Item 6i Memo
PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6i Date of Meeting June 2, 2009 DATE: April 30, 2009 TO: Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer FROM: Rod Jackson, Capital Project Manager SUBJECT: Terminal 91 W-40 Building Demolition Project. ACTION REQUESTED 1. Request Port Commission approval to increase the authorized budget by $165,000 for a new total authorization of $1,026,000 to cover additional project cost. 2. Request for authorization to expand the existing project scope to include a new forklift ramp at the south east portion of the W-40. SYNOPSIS Because of unforeseen building conditions and operational concerns, project costs have exceeded the authorization. Additionally the need to re-establish the forklift ramp on the southeast corner of the building has been defined. BACKGROUND Demolition for the Terminal 91 (T91) W-40 building south bay has been completed. After final close out and punch list discussions with the current tenant CityIce, it was determined a new forklift ramp was to be installed after the demolition of building W-40 was complete. Because the ramp design was not included within the original scope of the project, staff is requesting authorization to expand the existing project scope to include a new (ecology block/ asphalt) forklift ramp at the south east portion of the W-40 building. To complete the forklift ramp and to close out the project; additional funds are needed to pay for project costs that exceeded the current project authorization. Staff is unable to pay outstanding invoices and project costs for the approved $861,000 authorization because preliminary demolition work performed by in-house labor and others did not include the sufficient and necessary funding to support the original project scope. Unforeseen repairs at building W-40 consisted of; valve house repairs, valve house insulation, water line and air compressor-line piping including increased allocated COMMISSION AGENDA Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer April 30, 2009 Page 2 of 5 overhead charges which led to higher than expected project costs. Issues that impacted design and construction cost included; Lack of adequate "as-built" drawings. Maintaining building operations during construction. Maintaining and re-routing building systems including fire alarms, telephones, sprinklers, electrical power and water. Staff is now requesting approval of an additional $165,000 to pay for outstanding project costs and installation of a new forklift ramp at the south end of the T-91 W-40 building. LESSONS LEARNED The lessons learned from the T91 Building W40 Modification Project were: Utilize the new "Encumbrance Report" developed by the Project Controls Group to recognize where the current spending is relative to the current project budget. When utilizing in-house Engineering, designate only one contact to provide and supply Project Management with up to date estimates and estimate revisions. Complete "Project Definitions" early on "Fast Track" projects. Provide additional project contingency for "old buildings and remodels". PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION Demolition of the south bay of Building W-40 is complete. Expanding on the existing project scope, this portion of the project will include a new (ecology block/ asphalt) forklift ramp at the south east portion of the W-40 building to allow continued tenant access. The objectives of the T91 Building W40 Modification Project were: Creating greater traffic ingress and egress capacity for future T91 cruise terminal by demolishing the southernmost bay of Building W40 and paving the resultant vacant area prior to start of 2009 cruise season. Terminal reconstruction design that is compatible with the Port's long range plan for T91. Minimize project impacts to existing building tenant, terminal operations and surrounding communities. Environmental stewardship, including compliance with environmental storm water review and permitting requirements. Meet or exceed the Port's financial criteria. Meet strategic asset management criteria. COMMISSION AGENDA Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer April 30, 2009 Page 3 of 5 PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE: Completed activities Asbestos abatement removal Utility relocations Installation of structural cross-bracing Roof connections Removed tested and disposed of discovered contaminated soils Demolished 6,300 square feet comprising the south bay of Building W-40 at T91 Construction and demolition work commenced in September 2008 with the project completed ahead of schedule in late January 2009. Future Activities Pay additional project expenses due to increased labor and allocated costs during in- house demolition. Construct a new forklift ramp at the south east portion of the W-40 (to be completed by Port staff). With approval and authorization today, the new forklift ramp for W-40 will be complete in late July 2009. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES: This project supports the Port strategy to "Ensure Airport and Seaport Vitality" by maximizing asset utilization and preserving existing assets. BUSINESS PLAN OBJECTIVES: Creating greater traffic ingress and egress capacity for future T91 cruise terminal by demolishing the southernmost bay of Building W40 and paving the resultant vacant area prior to start of 2009 cruise season. Terminal reconstruction design that is compatible with the Port's long range plan for T91. Minimize project impacts to existing building tenant, terminal operations and surrounding communities. COMMISSION AGENDA Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer April 30, 2009 Page 4 of 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: Budget/Authorization Summary Approved Budget Revised Forecast Construction $502,000 $ 596,000 Design $160,000 $ 228,000 Construction Management $ 86,000 $ 118,000 Environmental Permitting $ 12,000 $ 37,000 Project Management $ 61,000 $ 47,000 Contingency $ 40,000 $ 0 Total $861,000 $1,026,000 Source of funds This project was included in the 2009 Plan of Finance under CIP #C800265 in the amount of $894,000. The incremental $165,000 needed for increased project costs is available due to anticipated timing delays in other 2009 Draft Plan of Finance committed projects, such as the purchase of container support yard land. The source of funds will be the general fund. CIP Category Renewal/Enhancement Project Type Renewal/Enhancement Risk adjusted 7.5% Discount rate Key risk factors N/A Project cost for $1,026,000 analysis Business Unit (BU) Seaport Industrial Properties Effect on business The $165,000 increase in project costs will result in an increase performance in depreciation expense of approximately $16,000 per year. NPV/IRR The impact of the increase in project costs on NPV and IRR is shown below. COMMISSION AGENDA Tay Yoshitani, Chief Executive Officer April 30, 2009 Page 5 of 5 REVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS: On September 9, 2008, the Commission approved request for authorization to (1) authorize additional funds in the amount of $411,000; (2) execute a contract for WP 103901, Terminal 91 Building W-40 partial demolition, (3) enter into professional services agreements as needed and; (4) approval for an 11 year term lease with CityIce Cold Storage for Building W-40. On June 24, 2008, the Commission approved request for authorization to complete design, permitting, asbestos abatement, in-house demolition and advertise for outside construction demolition of approximately 6,300 square feet of warehouse including paving of the area and possible modification of perimeter fencing; and enter into professional service agreement for services as needed, authorize additional funds in the amount of $250,000, for a total authorization of $450,000. On March 25, 2008, the Commission approved request for authorization to negotiate lease with CityIce Cold Storage and approve funds for design and permitting.
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.