COMMISSION 
AGENDA MEMORANDUM                        Item No.          8a 
ACTION ITEM                            Date of Meeting     December 15, 2020 
DATE:    June 23, 2020 
TO:      Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director 
FROM:   Laurel Dunphy, Director Airport Operations 
Mark Coates, Senior Manager Airport Operations 
Steve Osmek, Manager Airport Wildlife 
SUBJECT: Authorization to Advertise and Award a Contract to Support the Mandatory Airport 
Wildlife Hazard Management Program 
Amount of this request:                 $3,500,000 
Total estimated contract cost:            $3,500,000 
ACTION REQUESTED 
Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to execute a three-year contract
with two additional two-year options for airport wildlife hazard management support services.
The estimated contract value over seven years equals $3,500,000. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
The purpose of the new contract is to mitigate the threats of hazardous wildlife to safe aircraft
operations. After two decades, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Wildlife
Services (WS) notified the Port that they will no longer provide wildlife management services to
support the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) which is required by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) for operations.
This new contract will allow us to consolidate wildlife management services contracts into a new
single contract with an expanded scope and will provide more off-hour coverage. The increased
services can be accommodated within the 2021 budget. A consolidated contract enables the
program to reduce wildlife hazards, increase aviation safety and potentially lower airline costs
due to delays and aircraft damage. The operating budget and 5 -year Interlocal Agreement (ILA)
with USDA Wildlife Services, other signatories and the Port to manage the surplus Canada goose
population within the greater Seattle metropolitan area remains in place.
JUSTIFICATION 
Wildlife Hazard Management (14 CFR  139.337) and related FAA Advisory Circulars (AC) describe
Airport Operator responsibilities with respect to managing hazardous wildlife out to 5 miles from

Template revised January 10, 2019.

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8a                                  Page 2 of 6 
Meeting Date: December 15, 2020 
the airport. SEA is required to maintain a current Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. The goal of
the Plan is to minimize the risk to aviation safety, airport structures or equipment, or human
health posed by populations of hazardous wildlife on and around the airport. The Plan
accomplishes this through the identification of hazardous wildlife and their attractants, suitable
proactive and reactive management techniques, necessary resources and supplies to successfully
implement a wildlife hazard management program and personnel responsibilities and training
requirements. 
SEA intends to carry out its responsibility under the plan by contracting out the necessary support
services. It is estimated that the contracted support hours will be between 80  120 hours per
week. Additional hours will provide more weekend coverage. The new contract will give the
Wildlife Program the ability to meet the intent of Federal and State regulatory mandates and
support several of the Port-wide goals, as follows: 
Operate Effective Aviation Gateways - By maintaining continuity of operations when
hazardous wildlife is kept away from the airfield, the number of strikes and flight delays
are reduced. While total aircraft departures and arrivals have declined year-to-date, the
bird strike rate has not. The Program's key performance metric of 20 strikes/100,000
aircraft operations is still being exceeded. 
Enhance Safety - By adhering to the Port's principle of keeping safety a high priority, the
response to wildlife hazards, whenever they are detected, must include a contractor who
can more effectively manage raptors, utilize the Port's Avian (bird) Radar, Foreign Object
Debris (FOD) Detection system, and support the Port wildlife biologists with off-hour
wildlife issues especially on weekends. The executed request will include assistance with
firearm, pyrotechnic, and capture equipment training. Port Risk, Health and Safety, and
Police have all stated that the three dozen or so Qualified Wildlife Personnel (QWP),
comprised of the Airport Duty Managers (ADMs), Airport Operations Specialists (AOSs)
and some Airport Operations Managers need training more than once per year. 
Diversity in Contracting 
Most of the qualified support providers are considered Women and Minority Business
Enterprises (WMBE), whom can participate as a prime. Airport Operations has set a WMBE
aspirational goal of 10% for this contract. Airport Operations is collaborating with CPO and Equity,
Diversity, and Inclusion to create workforce development opportunities with the Prime along
with the Port Wildlife Biologists. 
DETAILS 
For over two decades, most support services were provided by the USDA Wildlife Services. This
is the first time the Airport is requesting that all wildlife support services be provided by a private
entity. The private sector option is more desirable now because a private company contractor
can provide all the needed support services and there were multiple well-qualified WMBE
companies who responded to the July 2020 RFI. Additional resources are needed for the Program

Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8a                                  Page 3 of 6 
Meeting Date: December 15, 2020 
to address the backlog of wildlife-related work that cannot be accomplished adequately now, 
such as investigating aircraft-wildlife strikes to determine extent of aircraft damage and
operational impacts. Added to the workload, is several species are increasing in abundance and
need additional attention. Commission authorization will result in a contract for providing
essential-worker functions related to wildlife management support services at the Airport. The
initial term of the contract would be for three years and will give the Port the option to extend
the contract for two additional two-year periods. The total life of the contract would have a
length of up to seven years at an estimated cost of $3,500,000, if all optional periods are
exercised. In 2021, the remaining wildlife support contractor, Airport Raptor Management
(ARM), will finish its 20 hour per week contract and assist the prime contractor (this request) as
they take over those portions of the raptor (birds of prey) relocation program around 2022. The
new contract is expected to provide 80 hours per week of support services, with options for an
additional 40 hours a week. 

