6

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.