8c Motion 2019-12 Supporting Initiative 1000
Item Number: 8c_motion Meeting Date: October 22, 2019 1 MOTION 2019-12: 2 A MOTION OF THE PORT OF SEATTLE COMMISSION 3 4 supporting Initiative 1000, through endorsement for the 5 approval of Referendum 88, an initiative to the Legislature 6 which was passed in April 2019 and which supports the 7 Port's goals of increasedutilization of small businesses, 8 including disadvantaged, minority-owned, and women- 9 owned businesses. 10 11 The title of Referendum 88: The legislature passed Initiative 12 Measure No. 1000 concerning affirmative action and 13 remedying discrimination, and voters have filed a sufficient 14 referendum petition on this act. Initiative 1000 would allow 15 the state to remedy discrimination for certain groups and 16 to implement affirmative action, without the use of quotas 17 or preferential treatment (as defined), in public education, 18 employment, and contracting. Should Initiative 1000 be 19 Approved [ ] Rejected [ ]? 20 21 PROPOSED 22 OCTOBER 22, 2019 23 24 INTRODUCTION 25 26 Passage of this motion reflects the Port of Seattle Commission's continued commitment to 27 ensure that the economic prosperity in the region, and the economic development we help to 28 foster, is shared by all. 29 30 TEXT OF THE MOTION 31 32 Consistent with the Port of Seattle's previous public positions in support of small, disadvantaged, 33 minority-owned, and women-owned business enterprises, the Port Commission hereby endorses 34 the approval of Initiative 1000, set to be considered for a vote on the statewide ballot on 35 November 5th, 2019 through Referendum 88. The Port of Seattle Commission previously adopted 36 Resolution No. 3274, in 1998, to oppose the original effort to prohibit public entities from 37 promoting this category of business. Additionally, in 2016, the Commission adopted Motion 38 2016-02 to support the Legislature's efforts to repeal Initiative 200, the citizen law that first put 39 this prohibition in place. Repealing the restrictions put in place by Initiative 200 will allow the 40 Port greater flexibility in fulfilling its mission of supporting economic vibrancy in the region and 41 ensuring that economic gains are shared by all. Motion 2019-12 Referendum 88 Page 1 of 3 42 43 STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION 44 45 The Port of Seattle is committed to the increased participation of small businesses, the provision 46 of quality jobs, and the development of a diverse and skilled workforce that can support regional 47 economic vitality. The Commission has long viewed Initiative 200 as a challenge to that mission, 48 and first adopted a Commission Resolution opposing the Initiative in 1998, when it was due to 49 be considered on the statewide ballot. Following that vote, commissioners have traveled to 50 Olympia in each of the past four legislative sessions to testify alongside representatives from the 51 City of Seattle and King County in support of repealing Initiative 200. 52 53 In the 2019 Legislative Session, Washington voters presented the State Legislature with an 54 "Initiative to the Legislature" that sought to amend RCW 49.60.400, put in place originally by the 55 passage of Initiative 200. That effort, known as Initiative 1000, gave the legislators three options: 56 adopt the measure as drafted; put forward an alternative and have both I-1000 and that 57 alternative measure considered side-by-side on the ballot; or take no action, and send the 58 initiative as written to the ballot. After much deliberation, and a public hearing that lasted nearly 59 an entire day and featured testimony from all three living former Governors, the Legislature 60 voted to pass I-1000 as written. With that vote, the prohibition in the granting of preference that 61 I-200 put in place was officially repealed. However, the I-200 advocates immediately began to 62 gather signatures for a referendum that could overturn that legislative action, and that gave rise 63 to Referendum 88, up for a vote in this November's election. 64 65 On January 8, 2018, the Port of Seattle Commission officially adopted its new Diversity in 66 Contracting policy. That policy seeks to increase opportunities for women and minority-owned 67 business entities (WMBEs) across Port operations. The policy is designed to increase both the 68 percent of contracting dollars paid to WMBE firms as well as the number of WMBE firms under 69 contract. It requires divisions and departments within the Port to set goals for WMBE utilization, 70 created a WMBE inclusion plan pilot, and supports prompt payment for WMBE firms that work 71 with the Port. 72 73 Meanwhile, in December 2017, the Commission moved to establish a Priority Hire policy that will 74 ensure better access to training programs and well-paying construction jobs for local workers, 75 particularly those from economically distressed areas. That effort also sets as a goal the increased 76 the diversity of the workforce on Port construction projects and focuses on workforce 77 participation by apprentices and journey-level construction workers. The policy will require 78 contractors on large Port construction projects to hire more local apprentices from under- 79 represented zip codes. 80 81 In 2014, the Port of Seattle completed a disparity study to learn more about its successes and 82 challenges as an organization in the area of WMBE contracting. The study found disparity in Port 83 utilization of minority contractors for construction and construction-related projects was 84 substantially below what might be expected based on the availability of those contractors. The 85 study also concluded that all categories of minority-owned businesses displayed utilization rates Motion 2019-12 Referendum 88 Page 2 of 3 86 that were below parity, recommended overall the Port make efforts to ensure that mechanisms 87 for monitoring future performance and utilization of those contractors were enforced. The study 88 allowed the Port to request from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) which granted the 89 authorization to implement a "race-conscious" DBE program for federally assisted projects. 90 91 That study informed the work being done under the Priority Hire and Diversity in Contracting 92 policies. It also helps to inform the work being done by the Port's newly formed Office of 93 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. But it is all made more challenging by the state law put into place 94 by the 1998 passage of I-200. 95 96 Passage of I-1000, which can be sustained by voters through the approval of Referendum 88, and 97 the amendment of 49.60.400 (I-200), will allow the Port greater flexibility as we advance our 98 mission of supporting broad-based and diverse economic development, and ensuring that the 99 growing prosperity of the Puget Sound region is shared by all communities equally. 100 101 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED 102 Full text of Referendum 88, as submitted to the Washington Secretary of State Motion 2019-12 Referendum 88 Page 3 of 3
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.