9a C1 Building Expansion Presentation

C1 Building
Expansion Project
Commission Meeting
March 10, 2020


Item No. _9a Supp_
Meeting Date: March 10, 2020

C1 Building Location

Area of work in red

New Concept
Existing
2

C1 Building Project Drivers
Highest and Best Use of Existing Facilities
Currently housing centralized screening for C1 system and TSA operational and leased space
(not public facing)
Only substantial location at SEA to build "up" not "out"
Meet Current Customer and Tenant Demand
Meet Airport Dining and Retail food and beverage deficiency
Provides space for pent-up premium lounge demand
Provides office space capacity for existing tenant pent-up demand
Increase Non-Aeronautical Revenue
Increased Small Business Jobs and Employment
Airport Dining and Retail Kiosks
A/E Consultants
Construction
3

C1 Building Project Drivers (Cont.)
Customer Service Improvements
Improved Airport Dining and Retail (ADR) options
Added Premium Lounge Capacity
Opportunity to Reflect New SEA Brand
Operational Improvements
Passenger congestion and lack of seating near Horizon gates
Loading Dock/Track/Recycling
Maintain efficient baggage system connections
Amenities
Flexibility for All Gender Restrooms
Second Post-Security Meditation Room
Mothers Nursing Suites

4

C1 Project Scope
The C1 project provides for the re-use and redevelopment of the existing three floor
building (redeveloping the concourse level and first expanded floor) into publicly
accessible space to accommodate new dining and retail spaces.

The project expands up four additional floors to provide office and lounge space. It
creates a rooftop mechanical penthouse, an additional expansion of the C3 hold room
(additional gate seating) and adds a loading dock.

There will be no added gates nor additional airplane operations as a result of the C1
project.

C1 Building Overview
Four additional floors on top of existing two-
story C1 Building                                                                                    Two Levels of
Lounge/Office/Mech
anical
70K sf of incremental office/lounge/ space.
25K sf of additional ADR space
(30K+ sf deficiency based on 2016 ADR study)
Additional public space consisting of more
seating in the congested C3 gate area, new
public restrooms and additional public
amenities, including 670 SF of nursing
mother's space and 722 SF of meditation
space.

6

Airport Dining and Retail Deficiency



7

Sustainable Project Framework
C1 is the Airport's first Tier 3 project
SPARC (Sustainability Project Assessment and Review
Collaboration)
- Identified key project analyses
Sustainable Design Approach
- Requires designers to conduct range of sustainability and cost
analyses
Port staff will review results and develop recommendations in
Sustainable Design Strategy
Consult with Commission's E&S Committee at 30% design

8

C1 Sustainable Design Approach (SDA)
Category    Design Analyses                                             AV Environment
Energy and   Total energy use (electricity, liquid fuel, natural gas)             Estimate carbon
Carbon       Options to reduce energy by 5%, 10%, and 20% below            emission and
Washington State Energy Code                                   reduction from
Capital and total cost of ownership (TCO) for each proposed         proposed
option                                                          options.
Materials     Provide technical specifications and amounts of concrete, steel,     Estimate carbon
and gypsum                                                 reductions from
Develop options to reduce embodied carbon for those materials       lowest
embodied level


9

C1 Sustainable Design Approach (SDA-Cont)
Category       Design Analyses                                               AV Environment
Water           Water use and cost of options to reduce water use by 10% and 20%   Review
conservation       below Uniform Plumbing Code 2015 and Washington State
Amendments
Proposed options must meet the Port's existing design standards
Transportation    Options to support employees that commute via active               Review
transportation, public transportation, or other non-drive alone
modes
Cost estimates (TCO)
Innovation       Additional options that could be considered innovative techniques     Review
Provide evidence of past precedent within the last three years and
corresponding performance data for Port review


10

C1 - Diversity in Contracting
Diversity in Contracting (WMBE) Aspirational Goal Range for C1:
Design                   Construction
9%-15%               8%-15%
A final goal will be established before we advertise.
The Port-Gen C1 Project informational meeting on February 26 had over 120 guests.


11

Design Approach
Design Status and Strategy
Project Definition Document created (PDD)
Utilities and structure have been reviewed by engineers
Designer will be required to have experience "designing to budget"
Port design reviews will be limited to key personnel
Design Success
Designing to budget
Using architectural elements to draw passengers to 2nd floor ADR spaces
Creating an open and well-lit environment

12

Project Delivery
General Contractor / Construction Manager (GCCM)
The GCCM will provide and extensive survey of existing conditions in
the C1 Building
Provide a construction estimate at each major design milestone. This
approach will assist with the project team's goal of scope and budget
control.
The GCCM will provide essential input on project phasing.

13

Project Status             The C1 PDD was approved by the
Managing Director of the Airport on
January 17, 2020.
Still  pending  in  Status  3,  is  Airline
Approval, scheduled for prior to GC/CM
and Program Management request.
Degree of Uncertainty
Passage of time
14

Project Estimate            Association of the Advancement of Cost
Engineering (AACE)  AACE International
Recommended Practice 18-R 97. 2005
Class       Level of Project           Purpose               $ Accuracy Range
Definition
Class 5                 0-2%       Concept Screening           L: -20% to -50% / H: +30%
to +100%
Class 4               1 to 15%     Study of Feasibility           L: -15% to -30% / H: +20%
to +50%
Class 3               10-40%      Budget Authorization,       L: -10% to -20% / H: +10%
Control                             to +30%
Class 2               30-70%      Control / Bid Tender         L: -5% to -15% / H: +5% to
+20%
Class 1               50-100%     Check Estimate or Bid       L: -3% to -10% / H: +3% to
Tender                             +15%
Low (L), High (H)

15

Project Estimate (Cont.)
C1 has a Class 4 estimate that is based on a project definition of between 1
and 15 percent complete, and the range of accuracy is 15-30% on the low side
and up to 20- 50% on the high side.*

C1 Class 4        C1 Class 4 , Hard       C1 Class 4 , Hard
Program Estimate   construction est. 1     construction est. 2
$340M           $189.2M           $207.1M
Association of the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) 
AACE International Recommended Practice 18-R 97

16

Look Ahead
1.  Comm. Briefing and Introduction                      -  March 10, 2020

2.  Comm. Auth to Advertise for Design                   -  March 24, 2020

3.  Comm. Auth. GC/CM and Program Management      -  Q2, 2020

4.  Issue Design Notice To Proceed                       -  Q3, 2020

17

Xolgr
of Seattle:

C1 Building
Expansion Project
END

C1 Space program         Presentation Appendix



20

C1 Existing Baggage Level





Baggage level

21

C1 Proposed Baggage Level                        Presentation Appendix





Baggage level

22

C1 Existing Bridge Level





Bridge level

23

C1 Proposed Bridge Level





Bridge level
24

C1 Existing Concourse Level


TSA OFFICE                             Concession Space            Concourse D

Concession Spaces

Concourse C

Concourse level
25

C1 Proposed Concourse Level





26

C1 Proposed Mezzanine Level






27

C1 Proposed Level 1, Office / Lounge






28

C1 Proposed Level 2, Office / Lounge






29

C1 Proposed Level 3, Office / Lounge






30

Limitations of Translatable Documents

PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.