Scope of Work 
Mandatory responsibilities of the wildlife support contractor include  providing oversight,
direction, and control of its staff for continuous monitoring and assistance with responding to
safety concerns as is outlined in the various Port Standard Operating Guidelines (SOGs) and as is
required in 14 CFR  139.337 Wildlife hazard management: (a) In accordance with its Airport
Certification Manualeach certificate holder must take immediate action to alleviate wildlife
hazards whenever they are detected. 
The existing skilled Wildlife Biologists on Port staff are involved with trapping, animal handling 
and care, accurate wildlife identification, and,  in rarer instances,  humanely euthanizing
hazardous/nuisance wildlife that pose a significant risk to human health and aviation safety.
More focus is still needed on those tasks as well as performing the expanded scope which
includes: 
Providing additional weekend coverage to respond to urgent situations regarding wildlife
hazards, injured wildlife, escaped domestic animals and atypical animal situation
requiring the use of specialized capture equipment and skills. 
Assisting Port Biologists with training Airport Operation's personnel with more frequent
firearm and pyrotechnic safety training and the maintenance of specialized capture
equipment. 
Investigating aircraft-wildlife strike events to obtain information on aircraft damage and
strike impacts to airlines for the weekly airfield safety report. 
More fully utilize the Avian (bird) Detecting Radar and FOD Detection systems and
assistance with responding the real-time alerts to hazards that are identified by these
advanced technologies. 
Database management and trending for planning and the development of best
management practices 

Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8a                                  Page 4 of 6 
Meeting Date: December 15, 2020 
Schedule 
Activity 
Commission Authorization (this action)             2020, Quarter 4 
Contract Advertisement                           2021, Quarter 1 
Contract Award                                  2021, Quarter 2 
Contract Start                                        2021, Quarter 2 
Cost Breakdown 
2021-23       2024-25         2026-27       TOTAL PROJECT 
$1,415,000     $1,015,000      $1,070,000        $3,500,000 
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED 
Alternative 1 (Status Quo)  The USDA WS contract expires on December 31, 2020. Support from
a private contractor is needed. 
Cost Implications: Results of the RFI suggest that the cost of private firm are comparable to the
USDA Wildlife Services for similar staffing levels, however annual costs are still expected to be
higher due to private sector insurance requirements and the expanded scope of work. 
Pros: 
(1)     None. 
Cons: 
(1) If status quo was possible, the Airport would eventually become out of compliance with
the FAA approved Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) and its Airport Operating
Certificate (ACM) given the scope of the USDA contract cannot be expanded to meet Port
needs. 
This is NOT the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 2  Utilize the Portability Program in addition to Veteran Fellowships, internal and
external internships, graduate students and volunteers to satisfy Program needs. 
Cost Implications: Financially favorable. 
Pros: 
(1)   The Wildlife Program will explore additional assistance through the Portability Program
to address the backlog of work that still needs to be accomplished regardless of this
request. 
Cons: 
(1)   A short-term solution cannot be tailored to address long-term needs or the diverse body
of work that is required from skilled individuals (this request). 

Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8a                                  Page 5 of 6 
Meeting Date: December 15, 2020 
(2)   The above-mentioned employment options are not designed to hire multiple people
with a unique skill set. 
This is NOT the recommended alternative. 
Alternative 3  Hire a single contractor to provide 80 hours per week with an additional 40 hours
being an option, if finances allow for additional wildlife support services. 
Cost Implications: $406,800 is included in the 2021 operating budget. The last four optional years
of the contract are negotiable. 
Pros: 
(1)   All support tasks will be the responsibilities of a single contractor. One contractor will
provide clarity of expectations and result in a crossed-trained group of personnel that
can support the Wildlife Program when a worker is absent. 
(2)   Given wildlife related responsibilities are 24/7/365 additional personnel give the two
Port Wildlife Biologist the ability to create an on-call schedule for responders to include
off hours and weekends. 
Cons: 
(1)   This Alternative delays the need for Airport Operations to bring on additional FTEs to
support Airport Operation's full-implementation of the WHMP. 
(2)   Contractors are ephemeral compared to FTEs which offer more operational continuity
for  research  investigations  that  are  the  basis  for  knowing  how  best  to  adapt
management approaches to emerging animal issues at the Airport. 
(3)   A contract with a 7-year potential provides less program continuity than one that can
be extended even longer. 
This is the recommended alternative. 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds 
The annual expenses would be included in each fiscal year's operating budget. The operating
expense of $406,800 was included in the 2021 operating budget. The expenses would be 
recovered through the airlines rates and charges. The funding source is the airport development
fund. 
ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST 
None 


Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).

COMMISSION AGENDA  Action Item No. 8a                                  Page 6 of 6 
Meeting Date: December 15, 2020 
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS 
1)      December 11, 2018  Minutes of Commission Meeting 
a.  Item 6c. - Authorization for the Executive Director to reauthorize and execute two
5-year agreements between the United States Department of Agriculture Wildlife
Services and the Port of Seattle for managing human-wildlife conflicts on or near
Port property for the period January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2023, in the
amount of $1,560,000 for a Cooperative Service Agreement and $15,000 for an
Interlocal Agreement to control Waterfowl (Canada goose) in the greater Seattle
area for a total of $1,575,000. 














Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).